RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


thishereboi -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 3:27:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

I have to admit that since the firearms ban in this country, everybody seems to creep around in mortal fear of being robbed, mugged, assault, raped and murdered in their beds kirata. Bring back hanging and the garrotte I say !!!!!
What a load of old cobblers.



That might be the case where you are from, but it certainly isn't the case here. Despite the bullshit you read on the internet.




Musicmystery -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 3:38:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

The value of reduced firearms deaths at the price of rendering law-abiding citizens more subject to assaults, muggings and rapes, seems debatable.

Do you have the stats on non-gun owners having more assaults, muggings, and rapes visited upon them than gun owners? Or the former being less law-abiding than the latter?

Just curious.

I had this in mind:

Defensive use of guns by crime victims is a common occurrence, although the exact number remains disputed (Cook and Ludwig, 1996; Kleck, 2001a). Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million (Kleck, 2001a), in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008 (BJS, 2010).

On the other hand, some scholars point to a radically lower estimate of only 108,000 annual defensive uses based on the National Crime Victimization Survey (Cook et al., 1997). The variation in these numbers remains a controversy in the field. The estimate of 3 million defensive uses per year is based on an extrapolation from a small number of responses taken from more than 19 national surveys. The former estimate of 108,000 is difficult to interpret because respondents were not asked specifically about defensive gun use.

A different issue is whether defensive uses of guns, however numerous or rare they may be, are effective in preventing injury to the gun-wielding crime victim. Studies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns (i.e., incidents in which a gun was "used" by the crime victim in the sense of attacking or threatening an offender) have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies (Kleck, 1988; Kleck and DeLone, 1993; Southwick, 2000; Tark and Kleck, 2004).


Source: National Research Council

K.


Is all this gun defense happening with assault rifles?

Or are regular handguns doing the trick?




RottenJohnny -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 5:05:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

I agree RJ..................let the U.S. walk it's own patrol, just as every other country is allowed to do. We have gun restrictions here; big deal. You don't have those restrictions; that's fine too.

Well said, sir.




RottenJohnny -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 5:06:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

A howitzer is better for that.

Or, should I say;

"A howitzer provides more freedom than a .50 caliber sniper rifle."

That depends on who's controlling the weapon. [:)]




WhoreMods -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 5:12:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

The value of reduced firearms deaths at the price of rendering law-abiding citizens more subject to assaults, muggings and rapes, seems debatable.

Do you have the stats on non-gun owners having more assaults, muggings, and rapes visited upon them than gun owners? Or the former being less law-abiding than the latter?

Just curious.

I had this in mind:

Defensive use of guns by crime victims is a common occurrence, although the exact number remains disputed (Cook and Ludwig, 1996; Kleck, 2001a). Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million (Kleck, 2001a), in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008 (BJS, 2010).

On the other hand, some scholars point to a radically lower estimate of only 108,000 annual defensive uses based on the National Crime Victimization Survey (Cook et al., 1997). The variation in these numbers remains a controversy in the field. The estimate of 3 million defensive uses per year is based on an extrapolation from a small number of responses taken from more than 19 national surveys. The former estimate of 108,000 is difficult to interpret because respondents were not asked specifically about defensive gun use.

A different issue is whether defensive uses of guns, however numerous or rare they may be, are effective in preventing injury to the gun-wielding crime victim. Studies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns (i.e., incidents in which a gun was "used" by the crime victim in the sense of attacking or threatening an offender) have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies (Kleck, 1988; Kleck and DeLone, 1993; Southwick, 2000; Tark and Kleck, 2004).


Source: National Research Council

K.


Is all this gun defense happening with assault rifles?

Or are regular handguns doing the trick?

Oh, good luck getting an answer to that one.
[:D]




Kirata -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 5:55:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Is all this gun defense happening with assault rifles?

Or are regular handguns doing the trick?

I don't know what you mean by an "assault" rifle, so I'll pass on that. Shotguns and popular sporting rifles like the AR variants feature in self-defense only rarely and typically within the home. On the other hand, the typical ammunition for rifles like the .223 that have been used in mass shootings is a small FMJ round. One of the Orlando victims was shot eight times and is expected to survive. You're less likely to be so lucky if you get hit by a larger heavier hollow-point from a handgun.

Overall, long guns (rifles and shotguns) account for only a tiny fraction (here) of the total homicide rate. A weapon isn't much good if you can't conveniently have it with you when you need it, so handguns are both the overwhelming choice for self-defense and also the weapon that accounts for the overwhelming majority of criminal uses because they are less expensive and more easily concealable. Focusing on rifles ("assault" or otherwise) will have little impact on either the homicide rate or self-defense.

And again: FixNICS

K.




Musicmystery -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 6:01:41 AM)

Another semantics king. OK. How about military grade automatic weapons? What language would you prefer? You know where the intent is going.

But if folks are going to play this "Well, golly! I just don't know what kind of gun-thingy that would be" game, then fine, ban them all instead. FFS.




mnottertail -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 6:02:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

Is Lichtenstein a country ? I thought it was a Duchy. But she did forget about poor little Luxembourg, although it's not quite on the border

Technically, it is a country, although it refers to itself as a principality. I've always wanted to visit.


