RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Lucylastic -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:06:31 PM)

Thats why some protesters were charged with trespass.
Im supposing people know that.




bounty44 -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:13:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ImperialPath


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i heard said recently that throughout history, there are have been 10 contested conventions and in those conventions, 7 out of 10 times the candidate with the most delegates going in did not win the nomination.


That is true. Do you think that will be the case here if Trump has the majority?


its hard to tell isn't it---its not that the delegates are some secret society trying to avoid detection, but at the same time, what they think isn't public news.

I think id need more information before making a prediction and some of that information is going to come from how well trump does in the upcoming states with closed primaries vis-à-vis cruz. rubio's dropping out would also seem to favor cruz, so I'd want to see how that plays out also.

in general though trump has a couple of things going against him in a contested convention. one is, he's done a great job of alienating a lot of people and being at least in some instances, buffoonish. the other is, and id love to hear a debriefing after the fact as to the reasons, cruz has been stacking up better against Hillary than trump has poll wise. so actually, that's another thing that remains to be seen also.

at the very least, I think cruz needs to win more states and be closer in the proportional ones.




mnottertail -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:14:19 PM)

I dont think there is a shred of factual evidence that is was leftists, nor black lives matter nor anything else, and nobody on the left shut anything down, the nutsuckers runs his fuckin yap, but shits his pants when he is stood up to.

He shut down his own asswipe.




Phydeaux -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:14:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you are condoning violence....colour me surprised.




Oh, you mean like Obama dropping charges when a plea deal had already been agreed to against the black panthers that threatened voters.

Funny, I didn't hear you condemn that.

Did I miss it where you condemned the violent protestors at Ferguson? The looting, the arson?

Or when the democrats trashed all the shop windows in seattle protesting the free trade agreement... ? I suppose you condemned that too.


Trump stating a fact (there will be riots) isn't "condoning violence". Do you have any idea how warped your objectivity is?




ImperialPath -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:15:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: ImperialPath


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

yeah sorry sweetstuff, you stand more chance of whipping hillary.




How do you know I haven't?

Actually, I find most submissive women also happen to be liberals and that happens to make whipping them even sweeter. I tell them I'm conservative after I bind them. Every strip I lay on a tree hugger gives me so much satisfaction with that little bit of icing on the cake.

snorts, yah ok , whatever you say....
yawn
big bad conservative dom huh?
well well
[image]http://www.lucylasticslair.com/colllar/saturday14.jpg[/image]


I do okay. They scream louder too. Making them beg me and thank me is very special also.




Phydeaux -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:17:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ImperialPath


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

yeah sorry sweetstuff, you stand more chance of whipping hillary.




How do you know I haven't?

Actually, I find most submissive women also happen to be liberals and that happens to make whipping them even sweeter. I tell them I'm conservative after I bind them. Every strip I lay on a tree hugger gives me so much satisfaction with that little bit of icing on the cake.



I go one step further. I make them vote republican. It is quite amusing.




Phydeaux -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:20:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Well he has certainly bought off many many people, thats true, politicians around the country, and the world.
Of course he is baiting....
Where else has a guy been punched out and then arrested, while the puncher was watched saying "yes, if he comes back we might have to kill him? WE dont know if he is isis?"
You might think thats fun and dandy, I dont
where else has this happened in this election cycle?? people loved it here when bernie was pulled away from the mic during an early rally...
Trump has flip flopped/evolved/learned/changed on his positions since day one, oh and lied about them, even in the face of video proof.

I don't remember cheering for protestations against anyone.

Seems to me, the only protestors against Bernie were part of the Black Lives Matter group or some other leftist group.

As a matter of fact, haven't the protestors and disruptors at these events all been from the left? Unless someone can show me an article I missed about protestors from the right showing up to disrupt or even shut down a Hillary or Bernie rally?




