J0K3ER
Posts: 211
Joined: 10/9/2015
Status: offline
|
quote:
You realize words in English often have more than one meaning... right?
And that just because a word in English has multiple meanings, it doesn't mean whatever meaning doesn't suit your purpose is incorrect... right?
And that dictionaries list words in order of more frequent common usage... right?
Absolutely. I do realize the meaning of a "word" not only in english, but in every language depends on the context which that particular word is being used in. " are we really having this conversation?.
The word Caucasian is not english at all, and thus not subject to any language accidence.
quote:
quote:
Cau·ca·sian
kôˈkāZHən/
adjective
1.
NORTH AMERICAN
white-skinned; of European origin.
I know this. there is more Caucasians than you can even count in north America. but this does not make every light skin person, or a European immigrant a caucasian. calling a Celtic, French, German, Dutch, Nordic person a caucasian is akin to calling a dog, cat.
So you may have mistakenly listed your self as a caucasian while you are Dutch, like you once listed your self as a Gorean slavegirl (called "kajira"). however, if that pic on your profile is really YOU, or the picture you also have on your amazon acc. you dont look Caucasian to me.
you rather have that eerie scary Dutch-German complection, woe!.
Do you also realize that when you reply to my "inspiring" posts, your writing style seems to be rather assertive. not to mention the intentional use of complex language structure to prevail.
I remember telling you in earlier posts, you can go ahead and do what you do best, insult my poor english, I will not wince from your spear. but you chose to beat about the bushes and instead of insulting a man's 4th language which will surely detract from your high standard, it was safer to insult his intelligence.Right? kajira.
quote:
ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar
quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
quote:
ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar
quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
ETA: The word I used wasn't vaginal - so your fucking shitty S6 got it wrong again!! 
You realize that in most of the languages you picked, the translated word doesn't actually at all mean the equivalent to the English insult "pussy" just because that's what the translator picked when you attempted to translate it, right?
It wasn't 'pussy' either 
Cunt then... or whatever.
Which is precisely my point: you are not translating meaning at all, because you do not understand the languages you picked enough to know what you're translating into.
What you've SAID, in most cases, was "female genitalia/vagina".
From that, and the fact that I know you're attempting to insult him, I can guess that you said "pussy" or "cunt", or potentially something else... but seeing that you didn't actually SAY any of these things, and what you DID say was "female genitalia/vagina" it's just a guessing game to figure out what you meant to say.
Yet here you are arguing that you said what you meant to say, instead of what you actually DID say.
And ridiculing other people's language skills because of your own language skills are so terrible poor that you lack even the comprehension in the fact that words do not always have a literal translation into other languages.
This is a Before-and -After Experiment .of course this was before amazon, lets take a look at after amazon.
quote:
ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar
quote:
ORIGINAL: J0K3ER
because i mistakenly used the word "here" instead of "there" I meant to say you are always there to either kick or save my ass.
Huh? What? That's completely irrelevant to anything I said.
I didn't even notice your mistake (if it wasn't a mistake at all, because I think either one works to convey the meaning you were trying to get across).
quote:
ORIGINAL: J0K3ER
unfortunately you did not attempt any correction, and thought I meant you are always online. right?
Nope, that wasn't my assumption at all.
quote:
ORIGINAL: J0K3ER
this is why your reply came so defensive stating you are a house wife.
Why would stating I'm a housewife be defensive? It's just a fact that explains how come I've got so much time to post at weird times. Nothing more, nothing less.
quote:
ORIGINAL: J0K3ER
Ye,t your definition of high posting standard was based on 1st prejudice, 2nd your bias of opinion.
Of course my definition of a higher posting standard is based on my own prejudice and biases.
Please do tell me how I go about forming an opinion on a subject not factually measurable, or testable, that's not at all based on biases and prejudice.
Everybody's opinion regarding everything are always necessarily based on their own biases and prejudice.
quote:
ORIGINAL: J0K3ER
I'd hold that in higher esteem if you said that is your opinion
I don't need to say "in my opinion". Of course it's my damn opinion, I'm the one who said it. I ain't going to post stuff that's not my opinion, so you can make the fairly safe assumption that when I post something... it's my opinion... duh.
quote:
ORIGINAL: J0K3ER
this user responded to my post, and lets say his posting standard is as low as mine, otherwise he would not respond if he thought he would lower his "posting standard" BTW I like this new term. and even though this user has clearly stated that he was not replying to you. malgré tout ça , Being the ultimate poster, you gave up your very high "posting standard" and accepted a lower one. you jumped into my low " posting standard" conversation with others knowing it is of lower quality.
you have one more move
mate in 1
That doesn't even make sense.
Nowhere in my definition I gave you about what constitutes a higher posting standard did I say anything about it being related to whom a person replies to. What it depends on is how intelligent a post is, whether it contributes to the debate, and whether it provokes new ideas in the readers.
People's posting standards don't go up and down based on the idiocy of the people they reply to.
Your last post (the one I'm currently replying to) was a bunch of mostly incoherent dysfunctional illogical gibberish. Posting that sort of nonsense and making unfounded, bizarre, and illogical arguments (as you're prone to doing) detracts from your posting standards, because it emphasizes how little intelligent debate you bring to the table.
Somebody else (freedomdwarf, me or anybody else) replying to your nonsense to point out in a logical constructive way that it is indeed nonsense doesn't detracts from their posting standard at all, because they ARE bringing something to the table. In fact, when it's a witty, especially well-thought out rebuttal of your nonsense, and the reply makes several good points that aren't obvious at first glance, such a reply might very well elevate their posting standards.
Even tho efforts were put forth to maintain a high level of complexity those little sentences carried very little meaning, restrained and mainly focused on telling the same thing many different ways. and revealed a very bad logic.
but let me remind you of what you have forgotten, a person's posting standard can vary from brilliant to mild depending on the importance of a subject to that particular person, and how much readiness does a poster have to go far onto it. I have seen some posts of yours that add only to the count.
LNL. I'd like to tell you something about Gifts, I assume you already know that, however it wont hurt to remind.
the "gift" sender MUST see the gift, choose it, touch it, like it, etc... because the sender is not only sending an "object" they are also conveying meanings along with the gift for the receiver's appreciation.
< Message edited by J0K3ER -- 10/15/2015 4:17:33 PM >
_____________________________
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
RE: To want or not to want - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread