Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

statistical impossibility


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> statistical impossibility Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
statistical impossibility - 9/10/2015 3:40:31 PM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-34151528

to get 0% on each of 7 tests for a top ranked student is statistically impossible, I believe. You can guess and get some right. Another mind wasted.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/10/2015 3:48:33 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Did you not fully understand what you read ?

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/10/2015 3:55:00 PM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
Yeah I read it. What appears to be corruption isn't allowing a bright young student from moving forward (most probably because of her sex or religion although the article didn't say). Nevertheless it is a waste of a good mind. And the independent commission or whatever they called it hasn't been authorized yet. In a corrupt government and educations system, it may not make much difference anyway.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/10/2015 4:02:52 PM   
KYsissy


Posts: 781
Joined: 5/12/2005
Status: offline
A christian woman in Egypt. Why am I not surprised?

_____________________________

"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went."
Will Rogers, 1897-1935

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/10/2015 4:14:27 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KYsissy

A christian woman in Egypt. Why am I not surprised?


You didnt read the full article.

(in reply to KYsissy)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/10/2015 4:16:02 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Did you not fully understand what you read ?

Based on what he posts, the statistical probability of that is nearing 100%.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/10/2015 4:25:50 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-34151528

to get 0% on each of 7 tests for a top ranked student is statistically impossible, I believe. You can guess and get some right. Another mind wasted.


Not when the government cheats, it is not.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/10/2015 5:10:44 PM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
Aylee LOL My partner and I wrote a test once that was 20 question T/F And there were no right or wrong answers. LOL

We had a great deal of fun with it and it always stimulated interest in the class.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/10/2015 8:53:26 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Did you not fully understand what you read ?


To fully understand, would imply having read the full document. KenDckey did not read the full article, so therefore, does not fully understand the information given. We both know how he failed; an we haven't talked about this issue anywhere else before hand!

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/11/2015 3:48:04 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Did you not fully understand what you read ?


To fully understand, would imply having read the full document. KenDckey did not read the full article, so therefore, does not fully understand the information given. We both know how he failed; an we haven't talked about this issue anywhere else before hand!


sorry comrade bird brain and misnamed in uk, its the two of you that not only misunderstood ken's "another mind wasted" comment, but you also failed to take note of his subsequent explanation. not to mention you have no way of knowing whether ken read the whole article or not. youre a pretentious twit and an absolute critical thinking embarrassment.

is your self esteem and self worth so bad that you need to get your jollies off putting other people down without cause? does it make you feel superior? is progressivism/liberalism/communism/socialism (whatever form of leftie you are) show itself as being a better social-political worldview because of your incessant slamming of others?

quote:

an we haven't talked


oh, and its "AND" not "an"...maybe you would look better at busting on other people if you had all your own i's dotted and t's crossed?

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 9/11/2015 4:05:30 PM >

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/11/2015 4:39:05 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Did you not fully understand what you read ?


To fully understand, would imply having read the full document. KenDckey did not read the full article, so therefore, does not fully understand the information given. We both know how he failed; an we haven't talked about this issue anywhere else before hand!


sorry comrade bird brain and misnamed in uk, its the two of you that not only misunderstood ken's "another mind wasted" comment, but you also failed to take note of his subsequent explanation. not to mention you have no way of knowing whether ken read the whole article or not. youre a pretentious twit and an absolute critical thinking embarrassment.

is your self esteem and self worth so bad that you need to get your jollies off putting other people down without cause? does it make you feel superior? is progressivism/liberalism/communism/socialism (whatever form of leftie you are) show itself as being a better social-political worldview because of your incessant slamming of others?

quote:

an we haven't talked


oh, and its "AND" not "an"...maybe you would look better at busting on other people if you had all your own i's dotted and t's crossed?



Bounty, youre a fucking hypocrite..... you post asking for no name calling but are happy to do just that.

Kens post was incorrect as the poor girl had no chance of scoring any points due to cheating. Does this make me feel superior to you.....nope you manage to do that with your own stupid posts.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/11/2015 6:11:50 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Did you not fully understand what you read ?

To fully understand, would imply having read the full document. KenDckey did not read the full article, so therefore, does not fully understand the information given. We both know how he failed; an we haven't talked about this issue anywhere else before hand!

sorry comrade bird brain and misnamed in uk, its the two of you that not only misunderstood ken's "another mind wasted" comment, but you also failed to take note of his subsequent explanation. not to mention you have no way of knowing whether ken read the whole article or not. youre a pretentious twit and an absolute critical thinking embarrassment.


Comrade? What? Are you russian now? Got the hots and desire for some Putin-man love? You needed it up the ass from a real russian bear, don't you?

HHere is what you and KenDckey did not read from the article:

"And several prominent Egyptians have stepped forward with offers of funding for her further education."

The reason for taking the tests was to obtain funding to go to school. That you, in your desperate attempt to attack me, overlooked the article and the information with it. As such, come across as an ignorant moron!

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
is your self esteem and self worth so bad that you need to get your jollies off putting other people down without cause?


Pot Calling the Kettle Black!

You sir, are a hypocrite!

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
does it make you feel superior?


I do not feel superior, elite, or even even impressive when dealing with you and most of the conservatives/libertarians on this board. I feel pity. That for some unknown and unexplained set of reasons, you each have done one or more things to dumb yourselves down. All this good information on the Internet, and some how, most of you miss out on it in your posts. It doesn't take even five minutes of research to find find the correct information that shows one or more of your arguments is full of shit. To which I ask: Why didn't this person research their information better?

