RE: Unreasonable?

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Unreasonable?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Unreasonable?

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 3:24:49 AM

thishereboi

Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
Trying to set a numerical value in dollars for the responsibility each person could never be done fairly even if it were to be possible, which it is not, in today’s political climate.

And, here's the real kicker, I know my family didn't participate in slavery in the US. My lineage didn't get here until the 1900's. And, we started in Jersey, and slowly moved West. I should't owe anyone anything for past slavery/racism.

My dad's side didn't get here until the late 1920's so that sides safe and according to my mother's dad, their ancestors helped slaves escape through the underground railroad so they should be good also. If anything we might even be owed some trainfare but that's another thread.

but even with that said, if the professor is really hurting for cash, I have no problem sending him all my unearned money. I just hope he's not expecting much as I don't often find money just sitting on the ground.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert

This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Post #: 41

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 4:00:34 AM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Being ¼ Cherokee, I think all y'all mua-fuckers owe me some scratch.

If that were true you would be getting a check...since you claim not to be getting a check it is clearly you lying again. Just another bozo making shit up again.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)

Post #: 42

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 4:03:39 AM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

My dad's side didn't get here until the late 1920's so that sides safe and according to my mother's dad, their ancestors helped slaves escape through the underground railroad so they should be good also. If anything we might even be owed some trainfare but that's another thread.

but even with that said, if the professor is really hurting for cash, I have no problem sending him all my unearned money. I just hope he's not expecting much as I don't often find money just sitting on the ground.

As usual you are talking out of your ass. Perhaps if you were to actually do some reading about this subject your post would not seem so stupid. You wont because you seem to like looking foolish.

(in reply to thishereboi)

Post #: 43

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 4:16:26 AM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Lincoln had the right idea, ship the motherfuckers back to Africa and let them get eaten by lions or tigers n shit.

Once lincoln was made aware of how stupid the idea was he stopped pimping it.
Only a dumbass would believe that tigers live in africa except in the zoo.

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Post #: 44

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 5:18:23 AM

lovmuffin

Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

for those of who don't speak your particular brand of brain damage, maybe you could please provide definitions of "felching" and more importantly "nutsucker?" you know, so us less vile people can follow along...

The best I can tell from all the descriptions attributed to nutsuckers is they are liberal Democrats.

_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to bounty44)

Post #: 45

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 6:00:57 AM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

an interesting irony in the moniker also---to use the phrase as a derogation given we're on a kinky site where one can presume everyone's accepting of "alternative" lifestyles?

that's almost like going to some mainstream forum and seeing "the wife-kissers who write blogs are picked up by wife-kissers who wife-kiss and are shared by wife-kissers for more wife-kissing."

one wonders how the pc folks here aren't all over him for that? well, not really...since he's a fellow comrade...

also gotta love the (warped) thinking of "if its not in the ny times or on msnbc, 'it didn't happen.'"

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 12/22/2015 6:28:51 AM >

(in reply to lovmuffin)

Post #: 46

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 6:32:15 AM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

by the way, here are some of the article titles from the fellow in question:

Cultural Competency, Race, and Skin Tone Bias Among Pharmacy, Nursing, and Medical Students: Implications for Addressing Health Disparities

The Multilevel, Multicultural, and Multi-temporal Ecosocial Framework of Population Health: How Neighborhoods, Culture, and History Impact Health Outcomes and Produce Health Disparities (Dissertation)

Down to the Wire: Displacement and Disinvestment in Baltimore City (The 2015 State of Black Baltimore)

Failing Our Children: Racial Disparities in Academic Performance and Disproportionate Spending in the West Memphis School District (report)

Collective Punishment Reveals White Supremacist Theology (article in The Journal of Southern Religion)

and the one very germane to the op:

Historical Trauma, Colonizing Capitalism, and Systemic Racism: Addressing the Damage Caused by Serial Forced Displacement

(in reply to bounty44)

Post #: 47

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 7:48:21 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

an interesting irony in the moniker also---to use the phrase as a derogation given we're on a kinky site where one can presume everyone's accepting of "alternative" lifestyles?

that's almost like going to some mainstream forum and seeing "the wife-kissers who write blogs are picked up by wife-kissers who wife-kiss and are shared by wife-kissers for more wife-kissing."

one wonders how the pc folks here aren't all over him for that? well, not really...since he's a fellow comrade...

also gotta love the (warped) thinking of "if its not in the ny times or on msnbc, 'it didn't happen.'"

How is it derogation, nutsuckers named themselves?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to bounty44)

Post #: 48

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 7:55:07 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

an interesting irony in the moniker also---to use the phrase as a derogation given we're on a kinky site where one can presume everyone's accepting of "alternative" lifestyles?

that's almost like going to some mainstream forum and seeing "the wife-kissers who write blogs are picked up by wife-kissers who wife-kiss and are shared by wife-kissers for more wife-kissing."

one wonders how the pc folks here aren't all over him for that? well, not really...since he's a fellow comrade...

also gotta love the (warped) thinking of "if its not in the ny times or on msnbc, 'it didn't happen.'"

nutsuckers felching their strawmen and propaganda in fine fettle, from the OP and all nutsucker slobberblogs which have never been correct, to their corporate catamitism, and teabagging the Kochs.

