Phydeaux
Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
I wonder how a discussion on Israeli attempts to subvert the US democratic process has ended up talking about alleged Iranian terrorism.
Diversion tactics anyone?
Why is it that those who feel the need to defend Israel's activities in this matter also feel the need to divert discussion on those activities towards a tangential area? Why is it that they never seem to be able to discuss some of Israel's darker activities directly but deny and obfuscate all the time, not to mention the wholesale abuse of their opponents?
Why is it that they seem unable or unwilling to discuss the relevant facts of the issue? Is it because truth is rarely on their side, that if the facts of the matter are known, the Zionist argument comes off second best? That seems to me to be the most obvious reason for their behaviour.
The diversion into Iranian terrorism was introduced by Termynator. I don't think you can, with a straight face, call him a Zionist.
The first mention of "Iranian terrorism" in this thread occurs in post # 8:
"It also seems likely that I know more about Iran's support for terrorism over the years." The author of post # 8 was Phydeaux. The introduction of the "Iranian terrorism" theme was part of your first contribution to the thread. So ....You introduced the diversion as part of a long series of boasts about your claims of superior knowledge and information on various ME- and nuclear related issues.
As you appear to have forgotten about your self proclaimed intellectual superiority only a mere two pages later, these claims seem to be as (un)reliable, as (in)credible and as (in)accurate as your memory .... and we just been shown how reliable,credible and accurate your memory is.
I find it odd that someone like you who supports Israeli attempts to subvert the US democratic process criticises others for their alleged anti-Americanism. As your contributions to this thread demonstrate, you have a long record of promoting foreign/Israeli interests over US interests. So it's pretty clear that, for you, US well being is secondary to that of a distant foreign nation whose policies are abhorred by most of the world. And that sounds and looks like a genuine de facto anti-Americanism to me.
Ah how lovely to get you panties in a twist.
You claim I diverted the conversation - and yet - the topic of the Iranian treaty continued to be discussed all the way through to termynators post on post 36. Which is when the topic switch to Iranian terrorism.
Now I'm sure you'd rather exclude Iranian terrorism from the discussion of the Iran deal, but fortunately a majority of americans find it rather relevant.
In fact terrorism is the number one concern of all americans at the moment - more specifically muslim terrorism.
I have zero record in promoting Israeli interest over US interests. I don't accept your ridiculous assertion that american and Israeli interests are not aligned.
Just like American interests include Al-Sissi, Jordan's King Abdullah, Abdullah Abdullah, and the kurds, and the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia. We have friendly relations with qatar, UAE - although these nations are problematic.
The United States has nothing in common with the terrorist PLO, Hezbollah, Hamas, al-nusra, The Muslim Brotherhood, or Iran. They are enemies who proclaim death to Israel, death to the united states at the drop of a hat - no doubt just like you have.
You want to continue trying to push the idea that the US has interests in with these movements and I'll be happy to continue to ridicule them. Your posts attacking the US, criticizing it are legion. So to be the object of your shrew tongue - well frankly I welcome it.
And I will continue to point out the idiocies of statements such as your post 49 in the Saudi and Iran thread
quote:
Maria B has posted a document listing about 50 countries "attacked by bombing sabotage or attempted government overthrow" by the US since 1945
which was entirely an Anti-American hit piece, where half the entries were the US supporting the nations of Kuwait, South Korea, Poland, etc at the invitation of those nations was listed as an attack.
You are transparently anti-american. You lie deliberately, and poorly. Sadly, while your kind of comments are accepted without challenge in whatever poisonous den you live in - here in a free forum they are open to debate and challenge. And I will happily invite people to compare how we conduct posts.
You assert I support the subversion of american democracy - I provide cited support that Iran has in fact supported terrorism; cited support that the US didn't attack Kuwait, or Poland, or the Phillipines (86).
So while your leftist screed may work in your leftist circles in Sydney - it won't play here in Peoria.
< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 1/10/2016 10:04:40 AM >
|
RE: Netanyahu bribed Republicans to kill Iran peace deal - 
Profile
.gif){kind=avatar}
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread