Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 9:11:02 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
you can call them non christians all you want to bounty.
The killer of those people at Planned parenthood in colorado was "christian" the republicans are crawling around kissing the arses of pastors who have called for the death of gays and abortion doctors. they have a long history of wanting to kill people because of the bibble.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 321
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 9:12:16 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

and let me repeat this because it bears repeating, those killing in the name of islam are not islamic.

And yet it clearly states in the Qur'an to kill all infidels.
Not by fables or stories, it is one of their main tenets, like one of our ten commandments.
This is their holy book that defines their religion, culture and lifestyle.

For those that do not follow the holy book is to turn their back on Islam: punishable by death.

From The Religion of Peace: The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.
Just one of the 109 verses (picked at random): Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has charted them to make Islam "superior over all religions." This chapter was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.

So if they don't kill the infidels, they are not following their religious tenets.
Ergo, that makes them non-Islamic (hypocrites); not those that do kill.

Can't have it both ways Ron.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 322
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 9:22:03 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
have said this before, and it bears repeating:

much of the heinousness done in the name of Christianity in times past had to do with the unholy marriage of church and state and the influence of the state on the church, or vice versa.

more importantly, when Christians kill seemingly "indiscriminately" (as opposed to in self defense, or in the context of war) they are not acting consistent with the tenets of their faith. the same cannot be said for islam.

Which is why most of the christian world has indeed separated the "state" from the "church" for law-making.
It started here when our 'enry told the pope to go swivel and setup the 'Church of England' loosely based on the Lutherans of Germany.

The most notable exceptions are the US and Islamic nations.




i'll agree partially on that...but its less about the church not having some influence when it comes to law creating, and more about the church and the state being in complete overlap with each other.


(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 323
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 9:45:39 AM   
DominantWrestler


Posts: 338
Joined: 7/4/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

have said this before, and it bears repeating:

much of the heinousness done in the name of Christianity in times past had to do with the unholy marriage of church and state and the influence of the state on the church, or vice versa.

more importantly, when Christians kill seemingly "indiscriminately" (as opposed to in self defense, or in the context of war) they are not acting consistent with the tenets of their faith. the same cannot be said for islam.

and given that, its more than likely that the people doing the actual killing in some, if not most cases, were not themselves Christians.

while im here---im extremely skeptical of the number into the hundreds of thousands concerning witch burning.

the website itself says:"The total number of victims was probably between 50,000 and 100,000"

im still skeptical. the website provided does not really document anything nor are any of its claims specifically referenced.

I cannot watch video, so I cant speak to the video link provided, but this link: http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/ ...goes nowhere.

the cornell link merely takes you to a front page where the very large cornell collection is described. there is no information there specific to what the website is claiming.

in those regards, the websites extremely poor and wouldn't pass muster at a high school level.

at the same time, ive got three Christian history books---two for the church at large and one for north America. ~1800 pages of people, places and things and the only mention of witches are the salem trials in the north American text, wherein 20 people were killed.

im hard pressed to believe if the church had burned/hung hundreds of thousands of suspected witches, or even just many thousands for that matter, that that wouldn't appear in classically used texts.

as for the rest of the material at "truth be known"---id have to look more carefully.


Wow, you're ignorant.

Mathew 5:30
And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better to lose a part of your body than to have your whole body go to hell.

Combine this with the concept of damnation or at best purgatory for non-Christians and you have the logic of the crusades

This is a paraphrase of the Qu'ran, but more or less "to murder an innocent is to murder the whole world". It might be humanity but it carries the message.

Three acceptable methods methods of dealing with someone who murdered your brother. The lowest form is to demand life for life. A better form is to accept a monetary value as compensation. The highest form is forgiveness. The last characterizes the teachings of Jesus,the most quoted profit in the Qu'ran, where as the first two characterizes the actions of the Catholic Church

Both Christianity and Islam have been contorted to support violence

Jesus knowledgably taught tolerance. You spread ignorant hate

< Message edited by DominantWrestler -- 1/28/2016 9:47:14 AM >

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 324
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 9:50:07 AM   
DominantWrestler


Posts: 338
Joined: 7/4/2010
Status: offline
As for the state interfering with religion, you know what ISIS stands for?

