quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

No, you can felch yourself, you have done a wonderful job to date.

I said what I said, not the lying asswipe you said.

So far I havent made stupid statements, you are the fucking buffoon here welfare patient. You make up shit (its called lying and in your case toiletlicking propaganda) that was never said, and then tell me I must defend it. Heres the news dumbass, I don't need to defend what was not said by me and you are too fucking stupid to understand it even if I did.

You havent answered this:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, <<<<<<<<<<<< I will wait, welfare patient.

Until you get that bit of simple English correct you get no answers, you just will be self-felching.

quote:

Th[e] [IG]...report is highlighted in a CNN article titled State Department report slams Clinton email use...

[the article goes on to enumerate and de-bunk some of Hillary's lying and equivocating]

Thus, every legal defense of Clinton’s emails has just been shattered...

This isn’t Whitewater. It’s a huge story, and a controversy that will lead to the FBI recommending indictments...

It is a crime to store Top Secret intelligence anywhere other than government networks; regardless of whether or not Clinton believed her server to be more secure...

The Espionage Act states that whoever is “entrusted” with state secrets must ensure this data isn’t “removed from its proper place of custody” and that “gross negligence” isn’t a defense:

Yes, Clinton’s 22 Top Secret emails were “illegally removed from its proper place.” [gee that looks disturbingly like a fact!]

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

this is a week old but it comes from a comrade source...(maybe they have been infiltrated by some "nutsuckers??")

"time to care about damn emails Hillary clinton has a serious legal problem"

quote:

Th[e] [IG]...report is highlighted in a CNN article titled State Department report slams Clinton email use...

[the article goes on to enumerate and de-bunk some of Hillary's lying and equivocating]

Thus, every legal defense of Clinton’s emails has just been shattered...

This isn’t Whitewater. It’s a huge story, and a controversy that will lead to the FBI recommending indictments...

It is a crime to store Top Secret intelligence anywhere other than government networks; regardless of whether or not Clinton believed her server to be more secure...

The Espionage Act states that whoever is “entrusted” with state secrets must ensure this data isn’t “removed from its proper place of custody” and that “gross negligence” isn’t a defense:

Yes, Clinton’s 22 Top Secret emails were “illegally removed from its proper place.” [gee that looks disturbingly like a fact!]

http://www.salon.com/2016/05/27/time_to_care_about_damn_emails_hillary_clinton_has_a_serious_legal_problem/

oh no comrades, salon news?

quote:

on another hand, to dismiss everything away by attaching tribal monikers to them is to not give a fair hearing to the reality of the situation or to deal effectively with the content. something the comrades try to do frequently. as ive said before---if you did this in the classroom, youd fail. if you did this as a part of your critical thinking job, youd be fired.

other sites used multiple times include CNN, the NYT, CBS news, reuters, AP, USA today, Wikipedia, drudge, and the huffington post. a veritable pantheon of a right wing conspiracy against Hillary!

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

No, you can felch yourself, you have done a wonderful job to date.

I said what I said, not the lying asswipe you said.

So far I havent made stupid statements, you are the fucking buffoon here welfare patient. You make up shit (its called lying and in your case toiletlicking propaganda) that was never said, and then tell me I must defend it. Heres the news dumbass, I don't need to defend what was not said by me and you are too fucking stupid to understand it even if I did.

You havent answered this:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, <<<<<<<<<<<< I will wait, welfare patient.

Until you get that bit of simple English correct you get no answers, you just will be self-felching.

The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

If you understood the rules of structure in English you would know that this part of the sentance is the dominate one.

You have just stated I am a welfare patient, proove it.
You stated that I got riffded, proove it.
You stated that I have sex with my mother and sister, proove it
You stated that I am a double dipper, proove it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

No, you can felch yourself, you have done a wonderful job to date.

I said what I said, not the lying asswipe you said.

So far I havent made stupid statements, you are the fucking buffoon here welfare patient. You make up shit (its called lying and in your case toiletlicking propaganda) that was never said, and then tell me I must defend it. Heres the news dumbass, I don't need to defend what was not said by me and you are too fucking stupid to understand it even if I did.

You havent answered this:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, <<<<<<<<<<<< I will wait, welfare patient.

Until you get that bit of simple English correct you get no answers, you just will be self-felching.

The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

If you understood the rules of structure in English you would know that this part of the sentance is the dominate one.

You have just stated I am a welfare patient, proove it.
You stated that I got riffded, proove it.
You stated that I have sex with my mother and sister, proove it
You stated that I am a double dipper, proove it.

Understanding the rules?

https://sites.google.com/site/englishgrammarguide/Home/sentence-structure--part-1----basic-clause-structure-1

There you go, looks like you got caught out in your felch.

you need to learn English, not only is your grammar atrocious, but you can't even spell. Of course, as an Army cook, you really didn't need to, did you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Ja, you were not in intelligence, thats for sure, you have to be able to spell 2nd grade words, and you cant, so I can only assume you were a cook. And a damn poor one, being Riffed and a double dipper welfare patient now.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Not even, you are a proven liar, you lie continuously.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

You have been out there hallucinating all your life in mulletheaded welfare patient land son, you haven't amounted to shit yet.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

you prove you are not. I said welfare patient, you live in a welfare patient state (one) and got a retirement instead of a boot from sub-standard performance in the military another welfare gig for you (two) a drain on Amenricas resources.

You have proved it yourself with your own words, now prove anything you said I have said (none of which I have), you lying nutsucker welfare patient.

quote:

A former Secret Service officer has penned a scathing tell-all book about Hillary Clinton, describing her “erratic, uncontrollable and occasionally violent” disposition as unfit for the presidency.

Gary Byrne, who was posted outside of Bill Clinton’s Oval Office, details an environment of terror under the former first lady whose unpredictable fits of rage permeated among White House staff.

“What I saw in the 1990s sickened me,” Byrne writes in the book’s introduction, according to Page Six.

The book, Crisis of Character: A White House Secret Service Officer Discloses His Firsthand Experience with Hillary, Bill, and How They Operate, is set for release June 28—just one month before the Democratic National Convention. The exposé has already reached No. 1 on Amazon’s bestseller list due to pre-orders.

Byrne recalls Clinton often hurling obscenities at her husband, Secret Service agents, and White House staffers. He describes one “violent encounter” between the couple ahead of a national presidential address and a 1995 fight that left a blue vase shattered and a black eye on the former president.

“Hillary Clinton is now poised to become the Democratic nominee for president of the United States, but she simply lacks the integrity and temperament to serve in the office,” he writes in an excerpt obtained by Page Six.

“From the bottom of my soul I know this to be true. And with Hillary’s latest rise, I realize that her own leadership style–volcanic, impulsive, enabled by sycophants, and disdainful of the rules set for everyone else–hasn’t changed a bit.”...

Byrne’s book comes a year after investigative journalist Ronald Kessler published a tell-all about Clinton’s bitter treatment of the Secret Service.

In one encounter described by Kessler, a former Secret Service officer greeted Clinton, saying, “Good morning, ma’am,” to which she responded, “Fuck off.”