Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/26/2006 10:02:46 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
I still think the issue is not ours, but if we have to wade in then look at the history of Hezbollah.   Created in 1982 with the specific objective of sending terrorists into Isreal.  Ressponsible for the 1983 US Marine Barracks attack, Responsible for the bombing of the French Headquarters (as a part of a UN Multinational Force) sent to keep the peace.  Hezbollah (aka South Lebanonese Army) have had incursions into Isreal, since the Isreali withdrawal from South Lebanon - this technically makes any action against Isreal by Hezbollah an invasion by Lebanon.  Hezbollah has also been linked to other terror organizations.   All this from Wikipedia.

My opinion is still unchanged.  For us to stay out of it, it isn't our business.   In my opinion, the efforts of our Secretary of State lends help to mostly to those who killed our Marines. 

(in reply to Moloch)
Profile   Post #: 221
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/26/2006 10:04:52 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
I don't know abut the pictures shown in the Media.  I consider the media biased anyway.   But fact:  My grand daughters Arab dad called my grand daughter on 9/11 and gleefully asked her if she was enjoying what her cousins were doing to our country.

(in reply to Moloch)
Profile   Post #: 222
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/26/2006 10:20:55 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
1982 ? Isn't that the year Ariel Sharon became a hero, and became wanted for war crimes ? In what country did he do that ?

T

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 223
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/26/2006 11:35:44 AM   
Moloch


Posts: 1090
Joined: 6/25/2005
Status: offline
Sharon turned the other way when Christian militia came in and raped and murdered a muslim refugee camp, Lebanon I think.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 224
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/26/2006 3:31:16 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterKalif

about solutions: we all know what has to be done. Bush and the US administrations after him have to "put their pants on" as they say in my country, and act with decision. That means they have to stop its lackey, Israel from doing whatever it wants....then it has to force Israel into a complete unconditional ceasefire, then meet with Arab leaders in Lebanon, push for their army and government to act in South Lebanon to stop Hizbullah, have talks with Syria and Iran to avoid interference, and force BOTH sides to comply with a US-peace proposal. This has to be a serious proposal for both sides. UN forces have then to enter southern Lebanon, and the world as well as Israel should pay back to reconstruct that beautiful country of Lebanon.


I would almost promise you that if Israel announced an unconditional cease-fire, either Hezbollah or Hamas, or both, would do anything they could to provoke Israel.
 
There are countries that would provide forces in Lebanon to peace-keep, I believe Turkey is willing to send quite a few. Lebanon needs to be allowed and urged to develop it's forces to be able to protect its own land.
 
As for the rebuilding of Lebanon:
 
"Saudi king offers Lebanon $1.5bn  King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia has promised to give $500m to Lebanon to pay for reconstruction.
He also approved $1bn for the Central Bank of Lebanon to support the economy. "

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/5214354.stm

< Message edited by Level -- 7/26/2006 3:32:02 PM >


_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to MasterKalif)
Profile   Post #: 225
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/27/2006 3:20:24 PM   
Carrera


Posts: 2
Joined: 7/23/2006
Status: offline
I'm DDM but I lost my password so I'll just test this works

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 226
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/27/2006 3:35:08 PM   
Carrera


Posts: 2
Joined: 7/23/2006
Status: offline
O.K. I accidentally deleted my login and password so I had to squeeze in through the back door. I am ddm in fact so I'll answer.
I think maybe you haven't taken into acount that the concept of Jews living as a community in other countries failed. There was the hollocaust, for example, where attempted genocide took place. To my mind, the fanatical clerics in Iran go hand in hand with the perverse ideology the Nazis adhered to.
Apart from the hollocaust, you had the pogroms in Russia but I think it was the hollocaust that convinced the powers that be that Israel should be re-established.
Here is my point: Why should Jews leave their ancestral land to accommodate the Arabs who have huge expanses of oil rich land between them and still haven't created freedom, democracy and economic prosperity throughout their region. Are they not simply blaming the west for their own stagnation?
Where are Jews to go if they are driven from Israel? Maybe to France where radical Moslems have been burning synagogues, cars in the suburbs and proclaiming jihad on the west? Let's get this straight: Radical moslems aren't happy with Jews living in Israel but they don't want them in France or Europe. Yet France has taken in millions of moslems so why not Jews?
My view: I'm not Jewish but I'm right behind Israel. Jews have lived in Israel for millenia and it's the Arabs who are the newcomers. I know of not a single 9/11 hijacker, Bali bomber, London bomber e.t.c. who is Jewish and I fail to see what harm Jews have done to either Americans or Europeans that we can't support them in their hour of need. Jews are in the same boat as Americans and Russians - facing terrorist attacks by religious fanatics who have a perverse goal to drive us all back to the Dark Ages. I say no compromise.

