Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Close call in Singapore


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Close call in Singapore Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/9/2016 11:49:27 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD


History Channel (back when they really did history)


Roflmfao....the televison is not history it is television.



Special the norths Andersonville.
I thought that MLKs comment was common knowledge, except for people who don't want to hear it.


The lie you posted he never said.


Why does it matter what battles the LA home guard was in.


The "home" they guarded was the home of thier owner dumb ass...get a clue They were not and never were soldiers in the confederate army they were security guards dressed in the livery of their owner.


Southern units were more likely to be integrated than Northern ones.


This would be because the blacks were the recognized children of the officers.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.



(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/9/2016 11:51:08 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: BamaD

Check this story in the New York Observer.

Sunday, Dec 14, 2014 11:30 AM CDT
The North isn’t better than the South: The real history of modern racism and segregation above the Mason-Dixon line


That is not quite the same as the north was worse than the south now is it?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.



< Message edited by thompsonx -- 8/9/2016 11:58:50 AM >

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/9/2016 11:53:27 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: BamaD


When it stated clearly that there were indeed black Confederates? That was my point.


Was it your point that those blacks were the recognized children of the officers and that they represented a fraction of a single digit percentage of the confederate military?






< Message edited by thompsonx -- 8/9/2016 11:59:25 AM >

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/9/2016 11:57:14 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD


He, being English does not realize that slavery was an economic, not a racial issue.

You being stupid do not realize that there were no white slaves so yes it was racial.

Slavery was not decreed to be evil untill the North had no productive use for slaves.


Liar


The tension between the North and south was exonomic.


Why was there no "gag" rule for economic issues as their was for slavery?

And the tension was primarily between whites and the views they had on economics. For his view of the Civil War to hold water blacks would have had to have risen up and won their own freedom.



The "well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state" saw to it that one side of that conflict would be unarmed.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.


The LA home guard, while not part of the Confederate Army per se did defend the LA until the war was winding down.

Liar...they defended their owners property.



(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/9/2016 12:00:03 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Aylee



No, you illiterate twit.


You are wrong you illiterate twit.


Their service was to the Governor of LA.

Nope their service was to their owner.


If you do not understand the difference, you need to stop typing.


You obviously need to follow your own advice.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/9/2016 2:25:10 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I have never been there, let alone lived there so I have no reasonto doubt you.
It has been 40 years since I was in CO but when I was there I didn't see much bias against blacks, Indians on the other hand. Of course I wasn't there long enough to make a blanket proclimation about people there.


I should have been more clear. The more populated of an area of Colorado (or town) the more racial tensions there were. My high school - very few blacks - no issues. Another high school in town - larger number of blacks - more issues. On the Eastern Slope - the same thing. More diversity = more problems.

I did not notice too many issues with Native Americans, but I do recall "hearing" things about Mexicans. Of course that was after I entered the workforce.

I haven't been to CO since the 60's so any observations I made at that time could easily be obsolete by now. And as I said I didn't stay there long enough to get a feel for "community" attitudes. Your observations, coming from actually living there and being more recent are clearly will outweigh my obsevations from half a century ago.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/10/2016 4:55:46 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler

Ok, let's assume the easily accessible information on confederate slave soldiers is propaganda, do you have any citations for your claims? And are you admitting the Louisiana home gaurd saw no major combat?

A The blacks in the Confederate army were not slaves. The Confederate government was very clear that slaves would NOT be pressed into service.
You insist that the things I know to be a fact are only propaganda as the truth undermines your world view.
B The LA home guard never left LA, how does that negate their existance.



The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Native LA did well, fought well, and, in disproportionately large numbers, died well. Along with the 54th and 55th Massachusetts, 1st and 2nd Kansas Colored, 20th USCT...some few others...who all were by and large free born.


BamaD's Harvard article states the LA did not fight as confederates and switched sides as soon as they were offered. Additionally, it has a quotation of a slave that was forced to fight by the north



Yes, the Confederate Army rejected them. So they did not "switch sides" as they were never on the Confederate side officially.

General Butler's orders were to enlist ONLY freedmen. However, meh, it was war.

http://www.historynet.com/americas-civil-war-louisiana-native-guards.htm

I am not exactly sure what you are trying to prove? That black freedmen were bad soldiers? That blacks were not "real" soldiers? (Yes, they did end up doing a lot of fatigue work.)

Racial tensions? Heh. Let me state this plainly: As near as I can tell, racial tolerance in the armed forces has improved since Vietnam despite, not because of, the race relations and EO programs inflicted on us.

He is also trying to claim that there is far more racial tension in the south than in the north. My personal experience refutes this Idea completely.
I have lived in MO, IL, TX, CA, and MD and can assure you that there is less racial tension here than in most parts of the country.


