Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/18/2016 11:48:35 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
oh so
quote:

An endangered species which has been out-evolved and out-competed by those dominating male chimpanzees.
is your term for homo sapiens not Pan troglodytes now??
Makes sense.
LMAO
Seriously?

Bonobos are considered amongst our closest relatives in the animal kingdom. We out-competed and out-evolved them.

Duh.

Again, Christ some people are thick.


when you post bullshit and get caught on it, then have the nerve to try and backtrack so badly, you become irrelevant.
You have had a BAD BAD week for relevancy and fact.
why not put it down to a bad spell checker, that might have garnered a trickle of belief.



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/18/2016 11:49:54 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Oh, I love the way you try and play mean girls by talking about someone to each other instead of to them.

It's something which men don't do. We're more directly confrontational. Well... unless you're a submissive male of course. Then you act like a girl.

QED.


Look, Awareness, word to the wise - maybe you should just avoid the forums at this time of the month? Particularly if you're having, well, not to put too fine a point on it, a very heavy one.

Males have hormone problems of their own without blaming it on menstruation....

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/18/2016 11:52:19 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline 		Possibly, but the sad thing about this guy is that he's faking it.
(Like every woman he's ever fucked...)

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/18/2016 11:54:27 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Males have hormone problems of their own without blaming it on menstruation....


Well, we can thank our lucky stars that Awareness will never suffer from them, as well, then.


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/18/2016 11:55:01 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/18/2016 12:13:45 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

when you post bullshit and get caught on it, then have the nerve to try and backtrack so badly, you become irrelevant.

When has he been anything but irrelevant? He's running neck-and-neck with Sanity for the ironic username award.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/18/2016 12:39:44 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stef


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

when you post bullshit and get caught on it, then have the nerve to try and backtrack so badly, you become irrelevant.

When has he been anything but irrelevant? He's running neck-and-neck with Sanity for the ironic username award.

Well, I have agreed with him before, but I have also had bad judgement regarding some people, so I have to agree with you after the past few days of posts.



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/18/2016 2:47:15 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

And what does the social structures of other species have to do with those of humanity?
Sexual dimorphism, gender-based division of labour and patriarchal societies are aspects of successful species.

Matriarchal societies tend to be small, isolated or extinct.



Not among other animals, well at least their decline has fuck all to do with their matriarchal nature, and more to do with humans being out of control killing machines that wipe out entire species without regard to their social structure.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/18/2016 3:47:21 PM   
blnymph


Posts: 1598
Joined: 11/13/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
Bonobos are considered amongst our closest relatives in the animal kingdom. We out-competed and out-evolved them.




Yes they are, and no, we did not.

Recent genome analysis leads to a conclusion that our last common ancestors lived about 6-7 million years ago. Since then human evolution went on, but so did theirs (both Pan species) although in different ways. It is a common misassumption that more "primitive" species of whatever kind at some time came to an evolutionary standstill. Some species or even orders (like for example sharks, crocodiles, nautilus, horseshoe crabs) reach a near-to optimum of adaption to their habitats at some early stage so that at least the external appearances appear unchanged for long periods. This does not exclude further evolutionary adaptions without externally visible consequences.

The "out-evolution" is not yet decided between humans and bonobos btw.
Bonobos seem to be immune to Simian immunodeficiency virusses (SIV which is most likely the same as HIV) while we (as well as chimpanzees) are not. If humans will not eat them all to extinction before the score might look different after a few more AIDS waves.
Nobody yet knows why they are immune but it might be something they developed during their more recent evolution apart from chimpanzees and humans.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/19/2016 1:40:25 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
oh so
quote:

An endangered species which has been out-evolved and out-competed by those dominating male chimpanzees.
is your term for homo sapiens not Pan troglodytes now??
Makes sense.
LMAO
Seriously?

Bonobos are considered amongst our closest relatives in the animal kingdom. We out-competed and out-evolved them.

Duh.

Again, Christ some people are thick.



Oh... so you when you typed
quote:

An endangered species which has been out-evolved and out-competed by those dominating male chimpanzees.
you meant to say "homo sapiens" instead of chimpanzees?

Christ, some people are thick.

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/19/2016 1:59:41 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

P.S. In case you didn't understand the implications - those tribal groups with matriarchal societies are largely dead because they had the shit kicked out of them by male-dominated societies.

Evolution in action.


Ah, one of the classic intellectual cul-de-sacs that MRA types like to pursue. It's very easy to draw simplistic conclusions from the past, but unless you apply some critical thinking you are apt to completely miss the most important points.

Environment is a huge driver for evolution, and many extinctions have occurred because the environment has changed more quickly than the threatened species can evolve.

Alas, MRA types don't seem to have grasped that the context in which Homo Sapiens exists has changed a tad since the stone age, and those traits of aggression and physical strength that saw the emergence of patriarchy are increasingly a hindrance to our survival...

Given that biological evolution trails far behind the evolution of our environment, we have to fill the gap with a little bit of intellectual evolution... something that a few people are demonstrably incapable of. Skills related to collaboration, compromise, empathy and long term strategy are more crucial to the survival of homo sapiens. These skills are very evidently sorely lacking in some.