(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 325
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 9:53:43 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
I have absolutely no problem saying that there has been significant bloodshed however your figures are a bit ... misleading.

A. In 632, Egypt, Palestine, Asia minor, North AFrica, spain france, italy, sicily, sardinia and corsica were all christian. Most of persia was nestorian christian.

By 732 muslims killed or captured 2/3 of the christian world - all those places mentioned. So while there were significant casualties, when the christians defended or counter attacked, well self defense is pretty much universally accepted principle.

The five biggest christian sees - Jerusalem, Alexandria, Antioch, Rome and Constaninople 4 of them were captured by muslims. The first crusade was based on Alexois's attempt to save the Byzantine empire.

In comparison - how many times have christians attacked the two sites of islam - mecca and medina?
None.

B. Your cite is certainly not scholarly, nor objective. Calling Innocent the III the greatest mass murderer pre Nazi - is factually not anywhere close to accurate. Timurlane killed 15 million nestorians, for example. So it exposes a significant bias, and lack of objectivity.


C. Massacres are bad. Period. But if you look at many of the massacres you mention, such as occurred in the crusades - the people responsible for them were punished and prosecuted.

D. Many of the events you outline as motivated by christianity are more properly described as motivated by nationalism, personal ambition etc. Henry VIII murdered Thomas a Becket. But that is hardly a murder caused by Christianity.

E. Your figure of 20 million dead for the other crusades revisits point B. No scholar has ever suggest that total casualties for the crusades were less than a million, nor more than 9 million.
Robertson - 9m
Aletheia - 5M
Elson 5M
Garrison - 3M
Prince - 2M
Wertham - 1M
Hittel - 1 M

In aggregate, examininig sources, the best estimates are 3 Million - which are far cry from your sources more than 20 million.

But even if we accept the rest of your figures as true your total is less than 5 million people. Compared to the over 200 million people I documented previously - and I left out a lot of muslim atrocities - such as the aforementioned timerlane, who killed 15 million nestorians and 35 million people alone.

5 million vs more than 235 million.

I think my points still stand.

a) Islam far outstrips Christianity as a violent religion.
b). Islam directly calls for the murder of non believers; agrees with the practice of deception. As such it has spawned groups whose purpose was to murder, steal, assasinate. While there have been christians who have done the same, it has never been theologically according to doctrine.


(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 326
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 9:56:23 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
have said this before, and it bears repeating:

much of the heinousness done in the name of Christianity in times past had to do with the unholy marriage of church and state and the influence of the state on the church, or vice versa.

more importantly, when Christians kill seemingly "indiscriminately" (as opposed to in self defense, or in the context of war) they are not acting consistent with the tenets of their faith. the same cannot be said for islam.

Which is why most of the christian world has indeed separated the "state" from the "church" for law-making.
It started here when our 'enry told the pope to go swivel and setup the 'Church of England' loosely based on the Lutherans of Germany.

The most notable exceptions are the US and Islamic nations.




i'll agree partially on that...but its less about the church not having some influence when it comes to law creating, and more about the church and the state being in complete overlap with each other.



Not so much in other non-US nations tho.
The Islamic states and the US have a massive overlap to such an extent that for many laws and statutes, the predominant religion rules over the 'state' or the state laws are in fact in co-habitation with the religion.
Within Islamic nations, the law is just an extension of the religion; some more strict than others.

Even the US pledge of allegiance (1892) states "...one Nation under God..." was written by Francis Bellamy (1855-1931), a Baptist minister.
Heck, even your currency notes have "In God We Trust" written on them!
Not many christian countries have such a tie-in with a single religion like the US does.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 327
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 10:01:23 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler

Wow, you're ignorant.

Mathew 5:30
And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better to lose a part of your body than to have your whole body go to hell.

