quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

And now there are reports that there were four of them.
Why didn't they tell us before?

I can see 3 possible reasons.

A I hope this is the one. They didn't want to tip thier hand that they knew about them.

B They were in denial about it being a terror attack

C This story was planted to make it look more like a terror attack.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

I recall initial reports of multiple assailants when crazyeyes Joker guy walked into the movie theater in Aurora, CO.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

And now there are reports that there were four of them.
Why didn't they tell us before?

I can see 3 possible reasons.

A I hope this is the one. They didn't want to tip thier hand that they knew about them.

B They were in denial about it being a terror attack

C This story was planted to make it look more like a terror attack.

I recall initial reports of multiple assailants when crazyeyes Joker guy walked into the movie theater in Aurora, CO.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

I recall initial reports of multiple assailants when crazyeyes Joker guy walked into the movie theater in Aurora, CO.

In this case, it was a witness hearing the gun man on a phone call with his accomplices.

He also says, they tried to run outside, but a man from outside barred the door from outside! While the gun man is inside!

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz
If someone was preventing another from exiting a building in which there is a person murdering up the place, clearly that someone is another shooter and not a person trying to stay away from the guy murdering others. It's just common sense.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz
If someone was preventing another from exiting a building in which there is a person murdering up the place, clearly that someone is another shooter and not a person trying to stay away from the guy murdering others. It's just common sense.

I have no idea what is your point right now, since I said, it's obvious that, he had accomplices. And one of the accomplices blocked the door from the outside to lock them in.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz
If someone was preventing another from exiting a building in which there is a person murdering up the place, clearly that someone is another shooter and not a person trying to stay away from the guy murdering others. It's just common sense.

I have no idea what is your point right now, since I said, it's obvious that, he had accomplices. And one of the accomplices blocked the door from the outside to lock them in.

I think it was aliens.

Yes, has to be aliens.

Most definitely aliens.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

And now there are reports that there were four of them.
Why didn't they tell us before?

I can see 3 possible reasons.

A I hope this is the one. They didn't want to tip thier hand that they knew about them.

B They were in denial about it being a terror attack

C This story was planted to make it look more like a terror attack.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

And now there are reports that there were four of them.
Why didn't they tell us before?

I can see 3 possible reasons.

A I hope this is the one. They didn't want to tip thier hand that they knew about them.

B They were in denial about it being a terror attack

C This story was planted to make it look more like a terror attack.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Staleek
Did you just use the words "critical thinking skills" in a sentence trying to validate Fox News as a source.
That's genuinely funny.

While he didn't claim Fox News Channel uses critical thinking skills, he also didn't try to validate Fox News as a source.

What he did do, is claim there was a lack of critical thinking skills among those who would rather oppose the messenger rather than the message. What happens if Fox News Channel and HuffPo post the same story? Then what? You're head going to explode because Fox News Channel was actually right?!?

If Fox News Channel is wrong in what was linked, show them to be wrong. There are but a few on here that won't acknowledge that Fox News Channel was wrong when they are definitively shown to be wrong.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Bama one again is full of shit, the security guys were armed and he swapped shots with an off duty policeman who crawled off into the bathrooms with the rest of them. Typical Bama #Epic #Fail.

BTW, where can I find the news about this off duty policemen, I can't seem to read anything about it!

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Two when they aren't in gun free zones the armed citizens stop it before it becomes news worthy.

The NRA really needs to get a better PR department then: if concealed carry enthusiasts were stopping shootings all over the place, you'd expect them to be braying it from the rooftops and spreading the news as widely as they could every time this happened.

They do but people like you don't read thier releases, only those edited by thier enemies and when the only dead guy is the crimainal it isn't "newsworthy", even worse when the bad guy is captured.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji
Here's your media matters. Clinton people funded by Soros. They first tried to get a 501c as an educational organization. They were going to tout leftist progressivism. IRS turned it down and now it's says it's a fact checker with no interesting in checking facts from liberal propaganda.

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2007/11/15/4429164-calling-out-media-matters-bias

https://www.activistfacts.com/organizations/media-matters-for-america/

You'll note one of my links was NBC, hardly a bastion of the hard right.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods
He didn't use a bomb.
It's conceivable that he might have resorted to a bomb if he hadn't been able to get hold of couple of firearms. However, he didn't need to be able to make a bomb.

So, you acknowledge that he could have used a bomb, right?

I acknowledge that he didn't use a bomb, and that he didn't have to because it was so easy for him to get hold of an AR-15 and an automatic pistol.

Of course, you know it was a rhetorical question, as you've already posted that he could have used a bomb (see bold above).

I understand you must be suffering severe mental anguish over having to acknowledge that the gun wasn't the reason, but want to really believe guns are the reason. You'll get over it soon enough.

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

I'm suffering no anguish at all: that does rather come across from your denial that easy access to a not quite military grade rifle was the reason this tonk was able to wipe out half a nightclub.
Just how many spree killings in your country in the last twenty years have involved home made bombs, rather than guns, out of interest? (Somebody blowing up their underpants, rather than an airliner, to no effect besides looking ridiculous doesn't count, btw.)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Bama one again is full of shit, the security guys were armed and he swapped shots with an off duty policeman who crawled off into the bathrooms with the rest of them. Typical Bama #Epic #Fail.

BTW, where can I find the news about this off duty policemen, I can't seem to read anything about it!

greta, I hope you keep after vile critter parts here, because he's notorious for not being able to support his assertions.

that said, I did hear on the news, very briefly, there was an exchange of gunfire, and I saw a one line sentence on a law firm's essay about the event that there was an off duty policeman there who fired.

at the moment though, internet searches for "armed security guys at the pulse" or "Orlando shooter swapped shots with an off duty policeman" don't turn up anything relevant and in light of the other story lines, if this was indeed the case, no one seems to be talking about it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Staleek

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

I'm suffering no anguish at all: that does rather come across from your denial that easy access to a not quite military grade rifle was the reason this tonk was able to wipe out half a nightclub.
Just how many spree killings in your country in the last twenty years have involved home made bombs, rather than guns, out of interest? (Somebody blowing up their underpants, rather than an airliner, to no effect besides looking ridiculous doesn't count, btw.)

Stop lying. It is clear that you're in so much anguish you are, ironically, about to explode.

You obviously thought there was some sort of correlation between being able to easily obtain weapons to shoot people, and shooting people.

I mean, it's not as if it is difficult to make a bomb is it? Any idiot can go and procure illegal explosives, detonators, timing equipment, and then set it up to explode without any outside help at all. I mean, just pointing your magic boom-wand and pulling the trigger is exactly as simplistic as operating a soldering iron and working with electronics.

The reports suggest this guy snapped. And that's what happens when you snap - you take days of careful planning, ordering materials, getting to meet and know people who can get you explosives and teach you how to make a bomb, and then you go do it. Just like that, in the heat of the moment, sort of, with a long moment, kind of.

And it's not as if any terrorist has actually suggested the ease of access to weapons makes it easy to kill people is it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpRQzTP8H1o

Well ok except for that guy. But he's a leftist liberal pussy socialist politically correct terrorist obviously.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

FR

Well, Shooter is a complex person. I mean. His Gay, His Muslim, He likes Guns and His a Registered Democrat.

Talk about interesting combos!