RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA..

RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

bondageerone -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 3:01:46 AM)
MORON BAMA THE COP PUT A LIVE ROUND IN . OK IT WAS A MISTAKE. HE MUST FEEL LIKE SHIT. SATISFIED NOW BD.XXX

BamaD -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 3:11:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bondageerone MORON BAMA THE COP PUT A LIVE ROUND IN . OK IT WAS A MISTAKE. HE MUST FEEL LIKE SHIT. SATISFIED NOW BD.XXX If you had checked back on page one you would have seen that I said That the cop and possibly the training instructor screwed up big time. Since he shot here more than once he most likely put in a magazine with live ammo rather than the one with blanks. Show be one statement I made that even remotely defended the cop. The copwho di the shooting faces a lawsuit, almost certainly loss of his job , and possibly jail time for negligent homocide.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 3:20:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD The copwho di the shooting faces a lawsuit, almost certainly loss of his job , and possibly jail time for negligent homocide. That should a mandatory thing, not 'a possibility'. [8\|] If they had that, maybe they would be a LOT more careful about double-checking what they do.

bondageerone -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 3:22:01 AM)
ok bama stroke your dog for me. have a nice day. xx

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 3:32:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: bondageerone this killing happened in a training exercise, THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BE BLANKS. I covered that on page 1. For this kind of exercise you don't even need blanks. Departments that can get the money often use a advanced version of a first person shooter game that electronically scores the officer. That begs the question: why were live rounds anywhere near the fucking place for that 'mistake' to even be in the realms of the possibility of happening?? I think the questions of responsibility need to be aimed much higher up the tree.

BamaD -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 9:16:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD The copwho di the shooting faces a lawsuit, almost certainly loss of his job , and possibly jail time for negligent homocide. That should a mandatory thing, not 'a possibility'. [8\|] If they had that, maybe they would be a LOT more careful about double-checking what they do. I am sure you haven't thought of this but the cop was almost certainly using an automatic. The weapon may have been loaded before it got in his hand. You think he should go to jail because someone else screwed up. Even if he checked the magazine the first round or two may well have been blanks, but you think he should go to jail because someone else screwed up? Whoever loaded the magazine is in big trouble but maybe we should find out just what happened before we form that lynch mob.

BamaD -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 9:19:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: bondageerone this killing happened in a training exercise, THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BE BLANKS. I covered that on page 1. For this kind of exercise you don't even need blanks. Departments that can get the money often use a advanced version of a first person shooter game that electronically scores the officer. That begs the question: why were live rounds anywhere near the fucking place for that 'mistake' to even be in the realms of the possibility of happening?? I think the questions of responsibility need to be aimed much higher up the tree. The training facility would have equipment for various types of training. That would include shooting at the range. However the live and blank ammunition would be stored seperatly (or most assuredly should be) so that doesn't explain the screwup.

mnottertail -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 9:24:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD The copwho di the shooting faces a lawsuit, almost certainly loss of his job , and possibly jail time for negligent homocide. That should a mandatory thing, not 'a possibility'. [8\|] If they had that, maybe they would be a LOT more careful about double-checking what they do. I am sure you haven't thought of this but the cop was almost certainly using an automatic. The weapon may have been loaded before it got in his hand. You think he should go to jail because someone else screwed up. Even if he checked the magazine the first round or two may well have been blanks, but you think he should go to jail because someone else screwed up? Whoever loaded the magazine is in big trouble but maybe we should find out just what happened before we form that lynch mob. He is an accessory even at that.........ANY REASONABLE MAN would check those loads.........

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 9:55:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD The copwho di the shooting faces a lawsuit, almost certainly loss of his job , and possibly jail time for negligent homocide. That should a mandatory thing, not 'a possibility'. [8\|] If they had that, maybe they would be a LOT more careful about double-checking what they do. I am sure you haven't thought of this but the cop was almost certainly using an automatic. The weapon may have been loaded before it got in his hand. You think he should go to jail because someone else screwed up. Even if he checked the magazine the first round or two may well have been blanks, but you think he should go to jail because someone else screwed up? Whoever loaded the magazine is in big trouble but maybe we should find out just what happened before we form that lynch mob. It's irrelevant what sort of firearm he was using or who loaded it. The point is, he fucked up by either loading it himself or not checking what was handed to him. That's just plain sloppy and unprofessional. No matter how you slice the cake, bottom line is he is still responsible. Period.

Lucylastic -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 10:01:19 AM)
A woman is dead because someone(including him) was careless. sounds like more training should be required.... A lot of it. And yes he should lose his job. jail time, I hope so Her life was worth more than a slap on the wrist. life is sacred....right?

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 10:02:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: bondageerone this killing happened in a training exercise, THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BE BLANKS. I covered that on page 1. For this kind of exercise you don't even need blanks. Departments that can get the money often use a advanced version of a first person shooter game that electronically scores the officer. That begs the question: why were live rounds anywhere near the fucking place for that 'mistake' to even be in the realms of the possibility of happening?? I think the questions of responsibility need to be aimed much higher up the tree. The training facility would have equipment for various types of training. That would include shooting at the range. However the live and blank ammunition would be stored seperatly (or most assuredly should be) so that doesn't explain the screwup. And this is why the US training is so inferior to ours. When they have that sort of training here, it is usually held at a separate location where live ammo isn't around, or, when this takes place at a regular shooting area, all other activity is cancelled and live ammo is locked away.

