RE: Brexit Vote Results (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Politesub53 -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/2/2016 4:49:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph

Just two points: It is hardly "the EU insist"ing again but some there reminding British politicians that free movement of humans (including labour) has been part of every free trade agreement the UK has signed since the 1950s including those before Britain has become a EC member. Going back to before that means no free trade agreement valid. It is naive even to consider 27 + a few more states (Norway, Iceland ...) to tear up 60 years of international trade (and more than only trade) regulations because Boris and the kippers promised you. Back to the 1950s because it sounds so good in your ears? It means back to a Europe before EFTA. Really, your wishes? No real chance, not before, not after referendum. Not because of the evil EU but because some politicians who should have known all those things (nothing secret about them as I posted above) have told you CRAP. Nothing but empty phrases.


Yes the Brussels technocrats are not elected. They do not listen to the electorate they listen to the EU commission, EU council, and EU parliament. Who votes for EU parliament: you and me and a lot more. Who makes up EU commission and council: your and mine and 26 other governments. While I rather distrust the intelligence of many in any european member states' governments this construction is the about the best possible after British governments constantly vetoed more competences for the EU parliament decade after decade for instance.
So yes the Brussels technocrats are not elected. But they are executives for heaven's sake, nobody I know votes executives in or out: Do you vote in or out your postman, garbage lorry driver, typist of the town mayor, army officer of any regiment, HM ambassador to China? This is not democratic indeed. Anywhere. (btw do you know that more than 1000 Brits work there?)
The "voted for" parts are your and mine and 26 other governments, and EU parliament. That parliament has not that much legislative power is the consequence of your and my and the other governments not enabling the EU parliament to.

It could be better no doubt about that. So could your and my government politicians. Have fun with yours. Ask them for a plan for the future, it is obvious they do not have one. Not one.


I usually like your posts, but I cant have this. Would you care to show me where there was free movement of people between the UK and the EU prior to 1972 ?

You, like a lot of others, mock those who voted leave as wanting to take the UK back to the fifties. Do I really need to remind you many of those same people fought in WW2 to preserve European freedom from the last person who wanted an EU Superstate. Add to that all of them would have lost relatives in WW1. They hardly need reminding about the horrors of "Two world wars" by the arseholes who want another referendum

As for a UK citizens working in Brussels, a 1,000 is hardly an equal sum given the amount of money we pay in. And far from lecturing me on technocrats and how they are voted in, let me remind you the general public has no say on how many of these technocrats are elected. So there is no way they are accountable to the general public. They are only accountable to the cronies who put them in office. This is far different from my MEP, who I am able to vote in or out every five years.




dcnovice -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/2/2016 4:52:14 PM)

quote:

Do I really need to remind you many of those same people fought in WW2 to preserve European freedom from the last person who wanted an EU Superstate.

Do you honestly see the EU and the Third Reich as analogous?




Politesub53 -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/2/2016 4:56:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

sorry there comrade, socialism roughly falls under a collectivist umbrella.

quote:

Collectivists usually focus on community, society, or nation. It is used and has been used as an element in many different and diverse types of government and political, economic and educational philosophies throughout history, ranging from communalism, democracy, monarchy, and socialism....socialism, as a political and economic theory, draws more from collectivism than it does from individualism...


https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Collectivism

as such, its legitimate to ask how the socialists actually voted, and how they understand the collective EU as being less desirable (seemingly) than an individual UK.

go harass someone else.





Get a grip ffs Bounty. You have been told by those that know, that people from all sides of the UK Electorate, age, race, colour, gender, religion, political leanings all voted differently. Did you miss the posts about both the far left and the far right being unhappy with the EU across Europe ?

Your problem is you are unable to label anything you dont agree with as anything but "leftists" along with many of your other right wing cohorts.




Politesub53 -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/2/2016 5:01:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent1


quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB

It was the old people who voted us out,
It was all those peasants who live outside London
It was white men who read the Daily Mail
It was 17.5 million biggoted stupid twats...

There is only one person to blame for this and that person is the man who decided to gamble our future to secure his position in his own party. David Cameron should go down as the most dangerous, most reckless PM this country has ever seen and yet all we seem to be getting is people misdirecting their insults at the voters.



Why is it that all of the arseholes in our country appear to post on this message board?

It is a quirk of fate that is inexplicable at this point.

But, if someone could let me know how and why all of our arseholes gravitated to this board I would be interested.

The way you lot are carrying on it wouldn't surprise me if you're one person with numerous profiles and posting out of Broadmoor.



If you want all the arseholes on here to say why they do so, you can have the first say.




