RE: Hillary Probed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/12/2016 6:38:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I find it interesting that Jon Stewart, a super left wing dude, has publicly called Hillary a fake.

I guess he must be for Bernie.

maybe he is just honest




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/12/2016 6:40:48 PM)

There are more than a few here under different accounts because they were "moderated" in the past. Im specifically talking about P&R.
I hope you reported him.





stef -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/12/2016 6:55:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

There are more than a few here under different accounts because they were "moderated" in the past. Im specifically talking about P&R.
I hope you reported him.

For what? I don't think reading posts under a different username is a violation of the rules since you can read using a guest account. If he posts from that account, I would imagine that to be a different matter.




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/12/2016 7:03:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: stef


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

There are more than a few here under different accounts because they were "moderated" in the past. Im specifically talking about P&R.
I hope you reported him.

For what? I don't think reading posts under a different username is a violation of the rules since you can read using a guest account. If he posts from that account, I would imagine that to be a different matter.

dammit, LOL go spoil my fun why dont you.
he seems to be enjoying himself...I thought it would make him happier if he could do that as well!![;)]




Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/12/2016 8:19:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

There are more than a few here under different accounts because they were "moderated" in the past. Im specifically talking about P&R.
I hope you reported him.



To whom are you referring Lucy?




Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/12/2016 8:20:49 PM)

I've heard the 20,000 figure from more sources than just napolitano. I think its pretty clear the russians cracked her email.

Pretty good article (dif sub): https://www.wired.com/2016/05/maksym-igor-popov-fbi/




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/13/2016 4:25:26 AM)

right, I should have made more clear I was talking about "posting" when I mentioned "not allowed."





Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/13/2016 6:29:55 AM)

yeah they call that backpedaling.
Its easy to spot.





bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/13/2016 7:26:35 AM)

the story just keeps getting better and better:

"New Emails Show Clinton Opted to Use Home Phone Over Secure Line"

quote:

New emails obtained by Judicial Watch reveal that she instructed a top aide to call her on her home phone number after the two had technological difficulties using the secure line.

“I give up. Call me on my home #,” Clinton told her then chief of staff Cheryl Mills in a February 22, 2009 email after failing to set up a secure communication.

“I just spoke to ops and called you reg line - we have to wait until we see each other b/c [the] technology is not working,” Mills said in an email sent moments later.

“Pls try again,” Clinton followed up.

The emails, which were obtained as part of a lawsuit against the State Department under the Freedom of Information Act, were not among the more than 30,000 messages already released in recent months

The previously unreleased Clinton emails date back as far as January 2009 and further contradict statements by Hillary Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails were turned over to the State Department and that she did not use her clintonemail.com system until March 18, 2009. The new Clinton emails cover topics such as: the administration’s Iran policy; Obama’s stimulus program; the sharing of “management issues” with “Maggie” Williams, former campaign manager for Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign; confusion over voice mail versus text messages; image coaching from 2008 campaign advisor Doug Hattaway; and a thank you note from Mark Hyman for “opening the door” for a Senate hearing on functional medicine; as well email detailing incoming calls from China and Russia.


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2016/05/13/new-emails-show-clinton-opted-to-use-home-phone-over-secure-line-n2162466




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/13/2016 7:51:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

the story just keeps getting better and better:

"New Emails Show Clinton Opted to Use Home Phone Over Secure Line"

quote:

New emails obtained by Judicial Watch reveal that she instructed a top aide to call her on her home phone number after the two had technological difficulties using the secure line.

“I give up. Call me on my home #,” Clinton told her then chief of staff Cheryl Mills in a February 22, 2009 email after failing to set up a secure communication.

“I just spoke to ops and called you reg line - we have to wait until we see each other b/c [the] technology is not working,” Mills said in an email sent moments later.

“Pls try again,” Clinton followed up.

The emails, which were obtained as part of a lawsuit against the State Department under the Freedom of Information Act, were not among the more than 30,000 messages already released in recent months

The previously unreleased Clinton emails date back as far as January 2009 and further contradict statements by Hillary Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails were turned over to the State Department and that she did not use her clintonemail.com system until March 18, 2009. The new Clinton emails cover topics such as: the administration’s Iran policy; Obama’s stimulus program; the sharing of “management issues” with “Maggie” Williams, former campaign manager for Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign; confusion over voice mail versus text messages; image coaching from 2008 campaign advisor Doug Hattaway; and a thank you note from Mark Hyman for “opening the door” for a Senate hearing on functional medicine; as well email detailing incoming calls from China and Russia.