Jesus knowledgably taught tolerance. You spread ignorant hate


sorry sporto---the admonition in matthew speaks to the individual hearing it. its not an admonition for how one person treats another. so to put it more plainly since you don't read very well---matthew 5:30 does not give me the biblical justification to kill someone else if they are "sinning."

other than that, forgive me if I wasn't following whatever other possible point you were trying to make with that scripture. its hard to keep up with your rambling.

as for "spreading ignorant hate"---well, you'll just have to be a little bit more specific, especially in light of the quranic references in freedoms post #322 now wont you?

am quite curious too, how that's "intolerant"---which by the way, I defy you to show is some universal and absolute trait jesus taught.

help me out too please---does calling someone "ignorant" qualify under the "tolerance" rubric?

so you've got plenty to do...

oh, and rape in Albania.




< Message edited by bounty44 -- 1/28/2016 10:24:11 AM >

(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 328
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 10:13:16 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
ja, lets talk fairy tales.

Like trump as president, or any nutsucker for that matter.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 329
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 10:14:32 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:


And yet it clearly states in the Qur'an to kill all infidels.
Not by fables or stories, it is one of their main tenets, like one of our ten commandments.
This is their holy book that defines their religion, culture and lifestyle.

For those that do not follow the holy book is to turn their back on Islam: punishable by death.


So what are you saying, then - that, since the vast majority of Muslims don't kill infidels - this vast majority of Muslims aren't actually Muslim at all?

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 330
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 10:17:48 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
have said this before, and it bears repeating:

much of the heinousness done in the name of Christianity in times past had to do with the unholy marriage of church and state and the influence of the state on the church, or vice versa.

more importantly, when Christians kill seemingly "indiscriminately" (as opposed to in self defense, or in the context of war) they are not acting consistent with the tenets of their faith. the same cannot be said for islam.

Which is why most of the christian world has indeed separated the "state" from the "church" for law-making.
It started here when our 'enry told the pope to go swivel and setup the 'Church of England' loosely based on the Lutherans of Germany.

The most notable exceptions are the US and Islamic nations.




i'll agree partially on that...but its less about the church not having some influence when it comes to law creating, and more about the church and the state being in complete overlap with each other.



Not so much in other non-US nations tho.
The Islamic states and the US have a massive overlap to such an extent that for many laws and statutes, the predominant religion rules over the 'state' or the state laws are in fact in co-habitation with the religion.
Within Islamic nations, the law is just an extension of the religion; some more strict than others.

Even the US pledge of allegiance (1892) states "...one Nation under God..." was written by Francis Bellamy (1855-1931), a Baptist minister.
Heck, even your currency notes have "In God We Trust" written on them!
Not many christian countries have such a tie-in with a single religion like the US does.



sure, and again, i'll partially agree with you...but all that really speaks to is the Christian influence on the government, not the government being in bed with the church. however, to backtrack a little on my use of the term "Christian" in this regard, mention and belief in "god" is not evidence of a preferential treatment of any one sect of Christianity, nor for that matter, even a sole compass pointing towards Christianity in particular or religion in general.

as to the first part of your post---yes---and its my contention that is what islam wants for the world.

people can either legitimately examine that, or resort, like so many lefties do, to calling people who believe that "islamophobes" (as you mention below to phydeaux).


< Message edited by bounty44 -- 1/28/2016 10:30:45 AM >

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 331
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 10:18:27 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
a) Islam far outstrips Christianity as a violent religion.
b). Islam directly calls for the murder of non believers; agrees with the practice of deception. As such it has spawned groups whose purpose was to murder, steal, assasinate. While there have been christians who have done the same, it has never been theologically according to doctrine.

Those figures aren't mine - just taken from some random website that answered your questions.

I don't dispute that Islam is far more murderous than anything christians have done, now or previously.
I also agree that Islam's doctrine is at fault and those that won't see it for what it is are blinded by modern rhetoric.

