RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 7:33:06 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

Myself, I'm wondering why somebody who spends all of his posts bitching about women usurping men's rightful role as earners and breadwinners and the people who are meant to hold down a proper job is whining about men being being expected to pay child support if they can't keep it in their pants or use a rubber?

Well we all know that bringing up kids is only about the finances.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to WhoreMods)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 9:36:11 AM

WickedsDesire

Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline

Alas, house husbands are still rare over here. Not that I am sure why that matters. Whoever gets custody of the kids keeps the house is how it works pretty much anywhere greta75

But it is not uncommon for the house to be sold and the bulk of the equity to be awarded to whoever has the kids, often the women.......always struck me as unfair that, it should be a 50/50 split in my mind regarding custody and in a fair percentage of cases (>10%) none of the two should have custody.

But as I have already said, greta75 and forum, his thread is based on sophistry, like pretty much all his others and contributions - The tally is completely unacceptable.....If he wishes to to contribute decency most of the time and have it out with a feminist, or fake profile, I am fine with that...he is not stupid either, but I am beginning to question this, or his purpose he has the capacity to word the thread a lot better..try doing so >50% of the time it is not a big ask

Edit
I do not speak to many men privately, or couples, they lack the capacity to have decent conversation so almost all my examples cite women.

A few years ago I was talking to one in Ayr, she was a nice person. She tried to explain to me he is selling the house, forcing us to sell it, and she was clearly upset and angry at times. I asked why should you keep the house.... never got one answer to my liking.

Wickeds Divorce 12 years ago- no kids...short version or a longer version. due the sophistry of the thread.

Wicked to lawyers her to have and keep everything with one condition she pay my fees for the divorce and outrageous £2000 for that…This irked my lawyer on account of it kept billable to an absolute minimum and that disgusted me

But 18 months later I got an email asking if I wanted the two cats, as she had to move back in with mum (who has dogs) on account of her not being able to afford the house – which is contrary to what she told me not that I actually believed anything she had said to me for a number of years. But fuk 18 months and all that euquity.

My absolute advice is everything must be split 50/50 with the bias going to the one who has custody. My personal belief is every one has a right to social housing most Americans will not understand that much as they exist in a backwards society. But with the greater share awarded to those who have custody, ironically usually the women…for reasons that escape me a childless man with 3 cats (different cats now)

< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 5/29/2016 9:54:59 AM >

(in reply to Greta75)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 9:48:53 AM

ifmaz

Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

https://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fstarecat.com%2Fcontent%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fpublic-housing-for-women-who-cant-financially-support-their-children-for-men-prison.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fstarecat.com%2Fcategory%2Fmen%2Fpage%2F9%2F&docid=ATU_Y_YKR7GO7M&tbnid=RKjpGxGxJq-brM%3A&w=735&h=731&bih=754&biw=1638&ved=0ahUKEwiF3IDMvv7MAhVBj5QKHdJ5CEUQMwgtKBEwEQ&iact=mrc&uact=8

So much for all this male privilege. lolz

Dude, who hurt you? You need a hug.

(in reply to respectmen)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 10:17:54 AM

WhoreMods

Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

https://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fstarecat.com%2Fcontent%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fpublic-housing-for-women-who-cant-financially-support-their-children-for-men-prison.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fstarecat.com%2Fcategory%2Fmen%2Fpage%2F9%2F&docid=ATU_Y_YKR7GO7M&tbnid=RKjpGxGxJq-brM%3A&w=735&h=731&bih=754&biw=1638&ved=0ahUKEwiF3IDMvv7MAhVBj5QKHdJ5CEUQMwgtKBEwEQ&iact=mrc&uact=8

So much for all this male privilege. lolz

Dude, who hurt you? You need a hug.

Some evil woman, obviously.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to ifmaz)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 11:38:25 AM

Awareness

Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Its a bit like the rape figures..cept the rape figures are worse
Half the parents that fuck over their kids, will never see the inside of a jail.

That's because women don't get put into prison for failing to pay child support.

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 12:24:52 PM

WhoreMods

Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Its a bit like the rape figures..cept the rape figures are worse
Half the parents that fuck over their kids, will never see the inside of a jail.

That's because women don't get put into prison for failing to pay child support.

Which is because the women are stuck with the kid, rather than being able to bugger off and leave its mother to deal with it.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Awareness)

Profile

Post #: 26

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 12:33:42 PM

WickedsDesire

Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline

all are fake above me and need locked in the bin of many loons for on their best days they offer poison and sophistry I would ban the lot of you forever

!00%

I give you them or all of me

(in reply to Greta75)

Profile

Post #: 27

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 12:35:39 PM

WhoreMods

Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

You're a platonist, then?

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to WickedsDesire)

Profile

Post #: 28

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 12:39:02 PM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Yes your ignorance of reality is well known.
Yes...women do indeed get hit with jail time. Not as often as men.

Now lets assume thats bullshit...
How many men are behind in support.
How many women are?
How many men walk out before the child is born...
How many women walk away after childbirth?
How many kids are used as pawns?
How many people are ignoring their kids needs.
Too many.

No, the child/ custody system is horrendous, it is unfair often.
On all sides.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Awareness)

Profile

Post #: 29

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/29/2016 4:02:18 PM

stef

Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

Dude, who hurt you? You need a hug.

Some evil woman, obviously.

That would be every woman that ever said no to him or pointed and laughed at him. Otherwise known as nearly all women.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to WhoreMods)

Profile

Post #: 30

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/30/2016 12:33:53 AM

respectmen

Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline

quote:

Dude, who hurt you? You need a hug.

Some evil woman, obviously.

Why doesn't this same type of ridicule apply to feminists again when feminists complain about injustices against women? Oh that's right, double standards and female favoritism.

(in reply to stef)

Profile

Post #: 31

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/30/2016 12:42:42 AM

WhoreMods

Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

quote:

Dude, who hurt you? You need a hug.

Some evil woman, obviously.

Why doesn't this same type of ridicule apply to feminists again when feminists complain about injustices against women? Oh that's right, double standards and female favoritism.

So which feminists in here spend all their time whining about injustice against women, then? I must have missed those posts.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to respectmen)

Profile

Post #: 32

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/30/2016 12:57:15 AM

respectmen

Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline

quote:

So which feminists in here spend all their time whining about injustice against women, then? I must have missed those posts.

So it depends on the place the person is complaining?

Wow, great argument you have there.

Sorry if you haven't realised, but feminists have been complaining endlessly for decades. Every day, every minute, every second, the feminist movement is making a complaint about how women are such poor victims and men are just such evil oppressors.

I'm sure that I complain no where near as much as the average feminist in a feminist forum. I'm sure that I complain no where near as much as people who attend women's studies classes. I'm sure that I complain no where near as much as feminist leaders.

There seems to be no limitation on how much feminists are allowed to complain. But when men just complain once about male issues, they get ridiculed.

(in reply to WhoreMods)

Profile

Post #: 33

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/30/2016 7:01:53 AM

MrRodgers

Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

Termy, thank Stef for that. I've never seen her post anything relevant or intelligent in discussion for all these years I've observed this forum. Her posts are usually silly one liners, or not if that, pictures.

She actually used to be a moderator. Not no mo, but she does have her moments. But I am sure she qualifies under most of the tenets of feminism.

We got the physical strength and usually the guns. We bestow rights on others, not the other way round.

White Men built half of what is good in this world, despite being a minority. We stole half of what we got, diamonds from South Africa, Cadmium from Bosnia or whatever, Milesovic country, phosphorus from Nam. Next up is gold in Mali. It is coming.

T^T

Actually Vietnam is rubber, at one time...1/3 of the world's supply. The French actually first went into Vietnam called French Indochina.