Dvr22999874 -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/2/2016 5:10:07 PM)

Thanks for that P.S...................I didn't think the public had any say about going into the EU/Common Market, but wasn't too sure. I believe there was a bit of a furor about it from a variety of sections of the public and parliament too but I admit to knowing little about it.




Politesub53 -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/2/2016 5:12:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Staleek

That's fact. Employers are not allowed to undercut the min wage or offer anyone working conditions that UK citizens are not entitled to. We all know this. If you're too precious to work in the same conditions ad immigrant or for their wage levels that's your issue.

It is true that there are now more unskilled workers around which will drive down wages, but that's market forces. If you are uneducated and unskilled, immigration can become a threat.

The solution to that is for you to man up and work harder, or get an education. Asking the government to tilt things in your favour by restricting immigrants is not how the world works.


I can understand Americans not getting all the issues, but not you, since you live here. NG is perfectly correct when he mentions labour costs and a constant supply of cheap labour undercutting UK wages for those at the bottom of the pile. Have you not read about the gangmatser supply dirt cheap labour and not only that, exploiting immigrans in many case keeping passports to stop them going elswhere to work. Have you not read anything about the involvement of foreign criminals running these gangs, and is such large numbers the Police are fighting a losing battle. Have you not read a government report agreeing foreign labour is indeed keeping some UK workers low.

Have you read fuck all on the issue, because somehow I doubt it.




Politesub53 -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/2/2016 5:17:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

a little late for reciminations, though, wot? here is were we all is, innit?


What pisses me off royally Ron is this: All those insisting on a second referendum because the vote was so close, and spouting off about democratic process, would not be doing so if they had won.

As I have already stated, if it had gone the other way I would have just accepted it as the democratic process in action.




Politesub53 -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/2/2016 5:20:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

Do I really need to remind you many of those same people fought in WW2 to preserve European freedom from the last person who wanted an EU Superstate.

Do you honestly see the EU and the Third Reich as analogous?


My point was most of those wanting us to remain are using both world wars as a reason for staying, IE, the EU has stopped the bloodshed. While that may be true, they are wrong for throwing that in the faces of those who actually fought in the war but have voted to leave.




Politesub53 -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/2/2016 5:24:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

Thanks for that P.S...................I didn't think the public had any say about going into the EU/Common Market, but wasn't too sure. I believe there was a bit of a furor about it from a variety of sections of the public and parliament too but I admit to knowing little about it.


Your welcome.

You might enjoy this comparing what the debate was in 1975 and how things turned out.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36367246




mnottertail -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/2/2016 5:27:29 PM)

I am astonished at you fuckin limeys. for years you been............. well if glastonbury had brought the bill for relief of stonehenge falling over to the Prime Ministers questions as his constituency demanded, we might have saved a quit.

Now you are playing at Americans. Fuck you in the ass you prigg, and whatnot.......Cameron is mashing 18 megatons of molten meat into the carapice of a porcine concubine,and its alls well that ends well, but you lose your fucking mind over a 3 billion economy? the fucking white house toilet paper bill is bigger than that for fucks sake.

In or out guv, your economy is that of mexico. What the fuck? Are you trading spotted dick with the frogs?

You are yelling at each other over what we wouldnt wipe our ass with.




blnymph -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/2/2016 5:44:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph

Just two points: It is hardly "the EU insist"ing again but some there reminding British politicians that free movement of humans (including labour) has been part of every free trade agreement the UK has signed since the 1950s including those before Britain has become a EC member. Going back to before that means no free trade agreement valid. It is naive even to consider 27 + a few more states (Norway, Iceland ...) to tear up 60 years of international trade (and more than only trade) regulations because Boris and the kippers promised you. Back to the 1950s because it sounds so good in your ears? It means back to a Europe before EFTA. Really, your wishes? No real chance, not before, not after referendum. Not because of the evil EU but because some politicians who should have known all those things (nothing secret about them as I posted above) have told you CRAP. Nothing but empty phrases.


Yes the Brussels technocrats are not elected. They do not listen to the electorate they listen to the EU commission, EU council, and EU parliament. Who votes for EU parliament: you and me and a lot more. Who makes up EU commission and council: your and mine and 26 other governments. While I rather distrust the intelligence of many in any european member states' governments this construction is the about the best possible after British governments constantly vetoed more competences for the EU parliament decade after decade for instance.
So yes the Brussels technocrats are not elected. But they are executives for heaven's sake, nobody I know votes executives in or out: Do you vote in or out your postman, garbage lorry driver, typist of the town mayor, army officer of any regiment, HM ambassador to China? This is not democratic indeed. Anywhere. (btw do you know that more than 1000 Brits work there?)
The "voted for" parts are your and mine and 26 other governments, and EU parliament. That parliament has not that much legislative power is the consequence of your and my and the other governments not enabling the EU parliament to.

