quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

FR,

I think the hair stylist should have the right to accept whatever customer he wants. It's a privately owned business. Let the owner(s) decide the rules, and let consumers vote with their dollars. It just might result in less discrimination in the long run.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

FR,

I think the hair stylist should have the right to accept whatever customer he wants. It's a privately owned business. Let the owner(s) decide the rules, and let consumers vote with their dollars. It just might result in less discrimination in the long run.

In my country that sort of bigotry is not legal. It used to be. There are plenty of fucksticks who would like to return to that. You may be too young to remember the "terrorists" who broke the law and sat down in an all white lunch counter. They were told there were other places they could go and eat "no reason to impose on those who don't want your kind".
Now if you do not like it perhaps you should get a law passed that would overturn that part of the constitution.
On a lighter note: If that is your picture in the avatar then you giving any opinion to or about a tonsorial question beomes ironic and like totally wierd.

quote:

I beg to differ. As long as the person turned away is not one of the classes protected by the civil rights acts, I could refuse to serve them. As the Guv wasn't refused because she was female, it's legal.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul

Did somebody say cake?

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

The tyanny of administrative law,
Resulting in the destruction of all rights,
through commerce.

We are all tired of being forced to drive on the wrong side of the street.
We are all tired of having hand rails on stars.
We are all tired of requiring cars not to drive on the sidewalk.
Well not me....the only thing I am tired of is your constant whining about how phoquing unfair the system is for not letting you be a bigot.[;)]

quote:

Worse you dont even know the difference between a bigot and someone who points out the 'letter of the law'!

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

FR,

I think the hair stylist should have the right to accept whatever customer he wants. It's a privately owned business. Let the owner(s) decide the rules, and let consumers vote with their dollars. It just might result in less discrimination in the long run.

In my country that sort of bigotry is not legal. It used to be. There are plenty of fucksticks who would like to return to that. You may be too young to remember the "terrorists" who broke the law and sat down in an all white lunch counter. They were told there were other places they could go and eat "no reason to impose on those who don't want your kind".
Now if you do not like it perhaps you should get a law passed that would overturn that part of the constitution.
On a lighter note: If that is your picture in the avatar then you giving any opinion to or about a tonsorial question beomes ironic and like totally wierd.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Worse you dont even know the difference between a bigot and someone who points out the 'letter of the law'!

It was the letter of the law that blacks were not allowed to marry whites.
It was the letter of the law that blacks were not allowed to eat in white only establishments.
You and bull connor have often spoken of the letter of the law.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

So poly marriage is kewel if your religion prescribes it?
Human sacrifice is kewel if your religion prescribes it?
You really post some silly phoquing opinion.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Religion has nothing to do with it. You referenced the letter of the law.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Enumeration?

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Religion has nothing to do with it. You referenced the letter of the law.

quote:

Strictly speaking that is correct, despite human sacrifice is a bit extreme and I cant think of any moral obligation one would have to sacrifice another except by agreement of the person being sacrificed.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Enumeration?

1) _______
2) _______

then fill in the blanks with whatever it is you want to enumerate.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Strictly speaking that is correct, despite human sacrifice is a bit extreme and I cant think of any moral obligation one would have to sacrifice another except by agreement of the person being sacrificed.

Strictly speaking I am always correct and you by definition haven't a clue. Quite often unwilling victims were sacrificed. That you were not aware of that would indicate the level of your education. Try reading more and posting less until you have read more.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Enumeration?

1) _______
2) _______

then fill in the blanks with whatever it is you want to enumerate.

For the intellectually challanged we are speaking of how blacks were enumerated as opposed to whites? I find it difficult to believe that anyone with a pulse and a two digit iq is this ignorant.[ How they are able to log on is a marvel.