|
Edwurde -> RE: In the name of Fair and Balance (3/30/2016 3:33:19 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Greta75
Being on Team Trump, I shall post some Trump negative news.
Anyway, I am interested to see if this will have any impact on his popularity.
I don't really want to cut and paste the whole letter here because it's damn long! But this is from his own top strategist.
But my view on this is, this does not change my opinion his still the best candidate, because, regardless what his motivation is.
His motivation is, and always has been, to show off his absurdly bad hair to as many people as possible, in bright lights, and have as many people as possible bow before him because of THAT. Nothing like having 'that hair' tell you; You're Fired! on television, for the worst in America, which is what American TV is all about (the worst of America). I see you're a fan, there. American advertisers LOVE people like you, and Trump is their ingress to impulsive people, who are statistically impulsive spenders. So there you go, for reason why someone who is essentially an emotionally retarded rhino is actually given any space to begin with by our "responsible media." That's why. "Big whiners are impulsive spenders." Rule of advertising. Advertising runs media.
It's true, as you say, that most who run for president do it for the glory, but that doesn't take away from the fact that there have been a few good presidents through all that, and certainly one could hardly claim that the US political process has been the worst in that regard. (Look at your own country and your own region, sweetheart.)
So it comes as no surprise that you (with such mindset), in your nanny city state of ~6.5 million population (which Trump would immediately dismantle in any economically, culturally, socially, or any and every other way he could think of, if he were president there) proposes to suggest that a country who outsizes yours by more than 50 times in both population or GDP, should have this guy as president. Don't think that outright hatred of US being the reason behind so many foreign Trump supporters is overlooked here, as a factor in that.
The treatment of Muslims in your dinky little country has no comparison to how that plays out in the 50 other countries much bigger than yours, nor does it have to do with the fact that too many of the largest of these countries lit the fuse in the first place, especially the (economically) largest one.
I don't understand what you're on about, I really don't. I mean, the most powerful country in the world has 'provided political cover' for making Muslim's (whom you obviously despise greatly) lives as miserable as possible, -in their own lands-, so they eventually flee to other lands, and now you bitch and moan about the immigrants.
Fuck, we (the US) tried our best. Did we not kill enough of them for you? By your trumping for Trump, apparently not. If the US didn't exterminate enough Muslims to your satisfaction, then I suggest that you talk to -your own lawmakers- and have mighty and glorious Singapore take the lead here, and do it properly.
You say in another thread that 'moderate Muslims' are supposedly living in daily torment if they are not fully invested in, and participating in Jihad, as according to Qur'an. If the Christians and the Jews, who have slavery and 'genetic cleansing' in *their* books are not fully participating today thereby, are they ALL in torment about that, too? Curious about your opinion on that.
So yeah, maybe somebody born to wealth, then blew it and gone bankrupt twice (because he's actually a business fuckwit) , bailed out by dad or his friends, and hates Muslims, is your idea of a 'good president' of the largest economy in the world.
There's the third world mentality.
Your micro city-state exists -only- because the UK and the US couldn't decide whom to hand that little biscuit off to, and you were lucky enough to have Japan or China out of the discussion at the time, thanks to us. So just shut up, thank you.
|
|
|
|
