Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Men vs women who can't support their kids


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Men vs women who can't support their kids Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/28/2016 9:55:48 PM   
respectmen


Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline 		https://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fstarecat.com%2Fcontent%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fpublic-housing-for-women-who-cant-financially-support-their-children-for-men-prison.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fstarecat.com%2Fcategory%2Fmen%2Fpage%2F9%2F&docid=ATU_Y_YKR7GO7M&tbnid=RKjpGxGxJq-brM%3A&w=735&h=731&bih=754&biw=1638&ved=0ahUKEwiF3IDMvv7MAhVBj5QKHdJ5CEUQMwgtKBEwEQ&iact=mrc&uact=8

So much for all this male privilege. lolz
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/28/2016 10:06:35 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/28/2016 10:08:31 PM   
respectmen


Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline 		Hey stef, would a male be considered a misogynist if he acted the same way as you towards an injustice and double standard against women?


(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/28/2016 10:13:12 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline 		My post refers only to you, not to any perceived injustice that you may be feeling on behalf of your fellow whiny babymen.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/28/2016 10:26:55 PM   
respectmen


Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline 		So when feminists complain, they are whiny babywomen? Oh that's right, you have double standards.

(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/28/2016 10:28:36 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline 		Nope. You should stop using that word until you understand the definition.

Until then, keep crying whiny babyman.



< Message edited by stef -- 5/28/2016 10:30:03 PM >

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/28/2016 10:36:58 PM   
respectmen


Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline 		So it isn't having a double standard to have one standard, a positive standard, when women complain about their gender grievances while having another standard, a negative standard, when men complain about their gender grievances?

Riight

I think you are the one who needs to learn what double standards mean. You seem so damn dumb that you don't even understand your own mindset.

When women complain about gender issues that affect women, they are poor victims standing up for their rights. When men complain about gender issues that affect men, they are whiny babymen lol.

Gotta larf at your version of equality.

(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/28/2016 10:47:16 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline 		If that was my version of "gender equality", you might have a point. It's not, whiny babyman.



_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/28/2016 10:52:59 PM   
respectmen


Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline 		So feminists are whiny babies too? If not, that's a double standard, dummy.

(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/28/2016 11:35:20 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline 		No, to both. Again, you really shouldn't use words you don't understand whiny babyman.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/28/2016 11:39:24 PM   
respectmen


Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline 		It's you who doesn't seem to understand what double standards mean. It's you who doesn't even understand what you are actually doing.You seem borderline retarded.

(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/28/2016 11:40:37 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline 		FR

There goes a minute of my time I'll never get back.

T^T

(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/28/2016 11:42:53 PM   
respectmen


Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline 		Termy, thank Stef for that. I've never seen her post anything relevant or intelligent in discussion for all these years I've observed this forum. Her posts are usually silly one liners, or not if that, pictures.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/28/2016 11:42:55 PM   
Blank101


Posts: 130
Joined: 9/15/2011
From: Portland, OR
Status: offline

(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 1:12:11 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

Termy, thank Stef for that. I've never seen her post anything relevant or intelligent in discussion for all these years I've observed this forum. Her posts are usually silly one liners, or not if that, pictures.


She actually used to be a moderator. Not no mo, but she does have her moments. But I am sure she qualifies under most of the tenets of feminism.

We got the physical strength and usually the guns. We bestow rights on others, not the other way round.

White Men built half of what is good in this world, despite being a minority. We stole half of what we got, diamonds from South Africa, Cadmium from Bosnia or whatever, Milesovic country, phosphorus from Nam. Next up is gold in Mali. It is coming.

T^T

(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 4:33:47 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline 		I'm just feeling smug that I'd suggested the 'fathers for justice" nonsense as part of his issues with women before he started this thread.


_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 5:30:27 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline 		Do I need to come out with the whole Ops’ thread is a classical example of dangerous(ish) sophistry. Please refrain for doing so, you do it almost all the time. As so do some of the rest of you - you know whom you are. Besides you(s) have a brain consider trying to make a better contribution >90% of the time, ranting <10% is acceptable.

Whence I was a lad I was well aware of my father avoiding paying maintenance, a pittance back in those days. I am also aware of a guy I used to work with said to me if he had to pay maintenance to his wife, who had a higher paying job and her new boyfriend. He would be left with almost no money and not able to house himself even in a wretched hovel – so he gave up his job. I am also aware some women who basked in being knocked up by many men so they could get the 3-4 bedroom house and a set of benefits, to the max. That allowed them to live a reasonably well off life where they did not work and had no intention of ever doing so and were able to go out partying every day at the weekends and more and they had the latest 500inch tvs and brand new kitchens with the gold plated sinks and butlers (okay maybe not the last bit).
Anyhoos I can cite a whole mixed bag of stories

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 6:49:57 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		Its a bit like the rape figures..cept the rape figures are worse
Half the parents that fuck over their kids, will never see the inside of a jail.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 7:11:45 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline 		Myself, I'm wondering why somebody who spends all of his posts bitching about women usurping men's rightful role as earners and breadwinners and the people who are meant to hold down a proper job is whining about men being being expected to pay child support if they can't keep it in their pants or use a rubber?

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 7:20:08 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline 		I'm pretty sure a house husband would get the house instead of jail for being unable to pay child support too.

And the woman who is responsible for his alimony and child expenses will be put to jail.

I'm pretty sure this is true for my country.

So tell you what. Be a house husband! Find a wife to support you financially. Be the one staying at home taking care of the kid. You won't end up in jail for refusing to pay child support as long as you are gonna personally hands on take care of the child all the way.

I know at least 5 house husbands in my life time personally with wives who earn over 100k per annum and they don't work, they just stay at home and take care of kids. So I know they aren't going to jail if they divorce and can't pay child support. They are financially reliant on their wives. And I know their wives won't even want custody of the kids in the divorce, they would get custody of the kids. As they marry career minded women.

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 5/29/2016 7:24:34 AM >

(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Men vs women who can't support their kids Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.090