RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

[Poll]

Does BDSM require "sex?"


Yes
  26% (19)
No
  73% (54)


Total Votes : 73
(last vote on : 9/13/2023 10:27:47 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )


Message


verbatimguy -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/23/2016 8:21:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: peppermint


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Yes, LIFE requires sex. Look kinkroids, because we have no choice but to obey the etymology of the words, I offer the following:

Bondage itself has acted as foreplay to sex. (especially when practiced unclothed, the 'binder' enjoying and the bound also...the tease aspect)
Discipline does not require sex but does also often act as foreplay to sex.

Sadism: the word is derived from the Marquis DeSade who inflicted pain as foreplay to sex and very often while simultaneously having sex and has subsequently been described as a kinky, sexual, fetish pleasure.

Masochism the origin of which followed Sadism by a few years, is defined as pleasure derived from receiving pain with that pleasure being almost exclusively but not entirely...as sexual foreplay or on occasion, simultaneously enjoyed during the act of sex.


I will agree that much of BDSM "can" include sex. However, so much of it does not include sex. Sex is not a requirement to be part of BDSM. If you don't believe me wait until you're 75, diabetic, bad heart, transplants. Guess you'll have to give up BDSM then as your BDSM world won't be all about sex.

I can look up meanings of words too.

Sadism

Psychiatry. the condition in which sexual gratification depends on causing pain or degradation to others.
Compare masochism.
2.
any enjoyment in being cruel.
3.
extreme cruelty.

OOPS? Two definitions of sadism that do not include sex.

Masochism

Psychiatry. the condition in which sexual gratification depends on suffering physical pain or humiliation.
2.
gratification gained from pain, deprivation, degradation, etc., inflicted or imposed on oneself, either as a result of one's own actions or the actions of others, especially the tendency to seek this form of gratification.
3.
the act of turning one's destructive tendencies inward or upon oneself.
4.
the tendency to find pleasure in self-denial, submissiveness, etc.

OOPS again. Sex mentioned in one definition and not in 3. Did the dictionary get it wrong? Perhaps they need to consult you before deciding on the meaning of words.

Didn't refer to definition, I referred to the etymology or the creation of the word. The so-called definitions of words and the publications there of, have assumed the right to be very malleable over the years.

The creation of the word Sadism comes from DeSade and he gives us no choice in the matter and had nothing whatever to do with degradation or cruelty. Those additions to the so-called definition which were added, much more describe the reaction to such sadism as in 'that must be cruel or degrading.' but were not in anyway defined as cruelty or degradation. And no, these publishers do not need to consult me when they take it upon themselves...to ADD to the meaning of many, many original words.

Masochism was also created for the reasons I give. Even some of [his] subjects made it plain that they found DeSade's actions neither degrading or cruel....they were aroused.

If one reads the original purpose for the creation of the word as in at least two, sadism and masochism it reflects that they were created as the original definition i.e., a sexual reaction to giving and receiving pain...nothing more. Adding these words to psychiatry in medicine...came later and of course, it multiplied their patients.


You cant speak cense to them because they cant undestand the origin of the words is sexual in nature.
There BONDAGFE sessions are always with full clothes on becasue they would NEVER do BDSM with nude people.
That would be sexual and tehy say they only do with clohes on all the time and never nude.




peppermint -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/23/2016 9:00:03 PM)

What a nice guy you are, and very naughty also.




LilJuly76 -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 3:27:39 AM)

dude I noticed you ignored everyone as usual and focused on the guy that is in tuned with you.

let me spell something out to you since you can't spell.

Nudity isn't sex-Nudity is just nudity

and also yes sometimes bondage is done with clothes on.

you need to get your terminology right instead of making up things as you go along.




LilJuly76 -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 3:28:52 AM)

hehe, he's not going to get that one.

on the plus side I broke stride with him in one way he actually used the word session wow holy cow there is hope for the newbie yet!




MsTanner -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 7:17:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: verbatimguy


You cant speak cense to them because they cant undestand the origin of the words is sexual in nature.
There BONDAGFE sessions are always with full clothes on becasue they would NEVER do BDSM with nude people.
That would be sexual and tehy say they only do with clohes on all the time and never nude.

*************************************************************
First, Your grammar and spelling is atrocious.
Learn to use spell check words underlined in RED are misspelled correct them.
There is also this http://spellcheckplus.com/ Use it!
Instructions: Type in the little box then make needed corrections, Clarity is important so readers can decipher
what you are saying.

Now O wise one what is the origin, meaning and components of BDSM, sex, sexual and sexuality?
Your viewing audience would like to know.




verbatimguy -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 8:06:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LilJuly76

dude I noticed you ignored everyone as usual and focused on the guy that is in tuned with you.

let me spell something out to you since you can't spell.

Nudity isn't sex-Nudity is just nudity

and also yes sometimes bondage is done with clothes on.

you need to get your terminology right instead of making up things as you go along.


You see what you want to see.
I agreed with residentsadist and mrrodgers who both explained it real good.
But you didnt agree with them.

I agree derectly with captr and thatidzzychick and slavelynn and docstrange and desfip and snitch and camille65 but you dont see that either.

I even agree opposite of derectly with thecabal because chastity is sexuality to.

What you see is what you want to see which is only who agrees with you.




UllrsIshtar -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 8:06:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist


Sexual sadomasochism, bondage and the other elements of BDSM were removed from the DSM as illness. Stating that their non sexual counterparts were diagnosed by other symptoms of mental illness... so the DSM doesn't list them as a disorder anymore. Just like when they removed homosexuality. It is just consider part of the human sexual condition now. As I clarified, there has to be a sexual context to BDSM to some degree for it to be kink.

If someone is practicing the components of BDSM outside of a sexual/sensual desire or pleasure, they have a personality disorder or mental illness, not a sexual kink. Domination, becomes oppressive and tyrannical.... tying people up, caging them, torturing them for the sake of torture is sadism (not sexual sadism). People who do that pulled the wings off of a flies or tortured animals when they were growing up.

So before anyone proclaims their is no sexual context, sensual stimulation or desire from practicing the BDSM arts, think about the alternative in that your are proclaiming you are a sociopath or even a psychopath. BDSM is all about sex, not always about having sex, but about being sensual, feeling sexy, fulfilling passionate desires or as a substitution for them.

I am the boss at work. It doesn't turn me on, it's my job. I am the head honcho at home and boss of my slave, that does turn me on. If being in charge of my slave didn't light my passions, it would just be like having another job.


Yes totally, because back in the day, when BDSM was still defined as a mental disorder, the DSM got it wrong. And back in the day, when homosexuality was still defined as a mental disorder, the DSM got it wrong.

But NOW, now that they've decided that BDSM isn't a mental disorder when it turns you on, and that it is only a mental disorder to engage in non-sexual rope, pain, needle, etc play as a path to finding your own center and limits in a non-sexual context, NOW they're OBVIOUSLY correct, and my non-sexual BDSM play is clearly evidence of a mental disorder...

Cause obviously they never get it wrong on anything... and if they say that engaging in non-sexual BDSM play means that somebody is a sociopath or psychopath, then they obviously couldn't be wrong about it...







ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 9:59:16 AM)

quote:

I agree derectly with captr and thatidzzychick

No actually you don't. See I never said that BDSM requires sex, I said that it does FOR ME. That means nothing to other people, each of us gets to make that determination for themselves, for some it is entirely sexual, for others it is partially sexual, and for yet others it is not sexual at all.




MsTanner -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 10:48:06 AM)

That has been the problem throughout this thread, misconstruing what is said to suit him. Apparently he does not have the ability to formulate his thoughts and believes and express them, But.... Can only rely on what someone else has to say if there is some semblance even if taken out of context.
Not once I seen a rebuttal to anyone of opposition. Not to mention by post he has apparently overlook or ignored because he can not answer what I posed.




WickedsDesire -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 11:17:19 AM)

I have a duty. Out with muffin plundering and herding waay to many cats.
And it is to wreck all women for all mankind. Wicked, he is quite mad, only chooses the top of the tree, apex, if you like, before I bludgeon them all down to size with my throbbing man parts....fr those who are slow or indulge in self trepanning

Only deranged animals say they do not require sex, monetary whore bags of intriguing diseases and wanting my cake money.

And few people remember origin.other than me, and one like who went to dust.

so who is up for a shagging on here...i like to ask the deep throb questions




MrJamesT -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 11:25:59 AM)

Its like the chicken or the egg debate. Submission should include all aspects of your life but the specifics are up to the Dom




MsTanner -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 11:45:44 AM)


Being from the opposite side of the keel my preference is to bludgeon them there throbbing male parts, Best wish's in your shagging adventures .




WickedsDesire -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 12:00:01 PM)

Mstanner you have so many profiles on here if they are all like you on here and I believe in excess of 99% are....give me better and more accurate directions

Visit me again, no matter your format, my words will be not so kind. I will repeat there are no genuine women on these forums seeking a man ball sack to crush - are we clear - or to fall in love with, only fakes galore, the odd ghost and deranged whore




MsTanner -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 12:11:22 PM)

First you're so full of it your eyes are floating.... Just how many socks do you need.... Everyone knows about you and the extent you go to in your self proliferating malarkey.... muffin




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 12:41:27 PM)

quote:

my throbbing man parts

You know, there's a pill for that.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 12:43:11 PM)

quote:

Submission should include all aspects of your life but the specifics are up to the Dom

Actually, the specifics are up to all those involved.




LilJuly76 -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 1:34:08 PM)

like I said before you twist other people's words around to fit your idea of what we said and than you agree with them. myself, ThatDizzyChick and MsTanner all said different things in regards to BDSM and you interpreted what we all said as something different.




verbatimguy -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 1:50:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

I agree derectly with captr and thatidzzychick

No actually you don't. See I never said that BDSM requires sex, I said that it does FOR ME. That means nothing to other people, each of us gets to make that determination for themselves, for some it is entirely sexual, for others it is partially sexual, and for yet others it is not sexual at all.


Same thing. Requires sex FOR me is requeres sex for you.

And sex is sexuality.
Male female stuff.






LilJuly76 -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 1:55:58 PM)

it's not the same thing, maybe you should finish the rest of what she said instead of taking only part of what she said.




MistrixMsE -> RE: Does BDSM require "sex?" (5/24/2016 1:59:17 PM)

For me, bdsm and sex are very much unrelated... bdsm for me is more about control.... surrendering of will and body from my sub. Only in a narrow scope does sex ever come into it, and only then with a committed partner. I can play anytime with near anyone male or female.. public or private... but ill be fully clothed, and no sexual activity is part of it.

For sex and kink, it requires a committed personal partner, who must be male and of a physical type i am attracted to, and it will be in private. While i will play publicly, i dont disrobe or fuck publicly.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875