dreamlady
Posts: 737
Joined: 9/13/2007 From: Western MD Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: notaBULL After exchanging many messages with Mistresses on here, I noticed members do not know the true definition of slavery. Basically, I had to debate many times if slaves are supposed to have sex with their owners. No! Slaves simply exist to provide income, as explained below. --- OP, you call yourself a slave and you're going to dictate to your prospective Owner what HER definition of slavery is or isn't? ROFLMAO Historically, there have been many types of slaves, just as there are many different types of household servants. A domestic slave performs domestic duties and this has nothing to do with generating or not generating income for his or her Owner, in the same way that a hired servant may or may not be used to produce household income depending on the servant's skillset. In BDSM slavery for example, it would generally be illegal for a sex slave to get pimped out to provide income. You don't want to be a sex slave evidently, so that's your Hard Limit. However, I find it supremely ironic that you think of yourself as an authority on the "true" definition of slavery, when there is no such thing as a "true" BDSM slave. Not only does "real" slavery not exist (except for the non-consensual criminal variety), but your concept of *slavery* would have you be puppet master in a poly household consisting of your Mistress, her Bull, and 5 slaves, according to your profile. Good luck with that -- you'll need it. Btw, my definition of slavery if I believed in it - which I don't - would be that of owning a sex slave as a mandatory proviso. After all, what use would I have for a slave, or any live-in male (companion) for that matter, if he could not or would not want to attend to EVERY SINGLE ONE of my erotic needs? Pff-ft. quote:
ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar quote:
ORIGINAL: notaBULL slav·er·y (slā′və-rē, slāv′rē) n. pl. slav·er·ies 1. The condition in which one person is owned as property by another and is under the owner's control, especially in involuntary servitude. If you're under my control, and I own ya, I'm gonna fuck you if I want to. Just like happened to historical slaves. Ishtar, that's assuming slave dude can fuck (or get it up) in the first place. OP might not want to have sex with his Mistress cuz he wants Bull dude to be the one fucking all of them, including him. DreamLady
< Message edited by dreamlady -- 9/29/2015 10:25:43 PM >
|