A brief history of racial tension in the US:

Every civilization on earth employed slavery, with no none feeling the need to justify it. The Christians of the Enlightenment, were the first, and _only_ civilization to see that it was wrong, and seek to abolish it.

To justify segregation, the inferiority of blacks was argued. But much of the argument was religious, God allegedly not wanting different groups to intermarry. And much was merely human: they are different, therefore they are inferior, a claim common to all people in all eras.

After civil rights, the incidence of blacks using drugs, being members of gangs, and living on welfare increased sharply. Those increases correlate well with the efforts of liberals to help black people.

The claim that black lives aren't valued as white lives are "systematically and institutionally" is weaselly evasion. There being no recognized standards of "systematically" or "institutionally" valuing anything, any situation can be claimed as showing black lives are more, less, or equally valued. E.g., black poverty shows we value blacks less, because they are in poverty. Or that we value them more, because we spend more in welfare and anti-poverty measures per black than we do per white.

#BlackLivesMatter got started because of police killings of blacks. Blacks are disproportionately killed by the police, about 1.5X their share of the population. Blacks are also disproportionately killers of police, about 2.4x their share of the population. Blacks are also a minority of those the police kill, about one fourth to one third of all police killiings. And blacks are murdered by other blacks at around 13x to 14x the rate police kill them.

It's not clear why any of this occurs. It's not clear why the police in the U.S. kill so many citizens. It's not clear why blacks are killed at higher than their numbers in the general population. It's not clear that efforts to lower the number of blacks killed by police will result in a net saving of black lives: there's some evidence that less brutal policing will result in a higher murder rate, increasing the number of blacks who die by violence.

But one thing is clear. Accusing hundreds of millions of white Americans of being bad people because they don't know how to improve a complicated situation won't help anyone except those who profit by setting Americans at each other's throats.





Where do you get your statistics?

According to the FBI, 44% of those killed by police over the last 30 years were white, though according to the 2010 census, those claiming only white descent make up 72.4% of the population. This means that white people were just over 3.3 times less likely to be shot

Though this is only a story I heard (which around here seems to be hard evidence), a person had a store and we're paying protection money to the bloods or crips, I forget which one. The place was robbed when they were closed. Police took a report and accomplished nothing. The gang that was being payed off found the goods and money and said that person would never bother them again. If racist corrupt cops are the norm, organized crime can sometimes provide justice. It worked for the Italian mob, it's worked for Pablo Escabar, why can't it work in black neighborhoods

An easy way to relieve some racial tension would be convicting obviously guilty police officers. In 2014, only .1% percent of federal cases were not indicted, 10% of those cases not indicted were police killing civilians. Adding hood cameras to patrol cars lowered hit and runs on officers. Badge cameras have been shown to lower police abuse charges by more than half, and also allow an easy conviction against those police witness committing a crime

52% of violent crime is committed by black people for what ever reason. No I am not saying it is about their skin color, there are many factors. However this indicates that blacks are underepresented in shooting, not the other way around, you are comparing the shootings to the wrong stat.


What the f are you talking about? You are obviously confused. 44% of Americans shot by cops are white. Greater than 70% of Americans are white. That means that white people are less than a third as likely to get shot by cops. Do you get it?

52% of violent crime.
thus 52% of the chances to get shot belong to blacks.
About 30% of the people shot by the police are black.
That means the 70% of the people shot come from 48% of the criminals.
I am amazed that you can't follow this.
Or are you saying that for every 15 black people who are shot the police need togo out and shoot 72 white people whether they have commited a crime or not?


Do you have evidence of anything you have posted? Are you aware that if a person is caught, not only are they less likely to do any time at all, but if they do they are likely to get less time? Drug convictions are the worst for this sort of discrepancy and contribute to most of the federal inmate population

BTW please explain why Boston shutting down their school system to avoid integration makes the south racist.
Or why Detroit burning everyone of their school busses to avoid integration does the same thing.
As I pointed out earlier I thought you were English because of your total lack of understanding of American history and your arrogance about your ignorance.
And like the spoiled child you are you are trying to pick a fight and derail another thread.
I look as people as individuals regardless of race.
You look at groups and try to make people fit the group.


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/10/2016 5:26:45 PM   
DominantWrestler


Posts: 338
Joined: 7/4/2010
Status: offline
So that's why slavery and racism didn't contribute to the causes of the civil war? Your biases in sharks and DUIs were repetitions of the underlying concepts in this thread. And resorting to insult to compensate for a complete lack of citations does not make you more correct

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/10/2016 5:28:20 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
FR

DW go back and look at what was said.
I said it wasn't racial tension, I did not say slavery was not a major cause.
To the contrary I said that slavery was a major factor.
Your "refutations" stated that there were black confedrates, your claim that this is a refutation because there were a lot more not only doesn't refute my assertion, but confirms it.
You fail to acknowlege that economic factors in the North had anything to do with the economic tensions (a factor of which was slavery). You also seem to be unaware that the attitudes of the abolishionist were, by my standards at least, were racists. They (as voiced by Lincoln) considered blacks to be inferior, except in anti slavery tracts of course. Lincoln berated black leaders in 1863 for opposing his plan to ship them all back to Africa.

