Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist Comments"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist Comments" Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 4:50:05 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
There seems to be a strange sort of view that whining at lefties here and in society at large about their 'political correctness' is somehow an excellent strategy for resolving the issue. It isn't. The only answer is to kick up enough fuss with Twitter to get them to change their decision. That's really all there is to it.

Or simply boycott twitter.
Which is what I do anyway. I do not have twitter or facebook or instagram.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 4:54:28 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
There are millions of people on twitter, facebook, etc.

Regardless of whatever ban, what is it about Milo that you think makes him more worthy than at least 100,000 other posters who say things ten times smarter than he does?

Oh right. I almost forgot who I was talking to here.

Bottom feeders seek bottom feeders.

His not special, but his specific message that the victim complain to twitter is racist, is NOT racist at all, that's my point. And they are banning him for racism.



I don't give a crap if he is racist or not. All I have to do is visit Illinois or New York or Iowa or wherever if I want ubiquitous racism.

"but his specific message that the victim complain to twitter is racist"

I have NO idea what you are saying there, but 'll take a guess that you saw the word 'victim' and saw a guy screaming loudly, so you found a connection.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 4:57:46 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline 		that rates right up there with one of the most partisan naïve statements ive seen on the boards---as if liberals have a corner on justice in particular, or all things good in general.

among (many) other things, you might find some worth reading about "democratic plantations."




(in reply to itsSIRtou)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 5:08:00 AM   
Kaliko


Posts: 3381
Joined: 9/25/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

The reason Milo got shoved was because he was an unpleasant little turd with views that made everybody want to go out and wipe their shoes on the kerb ... but, most of all, because Twitter didn't think he was good for business. If you don't like that, take it up with Twitter. You're not going to get far a) banging at me about my PC principles then b) banging at me about not using those same principles to defend you and people like you, old boy - seriously, now are you?



Oh, I don't know. I think we can all think of some examples in history when being what the majority considered to be "an unpleasant little turd" was actually the catalyst for some real change. That really, really shouldn't be included at all in a reason to silence somebody. Because he didn't abide by TOS? Sure. Because he says something unpleasant? Nope.





(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 5:20:37 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
Actually, I don't follow the guy at all.


But you made it a point to start a thread for a guy whom you 'don't follow at all.'

Just as you want the US to vote for a guy all of us have been familiar with as a clown for thirty years, but since you came to awareness of him six months ago, anybody who says the truth about him is only being 'influenced by liberal media.'

It's time for your nap, sweetie.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 5:27:10 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

But you made it a point to start a thread for a guy whom you 'don't follow at all.'



I make threads of people that I don't follow all the time. Because they just happen to be embroil in a situation that interest me that I read in the news.

I am just not a social media person, so I don't follow anybody.

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 5:27:45 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Oh, I don't know. I think we can all think of some examples in history when being what the majority considered to be "an unpleasant little turd" was actually the catalyst for some real change. That really, really shouldn't be included at all in a reason to silence somebody. Because he didn't abide by TOS? Sure. Because he says something unpleasant? Nope.


It isn't the majority that counts here, though, is it? It's Twitter's directors - what they think looks bad for them; legalities ... and the bottom line, their profits, of course. Twitter's directors are the 'powers that be', in this case. It's useless to have a go at lefties on this forum, or at lefties in general. It amounts to just empty bellyaching and goes nowhere.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 5:43:22 AM   
Kaliko


Posts: 3381
Joined: 9/25/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Oh, I don't know. I think we can all think of some examples in history when being what the majority considered to be "an unpleasant little turd" was actually the catalyst for some real change. That really, really shouldn't be included at all in a reason to silence somebody. Because he didn't abide by TOS? Sure. Because he says something unpleasant? Nope.


It isn't the majority that counts here, though, is it? It's Twitter's directors - what they think looks bad for them; legalities ... and the bottom line, their profits, of course. Twitter's directors are the 'powers that be', in this case. It's useless to have a go at lefties on this forum, or at lefties in general. It amounts to just empty bellyaching and goes nowhere.



Two points on that. 1. But really - isn't this the place for bellyaching? It's a discussion forum. And 2. Well, companies who know what they're doing in social media (and I have to assume Twitter does) monitor the internet for conversations that mention them. I know that this particular forum may not be included in those target results, but bellyaching actually does have more power these days than when we used to sit around the lunch counter griping to the same five people each day. (I know. I used to be their waitress.) Companies pay more and more attention to social media discussions.

Anyway, having not read the comments in question myself, I can only assume that Twitter had good reason to do what they did, if for no other reason than to limit their liability if anything more comes from it. They had to do something. I may not like that they had to, but they had to. If something were to ever come from it, Twitter cannot chance being seen as negligent in dealing with the potential issue, assuming that there really have been repeated TOS violations. Again, I don't like that we've become the litigious society that we have, but yes - I can see why Twitter would do it.


(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 5:53:34 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Are you saying black people deserve slavery?

Just askin.


Are you eating that crap out of your toenails again?

Just askin.'

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 6:03:25 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

I know that this particular forum may not be included in those target results, but bellyaching actually does have more power these days than when we used to sit around the lunch counter griping to the same five people each day. (I know. I used to be their waitress.) Companies pay more and more attention to social media discussions.