It could be better no doubt about that. So could your and my government politicians. Have fun with yours. Ask them for a plan for the future, it is obvious they do not have one. Not one.


I usually like your posts, but I cant have this. Would you care to show me where there was free movement of people between the UK and the EU prior to 1972 ?

You, like a lot of others, mock those who voted leave as wanting to take the UK back to the fifties. Do I really need to remind you many of those same people fought in WW2 to preserve European freedom from the last person who wanted an EU Superstate. Add to that all of them would have lost relatives in WW1. They hardly need reminding about the horrors of "Two world wars" by the arseholes who want another referendum

As for a UK citizens working in Brussels, a 1,000 is hardly an equal sum given the amount of money we pay in. And far from lecturing me on technocrats and how they are voted in, let me remind you the general public has no say on how many of these technocrats are elected. So there is no way they are accountable to the general public. They are only accountable to the cronies who put them in office. This is far different from my MEP, who I am able to vote in or out every five years.



We are not back at war.

Your questions:
1.
Stockholm convention 1960 Articles 1 and 16
and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_abode_(United_Kingdom)

UK citizen law 1971

While I agree (and did so before) on the basic fact that EU executives are not voted in or out but appointed by EU commission which is your and mine and the other governments while we all vote for our MEPs you should never forget what governments refused from the beginning to hand over any legislative powers from national government and parliament to the European parliament and thus refusing EP vital democratic legitimation to control EU commission as every parliament controls executive administration. What you complain about is "no cessation of national sovereignty to the EU" ... Tories' lament for decades. You complain a vital deficit the Tories are largely responsible for (long before Cameron's days).




mnottertail -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/2/2016 5:58:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

a little late for reciminations, though, wot? here is were we all is, innit?


What pisses me off royally Ron is this: All those insisting on a second referendum because the vote was so close, and spouting off about democratic process, would not be doing so if they had won.

As I have already stated, if it had gone the other way I would have just accepted it as the democratic process in action.



But, it does bring up your colonialism in fact, why the fuck (this is american) should the Scots be paired with you cunts? the UK at its inception was not united unless by dint of force. Scots have never been nobody and never will be, and there aint a man jack of you would have cried in your fucking pie mate, had their referendum passed. Now you have paired them with you. I wouldnt be surprised to see the IRA fragging your ugly ass again.

You might be middle of the road mate, but you aint wif it.

As i have said in the world you are a nobody, your time has came and went, you rolled out as much dole as you can and bucked up against our economy for support, they are gloaming onto the us.I remember the day your shit was at least 2.65 a dollar, what is your shit worth today? A buck 20? Jesus man, you put us into it. You fucked it up. You should be respbonsilbe for your bills, think about that mate, you want trump our president we will shove him down your throat any you willl say yesser, nossir come to that, if you blokes think you are playing in the big leauges you are sadly mistaken my tory friend. We werent holdin your ass up the first time.




blnymph -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/3/2016 4:44:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

a little late for reciminations, though, wot? here is were we all is, innit?


What pisses me off royally Ron is this: All those insisting on a second referendum because the vote was so close, and spouting off about democratic process, would not be doing so if they had won.

As I have already stated, if it had gone the other way I would have just accepted it as the democratic process in action.


The UK had a first referendum already, and this one was the second.

What about the 1975 referendum, with a 2 thirds majority for staying in?
no longer valid because too long ago? how long is a referendum valid? 30 years? 6 months?

While another referendum with whatever result is exactly as just not binding as the last, the real democratic problem is what you expect from Parliament, with a probable 2 thirds majority against leaving there? They are the only institution to invoke Art. 50 and set leaving into motion. Do you expect them to vote for leave and ignore their own opinions in order to accept the result of a (non-binding) referendum?

And if the MPs vote against what then? It would be their democratic right to do so. One could say it is even their obligation to avert damage to the nation even if a popular opinion wants them to. Would you accept that as the democratic process in action?





WhoreMods -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/3/2016 5:03:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
What pisses me off royally Ron is this: All those insisting on a second referendum because the vote was so close, and spouting off about democratic process, would not be doing so if they had won.

As I have already stated, if it had gone the other way I would have just accepted it as the democratic process in action.

Possibly, but that cuts both ways: this petition for a second referendum was started by somebody in the pro-leave camp who was worried that the vote would go to the other side, wasn't it?




