Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commited rape


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commited rape Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/29/2016 4:48:09 PM   
LadyConstanze


Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph

if someone actually reads the 2 articles linked in post 1 (the source of all this here) a few things are obvious

1) the 2 suspects are not part of the 27 refugees mentioned. They are if part of anything, 2 of those still on the waiting list, figures running into thousands.
2) the 27 refugees accepted are predominantly Nepali
3) the 2 suspects are Turks

the headline of this thread is not covered by the facts, the 2 facts have nothing to do with each other

In another words, Muslim refugees end up being the ones causing problems, before they even got their permanent status as refuguees in Japan. What coincidence.




I take 100 Muslim refugees before I'd take one Greta, there is only so much insanity I can deal with it, so I go with the Muslims

_____________________________

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!

http://exdomme.blogspot.com/2012/07/public-service-announcement.html

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/29/2016 5:35:18 PM   
StrongSpirit


Posts: 575
Joined: 4/10/2005
Status: offline
1) They were NOT refugees, they had APPLIED to be refugees.

2) Japan took in 27 ACTUAL refugees. The number of people that applied is a lot higher than that.

3) Japan had given ZERO screening. That is, the criminals in question did not pass any level of screening. They came in on a tourist visa, and then once they got there, applied for refugee status.

You are sloppy with your language - accept similar things as identical, and as a direct result believe stupid lies. Basically, you are no different than some idiot that said "a guy with a gun committed a crime, so we should lock up all guys with guns."

The number of good people in the world far outweigh the evil ones. Otherwise, the evil ones would have killed us all long ago. Victims outweigh criminals - and we need to be nice to the refugees. If we don't, then we are no different from the criminals.


Tell me, how much is Alquaeda paying you to mistreat their victims? We know why they want you to do it - every time you do, you convince one more child that we are no better than they are and that the innocent refugees are better off joining people that accept them.


(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/29/2016 5:49:32 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: StrongSpirit

1) They were NOT refugees, they had APPLIED to be refugees.

2) Japan took in 27 ACTUAL refugees. The number of people that applied is a lot higher than that.

3) Japan had given ZERO screening. That is, the criminals in question did not pass any level of screening. They came in on a tourist visa, and then once they got there, applied for refugee status.

Now you are splitting hairs. That's like saying someone is not a refugee UNTIL the country who accepts them and approve them as "refugees" accept their refugees status. Then all that mass group of people walking across Europe are not Refugees either then! After all, Europe doesn't need tourist pass to cross borders. No border control at all. Anybody walking in is a tourist.

quote:

The number of good people in the world far outweigh the evil ones. Otherwise, the evil ones would have killed us all long ago. Victims outweigh criminals - and we need to be nice to the refugees. If we don't, then we are no different from the criminals.

It is said that out of 1 billion Muslims, 60% of them wants Sharia Law to be implemented in non-Muslim countries. Tell me they aren't majority evil. And Sharia Law isn't an evil system of oppression.




< Message edited by Greta75 -- 3/29/2016 5:57:28 PM >

(in reply to StrongSpirit)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/29/2016 6:15:40 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph

if someone actually reads the 2 articles linked in post 1 (the source of all this here) a few things are obvious

1) the 2 suspects are not part of the 27 refugees mentioned. They are if part of anything, 2 of those still on the waiting list, figures running into thousands.
2) the 27 refugees accepted are predominantly Nepali
3) the 2 suspects are Turks

the headline of this thread is not covered by the facts, the 2 facts have nothing to do with each other

In another words, Muslim refugees end up being the ones causing problems, before they even got their permanent status as refuguees in Japan. What coincidence.




I take 100 Muslim refugees before I'd take one Greta, there is only so much insanity I can deal with it, so I go with the Muslims


You go right ahead. And when they're on top of you and you are screaming "RAPE" the police will kindly be politically correct and let them exercise their "culture".

Sorry if you do not like me anymore but I will blow their fucking heads off if they come anywhere near my Womenfolk.

Any Arabs or whoever else gives up stoooopid fucking religion, fine. Treat Women right, don't try to tell us what to do like take pork out of the schools, and you can live. Here even. Otherwise, as far as I am concerned you fucking die. We got no room for more assholes, we are already breeding them at an alarming rate. And you know what ? It is going to be White Men to fix that, eventually. As soon as the currency fails we are going to stack them up on the streetcorners like cordwood. Seriously. We are still the majority here.

You think White Men with 5,000 square foot houses on five acres with a gun safe bigger than some bathrooms are going to let these motherfuckers rape their daughters ? Bullshit, when, not if, law enforcement completely breaks down in this country the street will be flowing with blood. We have had enough of people destroying what our Fathers built.

And my advice to foreigners is to stay the fuck out of it. We'll call you when it is safe to come visit.