Well, I hope for Milo's sake that Twitter doesn't look at this forum, then. They'd see some of the foul-mouthed berks who support him here and think, 'Ah - no. We *definitely* don't want him and his sort back.'

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 6:07:01 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		Just shows how much throwback neanderthal dickheads moan like hell.
I think that was almost an emotional breakdown

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 6:08:12 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

Every business can ban who-ever they want.
But is their decision just?



Doesn't matter. That's just how the free market works, sadly. If they consider Milo is bad for business, he's out, and that is that.


So removing a gay man's voice on social media is good, but not baking cakes for gay people is bad.

I mean, do you even see the fucking bullshit that you write? Do you ever read it back and think that maybe you're just a tad fucking inconsistent and that your position doesn't even have a whiff of rationale behind it?

Unbelievable. What a moron. WHAT a fucking moron.


So, you think milo is the only gay man on social media?

I mean, do you even see the fucking bullshit you write?

Unbelievable. What a moron. WHAT a fucking moron.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 6:17:51 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

The reason Milo got shoved was because he was an unpleasant little turd with views that made everybody want to go out and wipe their shoes on the kerb ... but, most of all, because Twitter didn't think he was good for business. If you don't like that, take it up with Twitter. You're not going to get far a) banging at me about my PC principles then b) banging at me about not using those same principles to defend you and people like you, old boy - seriously, now are you?



Oh, I don't know. I think we can all think of some examples in history when being what the majority considered to be "an unpleasant little turd" was actually the catalyst for some real change. That really, really shouldn't be included at all in a reason to silence somebody. Because he didn't abide by TOS? Sure. Because he says something unpleasant? Nope.





Rush Limbaugh, forever.

Never suppress the voices of reason.

(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 6:22:14 AM   
Kaliko


Posts: 3381
Joined: 9/25/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

Every business can ban who-ever they want.
But is their decision just?



Doesn't matter. That's just how the free market works, sadly. If they consider Milo is bad for business, he's out, and that is that.


So removing a gay man's voice on social media is good, but not baking cakes for gay people is bad.

I mean, do you even see the fucking bullshit that you write? Do you ever read it back and think that maybe you're just a tad fucking inconsistent and that your position doesn't even have a whiff of rationale behind it?

Unbelievable. What a moron. WHAT a fucking moron.


So, you think milo is the only gay man on social media?

I mean, do you even see the fucking bullshit you write?

Unbelievable. What a moron. WHAT a fucking moron.



Actually, (and I know this may be difficult to believe LOL), I thought pretty much the exact same thing as Awareness when I read that. I immediately thought of the gay cake debate and saw the similarity of the two situations. And I thought to myself - how blind are these people, really?

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 6:51:32 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Actually, (and I know this may be difficult to believe LOL), I thought pretty much the exact same thing as Awareness when I read that. I immediately thought of the gay cake debate and saw the similarity of the two situations. And I thought to myself - how blind are these people, really?


Then you, as well as Awareness, read some moral point into what I was saying that wasn't there. I made a pretty simple and obvious comment about the mechanics behind what *had* happened; you both decided that I was talking about what *should have happened*. You were both seeing what you wanted to see - in Awareness's case, the better for him to burst his bladder in a fit of outraged pissyness.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 7:12:15 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

Every business can ban who-ever they want.
But is their decision just?



Doesn't matter. That's just how the free market works, sadly. If they consider Milo is bad for business, he's out, and that is that.


So removing a gay man's voice on social media is good, but not baking cakes for gay people is bad.

I mean, do you even see the fucking bullshit that you write? Do you ever read it back and think that maybe you're just a tad fucking inconsistent and that your position doesn't even have a whiff of rationale behind it?

Unbelievable. What a moron. WHAT a fucking moron.


So, you think milo is the only gay man on social media?

I mean, do you even see the fucking bullshit you write?

Unbelievable. What a moron. WHAT a fucking moron.

How do you have time to post when your tongue is constantly lubricating Peon's ass?


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 7:14:32 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

How do you have time to post when your tongue is constantly lubricating Peon's ass?


How do you have time to post when your tongue is constantly lubricating your own ass?


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 7:24:10 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline 		You don't let your lubricator speak for himself? Or is his tongue busy right now?

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 7:28:34 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		If they were removing milo because he was gay, you might have a point. But it isnt.

He's sucking up the hate all the way to the bank.



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist C... - 7/21/2016 3:12:41 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bondageerone

who the f... is milo.

I was thinking the same thing. Testimony to how detached and regulated by the digital...the modern western world is today. A N. Korean escapee comes to the US and simply can't believe how western people are so completely disconnected here, except only...by their device.

Oh and the creators of Twitter have long since cashed out somewhere around $74/share, saw the decline as fast as the rise, now have some insecure, white collar homophobic, bonus baby, college nerds as profit protectors who gleefully shuck any of the unwashed, capitalist proletariat from exposure to their weak spineless, sanguine digital memes who they think are buying products from those who 'monetized' [sic] the stock to $74 share to begin with.

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 7/21/2016 3:25:32 PM >

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to bondageerone)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Milo banned from Twitter for alleged "Racist Comments" Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109