Edwird
Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Termyn8or I know everyone cries for the poor Blacks, Jews, Hispanics, defectives and whatnot, and I guess that is OK. Well I have a question and I want cogent answers. Let's say we have a race. I have to run ten miles. Blacks only have to run nine miles, Hispanics eight miles, Women seven miles, Jews six miles because of their butthurt from somebody else, homosexuals five miles, blind or deaf, four miles. When this race is over, how the fuck do you know who is the strongest ? T^T If we're talking about the work place, affirmative action was/is about letting people previously excluded to just get into the race at all. Back in the day when the excuse was "but they can hand out the cups of water and the towels. See? They can take part in the race, too!" If talking about higher education, the issue is a bit more sticky. If one is a genius, or close enough, he/she only needs to see an example or two of the problem presented, given a simple walk-through how the problem is solved, and they're off and running. The rest of us are average, or somewhat lower or higher than average students. The ones who have to study a bit, or a lot, to make good grades. But in any case, at least 'adequate' teaching is required to that end, and even more, a decent home and neighborhood environment that at least accommodates a child in that pursuit. When a child has never had any of the above from the start, and even the few 'really smart ones' will have never come across anything resembling a decent learning environment until they reach college, why should we penalize them for what they had no control over by denying them entrance to the university? There are as many remedial courses as needed at most any university to get from inadequate earlier education to college-ready standing. I was a HS dropout, so even though I passed the GED with out taking any classes for it, I knew I wasn't ready, especially in math. One English and two remedial math courses later, I was hot to trot! I don't disagree at all that various standards should be upheld. But to assume that everyone who didn't make the best grades in HS when the whole environment of their -life- militated against that doesn't have the capacity for making decent-or-better grades in college is in fact showing great laziness among those making that assumption with out even considering the context. In any event, once at the university, everyone is ultimately held to the same standard. I'm sure there are extra programs, extra help of some sort, for students coming from economically disadvantaged (ergo, educationally disadvantaged, 90% of the time) backgrounds. But at the end of the day, everybody's got to take (and pass) the same exams to pass the course.
< Message edited by Edwird -- 6/9/2016 10:38:43 PM >
|