RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

[Poll]

Is trump a "genius" or crook


Behold our lord of utter splendor
  21% (5)
He is a crooked bastard & cash vortex
  78% (18)


Total Votes : 23
(last vote on : 10/12/2016 8:13:03 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )


Message


WhoreMods -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/9/2016 12:03:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

It's more that Trump is authentically ignorant enough to reach a lot of other ignorant people on their level without coming off as condescending. He's not a master manipulator, not a brilliant strategist... he is popular because in America, humility is dead and people have come to equate competence with how much someone resembles themselves.

So his base are orange-faced tiny-handed retards with bad hair?
That raises some interesting questions about the Trumptooners in here...




heavyblinker -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/9/2016 12:34:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

It's more that Trump is authentically ignorant enough to reach a lot of other ignorant people on their level without coming off as condescending. He's not a master manipulator, not a brilliant strategist... he is popular because in America, humility is dead and people have come to equate competence with how much someone resembles themselves.

So his base are orange-faced tiny-handed retards with bad hair?
That raises some interesting questions about the Trumptooners in here...


Haha of course I didn't mean physically resemble.

There's a great episode of classic Star Trek called 'Mirror, Mirror' where the crew meets evil versions of themselves... and at the end the conclusion is that it's easier for civilized men to act like barbarians than for barbarians to act like civilized men.

But the truth is, there's a much greater disconnect between the two. Intuitively, people usually know their own kind almost immediately. Establishment politicians typically feel a need to pander to their base as if they're the civilized men pretending to be barbarians... but even if they're unable to articulate it or latch onto other explanations that seem to fit, the people know when someone is not one of them. Trump is a barbarian speaking to his fellow barbarians without the fear of being exposed as a civilized man.

Post-Bush GOP candidates like Romney and McCain have been forced to do a lot more pandering since the Dems started to move to the right and the GOP devolved into a circus of Reagan-wannabes touting obsolete economic policies, religious whackjobs, science-denying anti-intellectuals and ignorant populist bullies... it's hurting them, and the great fear is that the only way to solve this problem will be to completely excise the old guard and embrace the insanity so that they can more authentically cater to their base. A Trump win would put them that much further.




WhoreMods -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/9/2016 12:38:28 PM)

I prefer The Trouble With Tribbles as far as OS Trek goes, myself.




WickedsDesire -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/9/2016 1:00:31 PM)

TOS now we are talking

How to kiss a woman by Captain Trump https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VuIShM5kAQ




Lordandmaster -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/9/2016 6:07:25 PM)

It's not true because Steve Jobs said it; it's true because it's true, and Steve Jobs happened to say it. Now and then even assholes say things that are true.

I'd be the last person to agree that Steve Jobs was a genius in the first place.

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

“It is in Apple’s DNA that technology alone is not enough—it’s technology married with liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the results that make our heart sing.” --Steve Jobs

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/steve-jobs-technology-alone-is-not-enough

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

Putting more money to education -especially to the 'technician class- is the better proposition.

Fuck all these grants and stipends for grad level psychologists, philosophers, etc.



I don't buy that Steve Jobs was a genius (given that his biggest talent besides a knack for marketing was claiming credit for smarter people's work), and his claims to have been inspired to greatness by a liberal agenda if you pay any attention to Apple's business practices under him. The tosspot was using slave labour long before Apple handed its manufacturing over to Foxconn, and his company's ongoing contempt for paying taxes has never struck me as evidence for a coporate level philosophy of humanism and liberalism either.




Lordandmaster -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/9/2016 6:16:38 PM)

Since I spend a lot of time in Europe, I'm going to have to disagree with this very strongly. Ordinary Europeans are better-read than ordinary Americans because Europeans public schools are better (because better funded) than American public schools. This changes drastically at the university level, where the top ten schools in America are the top ten schools in the world. (If you don't accept that, we'll have to start a different thread for it, because it would be hijacking the conversation.)

The fact is that Germany does NOT "have the funds to spend on uni education." Far from it! Of all the European nations, Germany is probably in the best position to spend on university education, and all you have to do is go there and visit universities to see that they're shockingly underfunded. Their research libraries, for example, are crap. With the exception of the Staatsbibliothek and MAYBE the library of the University of Heidelberg, a third-rate American research library is better funded, better stocked, and more up to date than anything you will ever find in Germany. Then look at things like researchers' salaries, faculty-student ratios, etc., and you'll see that Germany's higher education system is just not competitive. The best indicator of all would be to compare the number of German researchers in American universities to the number of American researchers in German universities. It's not even close. The PEOPLE are smart; the system is crap.