By the way, I was enlisted in the US Air Force in 1973, by your definition that means I was a slave and forced into service.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/10/2016 5:51:23 PM   
DominantWrestler


Posts: 338
Joined: 7/4/2010
Status: offline
I never denied it was economic either. Just because I never stated the economic influences doesn't mean I'm not aware of them, nor does it mean I'm arguing against them. Where do you get this stuff?

You also denied slaves were forced to serve the confederacy and posted a link that proved some of your points wrong. You are a lair and have no substantial evidence

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/10/2016 6:03:43 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler

So that's why slavery and racism didn't contribute to the causes of the civil war? Your biases in sharks and DUIs were repetitions of the underlying concepts in this thread. And resorting to insult to compensate for a complete lack of citations does not make you more correct

How many times do I have to remind you that I stated that slavery was a major factor in the war, and I told you that the first time you made that accusation.
No, but it does raise serious questions about your false claim of more racial tension in the south than the north.
Do you know about the race riots in Baltimore, NY Chicago, Memphis, DC, Watts, St Louis, KC Clevland, and on and on, all northern cities, now that shows racial tension.

You want to talk insults, how about your claim that I don't have a problem with blacks being mistreated?
That came long before my pointing out your youth and lack of maturity.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/10/2016 6:08:24 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler

I never denied it was economic either. Just because I never stated the economic influences doesn't mean I'm not aware of them, nor does it mean I'm arguing against them. Where do you get this stuff?

You also denied slaves were forced to serve the confederacy and posted a link that proved some of your points wrong. You are a lair and have no substantial evidence

Again you show a reading comprehension problem.
I said Confederate policy forbade forcing slaves into miilitary service, I even said that policy is often ignored.

You proclaimed southern economics to be at fault then tried to disguise the purpose of the protectionist tariffs as a money raiser as opposed to a means to force people to buy from northern manufacturers.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/10/2016 6:25:17 PM   
DominantWrestler


Posts: 338
Joined: 7/4/2010
Status: offline
You also said the confederacy did not force slaves to fight, then tried to correct your mistake when I pointed out your article was wrong. How many more lies do you need? Should I just repost the text of the Harvard article you posted? Interesting geographical distribution and I understand what you did

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/10/2016 6:26:55 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler

You also said the confederacy did not force slaves to fight, then tried to correct your mistake when I pointed out your article was wrong. How many more lies do you need? Should I just repost the text of the Harvard article you posted? Interesting geographical distribution and I understand what you did

Policy said no, it may have been violated, that isn't a lie, but you are real loose with that word.

You do know that there were 2 factors in the NY riots in July of 1863, now that was racial tension. The other factor was that the north was forcing people, both black and white, to fight.
The south also instituted a draft, but they only drafted whites.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 8/10/2016 6:36:43 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to DominantWrestler)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/10/2016 7:11:58 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
and they had a very high desertion rate in the south from those draftees.

but from the souths point of view it wasnt about economics, it was about slaves. "Lincoln is going to take our slaves away."

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/10/2016 7:32:39 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Again you show a reading comprehension problem.


We ll read well enough to spot the hlf truths and whole lies you post.


I said Confederate policy forbade forcing slaves into miilitary service, I even said that policy is often ignored.

But you denied that blacks were drafted into the confederate military....one more lie based on a half truth.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.


You proclaimed southern economics to be at fault then tried to disguise the purpose of the protectionist tariffs as a money raiser as opposed to a means to force people to buy from northern manufacturers.


You hate illegal aliens who take jobs from amerikan citizens but support those traitors who would buy from foriegners and put their fellow amerikans out of work.
You really are a two faced bullshit artist.



(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Close call in Singapore - 8/10/2016 7:37:06 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD

How many times do I have to remind you that I stated that slavery was a major factor in the war, and I told you that the first time you made that accusation.
No, but it does raise serious questions about your false claim of more racial tension in the south than the north.
Do you know about the race riots in Baltimore, NY Chicago, Memphis, DC, Watts, St Louis, KC Clevland, and on and on, all northern cities, now that shows racial tension.


This implies that there were no race riots in the south.
How disingenuous of you.


You want to talk insults, how about your claim that I don't have a problem with blacks being mistreated?


You don't? Could have fooled me.


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 97
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Close call in Singapore Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.172