The First Indochina War began in French Indochina on 19 December 1946 and lasted until 1946. In September 1945, Chinese forces entered Tonkin and a small British task force landed at Saigon. Vietnam was absorbed into French Indochina in stages between 1858 and 1887 with European influence and education.

Subsequently, the French were there after WWII to 'give' the Vietnamese a 'good deal' on their rubber. Vietnam supplied rubber to Michelin, currently the largest tire co. in the world. Vietnam is 4th in yield and 5th in the export of rubber.

As for gold in Mali. Well as long as the people doing the dangerous work and hard labor of getting that gold out of the ground which is otherwise worthless until then, are not paid too much and almost all of the money go the safe elitist investors, then the world will be much better off.

To actually pay the people to do all of the work involved, would be the dreaded socialism and we all know...we can't have that.

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 5/30/2016 7:09:12 AM >

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 34

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/30/2016 7:09:42 AM

WhoreMods

Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

quote:

So which feminists in here spend all their time whining about injustice against women, then? I must have missed those posts.

So it depends on the place the person is complaining?

Wow, great argument you have there.

Sorry if you haven't realised, but feminists have been complaining endlessly for decades. Every day, every minute, every second, the feminist movement is making a complaint about how women are such poor victims and men are just such evil oppressors.

So again: where are these whining feminist diatribes you're bitching about in here, then? If you're taking the line that your own ongoing tantrum is just tit for tat, maybe you could provide links to a few threads dissing the oppressive patriarchy.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to respectmen)

Profile

Post #: 35

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/30/2016 8:27:23 AM

sloguy02246

Posts: 534
Joined: 11/5/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

There seems to be no limitation on how much feminists are allowed to complain. But when men just complain once about male issues, they get ridiculed.

Dude, add up all the open/recent threads bashing women in this forum that you have started.

I would say your interpretation of "...just complain once..." indicates that basic arithmetic is not one of your strong points.

(in reply to respectmen)

Profile

Post #: 36

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/30/2016 8:49:22 AM

Awareness

Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Its a bit like the rape figures..cept the rape figures are worse
Half the parents that fuck over their kids, will never see the inside of a jail.

That's because women don't get put into prison for failing to pay child support.

Which is because the women are stuck with the kid, rather than being able to bugger off and leave its mother to deal with it.

Incorrect.

First off, women are given child custody at rates far exceeding men. Basically the only way a woman fails to get child custody is to be a documented drug addict. The classic way for women to gain advantage in divorce settlements is to allege domestic violence and/or child sexual abuse. Which they do.

Women aren't "stuck" with the kid. Ever. Heck, a woman can give birth to a child and they decide she doesn't want it and the child becomes a ward of the state. Another example of how women have reproductive rights but men have reproductive responsibilities.

The vast majority of so-called "deadbeat dads" are actually men who've lost their jobs or suffered a reduced income and for whom the courts refuse to adjust
levels of child support. These guys get stuck paying infeasible amounts they simply do not possess.

In contrast, the vast majority of parents who have the means to pay and choose not to, are women. Deadbeat moms are far more common than deadbeat dads.

Thus endeth the lesson. You're welcome.

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to WhoreMods)

Profile

Post #: 37

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/30/2016 8:53:14 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Lmao you do talk bollocks

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Awareness)

Profile

Post #: 38

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/30/2016 8:55:37 AM

Awareness

Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

No, I just possess understanding. You possess anti-male bias.

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Profile

Post #: 39

RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids - 5/30/2016 8:58:50 AM

WhoreMods

Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
The vast majority of so-called "deadbeat dads" are actually men who've lost their jobs or suffered a reduced income and for whom the courts refuse to adjust
levels of child support. These guys get stuck paying infeasible amounts they simply do not possess.

So the unemployed guys I've met who will do almost anything to avoid getting a job in case they have to start paying child support to every woman they've fucked who refused to take it up the arse were all hallucinations, then. I shall have to see a shrink.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Awareness)

Profile

Post #: 40