UllrsIshtar -> RE: What does an honorable man do if he is not sexually satisfied in marriage? (2/5/2016 7:37:47 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: princessmika quote:
ORIGINAL: princessmika I disagree with your interpretation of my question. It's not "If you love me, you'll do __". It's literally, "What is your more important? Your wife or your sexual desire"? Based on this answer, a decision can and perhaps should be made. quote:
ORIGINAL: OsideGirl Okay, replace "Dominant" with "gay", would you ask him what's more important? Would you still suggest that if his wife is more important that giving up who he is would work? Absolutely, yes. Instead of "gay", I'd just say "What is more important? Your S/O or your sexual desire?" From there, work and progress can be made. I am not suggesting "giving up who he is". I've never said that. Instead, I asked for a clarity of his priorities to help him come to a decision. I think what Oside girl means, isn't "what if he's gay with a gay partner" but "what if he figured out he was gay (instead of dominant) after marrying her"? If he was a gay man, married to a straight woman, would you still as him if his wife, or his sexual desires, are more important, thereby implying that his sexual desires is something he ought to be able to just turn off? He's discovered, sadly after marrying her, that he is fundamentally sexually incompatible with her. Implying that he could somehow turn off his sexual desires, and be content with that for the next 60 years, is ludicrous in my book. Sexuality doesn't work that way. If they're incompatible enough so that she can't meet him halfway, at the same time he's meeting her halfway (and I'm not saying that she should be able to, she might not be able to do so either, because of her own sexuality) then they're doomed. Even if they can meet each other halfway, it might very well not be enough, for either of them.
|
|
|
|