you cannot be serious. 9/11

you cannot be serious. 9/11 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

bondageerone -> you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/21/2016 3:00:14 AM)
so it had nothing to do with the two aircraft smashing into each tower. there are some really sad people everywhere. trying to blame the builders of the towers. NOT THE FUCKING LUNATICS WHO STARTED THIS.

Aylee -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/21/2016 6:05:45 AM)
??

MrRodgers -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/21/2016 6:34:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bondageerone so it had nothing to do with the two aircraft smashing into each tower. there are some really sad people everywhere. trying to blame the builders of the towers. NOT THE FUCKING LUNATICS WHO STARTED THIS. What...had nothing to do with two aircraft smashing into each tower. Yes, there are some really sad people everywhere. And ? Never read or heard anybody try to blame the builders of the towers. Not the fucking lunatics who started what ?

bondageerone -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/21/2016 9:29:48 AM)
response to the conspiracy morons. #realone#

BamaD -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/21/2016 11:04:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bondageerone response to the conspiracy morons. #realone# Didn't seem that cryptic to me.

WickedsDesire -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/21/2016 12:46:58 PM)
Last time I checked Op was a man with two stolen pictures Creature of wretch has spoken Behold its many sock realities

Real0ne -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/21/2016 3:30:22 PM)
thats being discussed HERE

bondageerone -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/22/2016 2:51:37 AM)
wickeddesire you are really a sad sick son of a bitch, your sole aim in life is to upset normal people, in real life I have offered to talk to you, but like most men you are a truly pathetic example, GLAD I AM A LESBIAN. XX

bondageerone -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/22/2016 2:53:09 AM)
IS THAT WHY.. you are obviously a STAR TREK fan and believe FICTION .. xx

WhoreMods -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/22/2016 6:06:58 AM)
That's a bit rough on the trekkies, isn't it? Even the most eccentric Klingon impersonator is more in touch with reality than R0... [:D]

bondageerone -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/22/2016 6:50:49 AM)
WHOREMODS , JUST BEAM ME UP ANYWHERE. XX

Termyn8or -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/22/2016 7:38:09 AM)
I still want to know who called all the people to tell them to take off that day I still want to know about the "Israeli students" who took a video of it. I still want to know why everyone forgot about 1993. I already know why the towers did not topple and just crush a bunch of buildings around there, there is always a demolition system built in. T^T

Nnanji -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/22/2016 11:29:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or I still want to know who called all the people to tell them to take off that day I still want to know about the "Israeli students" who took a video of it. I still want to know why everyone forgot about 1993. I already know why the towers did not topple and just crush a bunch of buildings around there, there is always a demolition system built in. T^T If you understand anything about structure fires then you know the buildings did exactly what a hot fire does to a structure. The idea there was a demolition system is far fetched. I'd need to see a citation. You could note that the towers were built just after asbestos was banned because of all of the lawsuits against it. The insulation was no where near what asbestos of the day or insulation of today would be. The fires, fueled with wing tanks full of jet fuel, just melted the structural steel and the building floors collapsed on each other as any fire fighter would have predicted.

klmpong -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/22/2016 11:37:15 AM)
------------------- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfBBnM1Il1w ---------------------------- enough said!.............to the sane anyway.

dcnovice -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/22/2016 11:37:34 AM)
quote: I still want to know why everyone forgot about 1993. I'm not sure everyone did. I remember reading after 9/11 that the 1993 attack led to improved safety measures, such as better lighting in stairwells and even evacuation drills that likely saved thousands of lives.

MrRodgers -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/22/2016 11:44:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or I still want to know who called all the people to tell them to take off that day I still want to know about the "Israeli students" who took a video of it. I still want to know why everyone forgot about 1993. I already know why the towers did not topple and just crush a bunch of buildings around there, there is always a demolition system built in. T^T If you understand anything about structure fires then you know the buildings did exactly what a hot fire does to a structure. The idea there was a demolition system is far fetched. I'd need to see a citation. You could note that the towers were built just after asbestos was banned because of all of the lawsuits against it. The insulation was no where near what asbestos of the day or insulation of today would be. The fires, fueled with wing tanks full of jet fuel, just melted the structural steel and the building floors collapsed on each other as any fire fighter would have predicted. In fact the WTC was loaded with asbestos and was a white elephant. The WTC had not a single deal on the complex in over 30 years prior to Silverstein's deal which BTW was just 6 months before 9/11 and included a very unusual clause for any terrorist attack that did pay off in the billion$. In fact, the reason there had not been any deal on the complex is because there was a $200 million asbestos (among others) abatement on the bldgs. upon which a waiver was granted every year. Silverstein Group got $4.6 billion insurance payout. Isn't that precious ? HERE