BamaD -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 10:23:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD The copwho di the shooting faces a lawsuit, almost certainly loss of his job , and possibly jail time for negligent homocide. That should a mandatory thing, not 'a possibility'. [8\|] If they had that, maybe they would be a LOT more careful about double-checking what they do. I am sure you haven't thought of this but the cop was almost certainly using an automatic. The weapon may have been loaded before it got in his hand. You think he should go to jail because someone else screwed up. Even if he checked the magazine the first round or two may well have been blanks, but you think he should go to jail because someone else screwed up? Whoever loaded the magazine is in big trouble but maybe we should find out just what happened before we form that lynch mob. It's irrelevant what sort of firearm he was using or who loaded it. The point is, he fucked up by either loading it himself or not checking what was handed to him. That's just plain sloppy and unprofessional. No matter how you slice the cake, bottom line is he is still responsible. Period. He is an American and a cop, so he should be in jail. You clearly don't know how these things work. Often the training supervisor will hand him the firearm just as he begins the exercise and he has no opportunity to check the loads, if the trainer can't tell the differnace between live ammo and a blank he shouldn't be the trainer. Yes it does make a difference what kind of firearm he was using. With a revolver just looking at the front of the cylinders would tell him if they were live or blanks. With an automatic he would have to unload the magazine and check each round. You want touble you tell the trainer you think he is incompetant.

BamaD -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 10:27:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: bondageerone this killing happened in a training exercise, THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BE BLANKS. I covered that on page 1. For this kind of exercise you don't even need blanks. Departments that can get the money often use a advanced version of a first person shooter game that electronically scores the officer. That begs the question: why were live rounds anywhere near the fucking place for that 'mistake' to even be in the realms of the possibility of happening?? I think the questions of responsibility need to be aimed much higher up the tree. The training facility would have equipment for various types of training. That would include shooting at the range. However the live and blank ammunition would be stored seperatly (or most assuredly should be) so that doesn't explain the screwup. And this is why the US training is so inferior to ours. When they have that sort of training here, it is usually held at a separate location where live ammo isn't around, or, when this takes place at a regular shooting area, all other activity is cancelled and live ammo is locked away. To here you tell it everything here is inferior to there. But then you claim to hit a target at a range where it can't be seen with a air rifle that won't carry that far, so I think you can tell how highly I view your opinion.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 11:15:12 AM)
Lucy gave the difference between the training of our firearms officers and those of the US. They are worlds apart. And this is just one incident of many where it shows. If you can't see just how deficient your lot are at training your officers, that's on you. The whole scenario was a complete fuck-up that with proper organisation and professionalism could and would have been avoided.

BamaD -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 1:43:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 Lucy gave the difference between the training of our firearms officers and those of the US. They are worlds apart. And this is just one incident of many where it shows. If you can't see just how deficient your lot are at training your officers, that's on you. The whole scenario was a complete fuck-up that with proper organisation and professionalism could and would have been avoided. They are American, therefore they are inferior, a claim you and Lucy make all the time. You must be almost as happy that you don't live here as I am. I realize this is a novel idea but how about getting the facts before passing jusdgement on every cop in America?

mnottertail -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 3:19:35 PM)
We have the facts, they are not trained as in other countries where their first idea is to not shoot anyone.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 3:26:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 Lucy gave the difference between the training of our firearms officers and those of the US. They are worlds apart. And this is just one incident of many where it shows. If you can't see just how deficient your lot are at training your officers, that's on you. The whole scenario was a complete fuck-up that with proper organisation and professionalism could and would have been avoided. They are American, therefore they are inferior, a claim you and Lucy make all the time. You must be almost as happy that you don't live here as I am. I realize this is a novel idea but how about getting the facts before passing jusdgement on every cop in America? Do you have anything to the contrary that proves your officers are superior in any way to ours? Your training is shit. Your professionalism seems to be shot to pieces. Too many sloppy incidents resulting in deaths.

thompsonx -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 3:30:03 PM)
ORIGINAL: BamaD Since he shot here more than once he most likely put in a magazine with live ammo rather than the one with blanks. What kind of gun will cycle semi-auto with blanks?

PeonForHer -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 3:44:53 PM)
quote: What kind of gun will cycle semi-auto with blanks? I'm going to put that question on my Facebook page, A. Just saying. All my FB friends will think I'm brilliant - because they're British, and won't even understand the question, never mind have an answer to it. ;-)

thompsonx -> RE: EVEN YOUR COPS..USA.. (8/13/2016 4:00:20 PM)
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer What kind of gun will cycle semi-auto with blanks? I'm going to put that question on my Facebook page, A. Just saying. All my FB friends will think I'm brilliant - because they're British, and won't even understand the question, never mind have an answer to it. ;-) The answer is none. Some will, with a special attachment. When a real bullet is fired through the attachment it hits an obstruction and the pressure is exhausted to the sides. Guns without the device need to be cycled by hand for each round. Which means this clown fired two rounds through a safety device or he cycled the weapon by hand for two live rounds. The recoil from blank is about 10% of that from a real bullet. This boys has history and is currently being charged with excessive force in a k9 attack on a bicyclist. It is all in the link.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.296875E-02