Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/12/2016 7:53:09 PM   
ifmaz


Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/now-oppose-assault-weapons-ban-doubts-stopping-lone/story?id=35778846

A majority of Americans oppose banning assault weapons for the first time in more than 20 years of ABC News/Washington Post polls, with the public expressing vast doubt that the authorities can prevent “lone wolf” terrorist attacks and a substantial sense that armed citizens can help.

Just 45 percent in this national survey favor an assault weapons ban, down 11 percentage points from an ABC/Post poll in 2013 and down from a peak of 80 percent in 1994. Fifty-three percent oppose such a ban, the most on record.

Indeed, while the division is a close one, Americans by 47-42 percent think that encouraging more people to carry guns legally is a better response to terrorism than enacting stricter gun control laws. Divisions across groups are vast, underscoring the nation’s gulf on gun issues.

There’s lopsided agreement on another concern: Just 22 percent express confidence in the government’s ability to prevent lone-wolf terrorist attacks, with 77 percent skeptical about it. Confidence in the government’s ability to stop a large-scale organized terrorist attack is much higher, albeit still well short of a majority -– 43 percent.

Personal fears about being victimized by a terrorist attack is not up –- it’s 42 percent now, vs. 49 percent in a Gallup poll last summer. But views on the government’s limitations, and on arming citizens, relate strongly to attitudes on banning assault weapons. Consider:

Among the roughly three-quarters of Americans who doubt the government’s ability to prevent a lone-wolf attack, 57 percent oppose banning assault weapons, vs. 41 percent in support. Those numbers are reversed among those who are more confident in government counterterrorism –- 56 percent favor banning such weapons, while 42 percent are opposed.
The split is even more striking between those who see stricter gun control as the better way to fight terrorism, vs. “encouraging more people to carry guns legally.” The former group divides 71-26 percent in favor of banning assault weapons. The latter group splits 22-77 percent, support-oppose.

The results of this survey, produced for ABC by Langer Research Associates, point to a shift away from the position favored by Barack Obama and others who responded to the recent attack in San Bernadino, California, by calling for stricter gun control measures. Notably, in a statistical analysis, Obama’s overall job approval rating is the single strongest factor in views on an assault weapons ban.

The president’s approval rating, as it happens, is not in great shape: 45 percent, down 6 points from October to match its low for the year, with 51 percent disapproving. He continues to get an even split on the economy, but 53 percent disapprove of his handling of the threat of terrorism, near his career high last month, and 59 percent disapprove of his handling specifically of the Islamic State terrorist group.
...


Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/12/2016 9:47:16 PM   
DominantWrestler


Posts: 338
Joined: 7/4/2010
Status: offline
So you're saying that before we had the Middle East muddied with republican lies, everyone knew assault weapons were unnecessary and now that fear has kicked in, it's a single digit difference?

And he still has a higher approval rating than bush

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/12/2016 10:10:58 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler

So you're saying that before we had the Middle East muddied with republican lies, everyone knew assault weapons were unnecessary and now that fear has kicked in, it's a single digit difference?

And he still has a higher approval rating than bush

No it means that people are starting to see through the Democratic lies about guns that look like assault rifles.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/12/2016 10:54:55 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler

So you're saying that before we had the Middle East muddied with republican lies, everyone knew assault weapons were unnecessary and now that fear has kicked in, it's a single digit difference?

And he still has a higher approval rating than bush

No it means that people are starting to see through the Democratic lies about guns that look like assault rifles.


Actually, its noting assault rifles, NOT, 'look alike' assault rifles. But after the next deadly mass shooting, people will shift once more towards what the Democrats are proposing. By limiting how firearms fall into the wrong hands can also reduce potential attacks. By allowing an easier access to firearms allows more potential 'lone wolves' to attack. Either way its ugly, but society will decide what it can and can not live with....

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/13/2016 12:35:46 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
yeah its funny .. 95% of all gun deaths are caused by handguns - but democrats want to ban assault rifles...

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/13/2016 3:30:19 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
quote:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/assault%20rifle

assault rifle

: any of various automatic or semiautomatic rifles with large capacity magazines designed for military use


I personally don't have much issue with the current system of regulating fully automatic (with or without selector switch) weapons as they currently exist. They are tracked, permitted, and regulated by the Fed.

Some want to ban weapons based upon their description. Like the Brown Bess, a flintlock rifle issued to the British Army and manufactured between 1722 and 1860 (all variants) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_Bess, because it has a bayonet lug https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon.

Weapons that are easily reloaded are often called assault weapons. I have heard individuals refer to the quick reload feature in some revolvers used by individuals and police referred to as assault weapons because they can be reloaded (with practice) in seconds. One such weapon is the .357 Magnum.

I have also heard individuals refer to any magazine holding more than one round (bullet) as high capacity. I cite the M1903 Springfield bolt action rifle as an example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1903_Springfield It has a 5 round internal magazine and can be loaded with a stripper clip https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stripper_clip

In short, there are so many definitions (based upon the individual's personal views) of what makes up an assault weapon, that there will probably never be good solid definitions of what an assault weapon and high capacity magazine are.