Well, you have to remember Hillary considers those pesky laws about email archives, corruption at the clinton foundation to be nothing more than a right wing conspiracy..




mnottertail -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:20:03 PM)

The guy is a fucking mental defective, he is Washington Times, and Michelle Bachmann.

There has never been a credible citation of threatening voters, a plea deal, a charge, or Obama having shit to do with it.




ImperialPath -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:27:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: ImperialPath


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i heard said recently that throughout history, there are have been 10 contested conventions and in those conventions, 7 out of 10 times the candidate with the most delegates going in did not win the nomination.


That is true. Do you think that will be the case here if Trump has the majority?


its hard to tell isn't it---its not that the delegates are some secret society trying to avoid detection, but at the same time, what they think isn't public news.

I think id need more information before making a prediction and some of that information is going to come from how well trump does in the upcoming states with closed primaries vis-à-vis cruz. rubio's dropping out would also seem to favor cruz, so I'd want to see how that plays out also.

in general though trump has a couple of things going against him in a contested convention. one is, he's done a great job of alienating a lot of people and being at least in some instances, buffoonish. the other is, and id love to hear a debriefing after the fact as to the reasons, cruz has been stacking up better against Hillary than trump has poll wise. so actually, that's another thing that remains to be seen also.

at the very least, I think cruz needs to win more states and be closer in the proportional ones.


Trump is different but I don't consider him in the least "buffoonish". He is well educated, well raised and proved himself intelligent, charismatic and a leader. A true executive for the Executive Branch of our government. Huh, go figure. Furthur, he is a bit like Washington and a bit like Lincoln and Caesar Augustus kinda leaning toward the latter. It just means you need to embrace such a president or vote for the other person and screw this county to the wall for another four years.

I just don't know what will happen at the GOP Convention. Existing huh?




Phydeaux -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:27:39 PM)

Once again - wrong.

Just because you don't and can't read doesn't mean others don't. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party_voter_intimidation_case.

Cue mnotters standard nutsacker gibberish.




mnottertail -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:28:39 PM)

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/3/16/1502202/-Vital-Florida-county-voting-station-tells-Democrats-that-primary-is-open-for-Republicans-only?detail=facebook

Voter intimidation, nutsucker style.




ImperialPath -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:29:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: ImperialPath


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

yeah sorry sweetstuff, you stand more chance of whipping hillary.




How do you know I haven't?

Actually, I find most submissive women also happen to be liberals and that happens to make whipping them even sweeter. I tell them I'm conservative after I bind them. Every strip I lay on a tree hugger gives me so much satisfaction with that little bit of icing on the cake.



I go one step further. I make them vote republican. It is quite amusing.


Now that is illegal. Shame. I like it.




Lucylastic -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:34:02 PM)

Lol shows just how little you know.good god cd, are you in line for a sainthood?




Aylee -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:34:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ImperialPath


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: ImperialPath


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i heard said recently that throughout history, there are have been 10 contested conventions and in those conventions, 7 out of 10 times the candidate with the most delegates going in did not win the nomination.


That is true. Do you think that will be the case here if Trump has the majority?


its hard to tell isn't it---its not that the delegates are some secret society trying to avoid detection, but at the same time, what they think isn't public news.

I think id need more information before making a prediction and some of that information is going to come from how well trump does in the upcoming states with closed primaries vis-à-vis cruz. rubio's dropping out would also seem to favor cruz, so I'd want to see how that plays out also.

in general though trump has a couple of things going against him in a contested convention. one is, he's done a great job of alienating a lot of people and being at least in some instances, buffoonish. the other is, and id love to hear a debriefing after the fact as to the reasons, cruz has been stacking up better against Hillary than trump has poll wise. so actually, that's another thing that remains to be seen also.

at the very least, I think cruz needs to win more states and be closer in the proportional ones.