People, including our very own misguided politicians, cannot see the Islamic faith for the murderous slime-balls they are.
Those that join Jihadi organisations and other extremists are just following Islam as it is written.
They aren't 'radicalised', they realise that Islam and 'the west' are just incompatible lifestyles.
That's not being an islamaphobe, that's telling it how it is without all the cotton-wool and sugar coating.

Even in those western countries they live in, they still hanker and want Islamic-style rules and laws.
They aren't content in getting out of the shit-hole they left behind for a better life in the west, they want to bring it with them.
They clearly don't believe in "when in Rome..."


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 332
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 10:23:28 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


And yet it clearly states in the Qur'an to kill all infidels.
Not by fables or stories, it is one of their main tenets, like one of our ten commandments.
This is their holy book that defines their religion, culture and lifestyle.

For those that do not follow the holy book is to turn their back on Islam: punishable by death.


So what are you saying, then - that, since the vast majority of Muslims don't kill infidels - this vast majority of Muslims aren't actually Muslim at all?


peon, though I don't think you are asking the question rightly (however, the muslims in isis might agree with it), isn't this been something we (not you and I specifically) have talked about on the forums before---that is, the interpretation of the quran. the folks in Syria and the terrorists and those who support them seem to wholeheartedly believe they are acting in accordance with what they are reading and being taught. the non-violent disagree.




(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 333
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 10:39:19 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
sure, and again, i'll partially agree with you...but all that really speaks to is the Christian influence on the government, not the government being in bed with the church. however, to backtrack a little on my use of the term "Christian" in this regard, mention and belief in "god" is not evidence of a preferential treatment of any one sect of Christianity, nor for that matter, even a sole compass pointing towards Christianity in particular or religion in general.

Ok, let's examine that a little....

Does the US (or any 'christian' country in the west, including us) acknowledge the marriage and divorce rituals of anything that is not specifically western christian (protestant or catholic)??? No.
Does the US (or any 'christian' country in the west) acknowledge the peculiar/specific laws that govern non-christian beliefs?? No.

Sure, they are free to practice their religion, but anything specific that clashes with western 'christian' rules or laws are either outlawed or not recognised.

I can have my Pagan wedding and the Chinese/Islamics/Indians/Tibetans/Eskimos etc can have their various ceremonies, but they aren't legally recognised unless they have some very specific (exclusively christian) phrases as part of it and usually only in specifically designated/authorised places and performed by authorised (usually christian) people.

Those restrictions are very specifically christian and christian-based.
The fact that your Oath of Allegiance was written by a baptist monk whose religious words are still embodied in the text and on your currency is just one such legacy of direct christian influence where "god" is directly meant and inferred as that ethereal 'holy being'.

I think that pretty much whitewashes your assertion that it is "...not evidence of a preferential treatment of any one sect of Christianity, nor for that matter, even a sole compass pointing towards Christianity in particular or religion in general"

_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 334
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 10:39:30 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

have said this before, and it bears repeating:

much of the heinousness done in the name of Christianity in times past had to do with the unholy marriage of church and state and the influence of the state on the church, or vice versa.

more importantly, when Christians kill seemingly "indiscriminately" (as opposed to in self defense, or in the context of war) they are not acting consistent with the tenets of their faith. the same cannot be said for islam.

and given that, its more than likely that the people doing the actual killing in some, if not most cases, were not themselves Christians.

while im here---im extremely skeptical of the number into the hundreds of thousands concerning witch burning.

the website itself says:"The total number of victims was probably between 50,000 and 100,000"

im still skeptical. the website provided does not really document anything nor are any of its claims specifically referenced.

I cannot watch video, so I cant speak to the video link provided, but this link: http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/ ...goes nowhere.

the cornell link merely takes you to a front page where the very large cornell collection is described. there is no information there specific to what the website is claiming.

in those regards, the websites extremely poor and wouldn't pass muster at a high school level.

at the same time, ive got three Christian history books---two for the church at large and one for north America. ~1800 pages of people, places and things and the only mention of witches are the salem trials in the north American text, wherein 20 people were killed.

im hard pressed to believe if the church had burned/hung hundreds of thousands of suspected witches, or even just many thousands for that matter, that that wouldn't appear in classically used texts.

as for the rest of the material at "truth be known"---id have to look more carefully.