Nnanji -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/22/2016 11:54:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: klmpong ------------------- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfBBnM1Il1w ---------------------------- enough said!.............to the sane anyway. Oh Jees, I watched a couple of minutes. What malarkey. First off, an architect wouldn't know his/her ass from a hole in the ground about structural material performance. Then, when they run through their list of "1,000" professionals, maybe three of the engineers had "PE" after their name, which is pretty much the only real measure of a competent professional. So your "enough said to sane people" had three people in the entire world that may...may...have been competent to refute anything in the report that the "ominous" government engineers wrote. I wonder just how hard it is to find three professionals, of any profession, to sign on to a conspiracy? Pure BS that has no professional backing. Funny as shit actually. I imagine if I watched more of it there'd be a lot more to laugh at.

Nnanji -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/22/2016 12:00:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or I still want to know who called all the people to tell them to take off that day I still want to know about the "Israeli students" who took a video of it. I still want to know why everyone forgot about 1993. I already know why the towers did not topple and just crush a bunch of buildings around there, there is always a demolition system built in. T^T If you understand anything about structure fires then you know the buildings did exactly what a hot fire does to a structure. The idea there was a demolition system is far fetched. I'd need to see a citation. You could note that the towers were built just after asbestos was banned because of all of the lawsuits against it. The insulation was no where near what asbestos of the day or insulation of today would be. The fires, fueled with wing tanks full of jet fuel, just melted the structural steel and the building floors collapsed on each other as any fire fighter would have predicted. In fact the WTC was loaded with asbestos and was a white elephant. The WTC had not a single deal on the complex in over 30 years prior to Silverstein's deal which BTW was just 6 months before 9/11 and included a very unusual clause for any terrorist attack that did pay off in the billion$. In fact, the reason there had not been any deal on the complex is because there was a $200 million asbestos (among others) abatement on the bldgs. upon which a waiver was granted every year. Silverstein Group got $4.6 billion insurance payout. Isn't that precious ? HERE I understand that tin foil hats is your best thing, but: http://www.foxnews.com/story/2001/09/14/asbestos-could-have-saved-wtc-lives.html In 1971, New York City banned the use of asbestos in spray fireproofing. At that time, asbestos insulating material had only been sprayed up to the 64th floor of the World Trade Center towers. Other materials were substituted for asbestos. Though the substitute sprays passed Underwriters Laboratories’ tests, not everyone was convinced they would work as well. One skeptic was the late-Herbert Levine who invented spray fireproofing with wet asbestos in the late-1940s. Levine’s invention involved a combination of asbestos with mineral wool and made commonplace the construction of large steel framed buildings.

MrRodgers -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/22/2016 12:09:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: klmpong ------------------- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfBBnM1Il1w ---------------------------- enough said!.............to the sane anyway. Certainly many, many unanswered questions but what do those 1500 expert architects and engineers know let alone the remaining 25,000 professionals who question the official version ? Certainly the bloggers just in this forum know much more than they do. Just like the pilots organizations on the obvious discrepancies of those flights...what do they know about say, the attack on the pentagon ? They're just career professional pilots, that's all. I mean let's get real here, do we believe these otherwise honest, everything to lose and nothing to gain professionals or a lying, delaying, obfuscating, obstructionist govt. whose principals and friends all got just what they wanted and made million$ on 9/11 ? It's obvious these wackos are just spinning their version of a crazy conspiracy theory unlike the US govt.'s own version of an even...crazier conspiracy theory. I mean you've just got to go with Bush, Chaney, the CIA, FBI and the neocons...right ? I mean didn't the admin. at the time always demonstrate their complete honesty, integrity and righteousness for all 8 years ? Nope, the OP is correct, you...cannot be serious about 9/11 at all.

WhoreMods -> RE: you cannot be serious. 9/11 (9/22/2016 12:11:04 PM)
Good job Fetchit killed bin Laden, then: he'd be getting sued by half of Manhattan for spreading asbestos about, otherwise.

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

6.054688E-02