RE: Serious question

RE: Serious question (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

MisterP61 -> RE: Serious question (11/13/2015 3:00:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HAK1M I agree with you in few points here. If you are for the freedom of speech , then I am also on the front line defending the freedom of speech not only here on the forum, but in the god damn streets, events and public places, and I got arrested protesting for the Obama care project last year.LOL. I also agree the Mod does not need my help. And since you understand this part , can you do me a favor and tell your wife the Mod does not need any help from I cut out most of this because anyone who wants can go back and read the rest of it in yours and Mine original posts. I will refer you back to My original about defending the freedom of speech. I will not tell Her what She can and cannot say, and I extend that same courtesy to you. I really believe a part of the ToS here is designed to take away that freedom. A good portion of it is spot on (posting pictures or writings involving children is one of them, or outright threatening someone with bodily harm), but this whole country has gotten so pussified with all the PC (hey everyone gets a trophy right?), that if you call someone an idiot, you get mod slapped. To Me that is BS. If they were to ban Me from this site, My life would go on and it wouldn't be any less wonderful because I wasn't here. Went many years without it, and will go many years again without it. Fact is when they had their big change here and took everyone off moderation and started everyone with a clean slate, they let the people who had very specific reasons for their bans (like stalking and threats) back on, and this is not their second, third, or even fourth chance. It numbers in the teens the times they have gotten "second" chances.

LadyPact -> RE: Serious question (11/13/2015 3:13:22 AM)
I remember us talking about that a couple of years ago. In fact, I even remember saying that it would be tough for me to be able to handle that kind of scrutiny. I think we have (?) two pictures of us together before he proposed. We didn't "document" our relationship. Heck, I didn't even realize we were 'dating' until somebody stepped up and told me. Neither of us had met the other's parents. (My mother was already deceased when we met.) I couldn't have told you a single name of one of his co-workers. Didn't know his favorite movie, color, or type of car. Heck, I didn't know if the man preferred Wheaties or Cheerios for breakfast. Guess it's a good thing I never had to prove we had a relationship. Oh, and we still don't share a bank account. [;)]

LadyPact -> RE: Serious question (11/13/2015 3:17:01 AM)
<Fast reply> My husband just said 'pussified'. I about piddled.

Lucylastic -> RE: Serious question (11/13/2015 5:34:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact <Fast reply> My husband just said 'pussified'. I about piddled. lol I can just see him saying it:) LOL

zombiegurlsos -> RE: Serious question (11/13/2015 6:55:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul quote: ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2 LP, might I suggest that engaging with this piece of shit simply feeds his presence here? Who cares what he says about you? No one gives a rat's ass what that sock troll says about anything. I have about come to the conclusion that nothing is going to shut them up. Or stop them from multiplying. and that is the way admin wants it to run apparently... the simplest explanation is usually the right one....

HAK1M -> RE: Serious question (11/13/2015 5:51:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: zombiegurlsos quote: ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul quote: ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2 LP, might I suggest that engaging with this piece of shit simply feeds his presence here? Who cares what he says about you? No one gives a rat's ass what that sock troll says about anything. I have about come to the conclusion that nothing is going to shut them up. Or stop them from multiplying. and that is the way admin wants it to run apparently... the simplest explanation is usually the right one.... [sm=beatdeadhorse.gif]

zombiegurlsos -> RE: Serious question (11/16/2015 4:15:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HAK1M quote: ORIGINAL: CynthiaWVirginia quote: ORIGINAL: HAK1M Hey dude, the symptoms you are demonstrating are related to ***TOS VIOLATION* And because the Mod isn't at your beck and call, you are plainly accusing him Of failing his job. Nah, it's just noticing that TOS is being violated and...it's possible that a mod isn't on duty at this present time. Nobody needs to be mentally ill to figure that out.** quote: Perhaps you need him to tell you your shit stinks too and put you on time out. Simply what you are playing now, is the very same game you played on CM. By means of crooked and despicable ways you got to be on CM mods good side, and started eliminating who ever did not fit your bill. FYI. This ain't no redeo... [sm=wtf.gif] Some angry person has an ax grinding. Now all of us know for whom. Thanks for the clarity. Go back to the previous page and check by yourself, and tell me WHERE THE TOS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED. it is only happening in her skull, even that imaginary stalker, does not exist. I can't tell what is her problem, unless she describes it in an eloquent language .she is an adult and she can leave whining to children and come to terms with other adults. THIS IS SPARTA. THIS IS AN OPEN FORUM. YOU DONT LIKE IT. IT DRAINS YOU OUT. LEAVE IT. However, to perhaps shed some light on facts. I'm as sure as hell not here to argue with a shriveled 56 years old trunk. yes your posts always promise eight inches or better, but they're more like 2 inches and very shy of anything interesting to say other than picking fights

zombiegurlsos -> RE: Serious question (11/16/2015 4:19:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HAK1M quote: ORIGINAL: zombiegurlsos quote: ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul quote: ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2 LP, might I suggest that engaging with this piece of shit simply feeds his presence here? Who cares what he says about you? No one gives a rat's ass what that sock troll says about anything. I have about come to the conclusion that nothing is going to shut them up. Or stop them from multiplying. and that is the way admin wants it to run apparently... the simplest explanation is usually the right one.... [sm=beatdeadhorse.gif] what is really sad HAK1M is your only intelligent posts are always the result of others comments and work..... that you cut and paste and post with no comment from yourself..... ummmmm

HAK1M -> RE: Serious question (11/16/2015 9:03:21 AM)
TOP DEFINITION Urban Dictionary would of A stupid way of saying "would have" or "would've". In essence, it's bad grammar & no one seems to care. I would of typed my paper using proper grammar but it is what it is. by Tommyt March 21, 2008 would of

zombiegurlsos -> RE: Serious question (11/16/2015 9:14:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HAK1M TOP DEFINITION Urban Dictionary would of well language is too abstract to be taken seriously

Page: << < prev 9 10 11 12 [13]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875