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 227
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/27/2006 4:40:16 PM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
Dark Ages suits me just fine.. Always said that if the human race survives (noguarantees about that) we would have one of three systems to live by

  1. World peace and a United World Government.
  2. Revert back to a Tribal/Clan System ~I'm a Celt with Norse blood, I can live with that.
  3. A Feudal System ~ As long as I'm a Feudal and not a serf I can live with that too.


_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to Carrera)
Profile   Post #: 228
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/27/2006 10:52:29 PM   
colchuck69


Posts: 7
Joined: 2/26/2006
Status: offline
There are no rockets being fired out of Beirut. They are being fired out of southern Lebanon. Israel has knocked down bridges, communication systems, the Beirut airport and the fuel tanks there. This is not about a few soldiers being taken--there are bigger plans, so tighten your seatbelt kiddies!

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 229
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/27/2006 10:55:11 PM   
colchuck69


Posts: 7
Joined: 2/26/2006
Status: offline
I agree with u IronBear--humans still let their reptilian brain control

(in reply to colchuck69)
Profile   Post #: 230
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/28/2006 12:26:55 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Carrera

O.K. I accidentally deleted my login and password so I had to squeeze in through the back door. I am ddm in fact so I'll answer.
I think maybe you haven't taken into acount that the concept of Jews living as a community in other countries failed. There was the hollocaust, for example, where attempted genocide took place. To my mind, the fanatical clerics in Iran go hand in hand with the perverse ideology the Nazis adhered to.
Apart from the hollocaust, you had the pogroms in Russia but I think it was the hollocaust that convinced the powers that be that Israel should be re-established.
Here is my point: Why should Jews leave their ancestral land to accommodate the Arabs who have huge expanses of oil rich land between them and still haven't created freedom, democracy and economic prosperity throughout their region. Are they not simply blaming the west for their own stagnation?
Where are Jews to go if they are driven from Israel? Maybe to France where radical Moslems have been burning synagogues, cars in the suburbs and proclaiming jihad on the west? Let's get this straight: Radical moslems aren't happy with Jews living in Israel but they don't want them in France or Europe. Yet France has taken in millions of moslems so why not Jews?
My view: I'm not Jewish but I'm right behind Israel. Jews have lived in Israel for millenia and it's the Arabs who are the newcomers. I know of not a single 9/11 hijacker, Bali bomber, London bomber e.t.c. who is Jewish and I fail to see what harm Jews have done to either Americans or Europeans that we can't support them in their hour of need. Jews are in the same boat as Americans and Russians - facing terrorist attacks by religious fanatics who have a perverse goal to drive us all back to the Dark Ages. I say no compromise.



For years there was no problem between Jews and Arabs in Europe but the hate in the middle east is now spilling over into to Europe which is why European governments want a peace in the middle east and disagree with the US policy of using its allies in the middle east to fight proxy wars against tomorrow's perceived enemies. The vast majority of countries in Europe just don't see Syria and Iran as the big threat the US does but sees the need of bringing them into the process without who, there will be no peace.

The best security for Israel is peaceful existence with its neighbours. No matter how many wars are fought, at the end of the day peace is the only answer. Winning a conflict only secures Israel until the next conflict. This conflict with Israel's concentration on destroying infrastructure and civilian targets has only increased the perception that Israel is the problem and it is Israel that doesn't want peace because peace will stop it forming Greater Israel. While Hezzbollah's rockets were a provocation, they were inaccurate and sporadic retaliations for Israeli kidnappings and extra-judicial executions. While the rockets are the reason cited by Israel for its offensive, before the offensive they were not the great number they are now and had done little damage. Destroying Lebanon and a war on its civilians was uncalled for and many, rightly or wrongly, see the hand of the USA behind Israel and believe Israel is fighting a war by proxy on behalf of the USA. This is only increasing anti-Americanism in Europe who wouldn't allow Europe to promote conflict in its back yard. Hell, the US sanctions European companies for carrying out legal peaceful commerce with Cuba. Now that is an illustration of US belligerence.