When I had an MK90 rifle, I had a 50 round drum magazine for it. It was fun to take out in the desert and shoot up engineer stakes with but it was awkward with that magazine to handle and would hate to use it in any form of combat situation. It also added a lot of weight which I felt was unnecessary and I got rid of both the weapon and magazines (all capacity from 5 to 50 rounds). I do enjoy shooting a 5 round internal magazine lever action rifle. Damned engineer stakes (my target of choice) don't stand a chance. I have only hunted with a bow. I never stood a chance of getting anything, but enjoyed the walk. All the deer got away without any problems. LOL

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/13/2016 9:30:04 AM   
DominantWrestler


Posts: 338
Joined: 7/4/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

yeah its funny .. 95% of all gun deaths are caused by handguns - but democrats want to ban assault rifles...


And not give hand guns to career criminals and the mentally disturbed. Imagine if basic instruction was needed to prevent all these parents from letting their kids get their hands. Spends 10 grand on new guns, won't spend 400 for a safe

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/13/2016 1:03:04 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler

So you're saying that before we had the Middle East muddied with republican lies, everyone knew assault weapons were unnecessary and now that fear has kicked in, it's a single digit difference?

And he still has a higher approval rating than bush

No it means that people are starting to see through the Democratic lies about guns that look like assault rifles.


Actually, its noting assault rifles, NOT, 'look alike' assault rifles. But after the next deadly mass shooting, people will shift once more towards what the Democrats are proposing. By limiting how firearms fall into the wrong hands can also reduce potential attacks. By allowing an easier access to firearms allows more potential 'lone wolves' to attack. Either way its ugly, but society will decide what it can and can not live with....

Name an assault rifle availiable without a massive background check.
Full auto is needed for it to be an assualt rifle none of these "laws" are aimed and full auto weapons, just semi auto.

Which is your contention based on, a lie or ignorance?

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/13/2016 1:06:47 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

yeah its funny .. 95% of all gun deaths are caused by handguns - but democrats want to ban assault rifles...


And not give hand guns to career criminals and the mentally disturbed. Imagine if basic instruction was needed to prevent all these parents from letting their kids get their hands. Spends 10 grand on new guns, won't spend 400 for a safe

Then why are firearm accidents the only household hazard which is getting safer?

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/13/2016 1:22:21 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Then why are firearm accidents the only household hazard which is getting safer?


Gawd, Bama. Only in the USA would that be something about which people would congratulate themselves.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/13/2016 1:30:51 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Then why are firearm accidents the only household hazard which is getting safer?


Gawd, Bama. Only in the USA would that be something about which people would congratulate themselves.

Gawd Peon I was correcting a lie that he believed. Note I said he believed a lie not that he had lied. The fact remains that of all the hazards in the home the one that is the least threat is firearms, particularly to children.
It is not that I am proud that the main threat improvement is in firearms, we should be making progress on all threats.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 1/13/2016 1:31:40 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/13/2016 1:56:51 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
The fact remains that of all the hazards in the home the one that is the least threat is firearms, particularly to children.


Good show. But guess how many gun accidents there have been in the home in Britain in the last half a century. Or anywhere else in Europe, or the English-speaking world, or even the advanced industrialised world, or even those countries the world over in which there isn't a war, or a civil war, going on.


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/13/2016 2:03:45 PM   
DominantWrestler


Posts: 338
Joined: 7/4/2010
Status: offline
Aren't most successful teenage suicides performed with guns

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/13/2016 2:40:19 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler

Aren't most successful teenage suicides performed with guns


Not in the UK or any other country that has a sane attitude towards guns, DW.


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/13/2016 2:48:48 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler

Aren't most successful teenage suicides performed with guns


Not in the UK or any other country that has a sane attitude towards guns, DW.


So you're happier if they jump out of windows?
Lack of guns does not = lack of suicide, see Japan.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/13/2016 5:54:29 PM   
ifmaz


Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

yeah its funny .. 95% of all gun deaths are caused by handguns - but democrats want to ban assault rifles...


And not give hand guns to career criminals and the mentally disturbed. Imagine if basic instruction was needed to prevent all these parents from letting their kids get their hands. Spends 10 grand on new guns, won't spend 400 for a safe


If the anti-rights advocates actually wanted to prevent firearm deaths, why not have a gun safe (which can run anywhere from $50 to several thousand) as a tax write-off? This would help prevent accidental deaths, including cases where children find a loaded firearm with tragic results. If gun owners are able to write off gun safes on their tax returns there's more incentive to purchase them.

After all, doesn't everyone care about safety?

(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/13/2016 8:47:50 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

yeah its funny .. 95% of all gun deaths are caused by handguns - but democrats want to ban assault rifles...


