|
Awareness -> RE: false identity/non-consensual sex - TRIGGER WARNING - SPOILER ALERT (10/7/2016 10:32:30 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
A feminist is someone who believes in equality of the sexes. No, they're not. That's a piece of propaganda feminists use to try and make out they're bigger than the minority ideological hate group that they are.
quote:
We've done this conversation over and over again, A. We have and you lie EVERY, SINGLE, TIME. Doesn't the failed attempt at deception become tedious.
quote:
You do *not* get to define the term the way you, personally, want to see it. Neither do you, Cupcake. Inventing lies out of whole cloth might be the only real tool in the feminist armory but nobody with a scrap of intellect will allow you to get away with it.
quote:
It's all over the net defined the way I and others say it is. You can call yourself a Flower Queen all you want, but it doesn't make you one. Feminists can claim they believe in equality all they want, but when their actions consistently undermine their claim, it's readily apparent that they're liars.
quote:
It is not defined on the net the way you say it is, except by fruitcake MRA sites that are beloved on this forum only by yourself and respectmen. A) You're unable to engage in a discussion without resorting to character assination of anyone who disagrees with you. This is classic leftist non-argument. Mens Rights Activists don't "define" feminism, they judge it on its arguments, its history and its merits. And indeed, if you had the FAINTEST fucking idea what you're talking about, you'd know that in many cases, those same people have no problem with second wave feminism in general.
Third and fourth wave feminism is a toxic anti-male cocktail of frustrated dreams and personal inadequacies expressed in a hierarchy of victim-hood. The anti-male toxicity is what Mens Rights Activitists comment on and they're right. Tweakabelle is a demonstrable example of that.
quote:
What people *claim* to believe in is something else entirely. It can do - and does - depend upon what people think of the word itself. Or, would you like to make the claim that the only people to be described as 'racists' are those who self-identify as racists? Well that depends, dude. Do you claim only white people can be racist? If so, then you're a racist.
The racism issue is another example of stupidity and virtue signalling overriding considered thought. All races and cultures experience xenophobia to some degree. It's a reflection of our tribal origins. And most people tend to shun outsiders. Pretty much everyone is a fucking racist - what varies is the degree. Or are you one of those sad, pathetic re-inventors of history who claim that only white people are racist?
I grew up in Melbourne, an incredibly multicultural society, and went to school with Greeks, Italians, Aboriginals, Asians, Turks and others. As kids we didn't give a damn about someone's race and the cultural differences were often interesting.
However, what many Leftists term "racism" is often just the desire of people to maintain their existing way of life. If Islam floods Melbourne, for example, then the way of life the people of Melbourne have enjoyed will be destroyed. Islam is not accommodating once it gains ascendancy. Sharia Law will inevitably be imposed and the existing, thriving culture will be annihilated and replaced with a violent, superstitious religion which hates gay people and believes women are subordinate to their husbands. (The left's support of Islam is - to put it bluntly - fucking insane.)
I really can't be bothered to get into this with you because you're invariably going to say something phenomenally stupid.
|
|
|
|