Again, toiletlickers can impugn and innuendo, but cannot provide a fact.

They twerk their little tongues in the nutsucker slobberbloggers asses. But cannot show one instance since the days of St. Wrinklemeat where anything they have idolized has been proven as fact.

The magical night is drawing near when the nutsuckers can perform their arts in the minneapolis airport bathroom to honor their founding asses.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to bounty44)

Post #: 49

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 7:56:07 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

for those of who don't speak your particular brand of brain damage, maybe you could please provide definitions of "felching" and more importantly "nutsucker?" you know, so us less vile people can follow along...

The best I can tell from all the descriptions attributed to nutsuckers is they are liberal Democrats.

Still untutored and unable to comprehend the simplest of concepts, I see.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to lovmuffin)

Post #: 50

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 8:58:44 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

for those of who don't speak your particular brand of brain damage, maybe you could please provide definitions of "felching" and more importantly "nutsucker?" you know, so us less vile people can follow along...

The best I can tell from all the descriptions attributed to nutsuckers is they are liberal Democrats.

It would appear the vile toiletlicking and brain damaged nutsuckers are the problem here, and you know who you are. If contards cannot follow along or use dictionary services, to offset their lack of intellect, then they will have to sit in the pants they have shit in, and continue whining as they always have. Fuck em.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 12/22/2015 9:01:46 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to lovmuffin)

Post #: 51

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 9:26:54 AM

lovmuffin

Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

for those of who don't speak your particular brand of brain damage, maybe you could please provide definitions of "felching" and more importantly "nutsucker?" you know, so us less vile people can follow along...

The best I can tell from all the descriptions attributed to nutsuckers is they are liberal Democrats.

It would appear the vile toiletlicking and brain damaged nutsuckers are the problem here, and you know who you are. If contards cannot follow along or use dictionary services, to offset their lack of intellect, then they will have to sit in the pants they have shit in, and continue whining as they always have. Fuck em.

It would appear that I was correct, nutsucker does mean liberal Democrat.

_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 52

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 9:29:44 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

It would not only appear not, it would be not. There is much to say in the negative regarding liberal democrats, but nutsuckers are the threat to America.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 12/22/2015 9:30:37 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to lovmuffin)

Post #: 53

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 4:38:55 PM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

And, here's the real kicker, I know my family didn't participate in slavery in the US. My lineage didn't get here until the 1900's.

Did your ancestors build the port they landed at?

And, we started in Jersey, and slowly moved West.

Did your ancestors build the roads that they traveled west on?

I should't owe anyone anything for past slavery/racism.

Of course not, you just like the slavers ,deserved the labor of those who were enslaved. How could you owe anyone anything for what you feel entitled to?

< Message edited by thompsonx -- 12/22/2015 4:39:58 PM >

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Post #: 54

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 10:03:51 PM

Kirata

Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

nutsuckers are the threat to America.

Are you making fun of other people's kinks again?

K.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 55

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/22/2015 10:17:22 PM

Kirata

Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

And, here's the real kicker, I know my family didn't participate in slavery in the US. My lineage didn't get here until the 1900's.

Did your ancestors build the port they landed at?

And, we started in Jersey, and slowly moved West.

Did your ancestors build the roads that they traveled west on?

I should't owe anyone anything for past slavery/racism.

Of course not, you just like the slavers ,deserved the labor of those who were enslaved. How could you owe anyone anything for what you feel entitled to?

If his ancestors built those ports and roads (presumably by magic, since they weren't in America) then those ports and roads weren't built with "the labor of those who were enslaved." Think of it as an intelligence test.

K.

(in reply to thompsonx)

Post #: 56

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/23/2015 3:49:09 AM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Kirata

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

And, here's the real kicker, I know my family didn't participate in slavery in the US. My lineage didn't get here until the 1900's.

Did your ancestors build the port they landed at?

And, we started in Jersey, and slowly moved West.

Did your ancestors build the roads that they traveled west on?

I should't owe anyone anything for past slavery/racism.

Of course not, you just like the slavers ,deserved the labor of those who were enslaved. How could you owe anyone anything for what you feel entitled to?

If his ancestors built those ports and roads (presumably by magic, since they weren't in America) then those ports and roads weren't built with "the labor of those who were enslaved." Think of it as an intelligence test.

What was the tax base of amerika from 1789 until 1861? Think of this as an intelligence test for racist bigots

(in reply to Kirata)

Post #: 57

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/23/2015 4:41:56 AM

Kirata

Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Think of this as an intelligence test for racist bigots

Well that leaves me out. Why don't you take it?

K.

(in reply to thompsonx)

Post #: 58

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/23/2015 5:19:37 AM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Kirata

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Think of this as an intelligence test for racist bigots

Well that leaves me out. Why don't you take it?

Since you do not feel qualified by intelligence how about logic?

(in reply to Kirata)

Post #: 59

RE: Unreasonable? - 12/23/2015 7:05:40 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

nutsuckers are the threat to America.

Are you making fun of other people's kinks again?

K.

I am pleading with them to embrace it. Be honest about it. Be factual about it.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Kirata)

Post #: 60

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Unreasonable?

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.109