RE: 9/11: Could the US Government Have Allowed the Attacks?

RE: 9/11: Could the US Government Have Allowed the Attacks? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Termyn8or -> RE: 9/11: Could the US Government Have Allowed the Attacks? (9/13/2016 5:09:44 AM)
She is part of the corruption. As secretary of state, how many new terrorists/freedom fighters were created ? Just what did she do ? Hiding those emails means that she doesn't even want the President who hired her crooked ass was doing on our time. And Obama, who seems to be fairly against war is so adamant against a republican or reasonable facsimile getting the big chair is protecting her by not ordering the release of those emails by the NSA, which surely has them all. He does not care that she is way more likely to start WW3 than damnear anyone. Or maybe he did get the files from the NSA and has seen some things that he did not want to see, and especially does not want us to see because it would make Trump a shoe in. And he doesn't remember PUMA. that was Hillary Clinton's website and PUMA stands for "Party Unity My Ass". It was short lived, but its existence no matter how short is another indicator of her having an autistic spectrum disorder. I remember, everyone seems to forget. This was before she was a senator so the football game came on and the sun shines, people forget. About your childish namecalling, tell me why your circus peanut is running at all. He certainly doesn't need the measely three hundred grand a year. At his age he doesn't need any more political connections. He does not need the workload as he has establish businesses that make him money almost maintenance free.He has no intention of promoting the republican party after how they treated him. He would not be stupid enough to pardon himself from the IRS audits. And narcissism ? Perhaps he has some of that,, in fact there is no doubt, but he has his name on buildings, Obama doesn't. Bush doesn't. and he has more money, or assets than all those people combined. Why is he running ? Because they won't let him put up a golf course somewhere ? Are they stopping him form putting up an indoor skiing range in FLorida like they have in Dubai ? I doubt it, they would probably be his best customers and he is certainly not running to get the zoning laws changed there, he has the money to grease enough people to put a rendering plant on the whitehouse lawn. I mean, I really do wonder why the fuck he is running at all ? Why does Putin want to be President of Russia ? He needs nothing. Not sure but I think he has even more money than Trump. He needs no more political connections and has plenty of money to bribe whatever government would get in, and could just take his money and run. Why not ? Now think of Clinton. Still soliciting donations and speaking fees even though they got enough money for Chelsea's grandkids to go to Harvard and Yale both. Trump and Putin don't give a fuck if anyone gives them any money. Hillary Clinton is a megalomaniac, that is why she is running. I don't care about her health, she could preside on a heart lung machine. The problem with her is what she would do. George W Bush got his chance only because the democrats put out such sickening characters. They appear to be doing it again. It seems that neither party really wants to win. Maybe I should write my campaign speech. But not here and now. T^T

WickedsDesire -> RE: 9/11: Could the US Government Have Allowed the Attacks? (9/13/2016 5:24:54 AM)
Good thread gauge no pun intended. Possible? Absolutely – you can cite a wealth of past History as precedence and that’s just the stuff that comes to light 25-50 years later. Our nation is a better by far, but not to the distance of decency. An apt analogy is did Churchill allow Coventry to be bombed – or was that an urban myth. Who would benefit 1. Intelligence services as they invoke 1984 dystopia and the rendering of your obsolete constitution utterly derelict 2. Civil westerners (conditioned paranoia) as it’s a well known fact to us civil westerners johhny foreigner are nowt but savage sand dwellers and a bunch of godless heretics whose ideology does not fit our model. 3. A portion of the wealthy as share plummets and then sky rocket – not including the war machine (various related elements) ones and those invested in security/private & digital technology- spying monitoring etc.

WhoreMods -> RE: 9/11: Could the US Government Have Allowed the Attacks? (9/13/2016 7:24:49 AM)
First off: Putin does give a fuck about people giving him money. He's got very angry whenever when of the oligarchs who helped him asset strip the former soviet union flees the country without handing the money they made from that over to him first. You are correct though, that he's worth a shitload more than Trump. Autocratic control of Russia is proving as goo a money spinner for him as it used to for the Romanovs. As for the tiny-handed shitweasel's political connections, most of those were with the Clintons, iirc, so he probably needs to start working on some new contents for his rolodex after his campaign thus far. You are correct though, that his most important connection exists outside of the political system: as well as Putin's bitch, he's also Murdoch's bitch. Murdoch, of course, does his best to get his hand up the arse of every politician in the western world, but I think the cockwomble is the first person you've had stand who was already in Murdoch's pocket when he first started campaigning. And again: on what basis are you arguing that Clinton is more likely to start a war than the circus peanut? Is this assumption purely down to the whole "Putin's bitch" thing? You've certainly not mentioned anything else that makes her seem more likely to start trouble than than the circus peanut, who has been making pretty solid efforts to antangonise a few other parties, a couple of whom have a much better record for attacks on the north American mainland than Russia could muster even back when it ran most of Eastern Europe. I do love the spectacle of Republican supporters and libertarian denialicans complaining about the nomination of a perceived warmonger who might have health issues, though. Isn't Reagan all but sanctified by the American right for those very qualities?

Edwird -> RE: 9/11: Could the US Government Have Allowed the Attacks? (9/13/2016 11:43:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Gauge I do not want to discuss any conspiracy theory relative to the towers, pentagon or the downed flight in PA. In this thread, I would like to discuss the possibility that the US government allowed the terrorist attacks on 9-11-2001. I would like to discuss why they would do that, and who would benefit from it. I am fine with speculating, but please, if possible, remain within the realm of reality. I am interested in hearing what people think, mostly for my personal edification. My personal take on this topic is that it is very possible that the government allowed the attacks to take place. The defense contractors would benefit, the contractors rebuilding the damage after the war would benefit, the oil companies sure benefited. However, aside from the money (most likely the primary reason) why would they do such a thing? So many people died as a result of that day. "I want to engage in pure speculation on what it's like to be pregnant. I don't want to hear any conspiracy theories about actual live birth."

tamaka -> RE: 9/11: Could the US Government Have Allowed the Attacks? (9/17/2016 8:39:01 AM)
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DicBp41jbuMo&ved=0ahUKEwidr8j13JbPAhUH6IMKHaofCyoQtwIIjAEwGA&usg=AFQjCNETxxCM7StD3oKRmg3dqP7x4GZeJQ

bondageerone -> RE: 9/11: Could the US Government Have Allowed the Attacks? (9/17/2016 8:43:59 AM)
HOW COMPLETELY FUCKING STUPID CAN YOU BE. ANYONE WHO EVEN ASKS THIS MUST BE SICK. NEARLY 3000 PEOPLE DIED. COUNTLESS THOUSANDS WERE LEFT IN MISERY.

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 4 [5]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875