No one would refer to themselves as a seconddipity, would you think?




Kirata -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 6:14:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Another semantics king. OK. How about military grade automatic weapons? What language would you prefer? You know where the intent is going.

But if folks are going to play this "Well, golly! I just don't know what kind of gun-thingy that would be" game, then fine, ban them all instead. FFS.

Don't fuck with me. I'm not a mind-reader. Semantics is the game. The intent in the past has been to indict any rifle with a pistol grip or a flash suppressor or half a dozen other irrelevant features as an "assault" weapon. Words matter. "Automatic weapons," for example, can refer to ordinary semi-auto pistols and rifles, and the phrase "military grade" offers little clarification. Let's not do this.

K.




Musicmystery -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 6:17:06 AM)

OK. Gun-thingy it is.

You know, the more the "no regulations ever" crowd weighs in on any measure to sensibly approach accessibility to any firearms whatsoever, the more I reluctantly move closer to the realization that Americans as a group may simply not be able to be trusted with firearms any more.

From "gosh, that could be spoons" to "I can't imagine what you're talking about when the concern is spraying bullets in mass shootings," if people really are unable to make that distinction, then the problem is indeed deeper than these tragedies created with readily accessible firearms---er, that's gun-thingys that spray a lot of bullets really fast to kill a lot of people all at once. Didn't mean to be unclear.





WhoreMods -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 6:28:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji
Japan's culture is different than ours.

Evidently: Japan isn't full of infantile paranoid imbeciles.




Kirata -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 6:35:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

OK. Gun-thingy it is.

You know, the more the "no regulations ever" crowd weighs in on any measure to sensibly approach accessibility to any firearms whatsoever, the more I reluctantly move closer to the realization that Americans as a group may simply not be able to be trusted with firearms any more.

And if you're implying that I'm in the "no regulations ever" crowd, it's going to reluctantly move me closer to the realization that some Americans can neither read nor understand English anymore.

One more time: FixNICS

K.





Musicmystery -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 6:36:29 AM)

I'm not. In the past you've shared you'd favor mandatory training at least.

But I'd share you don't seem to be representative.








Kirata -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 6:37:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

I'm not. In the past you're shared you'd favor mandatory training at least.

But I'd share you don't seem to be representative.

Okay. Fair enough, then. Thanks.

K.




Edwird -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 7:33:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail



quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

Is Lichtenstein a country ? I thought it was a Duchy. But she did forget about poor little Luxembourg, although it's not quite on the border

Technically, it is a country, although it refers to itself as a principality. I've always wanted to visit.


No one would refer to themselves as a seconddipity, would you think?



Ha!

Good one.




Nnanji -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 8:16:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


quote:

I believe I said it earlier.


Maybe you did. So why the reluctance to repeat it, or provide a link for same?

In any case, I don't recall that specific nomination in this thread or any other that you have chosen to sully with your incoherent drivel.

quote:

And, I'm sure you read where I said it before,


No, I didn't. But the point is, you are leaving others in the dark, here, whether I had actually read such a thing or not.

What, are you ashamed to say it?

M
Dude, how weird do you get?




Edwird -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 8:24:40 AM)


Bong hits before noon already?

"Dude!"




Awareness -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 8:24:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

Awareness....................did you ever see the movie "The Mouse That Roared'? with Peter Sellers playing multiple parts and set in the fictional country of Galardia ? I always thought of Lichtenstein being a similar place *smile*
I might have, but my favourites were always "The Party" and "After the Fox", the latter being a satire of both Hollywood and European directors such as Fellini.




Nnanji -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 8:26:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


Pardon me for not looking this up, but the preponderance of 'gun defense' stories I come across in reading the news involves convenience store robbery attempts. I know this occurs in the home sometimes, but it's difficult to recall the last one I read about. I can't recall any instance of a person on the street saving themselves from disaster by that expedient, though I'm sure it might have happened once or twice.

BTW, were the statistics cited limited to the US, or across a survey of several countries?

Two days ago, I had to help this 90-something yr. old (white) lady through the check out at the grocery store. She could just barely slide her card through the swipe slot in the first place, and then kept hitting the 'credit' option where she read it on the screen, rather than the physical button just to the right of it.

I had attention to the matter in the first place from witnessing some black guy go through the same routine with her last time I was there.

Her purse and wallet were available for ten different people to steal, all the time.

There is no way, no how, a woman as shaky as that could ever handle a firearm.

And in a county of 54% black people, she seems to survive, easy a 'mark' as she is.




"I'm sure it happened once or twice." How condicending. Let's take Bloomberg's cooked books view, it happens 500,000 times a year. While you were a dear with the little old white lady, what is your point? Because she hasn't been robbed, nobody is, or no whites are? You're not seriously discussing.




Nnanji -> RE: International study of gun control finds strong evidence it works (6/15/2016 8:36:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

I have to admit that since the firearms ban in this country, everybody seems to creep around in mortal fear of being robbed, mugged, assault, raped and murdered in their beds kirata. Bring back hanging and the garrotte I say !!!!!
What a load of old cobblers.

A load of old cobblers...I've never heard that before.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875