France is worse, and then if you start talking about countries like Spain, Italy, Czech Republic, you're not even in the First World anymore.

I'm sorry to have to say such unpleasant things, but they're based on many years of familiarity with European universities, and if you'd like further details, I'd be happy to get into them--in a different thread.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

The majority of people from Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark, etc. I come across on forums (primarily from pro audio sites) don't have a degree. They speak English, and some of them French, and it's obvious they are at least as well read as those in England or the US.

Germany has the funds to spend on uni education because they don't waste money on forcing plumbers and carpenters to suffer another two years beyond what's required for their trade. No stupid and completely useless 'High School Diploma' with no skill at all, as in the US.

I was a HS dropout and read James Joyce and William Faulkner and other crap when I was 16-17.

The problem with academia in the US is that it's assumed nobody has any interest in anything unless it's shoved down their throats by ... you guessed it; academia. The fact that the uni places far more importance on the written word, where everything is literally spelled out for you, more than art or music, which challenge abstract thinking process to a much greater degree, tells us what we need to know about the people ruling that enterprise.

The reason so many people drop out of college after one or two years, then go back to it a year or two later, because they know they have to for the job, is that the whole presentation and process is so utterly stultifying and stifling to any naturally free thinking mind. Whatever you thought would be fun to learn, the university goes out of their way to make it as un-fun as possible.

Here in the US, I've come across many people without college degree who are well spoken, well read, and/or listen to historical jazz or classical music, or have a great eye for art, classic photography, etc.





WhoreMods -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/10/2016 4:41:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

It's not true because Steve Jobs said it; it's true because it's true, and Steve Jobs happened to say it. Now and then even assholes say things that are true.

I'd be the last person to agree that Steve Jobs was a genius in the first place.

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

“It is in Apple’s DNA that technology alone is not enough—it’s technology married with liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the results that make our heart sing.” --Steve Jobs

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/steve-jobs-technology-alone-is-not-enough

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

Putting more money to education -especially to the 'technician class- is the better proposition.

Fuck all these grants and stipends for grad level psychologists, philosophers, etc.



I don't buy that Steve Jobs was a genius (given that his biggest talent besides a knack for marketing was claiming credit for smarter people's work), and his claims to have been inspired to greatness by a liberal agenda if you pay any attention to Apple's business practices under him. The tosspot was using slave labour long before Apple handed its manufacturing over to Foxconn, and his company's ongoing contempt for paying taxes has never struck me as evidence for a coporate level philosophy of humanism and liberalism either.


It isn't true on any level, I'm afraid: the claims that were (and still are being, even now) made for Apple's liberal nature are nonsense. This is a company that that had components of the Apple II assembled in sweatshops by illegal immigrants back in the late '70s, for Christ's sake.




Hillwilliam -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/10/2016 2:40:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
Again, I said a business that loses a Billion is RARE.
You proved it twice now.
As for me calling Hillary a sleazebag, when have I ever supported her?
A problem with those on the Right is that they cannot understand someone that is capable of independent thought. Either you are a RW "Sheeple"/"dittohead" or you MUST be a liberal.

Well, you may be capable of independent thought but it's abundantly clear you're not capable of logic. Maybe you're the liberal.


You keep proving my point and you're too fucking stupid to realize it.

Show my failure in logic.

Or go back to whining and bleating like sanity used to.




RottenJohnny -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/10/2016 4:19:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
Show my failure in logic.

I've already done so. The fact that you want to use denial and the "because I said so" argument isn't my failure.




Edwird -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/11/2016 4:26:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Since I spend a lot of time in Europe, I'm going to have to disagree with this very strongly. Ordinary Europeans are better-read than ordinary Americans because Europeans public schools are better (because better funded) than American public schools. This changes drastically at the university level, where the top ten schools in America are the top ten schools in the world.


I'll take your word on the situation as stands in the German Hochschule/Universität System, but you took that one item from my post and blew it out of proportion.

What were your observations on the situation regarding the other institutions of post-Grundschule (primary school) learning? The Hauptschule, Gesamtschule, Realschule, the various Fachschulen, etc.?

Education from the above involves anywhere from 10 to 14 years total.

Your claim in the post I responded to was that humanities were of equal or greater importance than technical education. I probably wasn't clear enough on the matter in my response, but I didn't intend to limit it to just 'technical' training and education, but rather all skills useful to society that might be obtained without a Bachelors degree.

The main point, though, is that I think shoving humanities down the throats of students to the level it is in the US is both unnecessary and possibly even counter-productive. I absolutely DO agree with humanities being part of the core requirements, just not to quite the level as it is now. To put it another way, hypothetically speaking, if we were to drop all requirements of any sort outside the major, I suspect that most of humanities courses would see only a slight drop, and even then only at first.

And yes, I also agree that people learning things outside their area of natural interest, -to a reasonable extent- , is useful to human development.

But not putting better effort to the more mundane requirements of society is not exactly the most responsible use of public funds. I wanted to take two more econ classes than what was required by the major, but the core requirement count, overcrowded by humanities, made that not possible.

The idea behind 'enforced humanities' is that every student have at least some notion of greater society, of other lands and other ways of thinking, etc., which I am full on board with, but inherent in the university mindset is an unhealthy dose of approbation to that purpose. As though no one has interest in anything until the university system enlightens them to any and all things of interest. And while at it, to make whatever subject as dull as possible.

In any case, another point made in my post was that a German with ten years of education in their system is much better off than the poor sods with a 'High School Diploma' in the US. The reason for that is because the Germans have a somewhat better idea of what is better for overall society, of which no small constituent is their notion that the purpose of society is to actually ... serve society. Somewhat of a distracting and obstreperous concept for many in the US, no matter how many hours of humanities taken at the uni.


Educational humanities courses aside, German brick layers have a better grasp of society than the typical US university grad.






cloudboy -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/11/2016 4:51:06 PM)

JETS fan and European traveler. I used to travel to the USSR and then Russia back in my university days and early 20s. Now my idea of travel is Starbucks.




cloudboy -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/11/2016 4:56:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


He does show some raw talent at self promotion,


^^^ This is an understatement. As he puts it, "I'm a ratings machine," and he's got the news media by the balls and pussy. Trump is everywhere in the news, commentary, and social media. No one can even remember who he ran against in the primaries. For him, unlike virtually anyone else, all attention is good attention.




Edwird -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/11/2016 5:56:04 PM)

~




Edwird -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/11/2016 6:16:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Ordinary Europeans are better-read than ordinary Americans because Europeans public schools are better (because better funded) than American public schools. This changes drastically at the university level, where the top ten schools in America are the top ten schools in the world. (If you don't accept that, we'll have to start a different thread for it, because it would be hijacking the conversation.)


That fatuous and utterly hubristic parenthetical of yours aside, keep in mind that the bulk of 'university rankings' are essentially based upon how many publications from a uni are quoted by other academic institutions. Quite the circle jerk there.

In all my investigation of those rankings, I think I've seen only one that even mentioned "quality of classroom instruction" somewhere in the mix.

No question that the US is better at throwing money where less useful than other countries, though. But society runs primarily on the usefulness of grads from whatever level, not so much from post-doc grant seekers, whatever the university ranking expertise in granting them.




Lordandmaster -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/13/2016 9:31:06 PM)

The "liberal" in "liberal arts" and the "liberal" in "liberal politics" aren't the same "liberal."

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

It isn't true on any level, I'm afraid: the claims that were (and still are being, even now) made for Apple's liberal nature are nonsense. This is a company that that had components of the Apple II assembled in sweatshops by illegal immigrants back in the late '70s, for Christ's sake.





Lordandmaster -> RE: Is trump a "genius" or crook (10/13/2016 9:35:15 PM)

First, citation statistics are extremely important because they tell you who is driving the field forward, who is publishing a bunch of superfluous crap, and who isn't publishing at all. In the natural sciences, ads for many positions will state something to the effect that "Applicants with an h-index lower than such and such need not apply."

Second, university rankings are not based solely on citation statistics. I wasn't referring to any particular university ranking, but I mentioned several criteria, and not one of them had to do with citations.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

That fatuous and utterly hubristic parenthetical of yours aside, keep in mind that the bulk of 'university rankings' are essentially based upon how many publications from a uni are quoted by other academic institutions. Quite the circle jerk there.





Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875