|
TheCabal -> RE: Transgender rights in rural Missouri (9/4/2015 5:30:34 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:
ORIGINAL: TheCabal
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne
TC,
these people are known as 'enablers'.
They failed in raising their own kids properly and expect the gubblemint to fix those failures for them, while simultaneously demanding everyone else, those with wisdom, vision, and foresight to accept their failed enabling theories and policies which is one of several root causes of parental failure in the first place.
......cant see the forest because all those damn trees are in the way, the solution of course cut down the forest so they can see the trees.... gasp... still no trees...
I think it goes beyond 'enablers.' I mean, maybe it'll get me called a radical feminist, but I'm willing to wear that label for suggesting that teenage girls really shouldn't have to share locker rooms and bathroom facilities with boys - even boys who insist they're girls. At least I think that's the position of radical feminists. Whatever it is, that's hardly a 'doctrinaire conservative' position.
The notion that a 17 year old who identified as a boy mere months ago, and only started using the girls locker room a few weeks ago, actually knows themselves well enough that we should simply accept their assertion that they're a girl without question... I mean, that's not enabling... that's delusional. And the crazy labels that get used... I about spit my drink all over my laptop a couple pages back when it was suggested that I was some sort of Christian... because we all know the guy with the avatar of a dragon clutching an inverted cross MUST be a Christian. LMAO.
For what it's worth, I do understand that Lila has been excused from gym class and now no longer uses the girl's locker room. Hmmm... perhaps getting out of gym class is the motivation for this. Nah... nevermind... no one has EVER wanted to get out of gym class.
Well look at this gay gene crap which I have said for years was nothing more than politicized bullshit science so gays could live with their decisions. They beat people over the head with this garbage science for years just so they could feel ok with themselves. Same thing is going on here only now its infringing on everyone elses established way of life. Now we will end up with long lines outside of public washrooms because they will all have to be made private with a lock and private locker rooms as well to accommodate the dysphoric little boys among us.
Last thing I would do is give them a solution that allows them mixed with the girls, private bathrooms with locking doors to insure there is no possibility of their feeling being hurt.
I'm willing to accept the possibility of a 'gay gene.' It really doesn't matter anymore, anyway - and this thread is the reason why it's irrelevant. We know that someone's physical sex IS controlled by genetics. It's not just a gene, but a whole chromosome full of genes that give you a penis or a vagina.
The transsexual community insists that you can be the opposite sex IN SPITE of your genes. Heck, according to Elizabeth Warren, Rachel Dolezal and Ward Churchill, you can also be another race in spite of your genes now. So, logically, you can be straight IN SPITE of your gay genes.
The belief that we can choose our sex but not our sexual preference... now there's some SERIOUS cognitive dissonance. Genetics don't mean squat anymore.
You know, I think we see this across this website. You've got to be at least a little bit of a freak to even sign up here. Certain things turn me on that don't do anything for (or disgust) most people. But it seems silly for me to try to claim that my arousal at seeing a woman locked in a collar, and wearing a corset and heels is genetic. Millions of years of evolution didn't create a high heel fetish gene, or a rubber fetish gene. It's just what I like. And that's fine. That's all the justification I need and should need.
|
|
|
|