And not give hand guns to career criminals and the mentally disturbed. Imagine if basic instruction was needed to prevent all these parents from letting their kids get their hands. Spends 10 grand on new guns, won't spend 400 for a safe

While the media propoganda in Prom (Peoples Republic of MA) may say otherwise nobody, repeat nobody, wants to give career criminals and the mentally disturbed guns. Although Fast and Furious did see to it that career criminals got a over 1000 semi automatic rifles, still not assault weapons outside of gun grabber circles.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/13/2016 9:46:21 PM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz


quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

yeah its funny .. 95% of all gun deaths are caused by handguns - but democrats want to ban assault rifles...


And not give hand guns to career criminals and the mentally disturbed. Imagine if basic instruction was needed to prevent all these parents from letting their kids get their hands. Spends 10 grand on new guns, won't spend 400 for a safe


If the anti-rights advocates actually wanted to prevent firearm deaths, why not have a gun safe (which can run anywhere from $50 to several thousand) as a tax write-off? This would help prevent accidental deaths, including cases where children find a loaded firearm with tragic results. If gun owners are able to write off gun safes on their tax returns there's more incentive to purchase them.

After all, doesn't everyone care about safety?



Teaching gun safety in schools would go a long way toward preventing accidents too. The NRA, has a kids program that teaches young children not to touch guns they might find lying around and to go find an adult. But to answer your question. noooooooooooo, libs don't care about gun safety. They just want gun control.

_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/13/2016 10:09:47 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler

So you're saying that before we had the Middle East muddied with republican lies, everyone knew assault weapons were unnecessary and now that fear has kicked in, it's a single digit difference?

And he still has a higher approval rating than bush

No it means that people are starting to see through the Democratic lies about guns that look like assault rifles.


Actually, its noting assault rifles, NOT, 'look alike' assault rifles. But after the next deadly mass shooting, people will shift once more towards what the Democrats are proposing. By limiting how firearms fall into the wrong hands can also reduce potential attacks. By allowing an easier access to firearms allows more potential 'lone wolves' to attack. Either way its ugly, but society will decide what it can and can not live with....



quote:

as·sault ri·fle
noun
noun: assault rifle; plural noun: assault rifles

a rapid-fire, magazine-fed automatic rifle designed for infantry use.


No, what the ban concerns is semi-automatic magazine fed weapons built on an assault rifle frame.

Now of course, there are some talented shooters, who, after years of practice can squeeze off enough rounds in a semi automatic while changing magazines to come very close to the 600 or more rounds a minute that an actual assault rifle is capable of.


This is the bullshit that congress came up with:


Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:

Folding or telescoping stock
Pistol grip
Bayonet mount
Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
Grenade launcher mount <<<<< This one got me, since a grenade launcher is an NFA weapon needing a special permit,

Semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines and two or more of the following:

Magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip
Threaded barrel to attach barrel extender, flash suppressor, handgrip, or suppressor
Barrel shroud safety feature that prevents burns to the operator
Unloaded weight of 50 oz (1.4 kg) or more
A semi-automatic version of a fully automatic firearm.

Semi-automatic shotguns with two or more of the following:

Folding or telescoping stock
Pistol grip
Detachable magazine.

Bottom line, the law was bullshit, and the current idea for such a ban is even more bullshit.

All anyone has to do to keep selling the guns that jackasses want banned is to make a few cosmetic changes. Drop the pistol grip, put an enlarged stock with a place to put your thumb, does the same job and it is legal.

Remove the flash suppressor, big deal. Take off the bayonet lug, no problem.

There are firearms based on the AR15 out already with those changes.

Personally, I prefer my M1A to the my bushmaster (AR style rifle) larger caliber, longer range, and IMO a hell of a lot more accurate. After that, either of my model 70 bolt actions.

No, the jackasses are trying to figure out how to get one group of weapons so it is easier to ban another group.

Its a bullshit money wasting idea to try and stop gun related crimes.

But then, I am presently trying to run down a ww2, bolt action, magazine fed 20mm anti tank rifle that was made in Finland. Never know, might come in handy.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/14/2016 6:17:56 AM   
DominantWrestler


Posts: 338
Joined: 7/4/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

yeah its funny .. 95% of all gun deaths are caused by handguns - but democrats want to ban assault rifles...


And not give hand guns to career criminals and the mentally disturbed. Imagine if basic instruction was needed to prevent all these parents from letting their kids get their hands. Spends 10 grand on new guns, won't spend 400 for a safe

While the media propoganda in Prom (Peoples Republic of MA) may say otherwise nobody, repeat nobody, wants to give career criminals and the mentally disturbed guns. Although Fast and Furious did see to it that career criminals got a over 1000 semi automatic rifles, still not assault weapons outside of gun grabber circles.


That's what the gunshow loophole litigation that has been brought up several times in congress is about. As long as you don't believe a gun will be used for crime, a private seller can sell a firearm without a background check. Hence how criminals can be sold guns without being able to charge the gun seller. And gun control is about safety for many liberals, myself included. Most teenagers can only summon the courage to kill themselves with a gun. Hence the rate of cutting and such that doesn't end in death. I am not anti gun, just anti stupid. How many illiterate or borderline illiterate adults are there in Alabama that own a gun?

< Message edited by DominantWrestler -- 1/14/2016 6:19:11 AM >

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.156