Wow, you're ignorant.

Mathew 5:30
And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better to lose a part of your body than to have your whole body go to hell.

Combine this with the concept of damnation or at best purgatory for non-Christians and you have the logic of the crusades

This is a paraphrase of the Qu'ran, but more or less "to murder an innocent is to murder the whole world". It might be humanity but it carries the message.

Three acceptable methods methods of dealing with someone who murdered your brother. The lowest form is to demand life for life. A better form is to accept a monetary value as compensation. The highest form is forgiveness. The last characterizes the teachings of Jesus,the most quoted profit in the Qu'ran, where as the first two characterizes the actions of the Catholic Church

Both Christianity and Islam have been contorted to support violence

Jesus knowledgably taught tolerance. You spread ignorant hate


Wow, you're ignorant.

1. Jesus taught in parables, to make spiritual points. And he used the more than two dozen rabbinical forms to make a point. People today do not recognize these stylized ways of arguing or making a point, but people at the time did.

The point of Mathew 5:30 has never been to teach people to cut their hands off, nor pluck their eyes. The point, paraphrased, is "Recognize the value of eternal things; don’t be derailed by temporal and physical distractions."

Second, the idea that virtuous pagans are doomed to hell is not now, nor ever has been christian doctrine. Longstanding tradition was codified at the council of trent, c.1545. For example, Thomas Aquinas c 1250 wrote extensively in this area.

2. Re: To murder an innocent...

Mohammed said many contradictory things. To resolve them, Islamic doctrine is that the last thing mohammed said on a subject is authoritative.


as for "to murder an innocent is to murder the whole world" - that is quite a lie. Lets quote the actual verse, shall we?

Kuran 5:32ff: "On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone slew a person - unless it be in retaliation for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew all mankind: and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all humanity. The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter; Except for those who repent before they fall into your power: in that case, know that Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful."

So lets break that down.

We ordained for the children of Israel - aka for the jews, that if they slew a person it would be as if he slew all mankind; if he saved a life, as if he saved all of humanity. This says nothing about prescriptions for muslims - but the following verses do. Making mischief in the land was speaking against islam, or waging war against islam. The penalty for which: death, crucifiction or maiming, etc.

So lets quote a few more verses from your religion of peace, this is an abrogated list. More than 254 similar exhortations can be found in the koran and hadiths.

Bukhari (52:177) - Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."

Tabari 7:97 The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the Prophet declared, "Kill any Jew who falls under your power." Ashraf was a poet, killed by Muhammad's men because he insulted Islam. Here, Muhammad widens the scope of his orders to kill. An innocent Jewish businessman was then slain by his Muslim partner, merely for being non-Musli

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..."

Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..." Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 484: - “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.’”

Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush


Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing...
but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.

Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward." The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers

Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home).Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward "

Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority". This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').


Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."

Muslim (1:149) - "Abu Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of Allah, which of the deeds is the best? He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Belief in Allah and Jihad in His cause..."

Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."

Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."

Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth

Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"

Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination." Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.

Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction." Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction." (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).

Quran (18:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude." He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son. (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia. Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).)

Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..." "Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context. It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.

Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter." This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.

Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost." Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad. The wounded are to be held captive for ransom. The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test.

Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom."


Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way" Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "battle array" meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict. This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist." (See next verse, below). Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.

Quran (61:10-12) - "O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of'Adn- Eternity ['Adn(Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success." This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above). It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.

Bukhari (52:220) - Allah's Apostle said... 'I have been made victorious with terror'

Muslim (1:33) - the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah

Bukhari (52:73) - "Allah's Apostle said, 'Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords'.

Muslim (20:4696) - "the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: 'One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihad died the death of a hypocrite.'"


Saifur Rahman, The Sealed Nectar p.227-228 - "Embrace Islam... If you two accept Islam, you will remain in command of your country; but if your refuse my Call, you’ve got to remember that all of your possessions are perishable. My horsemen will appropriate your land, and my Prophethood will assume preponderance over your kingship." One of several letters from Muhammad to rulers of other countries. The significance is that the recipients were not making war or threatening Muslims. Their subsequent defeat and subjugation by Muhammad's armies was justified merely on the basis of their unbelief.

One of the most respected Sunni theologians is al-Qaradawi, who justifies terror attacks against Western targets by noting that there is no such thing as a civilian population in a time of war:"It has been determined by Islamic law that the blood and property of people of Dar Al—Harb [ie. non-Muslim people who resist Islamic conquest] is not protected... In modern war, all of society, with all its classes and ethnic groups, is mobilized to participate in the war, to aid its continuation, and to provide it with the material and human fuel required for it to assure the victory of the state fighting its enemies. Every citizen in society must take upon himself a role in the effort to provide for the battle. The entire domestic front, including professionals, laborers, and industrialists, stands behind the fighting army, even if it does not bear arms."


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In short: you twist 1 verse make islam look like a religion of peace while ignoring literally hundreds of verses to the contrary.

Christianity is short and to the point: In verse after verse it says, to paraphrase 'turn the other cheek", blessed are the meek. There is no way you can make christianity out to be a religion of violence.

The same is NOT true of Islam.

(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 335
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 10:47:36 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
sure, and again, i'll partially agree with you...but all that really speaks to is the Christian influence on the government, not the government being in bed with the church. however, to backtrack a little on my use of the term "Christian" in this regard, mention and belief in "god" is not evidence of a preferential treatment of any one sect of Christianity, nor for that matter, even a sole compass pointing towards Christianity in particular or religion in general.

Ok, let's examine that a little....

Does the US (or any 'christian' country in the west, including us) acknowledge the marriage and divorce rituals of anything that is not specifically western christian (protestant or catholic)??? No.

Simply wrong. The ability of any faith to do marriages is recognized.. I didn't go through all of them - but you are welcome to. https://theamm.org/marriage-laws/

Alabama: (3) before or in any religious organization or congregation according to the established ritual or form commonly practiced in the organization or congregation.


Arizona: B. For the purposes of this section, "licensed or ordained clergymen" includes ministers, elders or other persons who by the customs, rules and regulations of a religious society or sect are authorized or permitted to solemnize marriages or to officiate at marriage ceremonies.

Arkansas: (5) Any regularly ordained minister or priest of any religious sect or denomination;




< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 1/28/2016 10:48:15 AM >

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 336
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 10:48:48 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


And yet it clearly states in the Qur'an to kill all infidels.
Not by fables or stories, it is one of their main tenets, like one of our ten commandments.
This is their holy book that defines their religion, culture and lifestyle.

For those that do not follow the holy book is to turn their back on Islam: punishable by death.


So what are you saying, then - that, since the vast majority of Muslims don't kill infidels - this vast majority of Muslims aren't actually Muslim at all?


peon, though I don't think you are asking the question rightly (however, the muslims in isis might agree with it), isn't this been something we (not you and I specifically) have talked about on the forums before---that is, the interpretation of the quran. the folks in Syria and the terrorists and those who support them seem to wholeheartedly believe they are acting in accordance with what they are reading and being taught. the non-violent disagree.






Thanks for suggesting a different question, FD, but I'm happy with my original question as it stands. This is because I'm concerned with the majority of Muslims, rather than a minority of fundamentalists and extremists.

Thus: if killing infidels is so central to Islam - is that vast majority of Muslims who don't kill infidels not actually Muslim at all, in your view?

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 337
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 10:53:25 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


And yet it clearly states in the Qur'an to kill all infidels.
Not by fables or stories, it is one of their main tenets, like one of our ten commandments.
This is their holy book that defines their religion, culture and lifestyle.

For those that do not follow the holy book is to turn their back on Islam: punishable by death.