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2016/05/13/new-emails-show-clinton-opted-to-use-home-phone-over-secure-line-n2162466




You keep using townhall for all your sparkling evidence. WHy not use judicial watch? you know the actual people who are putting info out there?
Despite the email you mention has been in judicial watches hands since last september.

The PDF can be found at http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/JW-v.-State-Huma-production-7-00684-pg-100-232-9752-59.pdf
its on page 4.
quote:

From: "Cheryl Mills"
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:02 :23 -0500
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Can we talk tonight?
Jusl dul - no answer
·-----Origmal Message----
From · H <hdr22@cbntonemoiLcom>
To: Cheryl Mills
Sent' Sun Feb 22 22:01:52 2009
Suhjed: Re Can we talk lomghl'l
I give up Call me on my home#.
------Onginal Message-----From:
Cheryl Mills
To: hdr22@clintonc;maiLcom
Sent: Feb 22, 2009 9·39 PM
Subject. RE· Can we talk tonight?
the:y were supposed to com1ect us - I called some time ago to do a secure
call with you-· call them and ask them to try the connection
·----Origmal Message-----
From: H (maiJto:[email protected]]
Sent: Stmdoy, February 22, 2009 9:39 PM
To: Cheryl Mills
Subject: Re Can we talk tonight?
Are you calling me? What#? I called ops and they gave me your "secure"·
cell which I just tned but only got a long high pitched whining sound.
-----Original Messlige------
From · Cheryl Mills
To: hdr22@clintonemail corn
Sent: Feb 22, 2009 8:58 PM
Suhjecl· Re Can we talk lonighl?
I can do now
-----Origrnal Message---
From H <[email protected]>
To Cheryl Mills
Sent: Swi. Feb 22 J 8·37:51 2009
Subject: Con we talk tonight?
I just landed and\\ ·u be home short! We l try a secure call at
your conveiuence Let me know what time
works.
86
RELEASE IN PART
,8=~6_ _ ___ __,, .
HA


[image]http://www.lucylasticslair.com/colllar/emailbounty.jpg[/image]
[image]http://www.lucylasticslair.com/colllar/googlesept.jpg[/image]
or you can get the cached version from
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:oUP4VIWfG4IJ:www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/JW-v.-State-Huma-production-7-00684-pg-100-232-9752-59.pdf+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca
Or you can see by the google search Ive snipped with the date and the origin.




Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/13/2016 8:14:07 AM)

I've posted from JW. But I'm curious why you find the source of the information interesting - and yet the content not worthy of comment, hmm?

Its rather like pulling a splinter and ignoring the arrow going through your head. The great big fat corrupt jackass in the room - hillary clinton.




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/13/2016 8:54:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I've posted from JW. But I'm curious why you find the source of the information interesting - and yet the content not worthy of comment, hmm?

Its rather like pulling a splinter and ignoring the arrow going through your head. The great big fat corrupt jackass in the room - hillary clinton.

WHat do I need to comment on, Im calling him out on his rather late to the event "news"
It doesnt need comment, it needs proof. I showed the proof that his news ISNT.
Despite all the right wing sites saying its new.
I cant help it if he wont research or use good sources to prove his point.






bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/13/2016 8:54:46 AM)

for the most part, that's all they got, whining about sources they don't like.

itd be fascinating to go back through this thread, and others, to see how many times they more or less ignored the content and instead based their "judgment" on the source.

its as old and tired as their ubiquitous cries of "raaaaaaaaaaaaacism."




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/13/2016 8:56:17 AM)

so you cant respond to the facts:)
I knew it.




Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/13/2016 10:28:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

sorry there comrade, if you read all my posts on the matter you can see that what I said to Michael was directly implied by the context of stwrinklemeat posting so that he could be reported.

regardless, clarifying is not "backpedaling"---try reading other people's minds instead of mine.




