RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Phydeaux -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/27/2016 5:08:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: Admin

We made a mistake in removing this thread “Milo Yiannopolous "A Dangerous Faggot". This action was taken due to our incorrect assumption that this posting contained derogatory content directed towards the gay community.



So you pulled it because you thought it was derogatory toward the gay community. But being derogatory to men (any of realone's threads) or conservatives is ok, eh?

Sounds like a double standard.

quote:



We do our best to provide an open platform for dialogue and debate on a wide spectrum of issues while at the same time trying to minimize gratuitous attacks on particular individuals or groups.


You're joking right?

quote:



In this case we got it wrong and, to be clear, the decision to remove this content was made by the site itself and not by our moderators.

If in the future, we make similar mistakes kindly point them out to us as was done here. This thread has been restored and moving forwards, we'll try to pause a bit longer before removing content in situations of this character and will try harder to make sure that we make the right call.

Please feel free to voice criticisms you might have of our website at any time. That being said we ask users of our forums to kindly refrain from ad hominem comments directed towards moderators or other users.

In the past,
present and future
quote:

the moderation has been outrageously biased ...





ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/27/2016 5:39:33 PM)

quote:

That being said we ask users of our forums to kindly refrain from ad hominem comments directed towards moderators or other users.

Then how come mnottertail's bile is allowed?




mnottertail -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/27/2016 5:48:10 PM)

same as yours; guy. You make personal attacks without provocation, mate. I don't start any shit, the nutsucker party (if I can be called liberal or by any OTHER label.?) start their own. The peroration shall be left as an exercise to the reader.

Whos sock are you? I am me.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/27/2016 5:49:35 PM)

quote:

Whos sock are you?

Nobody's
quote:

I am me.

That's not anything I would boast about.




sloguy02246 -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/27/2016 5:53:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

That being said we ask users of our forums to kindly refrain from ad hominem comments directed towards moderators or other users.

Then how come mnottertail's bile is allowed?


To be fair, several other posters regularly post their own "bile" comments, including ad hominems, false equivalencies, strawmen, black or white, etc.
But mnotter's comments are a much higher quality of bile.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/27/2016 6:01:01 PM)

True, on both accounts. he is just my particular peeve at the moment because I have not seen him post anything but incoherent homophobic bullshit and stupid attacks and yet his homophobic shit gets a pass for some reason.




Wayward5oul -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/27/2016 6:34:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

True, on both accounts. he is just my particular peeve at the moment because I have not seen him post anything but incoherent homophobic bullshit and stupid attacks and yet his homophobic shit gets a pass for some reason.


Not to mention that he just called a Chinese person a "slant-eyed motherfucker" in another thread.




thompsonx -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/27/2016 6:50:50 PM)

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

That being said we ask users of our forums to kindly refrain from ad hominem comments directed towards moderators or other users.


Then how come mnottertail's bile is allowed?


The dungeon is a lightly moderated forum. The others have more stringent rules of etiquette.
I cannot speak for others but my own vituperous verbiage is restricted to those who are rude to me first. Down here one usually gets what one gives. Some people can disagree without being disagreable some cannot.





mnottertail -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/27/2016 8:25:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

True, on both accounts. he is just my particular peeve at the moment because I have not seen him post anything but incoherent homophobic bullshit and stupid attacks and yet his homophobic shit gets a pass for some reason.


homophobic? in what way, guy?




mnottertail -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/27/2016 8:27:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

True, on both accounts. he is just my particular peeve at the moment because I have not seen him post anything but incoherent homophobic bullshit and stupid attacks and yet his homophobic shit gets a pass for some reason.


Not to mention that he just called a Chinese person a "slant-eyed motherfucker" in another thread.




John McCain called them worse, and now faggots is ok, where do we stop? My comments are not out of round. Do you want to see where (in actual historical citations that is ok, and they are referred to that way by their own ethnic group?)




DaddySatyr -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/27/2016 9:29:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Admin

We made a mistake in removing this thread “Milo Yiannopolous "A Dangerous Faggot". This action was taken due to our incorrect assumption that this posting contained derogatory content directed towards the gay community. In looking carefully at this posting it's apparent that this was not the case.