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
is progressivism/liberalism/communism/socialism (whatever form of leftie you are) show itself as being a better social-political worldview because of your incessant slamming of others?


Please define the following words: A ) Progressivism, B ) Liberalism, C ) Communism, D ) Socialism.

I once asked the conservatives on this forum to define 'liberal' and 'conservative'. Not a single one of them could define either word. How sad is that? You hate the words 'progressive, liberal, communism, and socialism. Yet, do you even know what the concepts imply?

While your at it, define the following words: E ) Conservative, F ) Libertarian, G ) Tyrannical, H ) Capitalism, I ) Corporatism, J ) Fascism, K ) The Republic, M ) Modern Era Feudalism. The last one should be easy to define if you had a pulse in the last ten years

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
an we haven't talked


oh, and its "AND" not "an"...maybe you would look better at busting on other people if you had all your own i's dotted and t's crossed?


You keep insulting me, I'll keep using 'An' in a manner that annoys you. Fortunately for the Internet Era, all my i's get dotted and t's crossed, automatically. You do understand that my handwriting is not Ariel or Times New Roman, right? While most people can read my handwriting, its not of a standardize printing style. I would expect you to have even a 1st grader's intellectual ability to understand this concept without stating it. Apparently, I'm wrong....

< Message edited by joether -- 9/11/2015 6:16:48 PM >

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/11/2015 7:51:09 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Did you not fully understand what you read ?

Based on what he posts, the statistical probability of that is nearing 100%.


In that case why don't you help a boi out and tell me what about this post you think is wrong.


quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

Yeah I read it. What appears to be corruption isn't allowing a bright young student from moving forward (most probably because of her sex or religion although the article didn't say). Nevertheless it is a waste of a good mind. And the independent commission or whatever they called it hasn't been authorized yet. In a corrupt government and educations system, it may not make much difference anyway.



Unless of course you honestly believe there was no corruption and she really did get a 0 on all 7 tests. Which as he pointed out in the op is highly unlikely.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/12/2015 2:48:28 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Kens post was incorrect as the poor girl had no chance of scoring any points due to cheating. Does this make me feel superior to you.....nope you manage to do that with your own stupid posts.


Ken was correct. His post was about her brain being wasted by the cheaters taking her grades away from her. Her options have been limited by the cheating.

I don't see how you didn't take that understanding from his posts.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/12/2015 3:41:23 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Kens post was incorrect as the poor girl had no chance of scoring any points due to cheating. Does this make me feel superior to you.....nope you manage to do that with your own stupid posts.


Ken was correct. His post was about her brain being wasted by the cheaters taking her grades away from her. Her options have been limited by the cheating.

I don't see how you didn't take that understanding from his posts.



so wanna try again misnamed in uk?

for the most part, after the introduction of both of you, I was mostly addressing comrade bird brain so you ended up getting caught up in some of the rhetoric. some collateral damage, some richly deserved.

if it helps knowing, I have you on hide, but unfortunately get to see your inane patter when someone else quotes you. you couldn't even get the reason for my questioning about "superiority" correct in your retort to me.

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 9/12/2015 3:55:38 PM >

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/12/2015 4:12:59 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Kens post was incorrect as the poor girl had no chance of scoring any points due to cheating. Does this make me feel superior to you.....nope you manage to do that with your own stupid posts.


Ken was correct. His post was about her brain being wasted by the cheaters taking her grades away from her. Her options have been limited by the cheating.

I don't see how you didn't take that understanding from his posts.



FFS whats up with some of you....... His Op mentioned statistics, the link had nothing to do with statistics. My post was the second on the page, ergo I was answering an incorrect OP.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/12/2015 4:20:33 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Kens post was incorrect as the poor girl had no chance of scoring any points due to cheating. Does this make me feel superior to you.....nope you manage to do that with your own stupid posts.


Ken was correct. His post was about her brain being wasted by the cheaters taking her grades away from her. Her options have been limited by the cheating.

I don't see how you didn't take that understanding from his posts.



so wanna try again misnamed in uk?

for the most part, after the introduction of both of you, I was mostly addressing comrade bird brain so you ended up getting caught up in some of the rhetoric. some collateral damage, some richly deserved.

if it helps knowing, I have you on hide, but unfortunately get to see your inane patter when someone else quotes you. you couldn't even get the reason for my questioning about "superiority" correct in your retort to me.


Most socks put me on hide because they dont like the truth. You are an arsehole who tends to be passive aggressive and because I point that out I am on your "hide list" ...................allegedly.

As for the fucking lie you werent addressing me, you referred to me directly. Hopefully someone posts this so idiot boy can read my reply to him.

You can join the list of other pricks who claim to have me on hide yet continue to make snidey digs.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/13/2015 2:56:42 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
Sub your "snidey digs" aren't appriciated by anyone. They detract from the point. Take up space. And in general piss people off. If that is your intent, maybe you should report yourself to the mods for remedial action.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/13/2015 3:31:41 AM   
captive4ever


Posts: 98
Joined: 8/16/2011
Status: offline
This thread is one reason I do not take part much in the forums here. One post and 17 flames.....wow what a ratio.

And it always seems to be the same old faces...

Where are the moderators?

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: statistical impossibility - 9/13/2015 3:35:35 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Bloody hell the irony here is gut destroying.
What a load of shit.
Everyone here in P&R is snidey, sarky, bitchy, assholeish, Stop pretending you are holier than thou....
YOU insist on calling out the male submissives.
Like, you are smarter because you are a DOM!
You really need to stop showing yourself to be completely the opposite.
Quit using peoples "status" or kink as a put down,



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> statistical impossibility Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109