T^T

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/29/2016 6:18:15 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Greta : "It is said that out of 1 billion Muslims, 60% of them wants Sharia Law to be implemented in non-Muslim countries."

It is said alot of things. From what I have heard it is more like maybe 10 %. I have no cite for that at the moment, but then neither do you.

And if you come up with one, make sure it isn't from the Haliburton party.

T^T

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/29/2016 6:26:03 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/10/51-of-u-s-muslims-want-sharia-60-of-young-muslims-more-loyal-to-islam-than-to-u-s

https://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/2015/11/28/most-european-muslims-want-sharia-not-european-laws/

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/12/07/muslims-and-islam-key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/

Pew Research has a comprehensive chart country by country, how scary it is, that many countries have over 50% want Sharia laws.

I'd say it all average out to worldwide 60%.

This link summarise the Pew Research data.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/12/massive_worldwide_support_for_sharia_law_among_global_muslim_community.html



< Message edited by Greta75 -- 3/29/2016 6:27:38 PM >

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/29/2016 6:30:17 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
Do you know what sharia is?

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/29/2016 6:31:29 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze
I take 100 Muslim refugees before I'd take one Greta, there is only so much insanity I can deal with it, so I go with the Muslims

Yea nothing more disgusting and I have absolutely zero respect for any woman who supports a religion dedicated to oppressing women to the worst extent possible of oppressing a woman.

(in reply to LadyConstanze)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/29/2016 6:33:21 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

Do you know what sharia is?

Absolutely.
I live in a country where elements of Sharia law that does not clash with civil law is legal and enforced.
You don't.
We still got official sharia court here casting fatwas all the time that will be legally applicable.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/29/2016 6:41:25 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Well, I guess probably 50 % of westerners would think Sharia law should be replaced with western law. All Women here do of course. But that brings up another point. They burned their bras here, they had protests. Why not there ?

If I were a Muslim Woman I would poison every boy child I had, in fact I would do all I can to become barren so that there are no more of these motherfuckers around. I owuld find solidarity with others and form suicide groups, you want us to strap bombs on ourselves and kill Whitey ? How about we kill you ? You give us as much fucking grief as they do and that is saying something. You are supposed to Husbands, not fucking owners. Even bumfuct Africa isn't this fucking bad ! Go fuck yourselves.

And go ahead and rape us, soon we will figure out a way to stop that. In fact, if you want to keep it up we can all catch an STD somehow. Like AIDS, the clap, whatever we can get. Stone us for infidelity ? Goo right ahead, and keep doing it until you are a nation of 90 % males. You will NEVER get a piece of ass.

You want that towelhead ? Or are you willing to consider treating Women like human beings ? (towelhead is the Muslim Woman speaking here, I don't make jokes about their funny hats)

T^T

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/29/2016 6:45:43 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
"We still got official sharia court here casting fatwas all the time that will be legally applicable. "

That is fucking ridiculous. Over here they don't even let the Natives do their peyote, WHICH GROWS IN THE GROUND.

Who the fuck are those people working for ? Certain not the Citizens. Same shit here, but we got so many guns they'll never get them all.

Eventually, time comes. But what do you do when only criminals (the government) have guns ?

T^T

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/29/2016 6:50:24 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
god save me from cupid stunts





quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

It is said that out of 1 billion Muslims, 60% of them wants Sharia Law to be implemented in non-Muslim countries. Tell me they aren't majority evil. And Sharia Law isn't an evil system of oppression.




quote:

Pew Research has a comprehensive chart country by country, how scary it is, that many countries have over 50% want Sharia laws.

I'd say it all average out to worldwide 60%.


IF you look at the fucking graphic, it says """""""% of muslims that want sharia law in their own country"""""", RIGHT UNDER THE TITLE.

Then you go on to promote 2 hyper anti muslim propaganda websites.
And then try to condone your hate by blaming others for YOUR ignorance..


rant off



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/29/2016 7:06:01 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Lucy, the propaganda is really strong. Every once in a while I see the TV or whatever, and I hear from people who watch it. They are full of misconceptions. Like that Saddam's WMDs got squirrelled away to Syria. Well if they were then he didn't have them anyway, a point that all the sheeple who believe this bullshit forget. So why didn't the US attack Syria after Saudi Arabian rebels attacked the WTC instead of Iraq which had absolutely nothing to do with it ? Answer : Because Saddam switched to the euro.

Until you understand the real reasons for war, you know pretty much nothing. The US never cared about human rights, not from day one. Slavery was legal, from day one. It is still legal in some countries, some of which are real cozy with the US government.

There is zero morality involved. Loyalty is for soldiers, and it is loyalty to the regime, not the country or the people. This is how it is. We want oil, cadmium, phosphorous, and a bunch of other natural resources. Let me clue you in on something, when they did Kosovo or whatever Milesovic was running, they wanted cadmium. Cadmium is very important in industry and military applications. They infiltrated the cadmium miners' union and incited them to take over the country. When that failed, Milesovic did this supposed "ethnic cleansing" and that claim brought on by the fact that the miners' union was predominately one race. If he was friendly with the western powers, what he did would have been called "restoring order". Same shit in Ukraine. Just to keep Gazprom from getting too much of the European natural gas market they started shit, and Crimea fell on them like a ton of bricks because quite frankly, Many eastern Europeans and western Asians prefer Russia to the US for an ally. And they got good reason.

T^T

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/29/2016 9:44:21 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
Lucy, the other websites interviewed American Muslims and European Muslims and even if the came from anti-muslims websites, but the research is done by neutral parties who aren't anti-muslims.

So interprete it as you will. 60% is accurate in my opinion.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/30/2016 4:17:40 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Greta75



So interprete it as you will. 60% is accurate in my opinion.


Your opinion and a couple of bux will get you a cup of coffee at denny's


< Message edited by thompsonx -- 3/30/2016 4:35:25 AM >

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/30/2016 4:22:00 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

Lucy, the other websites interviewed American Muslims and European Muslims and even if the came from anti-muslims websites, but the research is done by neutral parties who aren't anti-muslims.

So interprete it as you will. 60% is accurate in my opinion.

you can claim all you want, you arent being honest with yourself...
and everyone can see it.
its fairly easy to see that you are bullshitting.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/30/2016 4:25:26 AM   
Staleek


Posts: 361
Joined: 6/1/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

Lucy, the other websites interviewed American Muslims and European Muslims and even if the came from anti-muslims websites, but the research is done by neutral parties who aren't anti-muslims.

So interprete it as you will. 60% is accurate in my opinion.


Yes.

The thing is, your opinion is based on your own hatred of this particular demographic. That's all. You're using the lies of a particular website to justify your opinion to yourself, but at its core there is zero logic to your opinion.

I am completely serious here, I am far more concerned about you committing some sort of terrorist act (maybe shooting up a Mosque or something?) than an average Muslim committing a terrorist act.

You know how we see radicalized Muslim clerics ranting about how those on the other side need to be dealt with? To normal people you sound just the same.

The only difference is the religion you do or do not have (which, ironically, proves how little religion has to do with this), and the targets of your hate speech.

Seriously man just try to see the other side of things for once before pulling this shit.

Just for info. There is something I really hate in the world, and that's lies. When people not only lie but distort history in order to try and make a point they become not merely ignorant idiots, but something far worse. They become fascists.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/07/the-myth-of-islamic-science

That there is the biggest concoction of lies on the internet. It's malicious in intent, and pernicious in the hands of some misinformed bigot like you. The history of the Islamic world not a matter for historical debate, it is simply fact. Everything from algebra (or Al-Jabr, meaning "completeness") to the fucking scientific method (from the mind of Ibn al-Haytham) came from the Islamic world. The fact that you have referenced that site in an attempt to support "facts" tells me that you are either extraordinarily uneducated or so completely blinded by bigotry that you no longer recognize the difference between fact and opinion.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/30/2016 4:26:09 AM   
blnymph


Posts: 1600
Joined: 11/13/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph

if someone actually reads the 2 articles linked in post 1 (the source of all this here) a few things are obvious

1) the 2 suspects are not part of the 27 refugees mentioned. They are if part of anything, 2 of those still on the waiting list, figures running into thousands.
2) the 27 refugees accepted are predominantly Nepali
3) the 2 suspects are Turks

the headline of this thread is not covered by the facts, the 2 facts have nothing to do with each other

In another words, Muslim refugees end up being the ones causing problems, before they even got their permanent status as refuguees in Japan. What coincidence.




you apparently did not read the press articles you linked in your post.

link 2 called it a "gang rape" (what an ugly term) indicating there were even more men involved that these 2 Turkish guys (of which 1 might or might no have participated - evidence controversial) without any more nationalities indicated - since 1 or even 2 hardly justify being called a "gang" one might assume there were locals involved

again your statement is not based on the facts you posted yourself


(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/30/2016 4:26:52 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
bit of both Staleek.
Good post:)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Staleek)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commit... - 3/30/2016 5:08:41 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Staleek
The fact that you have referenced that site in an attempt to support "facts" tells me that you are either extraordinarily uneducated or so completely blinded by bigotry that you no longer recognize the difference between fact and opinion.

I reference a site that used statistic from an independent surveyor.

So end of the day, you may hate the site, just like libs will discredit anything from fox news as false. But the source isn't from website itself. They are simply quoting sources from independent surveyors. The one with real blind and bias hatred is you.

(in reply to Staleek)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Japan took in just 27 refugees and 2 already commited rape Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094