(in reply to Carrera)
Profile   Post #: 231
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/28/2006 6:04:37 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
Any objective person has to come to a conclusion that Israeli action is more than about defending itself.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1832183,00.html

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 232
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/28/2006 4:33:14 PM   
ddm


Posts: 18
Joined: 7/23/2006
Status: offline
I think there's a general misunderstanding of a phenomenon Vladimir Putin first warned of. That was prior to 9/11 when the U.S. dismissed Putin's warnings about radical Islam.
The thing is, Chechnya was similar to Gaza before Russia sent in the troops. I recall seeing those bombs in Moscow again and again and I recall Clinton telling Russia to negotiate. But what people didn't understand was foreigners were being kidnapped in Chechnya. The Chechnyan bandits were cutting fingers off westerners and sending them to relatives, asking for money.
So, Russia went in.
Now, sometime after that, New York was attacked. Some of the motivation was Iraq but not all of the motivation. A lot had to do with this feeling in the Middle East that the west was to blame for all the stagnation in Arab countries and an idea that democracy had to be destroyed. It goes very deep and Putin and his think-tanks knew all about it.
Believe me, Israel is not fighting this war out of a desire to expand its borders and those rockets have actually killed people. There were kidnappings in Gaza - even a British female who worked as a peacekeeper was kidnapped. The Gazans attacked the embassies of the U.K. and Denmark, were sending children over the border with suicide belts and finally the kidnap of Israelis. The situation was intolerable.
I count myself as one of the few people who supports Israel totally. Sure, I will criticize Israel if it disrespects civilian life and the loss of the lives of women and children is very sad. Buit I do think it's a case of the straw breaking the camels back. How would Americans feel if they faced suicide bombings and missile attacks every day in New York or L.A.? Why should a peaceful, democratic people have to tolerate and put up with terrorists who have reverted to Jew-hating and indiscriminate attacks in cafes, bars and on buses.
Let's not forget who has been attacked: Bali, London, Spain, Indonesia, India and the U.S.
Not only that but threats have been made against France for banning veils in schools but France opposed the Iraq War.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 233
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/28/2006 4:39:00 PM   
CrappyDom


Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006
From: Sacramento
Status: offline
Ronald Raygun, Cheney and Rummy manufactured modern Muslim radicalism from scratch with the help of our "allies" the Saudis.  They did this to help fight the Russians in Afghanistan.  Unfortunately, they were too dumb to put the genie back in the bottle and left it to ferment.

As for Chechnya, read about "the great game" and see how long the Russians have been killing, raping, and oppressing the Chechnyans.

(in reply to ddm)
Profile   Post #: 234
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/29/2006 3:38:37 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ddm

I think there's a general misunderstanding of a phenomenon Vladimir Putin first warned of. That was prior to 9/11 when the U.S. dismissed Putin's warnings about radical Islam.
The thing is, Chechnya was similar to Gaza before Russia sent in the troops. I recall seeing those bombs in Moscow again and again and I recall Clinton telling Russia to negotiate. But what people didn't understand was foreigners were being kidnapped in Chechnya. The Chechnyan bandits were cutting fingers off westerners and sending them to relatives, asking for money.
So, Russia went in.
Now, sometime after that, New York was attacked. Some of the motivation was Iraq but not all of the motivation. A lot had to do with this feeling in the Middle East that the west was to blame for all the stagnation in Arab countries and an idea that democracy had to be destroyed. It goes very deep and Putin and his think-tanks knew all about it.
Believe me, Israel is not fighting this war out of a desire to expand its borders and those rockets have actually killed people. There were kidnappings in Gaza - even a British female who worked as a peacekeeper was kidnapped. The Gazans attacked the embassies of the U.K. and Denmark, were sending children over the border with suicide belts and finally the kidnap of Israelis. The situation was intolerable.
I count myself as one of the few people who supports Israel totally. Sure, I will criticize Israel if it disrespects civilian life and the loss of the lives of women and children is very sad. Buit I do think it's a case of the straw breaking the camels back. How would Americans feel if they faced suicide bombings and missile attacks every day in New York or L.A.? Why should a peaceful, democratic people have to tolerate and put up with terrorists who have reverted to Jew-hating and indiscriminate attacks in cafes, bars and on buses.
Let's not forget who has been attacked: Bali, London, Spain, Indonesia, India and the U.S.
Not only that but threats have been made against France for banning veils in schools but France opposed the Iraq War.



To call on the Russians as support after what they have done in Chechyna is nothing more than an act of desperation. Yes, the Chechens carried out some horrendous acts of terrorism in Moscow but don't forget what provoked that. The Russians flattened Grozny. We criticize Israel for flattening Lebanon but Russia actually DID flatten Grozny without any hesitation.