So what are you saying, then - that, since the vast majority of Muslims don't kill infidels - this vast majority of Muslims aren't actually Muslim at all?


peon, though I don't think you are asking the question rightly (however, the muslims in isis might agree with it), isn't this been something we (not you and I specifically) have talked about on the forums before---that is, the interpretation of the quran. the folks in Syria and the terrorists and those who support them seem to wholeheartedly believe they are acting in accordance with what they are reading and being taught. the non-violent disagree.






Thanks for suggesting a different question, FD, but I'm happy with my original question as it stands. This is because I'm concerned with the majority of Muslims, rather than a minority of fundamentalists and extremists.

Thus: if killing infidels is so central to Islam - is that vast majority of Muslims who don't kill infidels not actually Muslim at all, in your view?



Muslim jurisprudence exhorts believers to jihad - it is the greatest good act a muslim can do, better than giving alms, caring for the poor, etc. Unless one has a reason (blind, lame) those that do not commit jihad will be inferior in paradise.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 338
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 11:05:54 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
your question presumes people outside the muslim world have the insider knowledge to determine who is, and who isn't a muslim. we don't. or at least I don't. that's why im saying its not a right question.

as for me personally, my answer is hidden above, but to be more plain, no I wouldn't say that of a person but that position mostly comes from a lack of knowledge of islam. ive never looked at my muslim friends and thought hey, unless you kill me you must not really be a muslim. or alternatively, since you are not trying to kill me, your faith is somehow less than those who want to kill me (figuratively speaking that is), but some muslims might disagree with that. they, and a few scholarly others, are the arbiters of that.

there's a rough and more easily understood parallel in Catholicism where people go to the catholic church on the corner, and yet disagree with catholic doctrine in deed and thought to the point where one might ask, how are you even catholic any more? if it becomes egregious, they are thrown out of the church and are no longer "catholic", at least in the roman catholic sense of the word.



< Message edited by bounty44 -- 1/28/2016 11:11:09 AM >

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 339
RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Enterin... - 1/28/2016 11:08:23 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


And yet it clearly states in the Qur'an to kill all infidels.
Not by fables or stories, it is one of their main tenets, like one of our ten commandments.
This is their holy book that defines their religion, culture and lifestyle.

For those that do not follow the holy book is to turn their back on Islam: punishable by death.


So what are you saying, then - that, since the vast majority of Muslims don't kill infidels - this vast majority of Muslims aren't actually Muslim at all?

From a purely Islamic point of view, No, they aren't.
And according to their most holy book, the very thing that they must learn by heart and recite daily otherwise they are considered lacking, they are no more than 'hypocrites' and Allah will send them to 'hell'.



quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


And yet it clearly states in the Qur'an to kill all infidels.
Not by fables or stories, it is one of their main tenets, like one of our ten commandments.
This is their holy book that defines their religion, culture and lifestyle.

For those that do not follow the holy book is to turn their back on Islam: punishable by death.


So what are you saying, then - that, since the vast majority of Muslims don't kill infidels - this vast majority of Muslims aren't actually Muslim at all?


peon, though I don't think you are asking the question rightly (however, the muslims in isis might agree with it), isn't this been something we (not you and I specifically) have talked about on the forums before---that is, the interpretation of the quran. the folks in Syria and the terrorists and those who support them seem to wholeheartedly believe they are acting in accordance with what they are reading and being taught. the non-violent disagree.






Thanks for suggesting a different question, FD, but I'm happy with my original question as it stands. This is because I'm concerned with the majority of Muslims, rather than a minority of fundamentalists and extremists.

Thus: if killing infidels is so central to Islam - is that vast majority of Muslims who don't kill infidels not actually Muslim at all, in your view?

I didn't suggest a different question Peon; that accolade belongs to Bounty.

But to answer your question directly, I utterly and sincerely agree that those who do not follow their religious tenets to the letter make them no better than heretics who pick and choose which bits they want to follow.
But in defense, I would apply that to all faiths, not just Islamics.

If a vast number of Islamics care to reject parts of Islam but embrace other parts, they are not true Islamics IMHO.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 340
Page:   <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125