KenDckey
Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: joether quote:
ORIGINAL: KenDckey http://news.yahoo.com/video/state-emergency-colorado-over-toxic-012238515.html Since the EPA created this emergency themselves 1. Should those involved be fined for the cleanup in the same manner as those in the civilian sector? Let's see if I understand this 'failure to engage one's brain": The US Government should fine the US Government. Or even 'better', the US Government should find the EPA, so that the EPA has....LESS...resources to keep others in-line when this and other clean up efforts break down. quote:
ORIGINAL: KenDckey 2. Should those involved be considered for criminal prosecution under the be a manager go to jail laws of OSHA? Why not ask the legal folks in government. Since they are the ones that have to prosecute the persons. As of right now, they are not going to do anything. The group doing the clean up notified all the proper agencies that might be able to do something about the situation in good faith. quote:
ORIGINAL: KenDckey 3. Should the supervisors and above be investigated for criminal negligence in the training and supervision of subordinates? Yeah, because we, the United States, 'always' do that towards businesses, right? How many of those big shots in BP are in jail due to an oil rig exploding, sinking under the ocean, and causing weeks of oil slicks that ranged from Texas to Florida? quote:
ORIGINAL: KenDckey 4. Is the Administration trying to poison the people of the west who are generally more conservative, thus eliminating some problems. This sounds like an accusation. How about you put some.....EVIDENCE.....that shows....WITHOUT A SHADOW OF DOUBT......that the current administration created this problem to....ELIMINATED POLITICAL PEOPLE OPPOSED TO THEM. All those people in the current administration are afforded the same rights and protections as you are! That means you have the burden of evidence to produce of wrong doing. Sure Joe I'll get proof after you prove that asking a question (you don't have to like the question or even respond to it if you don't want to) requires proof first. BTW the questions were designed to solicit input. Thanks you for yours. Now Prove please yours (not really because I don't see a need to prove your own question when soliciting input). Me, I just asked questions.
|