The other problem you have is that you cite other acts of terrorism as though they took place in a vacuum and without any provocation. It is very easy to be outraged about innocent victims and we should be outraged but we dhould not think for a moment that the west aare innocent bystanders. The west has meddled in the middle east for years for its own ends.

Again, Palestinain terrorism didn't start in a vacuum, there were reasons why people became radicalized enough to resort to terrorism. That terrorism has been going on tit for tat and the fact one side wears a state uniform doesn't alter what is being done.

As for France. Radical Arabs are now happy to cash in on every little policy to gain currency for their cause. However, not all French muslims were against the ban. Most of the muslim middleclass in France were for it and understood it wasn't an anti-muslim act but a policy against the showing of all relegious symbols in school.

Peace is the only way to solve this problem and you don't get that by upping the anti all the time. It requires cool heads and policies that win the hearts and minds of ordinary muslims while making sure you don't kill innocent people while in pursuance of terrorists.

(in reply to ddm)
Profile   Post #: 235
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/29/2006 7:28:37 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

Ronald Raygun, Cheney and Rummy manufactured modern Muslim radicalism from scratch with the help of our "allies" the Saudis. 


A "Fractured Fairy Tale" version of history, or convenient mental lapse that the radical Muslim movement was initiated in Iran with the fall of the Shah under the rudderless leadership of Jimmy Carter. 444 days of US impotency over a people who breached the sovereignty of the US by attacking it's embassy. The lack of an immediate and decisive response portrayed the US a paper tiger, unwilling to protect itself or its people.

Agreeing with your points regarding the manipulation of the Russian / Afghan war, the "birth" of Muslim radical fundamentalism occurred in Iran. Until then even Yasser Arafat wasn't "fundamental". Only after "students" following their Ayatollah brought the US to their knees were others inspired to follow; using religion as the rallying cry.

(in reply to CrappyDom)
Profile   Post #: 236
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/29/2006 7:38:14 AM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
Would "modern Muslim radicalism" include Black September, when they took Israeli's hostage at the Olympics in 1972?

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 237
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/29/2006 7:55:09 AM   
CrappyDom


Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006
From: Sacramento
Status: offline
Merc,

Iran is neither Arab nor Sunni, the Shia are an abomination in the eyes of the Sunni.  What happened in Iran, while radical, had little to do with religion and mostly to do with the brutal regime of the Shaw.

The leader of the revolution WAS a cleric and so he slowly turned the country toward religion but it wasn't a crowd of fundamentalists who stormed the embassy.  Look at pictures of the crowds, those kids were completely Westernized.

Modern Islamic fundamentalism like we see in Al Queda is Sunni based, NOT Shia.  While we see it as all the same, they certainly don't.  Bush's daddy certainly didn't and wrote about it extensively in his book about "why I didn't finish the job" in GWI.

Until Bush fucked up Iraq and advanced the strategic advantage of Iran, the Saudis had been working hard to pen in the Shia and contain them.  Which is why Syria and Iran being bed buddies is such an odd relationship and any decent statesman could split them apart but it would mean some compromise by Israel, something the current owners of America couldn't handle.

If we had intelligent leaders who had America's, as opposed to their own, best interests at heart, they would use these divisions to America's advantage to split these people apart and destroy the extremists.  Instead, they are knowingly provoking chaos in the ME by giving everyone a common ground and a common enemy, namely you and I.

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 238
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/29/2006 7:56:30 AM   
CrappyDom


Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006
From: Sacramento
Status: offline
Level,

The Palestinians were not religious radicals until reletively recently, certainly not back then.

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 239
RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? - 7/29/2006 8:02:18 AM   
CrappyDom


Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006
From: Sacramento
Status: offline
The problem with the ME is that we want the oil countries run be people who steal more than they give to their own countries because it ends up being cheaper.

Those leaders use Israel as the reason their citizens are poor so they actually NEED the Palestinians to be miserable as proof of how much the Israelis are oppressing the ME.

Having Hammas and Hezbollah fucking with Israel gives them the equivalent of the Roman games as a distraction to the radicals they have at home and gives them something to do.

Israel is at times fucking stupid and plays right into this crap or they answer to their own fundamentalist wackos and do self defeating crap.  The wall was a great idea but it should have been built on Israeli land.  Bulldozing the living rooms of Palestinians to build it gave the moral edge clearly to the Palestinians.

Until someone can devise a peace that deals with these sort of issues, it is in someone's best interest to sabotage it and there will be no peace.

(in reply to CrappyDom)
Profile   Post #: 240
Page:   <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Does Israel have the RIGHT to deploy over this? Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109