Awareness -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/3/2016 6:19:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

Wow, just wow

Exactly. Typical right-wing, "I'm alright Jack" fucktard who believes free-markets and laissez faire capitalism are the only things which really matter. He couldn't give a damn about anyone who's poor, sick or a member of an underclass because he implicitly believes that all of those things are a product of being lazy.




thompsonx -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/3/2016 6:51:52 AM)

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Exactly. Typical right-wing, "I'm alright Jack" fucktard who believes free-markets and laissez faire capitalism are the only things which really matter. He couldn't give a damn about anyone who's poor, sick or a member of an underclass because he implicitly believes that all of those things are a product of being lazy.

You do not seem to have a good handle on this "victimhood" thing do you. From reading your posts you seem to be both for it and again it??? How come???




thompsonx -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/3/2016 6:52:53 AM)


ORIGINAL: blnymph



The UK had a first referendum already, and this one was the second.

What about the 1975 referendum, with a 2 thirds majority for staying in?

The first referendum seemed to bring out the same sort of response as this one.

http://www.vernoncoleman.com/howthebritishmedia.htm




MariaB -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/3/2016 7:49:37 AM)

As Thousands at 'March for Europe' Brexit protest Paul Joseph Watson had this to say.




NorthernGent1 -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/3/2016 1:01:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

a little late for reciminations, though, wot? here is were we all is, innit?


What pisses me off royally Ron is this: All those insisting on a second referendum because the vote was so close, and spouting off about democratic process, would not be doing so if they had won.

As I have already stated, if it had gone the other way I would have just accepted it as the democratic process in action.


The UK had a first referendum already, and this one was the second.

What about the 1975 referendum, with a 2 thirds majority for staying in?
no longer valid because too long ago? how long is a referendum valid? 30 years? 6 months?

While another referendum with whatever result is exactly as just not binding as the last, the real democratic problem is what you expect from Parliament, with a probable 2 thirds majority against leaving there? They are the only institution to invoke Art. 50 and set leaving into motion. Do you expect them to vote for leave and ignore their own opinions in order to accept the result of a (non-binding) referendum?

And if the MPs vote against what then? It would be their democratic right to do so. One could say it is even their obligation to avert damage to the nation even if a popular opinion wants them to. Would you accept that as the democratic process in action?




It's no longer valid because the European Union of 2016 is nothing like the European Common Market of the 1970s.

We voted to join because it was a trade agreement.

Since the European Union is now a political union, and no one on the continent is hiding the ambition to move towards even further political and legal integration, then our country voted to leave.

Were it still the Common Market of the '70s then we wouldn't have even had a referendum in 2016. Similarly, we would never have joined in the first place if we knew then what we know now.




WickedsDesire -> RE: Brexit Vote Results (7/3/2016 2:31:39 PM)

heh I got the Boris ah johnson his second name why can I never remember dangerous non entities see sometimes I remember when I get things and stuff wrong and man up..I always get him mixed up with that farage bloke....and not one of you tarred and feathered me for that shame on you all big breasted women exempt..although I still believe he will get therein 2-4 years.
I have added much to this one and all the side tracks

I do not dislike the English, I just intently hate them all - heh its joke some of my past partners have been from engerland (even one from Wales- huge lovely tits that one and a brain too) and they all h8ungaryly gobbled my massive throbber to my satisfaction i could scarcely thrash them once, as opposed to many times.

So it means then end of the UK and I am fine with that - reminds me of a line from train-spotting for many in my nation are meek and cannot gobble cock correctly



In January 1974, the Conservative government had commissioned the McCrone report, written by Professor Gavin McCrone, a leading government economist, to report on the viability of an independent Scotland. He concluded that oil would have given an independent Scotland one of the strongest currencies in Europe. The report went on to say that officials advised government ministers on how to take "the wind out of the SNP sails". Handed over to the incoming Labour administration and classified as secret because of Labour fears over the surge in Scottish National Party popularity, the document came to light only in 2005, when the SNP obtained the report under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.[20][21]

one of you is also Scottish? I forget who...make yourself known

all that aside
both sides of the campaign were fought with lies, some more heinous than the remains pish.. From a legal point of view they should be dragged through the courts - and made to answer for their fooking sophistry - like that women who presented creatures self as a women when it was infact she a man with on stolen picture (worry not I gave that kunt some of my mind) when I logged on here...just give me one funking credible profile when I log on CS...come on just the one fffs.

All that aside, legality of both campaigns

I voted remain by the way.....Is the UK or the nations within better off within the EU or not...we are better off out..I think




Page: <<   < prev  33 34 [35] 36 37   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.054688E-02