|
crumpets -> RE: What do senders do that they can so quickly POUNCE on juicy profiles? (11/5/2015 6:43:29 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze
Men on average tend to have broader shoulders than women, nobody expects them to hide their shoulders.
This is a valid point, that men don't, in general, hide their overall male anatomy from female view.
Yet, in a way, they do though - but we can't write a treatise here to explain why ties evolved (perhaps to cover up hairy chests bulging from loosely buttoned shirts?) or why suits evolved - or even why codpieces disappeared.
However, how many times have you seen men walking down the street with shorts so short that their balls are hanging out (such as we saw in the photo of the woman with the sleeveless top with too-large armholes)?
I think the difference here is that women, as a matter of habit, USE their primary and secondary sexual anatomy as a visual TOOL!
Most men don't - and those that do - look ridiculous (see photos above).
It's not that the women are "hiding" anything - because they're doing the opposite - they're flaunting it!
Which is fine. (I'd be perfectly happy if women walked around naked all the time - I really would.)
The point is not that the women are flaunting their primary and secondary sexual characteristics that is the problem.
It's the part about getting upset when someone looks which is what makes no sense.
They flaunt it - someone looks - they get upset.
Makes no sense.
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze
Women do have breasts, it's really not a big deal, why on earth should we bandage them down or hide them?
Again, I concede this rather valid point that women have breasts just as I have a chest that would likely outsize almost any woman's here, in numbers anyway.
Yup., Men have cocks. All of them have cocks. Funny thing though.
You never see their cock when they're just walking down the street.
In fact, just has women have large breasts, men can have a huge cock.
Why is it that men can "hide" even their huge cocks, yet women can't seem to hide even the smallest of breasts?
And, you'll certainly never see men walking down the street with their cock-cleavage shown to the world (kids included!).
Just as women wear sexy revealing negligee in private, the man's cock is for the view of the woman in the boudoir.
He basically hides it from view, day in and day out (idiotic cock shots on Collarme notwithstanding).
Yet, a man's huge cock is very much always there.
Hidden. In his pants. At least while he's out in public.
It's something the general public really doesn't need to see.
While I've heard women a zillion times say they can "tell" the size of a man while he's wearing normal clothes, they can't (unless they know how to read digit proportions, but even that is only circumstantial of high testosterone levels in the womb, or unless he's wearing the same kinds of clothes that women wear - see prior photos of the banana hammock).
Fact is, guys don't walk around with their cock sticking out of their pants.
And then complain that women look at them.
Like some of you women with large breasts, I have a large cock, yet, I certainly don't walk around with my cock showing to anyone who has eyeballs to see, do I?
More to the point, I wouldn't complain that they look, if I did!
Neither do I wear shorts so short that my hanging balls can be seen to everyone, even kids on the street, day in and day out, every day of my life.
I don't wear pants so tight that you can see if my testicles have descended or not.
And then decry that people look, do I?
I don't buy my pants with the fashionable Perry Ellis zipper artistically cut in a V-shape, so low that large portions of my cock show to the world, do I?
I don't stuff the area so that it "lifts" and "pushes up" my cock, so that it appears, to you, larger than it really is, do I?
And then call the police to tell them that some woman stared at my cock, making me feel threatened and uncomfortable.
Point is, having a cock, and hiding it from view is not the same thing as having breasts, and flaunting them for all to see (even children) day in and day out - and then complaining when men stare at them.
Now, if you want to argue that men have breasts too and, for them, they're not sexually charged, and that women don't stare at a shirtless man on the street anyway, that's a perfectly valid point, as breasts in non-European tribal regions aren't any big deal, for example, even today, it seems.
*****TOS VIOLATION*****
Stop. Just stop with the potentially underage stuff, even if it's from National Geographic.
|
|
|
|
