Wayward5oul
Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014 Status: offline
|
quote:
sweetieDA Right but, as far as I could tell, this thread was about date and / or cyber stalking, which, as you have already agreed, IS usually the minor end of stalking. If a woman was being stalked by her violent ex-husband, I would give radically different advice. No, this thread was about stalking, period. LP did say that she and new mod agreed it would be appropriate because there are probably a higher number of stalker types in the kink community, but that was the only statement that could possibly be interpreted as narrowing down the type of stalking. And I doubt that LP intended for this to be viewed so narrowly. There is nothing in this thread that indicates it is only about date/cyber stalking. quote:
sweetieDA Please can you explain how a National Stalking Helpline from 2015 has not managed to 'keep up with' forms and levels of stalking in the last 20 years? Unlike the sources used for your NVADV article, some of which are from 1997, 1998 and 1999 and which reference websites no longer available? Or your victims of crime factsheet, which quotes sources from 1999 and 2002? Or your ABA article, which quotes studies from 1988, 1989, 1991, 1994, 1995, 1998 and 1999? In fact, there is not one fact on there that is older than 2006, yet you're lecturing me on dates?! The American Bar citation was a mea culpa-I thought it included updated statistics further down the page, but I don’t see them now. As for the rest, they are as current as what is both available and considered reliable, by multiple accredited sources. The very first link I provided directed you to a CDC page, and the first two items on that page are: Prevalence and Characteristics of Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization— National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011 http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/nisvs/summary_reports.html Published in 2014, this report describes the most recent data on the public health burden of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization and the characteristics of victimization. Data in this report summarizes the second year of data collection from the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey 2010 Summary Report http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_executive_summary-a.pdf Published in 2011, the NISVS 2010 Summary Report presents data on the national prevalence of IPV, SV, and stalking among women and men in the United States. The 2010 survey is the first year of the survey and provides baseline data that will be used to track IPV, SV, and stalking trends. (NOTE-the first report shown above is an update of the original, revised to show the most current numbers available since the publication of the original. The original is the second report shown above.) Sorry, but I am not going to argue with statistics that are supported by National Coalition Against Domestic Violence National Center for Victims of Crime Centers for Disease Control and Prevention The United Nations Bureau of Justice Statistics All within the last two years. Let me address the fact that I am using U.S. statistics-I know there are people from all over the world on these boards, but I have read posters on these forums mention several times how the majority are from the U.S. The OP and several others who have addressed this topic in this thread and others are in the U.S. So I thought that would be the most relevant for the people most likely to read this for advice. But I did initially look for international statistics. There was nothing to be found that was anywhere near reliable. I finally found a statement from the United Nations, buried in a report on women and violence that they released in 2010, that stated what I have quoted below. Their other reports on violence in the U.S. refer back to their Bureau of Justice Statistics, which I have already cited. From the report: The Friends of the Chair felt that, while stalking is a relevant phenomenon within the framework of violence against women, they were faced with a variety of inconsistent definitions, depending on national legal or statistical frameworks. A particular challenge in terms of defining the concept was the inclusion or exclusion of sexual harassment, as well as a possible interaction with emotional violence and fear. Thus, the Friends of the Chair decided that this topic would remain for further work. A comprehensive list of acts needs to be developed, as well as survey methodology to collect data on this issue. The Friends of the chair highlighted the need of taking into consideration the different national legal frameworks. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/vaw/IssuesFocus/Report-of-the-Meeting-of-the-Friends-of-the-Chair-February-2010.pdf quote:
ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul ...I can tell you with complete confidence that our experiences are not the norm. quote:
sweetieDA Do you have any statistics on this, or is it just your opinion? Yes, the from the links that I already provided, which are from a comprehensive research study done over a 12 month period from Jan-Dec of 2011, then published in Sept of 2014. 16.2% (of females) were stalked by a stranger 24.9% (of females) were stalked by an acquaintance. And when you consider that ‘acquaintance’ only means that the stalker was not an ‘intimate partner’ or family member of the victim, that means that if you were to try to narrow it down to just people they met for coffee once or a similar type interaction, then the number would be even lower. And from that lowered number, if you separate the cases like ours, where the stalkers were easily handled from the cases that escalated, then you end up with an even lower number. So, yeah, the statistics show that our cases are not the norm. So all of your advice about ‘not doing anything’ and ‘tell no one’ would only work in a small percentage of cases. And in fact in most cases, it could lead to tragic outcomes. quote:
sweetieDA My quote was in response to continued communication with the stalker. It is disingenuous to take it out of context and apply it to questions of data collection, which I made no comment on. Actually you did. You flatly stated ‘to tell no one’, and went on to list the things they should not do. quote:
sweetieDA Most of the time - do nothing. It works. Guaranteed way to escalate and ensure their continued attention? Keep reacting, getting angry, messaging them, arguing with them, etc. Keep demanding and insisting that they leave you alone. Threaten them, call the police, make it into a personal war, make it clear that you're keeping everything they say, recording every little deed **they will absolutely love it**. As soon as you feel that need to 'win', it's game on for the stalker. (emphasis mine) If you had ever dealt with a serious stalker, I doubt you would see trying to stop the situation as a need to ‘win’. This is no game for anyone but the stalker. People die from this shit. And this statement is nothing but victim blaming. As for your arguing with the numbers quote:
ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul 11% of stalking victims were stalked for 5 years or more. quote:
sweetieDA Which means that 89% were stalked for 5 years or less. In fact, 40% of victims were stalked for less than 6 months, and 64% were stalked for less than a year. This is important because it challenges comments made on this thread that 'most' stalking is 7 years or more, which is wildly incorrect and simply fear-mongering. I stated this because your comments treated all of this very lightly, and made it sound like the high numbers others cited were extreme. But 11% is still alot, and from there you have to work down to 4 years, 3 years, 2 years, etc. And how many of those women that never made it to the 5 years didn’t make it because they were killed by their stalker? quote:
ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul you were lucky. 1 in 7 stalking victims move as a result of their victimization. quote:
sweetieDA Which means that 6 in 7 don't. Which means that I'm not lucky, I'm typical. No that does not mean that you are typical. It does not mean that the other 6 out of 7 had the same experience as you and had no need to move. What is not typical is coming out of such an experience with no effects. quote:
sweetieDA This report then *quotes* the fact that 1 in 7 victims of stalking moved as a result of the stalking, yet it offers no evidence for this assertion. When the victims were asked why they thought the stalking had stopped, 10% answered because they had moved. Yet this is 1 in 10, not 1 in 7, and it does not suggest a cause for the moving. Not all of the statistics gathered by the research are referenced in the tables. That was a summary. Reading through it it specifically mention other questions that were not referenced in the tables provided. This does not mean that the data is invalid. They point out that in some things people were allowed to choose multiple answers, so percentages may not add up to 100%, they indicate where they did not have enough responses to guarantee a representative date, they address statistical significance, etc. They address all of that. quote:
sweetieDA I certainly doubt that 1 in 10 victims of cyber stalking move house as a result. No one tried to state that they did. That is your questionable interpretation of the data to make a point. As I said, all of this info is found on the websites of the following organizations, and from there disseminated to the rest of the country. I am pretty comfortable that they know a little bit about what they are talking about. National Coalition Against Domestic Violence National Center for Victims of Crime Centers for Disease Control and Prevention The United Nations Bureau of Justice Statistics But you go ahead and argue with them all you want.
|