LMAO when it comes down to you comrade(personal attack again from you what a surprise) I wonder if I should report you for all your personal attacks.
HAH
nah Im not as petty as you.
Well as far as reporting and whinging goes, no one is.


hum apparently you don't recognize all personal attacks.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/13/2016 11:14:17 AM)

"comrade" is a personal attack? as opposed to a simple moniker recognition of those on the other side, so to speak, with collectivist social political worldviews?

and sorry there again lucy---saying someone would be fired if this were their job, or "you have comprehension problems" or "you don't read well" (and other things like that) is different in both kind and degree compared to:

"go fuck yoiurself retard...what as a fucking retard yoiu have explained...dont fuck around retard, i have gave you more information than in your retarded asswipe you are fucking sucking each other in the nutsucer...yu and your freinds are retards, and I am horified you teach anything other than how to suck dick pathetically"

and

"The scabs on your knees are healing well, but the pustules on your lips are seeping worse. I conclude that you are a leprous whore."

I keep seeing posts like that, im going to keep reporting them.

call it petty if you want, call it whining if you want---I call it cleaning out the garbage.

no doubt sometimes I could be gentler, and kinder but if you think im violating the tos by what I post, you are very invited to report mine.





Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/13/2016 12:19:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

"comrade" is a personal attack? as opposed to a simple moniker recognition of those on the other side, so to speak, with collectivist social political worldviews?

and sorry there again lucy---saying someone would be fired if this were their job, or "you have comprehension problems" or "you don't read well" (and other things like that) is different in both kind and degree compared to:

"go fuck yoiurself retard...what as a fucking retard yoiu have explained...dont fuck around retard, i have gave you more information than in your retarded asswipe you are fucking sucking each other in the nutsucer...yu and your freinds are retards, and I am horified you teach anything other than how to suck dick pathetically"

and

"The scabs on your knees are healing well, but the pustules on your lips are seeping worse. I conclude that you are a leprous whore."

I keep seeing posts like that, im going to keep reporting them.

call it petty if you want, call it whining if you want---I call it cleaning out the garbage.

no doubt sometimes I could be gentler, and kinder but if you think im violating the tos by what I post, you are very invited to report mine.




so you dont have a response to my post showing your "news" but you think that calling someone a comrade(communist) is cutesy pie, or putting up that bullshit about the aclu and lefties and trying to back it up with other blatantly ignorant partisan bullshit posts. Youve called lefties baby killers 3 times not to mention godless liberals continuously. Youve mentioned that more than a few posters are mentally ill. Drug and alcohol problems, at least three posters that I can think of.


You dont like the term bagger or nutsuckers but you are fine with tarring all with the same brush on the left. everyones a comrade godless liberal baby kille and muslim lover
Im not discussing RONS posts, Im discussing yours.
I dont answer to Ron OR FOR Ron , or you or anyone else.
You by the way, didnt get him banned, you got him moderated.
Big man.
Now back to the topic of your fascinating sparkling news that isnt....
care to respond or just whinge about ron some more?





Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/13/2016 1:40:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

sorry there comrade, if you read all my posts on the matter you can see that what I said to Michael was directly implied by the context of stwrinklemeat posting so that he could be reported.

regardless, clarifying is not "backpedaling"---try reading other people's minds instead of mine.




LMAO when it comes down to you comrade(personal attack again from you what a surprise) I wonder if I should report you for all your personal attacks.
HAH
nah Im not as petty as you.
Well as far as reporting and whinging goes, no one is.


hum apparently you don't recognize all personal attacks.

dunno, but someone reported bountys comment and its been removed ...for a reason.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/13/2016 2:07:37 PM)

Well, yeah, big stuff this week, a brand new never before bombshell dropped on us by the nutsuckers.

I was gonna call you.
I didnt get your call.
No, you call me.
Do you want me to call you?
Never mind, I'll call you.


Jesus, pure guilt oozing out of that shit hah? What does Napalitano the nutsucker say?

Gowdy must be all over this.

Comey is probably slapping the cuffs on her as we speak over this.





Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/13/2016 2:12:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Well, yeah, big stuff this week, a brand new never before bombshell dropped on us by the nutsuckers.

I was gonna call you.
I didnt get your call.
No, you call me.
Do you want me to call you?
Never mind, I'll call you.


Jesus, pure guilt oozing out of that shit hah? What does Napalitano the nutsucker say?

Gowdy must be all over this.

Comey is probably slapping the cuffs on her as we speak over this.



I can certainly see why you'd cast a jaundice eye at it from your perspective. Yet what interests me the most is that's a new email chain popping up long after we were assure by Clinton we had all of her work related emails.




Page: <<   < prev  51 52 [53] 54 55   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625