Trump is different but I don't consider him in the least "buffoonish". He is well educated, well raised and proved himself intelligent, charismatic and a leader. A true executive for the Executive Branch of our government. Huh, go figure. Furthur, he is a bit like Washington and a bit like Lincoln and Caesar Augustus kinda leaning toward the latter. It just means you need to embrace such a president or vote for the other person and screw this county to the wall for another four years.

I just don't know what will happen at the GOP Convention. Existing huh?


He is kind of more John Adams than Washington.




ImperialPath -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:35:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/3/16/1502202/-Vital-Florida-county-voting-station-tells-Democrats-that-primary-is-open-for-Republicans-only?detail=facebook

Voter intimidation, nutsucker style.


So you think the explanation that it was a mistake and that it was corrected in short order is unreasonable?




Phydeaux -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:37:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/3/16/1502202/-Vital-Florida-county-voting-station-tells-Democrats-that-primary-is-open-for-Republicans-only?detail=facebook

Voter intimidation, nutsucker style.



Idiocy, Mnotter style.

So let me get this straight. You're accusing the hourly workers that are almost invariably democrats and/or the Polk County supervisor of elections who is assuredly democrat - of being a nutsacker.

Or are you just going to admit you fucked up. That you're an inconsistent hypocrite and would never level such an accusation against a democrat.

So which is it mnotter.. idiot or hypocrite?




Lucylastic -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:37:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ImperialPath


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: ImperialPath


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

yeah sorry sweetstuff, you stand more chance of whipping hillary.




How do you know I haven't?

Actually, I find most submissive women also happen to be liberals and that happens to make whipping them even sweeter. I tell them I'm conservative after I bind them. Every strip I lay on a tree hugger gives me so much satisfaction with that little bit of icing on the cake.



I go one step further. I make them vote republican. It is quite amusing.


Now that is illegal. Shame. I like it.


Of course its illegal, but im not surprised he likes force.




Lucylastic -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:40:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you are condoning violence....colour me surprised.




Oh, you mean like Obama dropping charges when a plea deal had already been agreed to against the black panthers that threatened voters.

Funny, I didn't hear you condemn that.

Did I miss it where you condemned the violent protestors at Ferguson? The looting, the arson?

Or when the democrats trashed all the shop windows in seattle protesting the free trade agreement... ? I suppose you condemned that too.


Trump stating a fact (there will be riots) isn't "condoning violence". Do you have any idea how warped your objectivity is?


Lmfao.
Fuck off dirtbag, yes i did come out against the violence.




Phydeaux -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:42:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: ImperialPath


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: ImperialPath


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

yeah sorry sweetstuff, you stand more chance of whipping hillary.




How do you know I haven't?

Actually, I find most submissive women also happen to be liberals and that happens to make whipping them even sweeter. I tell them I'm conservative after I bind them. Every strip I lay on a tree hugger gives me so much satisfaction with that little bit of icing on the cake.



I go one step further. I make them vote republican. It is quite amusing.


Now that is illegal. Shame. I like it.


Of course its illegal, but im not surprised he likes force.



And I'm not suprised you're such an idiot. Submissives want to be molded. My molding includes educating people on how stupid being a democrat is.
No force required. Democrat women are supremely ignorant; supremely concerned about "feelings".




Phydeaux -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/16/2016 1:47:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you are condoning violence....colour me surprised.




Oh, you mean like Obama dropping charges when a plea deal had already been agreed to against the black panthers that threatened voters.

Funny, I didn't hear you condemn that.

Did I miss it where you condemned the violent protestors at Ferguson? The looting, the arson?

Or when the democrats trashed all the shop windows in seattle protesting the free trade agreement... ? I suppose you condemned that too.


Trump stating a fact (there will be riots) isn't "condoning violence". Do you have any idea how warped your objectivity is?


Lmfao.
Fuck off dirtbag, yes i did come out against the violence.




But not, by your own admission, the black panthers intimidating voters in philadelphia, eh cunt? Why not - was in the news for weeks. Pretty direct analog, don't you think...




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875