SusanofO -> RE: Middle East, (7/20/2006 4:46:26 AM)
|
At the risk of sounding: 1) Uncaring, or like a 2) Generalizing bigot or an 3) Idiot - In Ireland, in the Middle East, (Israel & Palestine, and Iraqi tribal infighting (also in Pakistan and Iran), and in Africa (to name a few) - cultures have warred with eachother for centuries - centuries. Every once in awhile, there seems to be a lull in the violence, or a peace accord of some sort ,and the fighting stops for awhile. Then someone(s) tick the "other side" off and it all starts up again. I have to wonder if it occurs to only just me, that, after centuries - that if they wanted to stop fighting, they'd do that. Am I saying both sides are "wrong"? No. Am I saying they don't have "things" worth fighting for? No. I guess I am saying that if they wanted to not fight, they could figure out a way to get that done and co-exist peacefully. So far, it hasn't happened - it doesn't really seem to be (to me) for lack of trying. I wonder what the problem is. Bad habit? Ego fragility? Lack of conflict resolution skills? Hmmm. I am more scared of terrorists striking the U.S. again than anything - not because I am patriotic to a fault (although I do love my country), but because I live here, and I am scared that expecting any government that cannot seem to balance a checkbook, or find real reasons to begin a war, has no real clear idea what they are up to, and where they might strike next, within the U.S. As well as - how the U.S. would officially respond without starting WWIII, since we seem to have no clear policy on this that makes any sense to many foreign countries, or even our own citizens. According to that shameless publicity hound and promoter of political partisan peace and positive (wink) thinking, Newt Gingrich, and his new book, WWIII has already started). - Susan
|
|
|
|