Wanderling
Posts: 39
Joined: 10/14/2015 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail But a Findomme can also be a Femdomme. I'm sure my definitions are wrong, so, I defer to you on this. To me, a femdomme is all that exists. A findomme, to me, is just a femdomme who gets paid to femdomme [which I do realize isn't what anyone said but me!]. To you, a findomme is a valid kink in and of itself, which I'll wager is a fine thing. It's just now how I see it, but findomme is not my kink, so, maybe that's why I don't see it the way you see it. It makes neither of us right or wrong. We just have a mismatch of goals I guess. So, I really should use a DIFFERENT word for what I think a femdomme who gets paid is. What would you call what am trying to describe, which is a femdomme who gets paid to femdomme a man who just wants to PLAY and who doesn't want the relationship part of the enchilada? [I will call it that - whatever you want to call it - because my confused musings were never what the difference is between findomme and femdomme even if I am confused about what the differences are.] quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail But what I am gleaning here, from the discourse, is if you are one of those wormy, smarmy type of subbies (you know the ones....... ,,,, what kind of grease does mistress use ,,,, on her strapon) don't for all of fucks sake take her out to eat at a mexican joint. Or am I the only one? You are 100% on the mark. I am the ignoble one. I just want to play. No relationship needed, nor desired. Just play. Do you see the mismatch? You noble ones want more. You want the whole enchilada. I don't want the whole enchilada. I just want to play in the spicy hot sauce. But, the musings are what occur AFTERWARD. You see, afterward, after I play, it all seemed so shallow. So devoid of substance. So devoid of the complete experience. Hence the confusions. I asked for play. I got play. And then, I'm confused why it feels so shallow.
|