HoneyBears -> RE: One more silly little thread nobody will take seriously (10/15/2016 12:53:25 AM)
|
[Quotes parsed] quote:
ORIGINAL: Numerans quote:
ORIGINAL: MariaB To the op. You would make the perfect subject for Matza & Sykes’ who wrote at length about people like yourself https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Techniques_of_neutralization you’re distorting your own reality by reaching out to people who have the ability to resist and maintaining that what you do is acceptable. Your denial of responsibility and your inappropriate behavior is both primal and greatly lacking in control. We all (even you) understand our moral obligation to remain within the law and most of us have an inbuilt mechanism to resist temptation... You do posses that mechanism but you, unlike most of us, have the ability to silence the urge to follow what you know is morally right. You're inability to suppress your need for excitement and thrill seeking doesn't make you a bad person but it does make you an unstable person and it most certainly makes you an unpredictable person. You’re shop lifting capabilities are by the by. I’d be more interested in why a person like yourself has ventured into the world of BDSM D/s. <snipped> The reason why I'm staying in this world and becoming more interested in its depths is for a whole other list of reasons that are private. But you may be correct about my lack of self control as I've said that I'd already leave this topic. MariaB, thanks for providing that link. I was searching for this term last week on another thread (in P&R about those who deny and reject the faculties of basic human conscience, as relating to the theological concept of grieving the Holy Spirit). OP, you are a big red flashing DANGER sign, as an unsafe play partner. Unpredictable, unstable, a potential minefield of volatile triggers just waiting to get set off. You have boasted, 'I have yet to be caught :-)' You downplay your criminal acts. Quintessentially, you know you have been a naughty boy, will continue to be a naughty boy, and have no intention of changing your naughty-boy ways. Yet, there is a part of you which knows that the sands of time are running out, that you are playing Russian roulette with the fundamental freedoms that law-abiding citizens unlike yourself are entitled to enjoy, so you are attracted to BDSM where you can get your *punishment fix* that will enable you to pay the piper by proxy while you absolve yourself of personal responsibility by putting it all on the dominant's shoulders--the Top who *forced* you to submit. I believe it is not farfetched to contend that he is the type of personality who would deliberately buck a dominant's authority, in order to provoke a punishment & humiliation response. The red flags I see are warning signs that when (not if) he succumbs to buyer's remorse - during the vulnerable post-play subdrop stage - where he oxymoronically withdraws his consent after the fact, he might claim consent violation(s) and then suffer PTSD-like symptoms of shame, guilt and anxiety. This is one of many reasons why I do not do brats, and why I have always abhorred bratty behavior. (Personally, I believe most male non-dominants/bottoms start out as brats and fantasize about being a Femdom's bitch before they can come to terms with their submissive nature.) Which pales in comparison to what OP has described about himself. Spoiled rotten brats are not cute. There may be dominants and submissives who find it "cute" to refer to high-spiritedness or contrariness as "bratty," but this is not how I use that term. What OP advocates, and was seeking validation from others for, goes far beyond passive-aggressive acting out, thrill-seeking, and poor impulse control. IMO, he is also an instigator, as evidenced by initiating a celebratory thread on his amoral/immoral code of conduct. -- Lisa [Edited for typo]
|
|
|
|