We do our best to provide an open platform for dialogue and debate on a wide spectrum of issues while at the same time trying to minimize gratuitous attacks on particular individuals or groups. In this case we got it wrong and, to be clear, the decision to remove this content was made by the site itself and not by our moderators.

If in the future, we make similar mistakes kindly point them out to us as was done here. This thread has been restored and moving forwards, we'll try to pause a bit longer before removing content in situations of this character and will try harder to make sure that we make the right call.

Please feel free to voice criticisms you might have of our website at any time. That being said we ask users of our forums to kindly refrain from ad hominem comments directed towards moderators or other users.



Kudos to you for stepping up and doing the right thing so publicly (sort of. You're still anonymous). It is behavior that has been sorely missed for quite some time.

As far as users, engaging in ad hominem attacks against other users: clearly, you don't spend much time reading posts on your own site. It's a pity because it's an everyday occurrence.



Michael




brispslave -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/27/2016 9:40:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: brispslave

Um because right-wing folk either believe in free-speech(in which case they don't care what you say) or they're bigotted fucks(in which case they'll be the ones calling you a faggot). How can you not know this and still be allowed access to a computer?

What are you, you fuckin retard, some Izzard of philosophy, put that fucking thing away before you scare some little girl with it you batty boy..is that left or right?

Dont go thru life drunk, stupid, and retarded son. Its no way forward.



Wow, 53 *thousand* posts and you still can't spell, punctuate or make a valid retort without resorting to insults. No wonder you're so threatened by me :)

This is where I would respond to your argument, if you had made one.




Phydeaux -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/27/2016 11:10:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

That being said we ask users of our forums to kindly refrain from ad hominem comments directed towards moderators or other users.


Then how come mnottertail's bile is allowed?


The dungeon is a lightly moderated forum. The others have more stringent rules of etiquette.
I cannot speak for others but my own vituperous verbiage is restricted to those who are rude to me first. Down here one usually gets what one gives. Some people can disagree without being disagreable some cannot.




Bullshit.




Greta75 -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/27/2016 11:28:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Admin

We made a mistake in removing this thread “Milo Yiannopolous "A Dangerous Faggot". This action was taken due to our incorrect assumption that this posting contained derogatory content directed towards the gay community. In looking carefully at this posting it's apparent that this was not the case.

We do our best to provide an open platform for dialogue and debate on a wide spectrum of issues while at the same time trying to minimize gratuitous attacks on particular individuals or groups. In this case we got it wrong and, to be clear, the decision to remove this content was made by the site itself and not by our moderators.

If in the future, we make similar mistakes kindly point them out to us as was done here. This thread has been restored and moving forwards, we'll try to pause a bit longer before removing content in situations of this character and will try harder to make sure that we make the right call.

Please feel free to voice criticisms you might have of our website at any time. That being said we ask users of our forums to kindly refrain from ad hominem comments directed towards moderators or other users.



Thumbs up! For explaining!




thompsonx -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/28/2016 8:26:27 AM)


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


ORIGINAL: thompsonx



The dungeon is a lightly moderated forum. The others have more stringent rules of etiquette.
I cannot speak for others but my own vituperous verbiage is restricted to those who are rude to me first. Down here one usually gets what one gives. Some people can disagree without being disagreable some cannot.




Bullshit.


Opinions vary




MrRodgers -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/28/2016 10:26:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: Admin

We made a mistake in removing this thread “Milo Yiannopolous "A Dangerous Faggot". This action was taken due to our incorrect assumption that this posting contained derogatory content directed towards the gay community.



So you pulled it because you thought it was derogatory toward the gay community. But being derogatory to men (any of realone's threads) or conservatives is ok, eh?

Sounds like a double standard.

quote:



We do our best to provide an open platform for dialogue and debate on a wide spectrum of issues while at the same time trying to minimize gratuitous attacks on particular individuals or groups.


You're joking right?

quote:



In this case we got it wrong and, to be clear, the decision to remove this content was made by the site itself and not by our moderators.

If in the future, we make similar mistakes kindly point them out to us as was done here. This thread has been restored and moving forwards, we'll try to pause a bit longer before removing content in situations of this character and will try harder to make sure that we make the right call.