And... evolution will not be kind to them.


_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/19/2016 2:30:13 AM   
epiphiny43


Posts: 688
Joined: 10/20/2006
Status: offline 		A rather ironic username given the awareness of actual human societies through our technological evolution. Too much Saturday cartoons and pop-psychology from your local political propagandists??
Most small group hunting and gathering societies, the very ones that supposedly 'outcompeted' the other various primates, were largely matriarchies. More mixed than pure, females had roles and control, males had other areas. The emergence of patriarchies came with agriculture and animal husbandry, which are social and technological evolutions, not genetic, and not with far earlier group violence and competition where supposedly male physical dominance would prevail. Once there was yearly stored excess wealth (Food), and control of water became the instrument of power, power concentrated in the hands of a few. Patriarchs emerged, trade on a large scale developed, a military could be supported, and war as a social institution developed.
This is extremely late in the genetic evolution of Homo sapiens, a mere blink in the time real changes in the DNA, RNA and mitochondrial codes require. The later dominance of male dominated Western societies over more varied social structure pre-colonial societies had everything to do with material technology and disease histories and nothing genetic, other than acquired immunity to a variety of diseases developed in Europe. Guns, Germs and Steel covered that remarkably well.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/19/2016 2:54:33 AM   
otrok


Posts: 10
Joined: 5/8/2006
Status: offline 		As and whenever i see contemptuous remarks upon any subject i am reminded of the quotation that: 'Contempt before research and investigation is Not Science. On the other hand of which i have two. Contempt before anything is not only hateful its stupid.
Anyone who believes in any semblance of truth always realises that whatever the 'established' beliefs of the day are they will always be superseded, one way or another. All it takes is a Dictator to get into power and your beliefs will become theirs in next to no time. So we conclude by saying that in the blink of an eye the human mind can become as primitive as the merest life form; but to say that per see would suggest that primitive life forms are not intelligent.
I leave it with you to discuss.

(in reply to epiphiny43)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/19/2016 3:15:51 AM   
otrok


Posts: 10
Joined: 5/8/2006
Status: offline 		I am being rather vague here; i realise that and i wish i could have said this better but i can't seem to edit or delete it now. There is no reference to any user here particularly by the way. After all i don't know them do i?

(in reply to otrok)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/19/2016 5:33:44 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Oh, I love the way you try and play mean girls by talking about someone to each other instead of to them.

It's something which men don't do. We're more directly confrontational. Well... unless you're a submissive male of course. Then you act like a girl.

QED.


Look, Awareness, word to the wise - maybe you should just avoid the forums at this time of the month? Particularly if you're having, well, not to put too fine a point on it, a very heavy one.

He's been having a heavy one since the year dot. That may account for his persistent delusions of intellectual prowess and erudition.

There are other explanations but as they are even less flattering I won't go into them right now.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 5/19/2016 6:08:31 AM >

_____________________________



(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/19/2016 10:44:23 AM   
verbatimguy


Posts: 203
Joined: 5/11/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Oh, I love the way you try and play mean girls by talking about someone to each other instead of to them.

It's something which men don't do. We're more directly confrontational. Well... unless you're a submissive male of course. Then you act like a girl.

QED.


Look, Awareness, word to the wise - maybe you should just avoid the forums at this time of the month? Particularly if you're having, well, not to put too fine a point on it, a very heavy one.


Is Awareness a girl or a boy?

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/19/2016 1:36:14 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline 		Who gives a fuck.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to verbatimguy)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/19/2016 1:37:50 PM   
Spiritedsub2


Posts: 3316
Joined: 7/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: verbatimguy


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Oh, I love the way you try and play mean girls by talking about someone to each other instead of to them.

It's something which men don't do. We're more directly confrontational. Well... unless you're a submissive male of course. Then you act like a girl.

QED.


Look, Awareness, word to the wise - maybe you should just avoid the forums at this time of the month? Particularly if you're having, well, not to put too fine a point on it, a very heavy one.


Is Awareness a girl or a boy?


You seriously need to step away from the computer. Indefinitely.


_____________________________

Don’t grieve. Anything you lose comes round in another form.
~ Rumi

Laughing Dolphin

(in reply to verbatimguy)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/19/2016 1:54:34 PM   
MsTanner


Posts: 134
Status: offline 		Absolutely agree.

_____________________________

If you cannot change your mind, How are you so sure you still have one? -proverb

(in reply to Spiritedsub2)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge - 5/19/2016 2:38:57 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

And what does the social structures of other species have to do with those of humanity?
Sexual dimorphism, gender-based division of labour and patriarchal societies are aspects of successful species.

Matriarchal societies tend to be small, isolated or extinct.



Not among other animals, well at least their decline has fuck all to do with their matriarchal nature, and more to do with humans being out of control killing machines that wipe out entire species without regard to their social structure.
You're not really at all clued up on how the natural world works, are you.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: human evolution: women could have been in charge Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094