Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 1:02:41 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

That is because you don't like the 2nd, at no point does it require stupidity.
But of course, people who oppose the 2nd come up with ridiculous scenerios and pretend to think the 2nd would support them. A child/toddler can not legally make such decisions for themselfs so the the parents have every right to keep them from guns, just like they have the right to not let them play with matches or sharp objects untill they are old enough.

And again you miss the point.

No I don't. His point is that he believes that we have to allow those incapable of being rational to exorcise the full rights of a functioning adult.
It is like saying that if voting is a right we have to let toddlers vote.


Your point then is that you are a functioning adult. Don't speak for me, first of all you are a fucking dipshit, and secondly my point is that by god nutsuckers carry into coffee shops, doughnuts shops, and daycares, but they wont carry into their own funcions? Their fidelity to the second amendment is as deep as their facts, and deep as their fiscal responsibility, their adeherence to the law, and their protection of the constitution. In other words about as deep as Ted Nugent swallowed turds as a coward avoiding the duty to his country. All nutsuckers are cowards, all nutsuckers are innumerate, all nutsuckers would felch adolph hitler if given a chance, but we return to the fact they are fucking factless cowards destroying this country period.

I fuckin carry.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 1:13:35 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

Oh God, you really do have trouble following a conversation don't you?

No

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 1:15:08 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

That is because you don't like the 2nd, at no point does it require stupidity.
But of course, people who oppose the 2nd come up with ridiculous scenerios and pretend to think the 2nd would support them. A child/toddler can not legally make such decisions for themselfs so the the parents have every right to keep them from guns, just like they have the right to not let them play with matches or sharp objects untill they are old enough.

And again you miss the point.

No I don't. His point is that he believes that we have to allow those incapable of being rational to exorcise the full rights of a functioning adult.
It is like saying that if voting is a right we have to let toddlers vote.


Your point then is that you are a functioning adult. Don't speak for me, first of all you are a fucking dipshit, and secondly my point is that by god nutsuckers carry into coffee shops, doughnuts shops, and daycares, but they wont carry into their own funcions? Their fidelity to the second amendment is as deep as their facts, and deep as their fiscal responsibility, their adeherence to the law, and their protection of the constitution. In other words about as deep as Ted Nugent swallowed turds as a coward avoiding the duty to his country. All nutsuckers are cowards, all nutsuckers are innumerate, all nutsuckers would felch adolph hitler if given a chance, but we return to the fact they are fucking factless cowards destroying this country period.

I fuckin carry.

Since I wasn't talking to you dizzychicks last post should have been aimed at you.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 1:31:32 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

That is because you don't like the 2nd, at no point does it require stupidity.
But of course, people who oppose the 2nd come up with ridiculous scenerios and pretend to think the 2nd would support them. A child/toddler can not legally make such decisions for themselfs so the the parents have every right to keep them from guns, just like they have the right to not let them play with matches or sharp objects untill they are old enough.

And again you miss the point.

No I don't. His point is that he believes that we have to allow those incapable of being rational to exorcise the full rights of a functioning adult.
It is like saying that if voting is a right we have to let toddlers vote.


Your point then is that you are a functioning adult. Don't speak for me, first of all you are a fucking dipshit, and secondly my point is that by god nutsuckers carry into coffee shops, doughnuts shops, and daycares, but they wont carry into their own funcions? Their fidelity to the second amendment is as deep as their facts, and deep as their fiscal responsibility, their adeherence to the law, and their protection of the constitution. In other words about as deep as Ted Nugent swallowed turds as a coward avoiding the duty to his country. All nutsuckers are cowards, all nutsuckers are innumerate, all nutsuckers would felch adolph hitler if given a chance, but we return to the fact they are fucking factless cowards destroying this country period.

I fuckin carry.

Since I wasn't talking to you dizzychicks last post should have been aimed at you.

Since I wasn't talking to you, I was talking to His (whoevers) point that he believed, but now the post can be aimed at you,

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 1:52:19 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

That is because you don't like the 2nd, at no point does it require stupidity.
But of course, people who oppose the 2nd come up with ridiculous scenerios and pretend to think the 2nd would support them. A child/toddler can not legally make such decisions for themselfs so the the parents have every right to keep them from guns, just like they have the right to not let them play with matches or sharp objects untill they are old enough.

And again you miss the point.

No I don't. His point is that he believes that we have to allow those incapable of being rational to exorcise the full rights of a functioning adult.
It is like saying that if voting is a right we have to let toddlers vote.


Your point then is that you are a functioning adult. Don't speak for me, first of all you are a fucking dipshit, and secondly my point is that by god nutsuckers carry into coffee shops, doughnuts shops, and daycares, but they wont carry into their own funcions? Their fidelity to the second amendment is as deep as their facts, and deep as their fiscal responsibility, their adeherence to the law, and their protection of the constitution. In other words about as deep as Ted Nugent swallowed turds as a coward avoiding the duty to his country. All nutsuckers are cowards, all nutsuckers are innumerate, all nutsuckers would felch adolph hitler if given a chance, but we return to the fact they are fucking factless cowards destroying this country period.