Please feel free to voice criticisms you might have of our website at any time. That being said we ask users of our forums to kindly refrain from ad hominem comments directed towards moderators or other users.

In the past,
present and future
quote:

the moderation has been outrageously biased ...



This one is pretty easy: Being derogatory or insulting toward sexual disposition is a form of discrimination based on a human psychological/sexual orientation...similar to race. It is bigotry and reflects badly on the commentator.

However, slamming conservatives and liberals so-called, is a comment or judgment and insults based on what is most predominantly ones political beliefs which is fair game.

Ad hominem also, is a general term short for argumentum ad hominem, which offers a logical fallacy in which an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the correspondent. I am thinking this is used way too often as far too many want to go right after those aspects felt...about a source. These kinds of attacks are meaningless.

I never insult (I'll use words/descriptors of a poster used in a comment toward me...against them) or do I go after a messenger. If anything, when I debate and research, I learn.




Phydeaux -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/28/2016 11:03:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: Admin

We made a mistake in removing this thread “Milo Yiannopolous "A Dangerous Faggot". This action was taken due to our incorrect assumption that this posting contained derogatory content directed towards the gay community.



So you pulled it because you thought it was derogatory toward the gay community. But being derogatory to men (any of realone's threads) or conservatives is ok, eh?

Sounds like a double standard.

quote:



We do our best to provide an open platform for dialogue and debate on a wide spectrum of issues while at the same time trying to minimize gratuitous attacks on particular individuals or groups.


You're joking right?

quote:



In this case we got it wrong and, to be clear, the decision to remove this content was made by the site itself and not by our moderators.

If in the future, we make similar mistakes kindly point them out to us as was done here. This thread has been restored and moving forwards, we'll try to pause a bit longer before removing content in situations of this character and will try harder to make sure that we make the right call.

Please feel free to voice criticisms you might have of our website at any time. That being said we ask users of our forums to kindly refrain from ad hominem comments directed towards moderators or other users.

In the past,
present and future
quote:

the moderation has been outrageously biased ...



This one is pretty easy: Being derogatory or insulting toward sexual disposition is a form of discrimination based on a human psychological/sexual orientation...similar to race. It is bigotry and reflects badly on the commentator.

However, slamming conservatives and liberals so-called, is a comment or judgment and insults based on what is most predominantly ones political beliefs which is fair game.

Ad hominem also, is a general term short for argumentum ad hominem, which offers a logical fallacy in which an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the correspondent. I am thinking this is used way too often as far too many want to go right after those aspects felt...about a source. These kinds of attacks are meaningless.

I never insult (I'll use words/descriptors of a poster used in a comment toward me...against them) or do I go after a messenger. If anything, when I debate and research, I learn.


Interesting position. So its ok to be derogatory toward one because of being conservative, but not ok to be derogatory because of sexual orientation. And you think thats ok, why?




thompsonx -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/28/2016 11:40:03 AM)


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


Interesting position. So its ok to be derogatory toward one because of being conservative,

That is not what was posted now was it?

quote:

However, slamming conservatives and liberals ...

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.




BamaD -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/28/2016 11:43:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sloguy02246


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

That being said we ask users of our forums to kindly refrain from ad hominem comments directed towards moderators or other users.

Then how come mnottertail's bile is allowed?


To be fair, several other posters regularly post their own "bile" comments, including ad hominems, false equivalencies, strawmen, black or white, etc.
But mnotter's comments are a much higher quality of bile.


By that I assume you mean more bile, not classier.




BamaD -> RE: Ye Gods, you left-wing censorship-obsessed fuckwits (3/28/2016 11:45:25 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

True, on both accounts. he is just my particular peeve at the moment because I have not seen him post anything but incoherent homophobic bullshit and stupid attacks and yet his homophobic shit gets a pass for some reason.


Not to mention that he just called a Chinese person a "slant-eyed motherfucker" in another thread.



Actually with his experiences I would expect he was talking about the North Veitnamese, and, with his experiences, with good reason.
John McCain called them worse, and now faggots is ok, where do we stop? My comments are not out of round. Do you want to see where (in actual historical citations that is ok, and they are referred to that way by their own ethnic group?)





Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.445313E-02