dreamlady
Posts: 737
Joined: 9/13/2007
From: Western MD
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: longwayhome
How demeaning is that statement about women, and what does it say about your attitude to sex with another human being? At what point do you remember that there is a fully functioning, feeling person associated with all that flesh and bone stuff?
And just to make it even worse, you include the words "all men" like we all say and mean things like that. You take a fairly unpleasant saying and make it even worse. The implication, I think, is that even if someone is gorgeous and you fancy them, she may in fact be seen in a different way by the person who has to live every day of his life with her. What you say after that about "there's not much else left to admire" then takes your supposedly universal statement and shovels on extra unpleasantness.
"All men"? Not me, and last time I looked, I was a man, except that I think for all my experiences, positive and negative, I still like women. And not because I want into their pants, but because I respect my fellow humans. I may well also want into their pants, but it's not an entitlement, and, personally, it's never the explicit reason why I foster a friendship.
I profoundly wish we didn't have to deal constantly with all this sexual battlefield stuff. Idealistic perhaps, but hardly damaging. However, with statements like that, any rapprochement isn't happening any time soon for you, or any of us, by the looks of it.
The sad part is, that decent men like you end up having to jump through hoops to *prove* yourselves worthy of distinction above the common riffraff that so-called "subs" like crumpets exemplifies to the nth degree.
His agenda has never been to develop friendships with women, but to fuel his own gender-biased double standards. Why? Because it would feel incestuous to him to treat a woman as peer, such as he would expect other men to treat his own sisters or female kin.
So, like so many male subs (whether married cheaters or never-been-married confirmed bachelors), he is sexually conflicted and swings frantically from one extreme to the other:
He is either preoccupied with his own sexual objectification of himself, as to why aren't total strangers of the female persuasion pawing, groping and grabbing him in public to pull him into the bushes and jump on his bones, or else he is busily obsessed with sexually objectifying women.
I would have said FemDom as his preferred choice, but based on his track record of sexist remarks, I don't believe it really matters to him who or what she is as long as she has a pussy & tits.
He is among those who slavishly ape-talk and mimic what he thinks a Dominant woman wants in a submissive male. He doesn't even see himself for the sexual predator that he is.
Many years of encountering "submissive" wolves in sheep's clothing is why I am unequivocally turned off by any unowned man who claims to be a slave, whose loopy soundbite is how much his sole aspiration in life is to serve a Dominant (or D/D couple);
by any man who wants to be instantly sexually objectified by calling himself this kind of slut or that kind of sissy-slut, vying to be any Dominant woman's bitch;
and instantly owned by just about any Mistress who will have him. . . but who will also settle for casual NSA freebie BDSM play, wherever and whenever he can find it.
Frankly, any man whatsoever who exudes the odor of desperation or who has contracted a terminal case of crétinous thinking-with-dick-itis.
It is these lowlifes who drag down the reputation of the rest of you men who are earnestly seeking a meaningful, longlasting, and exclusively binding connection -- men whose oath of fealty is actually backed by the actions of a true devotée to his Mistress-Owner.
Now, to end on a lighter note, from http://www.collarchat.com/m_4787704/mpage_8/key_/tm.htm#4790509
quote:
ORIGINAL: dreamlady
quote:
ORIGINAL: GoddessManko
Life is very hard for crumpets, with his ginormous penis and abnormally large tongue, hehe. (Sorry, couldn't resist).  I'm still chuckling over this. . . and the sad part is, it's probably true. 
But, you know what they say, nature compensates in other ways, like in lack of stature, lack of charm, or by being clueless to the fact that all the penises and tongues in the world are meaningless when you can't even hold onto a woman long enough to not have to wear a condom with her anymore.
DreamLady
|
RE: Male to Female Ratios -- Look at Ashley Madison - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread