Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill for Those “Accused” of Domestic Violence


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill for Those “Accused” of Domestic Violence Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/8/2016 4:29:19 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

people do not pack table saws around with the intent of finding danger in a situation they would be forced to use it in.


Nobody legally carrying a firearm actively looks for a reason to use deadly force.



why do they carry them?


People get concealed carry permits for a variety of reasons, mostly to defend themselves by carrying a concealed firearm.

You appear to be an anti-rights advocate who claims to have an FFL and now a concealed carry permit. Why do you have an FFL if you don't like firearms? Why do you have a concealed carry permit if you do not carry a firearm? Why do you have both of these things if you dislike firearms?



q.e.d.

Please note the bolding.

Why do you beg strawmen? How the fuck do you come to this dislike of firearms? You carry it it use it. You have said as much.

Why don't you carry a table saw?
If you own 50 guns, I own (and I do own them) around 250 more than you,
I will freely admit there are a couple in that collection I don't really care for all that much.

https://www.atfonline.gov/fflezcheck/

3..41 ....... 02991 (fill in the blanks just the numbers in the 3 boxes)







< Message edited by mnottertail -- 5/8/2016 4:30:24 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/8/2016 4:33:16 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

people do not pack table saws around with the intent of finding danger in a situation they would be forced to use it in.


Nobody legally carrying a firearm actively looks for a reason to use deadly force.



I've had a concealed carry permit for over a dozen years. I keep in mind my best line of defense is to not be where things are dangerous. I think that was a straw man.

I have had concealed carry permits over 35 years. I dont carry. But why would you?

I haven't had a flat tire in, probably, forty years but I've always had a jack and spare tire in the trunk. I've used it twice in those years to help stranded women with flats. I carry for two reasons. Evidence shows that the more people that carry, the lower the physical crime rate for everyone. And, just in case that one bad thing happens.



Exactly so, why dont you carry a table saw? You carry to use. Just in case.

Lets not bullshit here, wilbur.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/8/2016 6:10:59 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
I have no idea what you put before the court, iow I would actually need to review the paperwork and the laws in your state and compare them. Courts are like door locks, you have the have the proper key to properly open the lock. The scum bag BAR 'association' and friends have long since done away with justices of the peace in the original sense who had wide discretion to read interpret your complaint and those courts no longer exist and today even small claims courts are infested with attorneys which totally changed the nature of the judical system. Like the previous post your problem may lie elsewhere for all I know and it is impossible to make any kind of solid dertermination whithout examining your paperwork, but it that judge treated it that way then I expect you had the wrong key sorry to hear.

It was not my intention to be rude in not being more prompt in replying to your post. I have to walk a very fine line on this subject due to the guidelines and agreements of this site. In other words, ya gotta work with me here.

Problem one was that I didn't go through civilian channels when I probably should have. Like a lot of other folks with this long term issue, when it first starts, you just think it will pass. The problem with that is, certain windows close. Since your thread is about folks surrendering weapons in hopes of avoiding alleged cases of DV escalating to homicide, it's worthwhile to post what DV criteria usually entails:

1. A current intimate (romantic or sexual) partner. Co-habitation is not necessarily a requirement to meet this standard but you have to be able to prove the relationship goes over and above 'casual'.

2. You have a child together that is under the age of eighteen.

3. You lived together within the last six months.


Problem two, I was dealing with multiple jurisdictions. All of the things that I could verify in person came from the state of Alaska. That meant that even though the individual came to my new state, I didn't have any in person evidence. I had various electronic stuff but because I couldn't prove that jurisdiction, it became a grey area.





_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/8/2016 9:30:03 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

people do not pack table saws around with the intent of finding danger in a situation they would be forced to use it in.


Nobody legally carrying a firearm actively looks for a reason to use deadly force.



I've had a concealed carry permit for over a dozen years. I keep in mind my best line of defense is to not be where things are dangerous. I think that was a straw man.

I have had concealed carry permits over 35 years. I dont carry. But why would you?

I haven't had a flat tire in, probably, forty years but I've always had a jack and spare tire in the trunk. I've used it twice in those years to help stranded women with flats. I carry for two reasons. Evidence shows that the more people that carry, the lower the physical crime rate for everyone. And, just in case that one bad thing happens.



Exactly so, why dont you carry a table saw? You carry to use. Just in case.

Lets not bullshit here, wilbur.

Lol, all that comes from you is Bullshit and bluff.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/8/2016 10:09:10 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
and all that comes from you is ignorant asswipe. But those were your sentiments the table saw and the just in case. So, bluff? Blowhard is what you are.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/8/2016 10:35:00 AM   
ifmaz


Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

People get concealed carry permits for a variety of reasons, mostly to defend themselves by carrying a concealed firearm.

You appear to be an anti-rights advocate who claims to have an FFL and now a concealed carry permit. Why do you have an FFL if you don't like firearms? Why do you have a concealed carry permit if you do not carry a firearm? Why do you have both of these things if you dislike firearms?



q.e.d.

Please note the bolding.

Why do you beg strawmen? How the fuck do you come to this dislike of firearms? You carry it it use it. You have said as much.

Why don't you carry a table saw?
If you own 50 guns, I own (and I do own them) around 250 more than you,
I will freely admit there are a couple in that collection I don't really care for all that much.

https://www.atfonline.gov/fflezcheck/

3..41 ....... 02991 (fill in the blanks just the numbers in the 3 boxes)


I'm not following your "logic", are you attempting to say a table saw is a better defensive weapon than a firearm or that the mere act of carrying a firearm means one wants to use it? If the latter, does that mean by owning a fire extinguisher I am looking forward to putting out a fire? Does an alarm system on a vehicle mean one looks forward to it being stolen? Does health insurance mean one looks forward to being ill?

If the former, you should have no problems citing articles extolling the virtues of table saws for self defense. I look forward to reading those articles.


< Message edited by ifmaz -- 5/8/2016 10:36:15 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/8/2016 10:56:36 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

People get concealed carry permits for a variety of reasons, mostly to defend themselves by carrying a concealed firearm.

You appear to be an anti-rights advocate who claims to have an FFL and now a concealed carry permit. Why do you have an FFL if you don't like firearms? Why do you have a concealed carry permit if you do not carry a firearm? Why do you have both of these things if you dislike firearms?



q.e.d.

Please note the bolding.

Why do you beg strawmen? How the fuck do you come to this dislike of firearms? You carry it it use it. You have said as much.

Why don't you carry a table saw?
If you own 50 guns, I own (and I do own them) around 250 more than you,
I will freely admit there are a couple in that collection I don't really care for all that much.

https://www.atfonline.gov/fflezcheck/

3..41 ....... 02991 (fill in the blanks just the numbers in the 3 boxes)


I'm not following your "logic", are you attempting to say a table saw is a better defensive weapon than a firearm or that the mere act of carrying a firearm means one wants to use it? If the latter, does that mean by owning a fire extinguisher I am looking forward to putting out a fire? Does an alarm system on a vehicle mean one looks forward to it being stolen? Does health insurance mean one looks forward to being ill?

If the former, you should have no problems citing articles extolling the virtues of table saws for self defense. I look forward to reading those articles.


He's mostly ignorant and always irrational. It's just fun to make him bluster. Don't worry about trying to understand his irrational quotes.

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/8/2016 6:30:14 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

People get concealed carry permits for a variety of reasons, mostly to defend themselves by carrying a concealed firearm.

You appear to be an anti-rights advocate who claims to have an FFL and now a concealed carry permit. Why do you have an FFL if you don't like firearms? Why do you have a concealed carry permit if you do not carry a firearm? Why do you have both of these things if you dislike firearms?



q.e.d.

Please note the bolding.

Why do you beg strawmen? How the fuck do you come to this dislike of firearms? You carry it it use it. You have said as much.

Why don't you carry a table saw?
If you own 50 guns, I own (and I do own them) around 250 more than you,
I will freely admit there are a couple in that collection I don't really care for all that much.

https://www.atfonline.gov/fflezcheck/

3..41 ....... 02991 (fill in the blanks just the numbers in the 3 boxes)


I'm not following your "logic", are you attempting to say a table saw is a better defensive weapon than a firearm or that the mere act of carrying a firearm means one wants to use it? If the latter, does that mean by owning a fire extinguisher I am looking forward to putting out a fire? Does an alarm system on a vehicle mean one looks forward to it being stolen? Does health insurance mean one looks forward to being ill?

If the former, you should have no problems citing articles extolling the virtues of table saws for self defense. I look forward to reading those articles.


No, I am not, it is just that you read an interchange, without seeing it and have a knee jerk reaction. Wilbur said they are for self defense, now I never said anyone looks forward to anything, that was your pathetic strawman. However, you carry to use. And this has nothing to do much with the OP other than, you carry to use, just in case, however you want to spin your asswipe, and therefore, in domestic violence situations, the weapons should rightfully be removed, because they are there to be used. You can extoll the virtues of carrying a gun, to never use it. Not ever, for any reason.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/8/2016 6:57:36 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

you carry to use, just in case

I would have thought that would have been a given.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/8/2016 8:21:11 PM   
ifmaz


Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz
I'm not following your "logic", are you attempting to say a table saw is a better defensive weapon than a firearm or that the mere act of carrying a firearm means one wants to use it? If the latter, does that mean by owning a fire extinguisher I am looking forward to putting out a fire? Does an alarm system on a vehicle mean one looks forward to it being stolen? Does health insurance mean one looks forward to being ill?

If the former, you should have no problems citing articles extolling the virtues of table saws for self defense. I look forward to reading those articles.


No, I am not, it is just that you read an interchange, without seeing it and have a knee jerk reaction. Wilbur said they are for self defense, now I never said anyone looks forward to anything, that was your pathetic strawman. However, you carry to use. And this has nothing to do much with the OP other than, you carry to use, just in case, however you want to spin your asswipe, and therefore, in domestic violence situations, the weapons should rightfully be removed, because they are there to be used. You can extoll the virtues of carrying a gun, to never use it. Not ever, for any reason.


You say it's my "pathetic strawman" yet you continue to say one carries "to use". So, again, does the mere act of carrying a firearm mean one wants to use it and actively seeks out situations to use it? Does that mean by owning a fire extinguisher one looks forward to putting out a fire? Does an alarm system on a vehicle mean one looks forward to it being stolen? Does health insurance mean one looks forward to being ill? You've conveniently avoided answering these questions. The answer, of course, is no: merely having a fire extinguisher does not mean one seeks out fires in order to use said fire extinguisher. Likewise, one does not carry a firearm looking for a reason to use it. If you have taken any CCW courses (again, you say you have a CCW permit) you would know this.

In the case of being accused of domestic violence, or any crime, I'd hope one would want an indictment before extinguishing any Constitutionally protected right(s). However, the people that wish for civilian disarmament make up these "common sense" arguments in order to advance their agenda -- and, unfortunately, lots of Americans who are clearly unfamiliar with our country's history buy into it believing various (and repeated) encroachments on their rights somehow guarantees their safety.

If I was to accuse you of domestic violence, please list the rights you would give up before being found guilty.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/8/2016 10:31:42 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

So, again, does the mere act of carrying a firearm mean one wants to use it and actively seeks out situations to use it?

No, and he never said it did, which is why your argument is indeed a strawman. However, the only reason to carry a concealed handgun is to use if you need to, if you intended to just frighten off potential trouble you would carry it openly.

< Message edited by ThatDizzyChick -- 5/8/2016 10:32:23 PM >


_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/8/2016 11:10:44 PM   
ifmaz


Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

So, again, does the mere act of carrying a firearm mean one wants to use it and actively seeks out situations to use it?

No, and he never said it did, which is why your argument is indeed a strawman. However, the only reason to carry a concealed handgun is to use if you need to, if you intended to just frighten off potential trouble you would carry it openly.


He said "You carry it it use it. You have said as much." which I took to mean anyone concealed (or open) carrying is just itching for a chance to use their firearm. I said no one goes out looking for a reason to use their firearm. There is an extremely large difference between going out looking for a reason to draw and fire versus carrying for defense. The conversation is similar to having fire extinguishers in the home yet hoping never to have to use them, or are we all secretly wanting to be firemen whenever possible?

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/9/2016 5:04:32 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz
I'm not following your "logic", are you attempting to say a table saw is a better defensive weapon than a firearm or that the mere act of carrying a firearm means one wants to use it? If the latter, does that mean by owning a fire extinguisher I am looking forward to putting out a fire? Does an alarm system on a vehicle mean one looks forward to it being stolen? Does health insurance mean one looks forward to being ill?

If the former, you should have no problems citing articles extolling the virtues of table saws for self defense. I look forward to reading those articles.


No, I am not, it is just that you read an interchange, without seeing it and have a knee jerk reaction. Wilbur said they are for self defense, now I never said anyone looks forward to anything, that was your pathetic strawman. However, you carry to use. And this has nothing to do much with the OP other than, you carry to use, just in case, however you want to spin your asswipe, and therefore, in domestic violence situations, the weapons should rightfully be removed, because they are there to be used. You can extoll the virtues of carrying a gun, to never use it. Not ever, for any reason.


You say it's my "pathetic strawman" yet you continue to say one carries "to use". So, again, does the mere act of carrying a firearm mean one wants to use it and actively seeks out situations to use it? Does that mean by owning a fire extinguisher one looks forward to putting out a fire? Does an alarm system on a vehicle mean one looks forward to it being stolen? Does health insurance mean one looks forward to being ill? You've conveniently avoided answering these questions. The answer, of course, is no: merely having a fire extinguisher does not mean one seeks out fires in order to use said fire extinguisher. Likewise, one does not carry a firearm looking for a reason to use it. If you have taken any CCW courses (again, you say you have a CCW permit) you would know this.

In the case of being accused of domestic violence, or any crime, I'd hope one would want an indictment before extinguishing any Constitutionally protected right(s). However, the people that wish for civilian disarmament make up these "common sense" arguments in order to advance their agenda -- and, unfortunately, lots of Americans who are clearly unfamiliar with our country's history buy into it believing various (and repeated) encroachments on their rights somehow guarantees their safety.

If I was to accuse you of domestic violence, please list the rights you would give up before being found guilty.



It doesn't matter what you accuse me of, we dont live together. The law is, and has been, if you are accused (and there are cops and prosecutors and so on that believe there is enough evidence of your crime) of domestic violence, you may not possess guns. If you are subsequently found guilty, the show is over, if innocent the guns returned.

And all the rhetoric good and bad, it makes no difference, it is the law, and it is constitutional.

Now, various and repeated encroachments are always with us, some are ignorant and some are enlightened, liberties, in a free society are not without let or hindrance. Life is not now, and has never been, nor never will be an allie allie in free.

If you are accused of murder, you will at hindrance to your liberty, be spending the weekend in the slam, as detrimental as that is to the notion of liberty.

You said that you carry to use, in answer to my why, I bolded it, dont put words in my mouth. You said it. Own it.

One walks into the ice cream store with ones gun to protect oneself, but quiver at the thought of a transvestite, an inter-sexed, or sex changed person shitting next to you in two different locked stalls. So, freedom is always a one way street for someone.



< Message edited by mnottertail -- 5/9/2016 5:06:08 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/9/2016 6:44:27 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz
I'm not following your "logic", are you attempting to say a table saw is a better defensive weapon than a firearm or that the mere act of carrying a firearm means one wants to use it? If the latter, does that mean by owning a fire extinguisher I am looking forward to putting out a fire? Does an alarm system on a vehicle mean one looks forward to it being stolen? Does health insurance mean one looks forward to being ill?

If the former, you should have no problems citing articles extolling the virtues of table saws for self defense. I look forward to reading those articles.


No, I am not, it is just that you read an interchange, without seeing it and have a knee jerk reaction. Wilbur said they are for self defense, now I never said anyone looks forward to anything, that was your pathetic strawman. However, you carry to use. And this has nothing to do much with the OP other than, you carry to use, just in case, however you want to spin your asswipe, and therefore, in domestic violence situations, the weapons should rightfully be removed, because they are there to be used. You can extoll the virtues of carrying a gun, to never use it. Not ever, for any reason.


You say it's my "pathetic strawman" yet you continue to say one carries "to use". So, again, does the mere act of carrying a firearm mean one wants to use it and actively seeks out situations to use it? Does that mean by owning a fire extinguisher one looks forward to putting out a fire? Does an alarm system on a vehicle mean one looks forward to it being stolen? Does health insurance mean one looks forward to being ill? You've conveniently avoided answering these questions. The answer, of course, is no: merely having a fire extinguisher does not mean one seeks out fires in order to use said fire extinguisher. Likewise, one does not carry a firearm looking for a reason to use it. If you have taken any CCW courses (again, you say you have a CCW permit) you would know this.

In the case of being accused of domestic violence, or any crime, I'd hope one would want an indictment before extinguishing any Constitutionally protected right(s). However, the people that wish for civilian disarmament make up these "common sense" arguments in order to advance their agenda -- and, unfortunately, lots of Americans who are clearly unfamiliar with our country's history buy into it believing various (and repeated) encroachments on their rights somehow guarantees their safety.

If I was to accuse you of domestic violence, please list the rights you would give up before being found guilty.



It doesn't matter what you accuse me of, we dont live together. The law is, and has been, if you are accused (and there are cops and prosecutors and so on that believe there is enough evidence of your crime) of domestic violence, you may not possess guns. If you are subsequently found guilty, the show is over, if innocent the guns returned.

And all the rhetoric good and bad, it makes no difference, it is the law, and it is constitutional.

Now, various and repeated encroachments are always with us, some are ignorant and some are enlightened, liberties, in a free society are not without let or hindrance. Life is not now, and has never been, nor never will be an allie allie in free.

If you are accused of murder, you will at hindrance to your liberty, be spending the weekend in the slam, as detrimental as that is to the notion of liberty.

You said that you carry to use, in answer to my why, I bolded it, dont put words in my mouth. You said it. Own it.

One walks into the ice cream store with ones gun to protect oneself, but quiver at the thought of a transvestite, an inter-sexed, or sex changed person shitting next to you in two different locked stalls. So, freedom is always a one way street for someone.



Oh undertail, post 72 you began the assertions of carrying with the intent of finding danger in which they can use. The rest of your argument is an affirming the consequent fallacious argument. Not worth paying attention to really. And to think you're the pillar the other nasties here bedrock upon.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/9/2016 7:00:45 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
Here's how they try and do it in California. In a state that is overwhelmingly run by lefties, they still have to hide their intent from the public until it's an accomplished fate. These bills are presently being quietly run through the state assembly.

Assembly Bill 156 (McCarty & de Leon) - AB 156, introduced as legislation to combat global warming, now requires the Attorney General to maintain information about ammunition transactions and vendor licenses.

Assembly Bill 857 (Cooper & de Leon) – AB 857, introduced as legislation to reduce greenhouse gases, now serves as a restriction on curios, relics, and home-built firearms.

Assembly Bill 1135 (Levine & Ting) – AB 1135’s introduced as legislation to form the Kings River East Groundwater Sustainability Agency, now serves as a reclassification of certain semi-automatic weapons to assault weapons. With this change any magazine capable of being removed from the firearm without disassembly of the firearm would now be classified as an assault weapon. This includes firearms that require a “tool” to remove the magazine such as rifles equipped with a “bullet button”.

Assembly Bill 1511 (Santiago) – AB 1511’s introduced as energy saving bill, now severely limits the ability to loan a firearm between two law abiding citizens, for example a hunting trip or home protection.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/9/2016 7:47:45 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

Oh undertail, post 72 you began the assertions of carrying with the intent of finding danger in which they can use. The rest of your argument is an affirming the consequent fallacious argument. Not worth paying attention to really. And to think you're the pillar the other nasties here bedrock upon.


Oh, wilbur the cockgargler, who carries around a table saw upon their person, and a fire extinguisher 'just in case'. There is no affirming a consequent, since you have yourself said that is the consequent. 'just in case', the fallacy is all yours wilbur. As usual. I simply ask why you carry (on your person, continuously or near continuously) when you dont carry a table saw or fire extinguisher on your hip 'just in case'.


< Message edited by mnottertail -- 5/9/2016 7:48:07 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/9/2016 8:19:19 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
his gun is wilburs safe place.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/9/2016 8:22:14 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
You can have my tablesaw when you pry it from my cold dead hands...

~one of wilbur's many socks.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/9/2016 8:26:58 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

You can have my tablesaw when you pry it from my cold dead hands...

~one of wilbur's many socks.

the sock never changes idiocies, its rather easy.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill ... - 5/9/2016 8:48:23 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

You can have my tablesaw when you pry it from my cold dead hands...

~one of wilbur's many socks.

the sock never changes idiocies, its rather easy.

LMAO...there you go. One of undertail's wannabes. Way to zing there. That's so funny.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Breaking: Connecticut Passes Gun Confiscation Bill for Those “Accused” of Domestic Violence Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109