I fuckin carry.

Since I wasn't talking to you dizzychicks last post should have been aimed at you.

Since I wasn't talking to you, I was talking to His (whoevers) point that he believed, but now the post can be aimed at you,

The post said in reply to me.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 3:16:47 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
Well this is certainly an enlightened conversation.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 3:34:51 PM   
Sahar4Blacks


Posts: 31
Joined: 4/2/2016
Status: offline
Sure. A woman can do pretty much everything a man can do !

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 3:49:59 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
I can't believe a thread about a fairly clear constitutional question turned into another shit-slinging match.

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to Sahar4Blacks)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 4:03:53 PM   
Sahar4Blacks


Posts: 31
Joined: 4/2/2016
Status: offline
Can a woman be President of the US ? Sure. Should a woman be President of the US ? Probably. Should Hillary Clinton become President of the US ? Hell no. I don't like her. I don't trust her. To be fair, Donald Trump isn't qualified to be President either. He's evil, racist and dumb. Who does that leave ? Hmm, I am feeling the Bern. How about you ?

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 4:04:53 PM   
Dvr22999874


Posts: 2849
Joined: 9/11/2008
Status: offline
Awareness, the thread could be about apples and oranges and their relative attributes and before the end of two pages it would have devolved into that same shit-sling, insult-hurling childish name-calling from the same perpetrators mate.....................it would also be a slanging match between pro-democrats and pro-republicans and how stupid the other side was..

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 4:08:41 PM   
Sahar4Blacks


Posts: 31
Joined: 4/2/2016
Status: offline
Don't be so pessimistic, dude. People can surprise you.

(in reply to Dvr22999874)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 4:13:45 PM   
Dvr22999874


Posts: 2849
Joined: 9/11/2008
Status: offline
They invariably do, but they are usually not pleasant surprises. I don't believe I am pessimistic, just pragmatic

(in reply to Sahar4Blacks)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 4:43:22 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Awareness

I can't believe a thread about a fairly clear constitutional question turned into another shit-slinging match.


Since it is a printed page it should not be too difficult to see where the train left the track.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 4:46:12 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

They invariably do, but they are usually not pleasant surprises. I don't believe I am pessimistic, just pragmatic


I think it is a pretty straight line of progression from adolescent enthusiam through adult pesimism to aged pragmatism...then if we are lucky we die in our sleep.

(in reply to Dvr22999874)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 5:47:13 PM   
Sahar4Blacks


Posts: 31
Joined: 4/2/2016
Status: offline
Can a woman be President of the USA ? Sure. Should Hillary be President ? Hell no !

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 6:18:33 PM   
Dvr22999874


Posts: 2849
Joined: 9/11/2008
Status: offline
Then I guess I had better get ready for my final patrol Thompson *smile*. I can almost hear the sergeant now "Guess who just volunteered for point ????"*smile*

(in reply to Sahar4Blacks)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 6:44:23 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

I can't believe a thread about a fairly clear constitutional question turned into another shit-slinging match.

Me either, particularly since, as you said, it was pretty clear from the outset that the Constitution didn't bar women.
This was just set up in an attempt to trap strict constructionists.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 6:46:58 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sahar4Blacks

Can a woman be President of the USA ? Sure. Should Hillary be President ? Hell no !

Agreed completly.
Both parties are running headlong into nominating the worst person they have.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Sahar4Blacks)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 7:19:01 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Me either, particularly since, as you said, it was pretty clear from the outset that the Constitution didn't bar women.

This would cast doubt on your opinion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_suffrage_in_the_United_States

This was just set up in an attempt to trap strict constructionists.

Trap????Is your white male priviledge slipping through your pudgy little fingers?

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 4/2/2016 7:20:30 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2347
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

I can't believe a thread about a fairly clear constitutional question turned into another shit-slinging match.

Me either, particularly since, as you said, it was pretty clear from the outset that the Constitution didn't bar women.
This was just set up in an attempt to trap strict constructionists.


Note from the OP:

1) I disagree that it is "pretty clear from the outset" that the Constitution doesn't bar women, There were a half dozen opinions (just opinions) that were expressed that Constitution doesn't bar women. People opine on all sorts of things. That doesn't make any fact "clear" at all.
I believe that:
a) The Constitution shouldn't bar women
b) The Constitution needs to be (and SHOULD be) amended to allow women.

2) Your quite absurd statement "This was just set up in an attempt to trap strict constructionists.". Since I am the strict constructionist that STARTED the thread (having just obliterated Phydeaux in a previous Constitutional debate, as I was taking a strict constructionist position), your assertion would seem rather silly.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094