Real0ne
Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
|
In these conversations there is a fundamental problem. The 900 pound gorilla.
Its like most of these matters a 'trap' and most people are none the wiser as they walk right in.
What they have done is to place the constitutional 'right to free travel', (which is purely private) [..and by the locomotion of the times] under the same umbrella as regulated 'commercial driving', [the conversion from private no touch zone to commercial regulated zone severely reduces peoples rights]. Hence when you are stopped and they talk with you they label everything as driver, driving etc which if you do not protest their label [forced to be belligerent/uncooperative] on the spot, it constitutes a legal contract being made on the spot with your tacit acceptance of the officers definition/charges which the court will then accept. Why wouldnt the court accept it? After all the traveler has accepted the re-characterization. They have gotten so bold they have even included travel in their statutes as something they are authorized to infringe upon. Its all about revenue. Common people who do not use the highway as a place of business were never expected to get licensed, any more than the ownership of arms. It does not matter how little it infringes it is a no go zone. Non-traffic laws believe it or not completely take care of all traffic matters. All that the state needed to do was to make their rules of the road pamplet, case would be decided in common law tribunals under law and equity. But nope, like everything else they are mafia minded and create a thriving business for themselves at the end of a barrel of a gun. dubose comes to mind. That is why I post the eddie craig, x deputy sheriff where even he gets beat to shit by these road nazis despite his extremely professional conduct when confronted by the road nazis.
Its their job to trap you, and they do it in the language they use. If you use the language that is correct for your situation they merely ignore it and move forward under their terms regardless. This is why eddie teaches how to reverse the situation and set them up for a suit, in federal court, precisely what they are doing to you to insure their ill-gotten revenue stream.
The whole key is that driving is fully regulated commercial activity and traveling is private in the no touch zone. The courts have illegitimately and continue to illegitimately commingle the commercial privilege with the private right to obtain regulatory jurisdiction in the no touch zones to destroy private rights and put everyone under the same umbrella. [Commercial and regulated]
Nothing will change until people wise up and grasp the distinctions. As irony would have it, the russian constitution makes these distinctions between man and beast perfectly clear. Now thats irony imo! 
< Message edited by Real0ne -- 8/3/2015 9:55:22 AM >
_____________________________
"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile
Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?
Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!
"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session
|
RE: University of Cincinnati Police Officer Indicted - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread