|
UllrsIshtar -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/8/2016 2:42:36 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Awareness
quote:
ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar
You know, the thing that bothers me about the biologic deterministic view about Dominance and submission is that, with the way biology works, there's necessarily going to be exceptions. That's the way evolution works, after all... if every specimen was a perfect clone of every specimen before, we wouldn't have the biodiversity we have today. There'll be exceptions but it's a question of whether those exceptions convey advantage.
From the perspective of someone who believes in biological imperative, submissive men are throwing away their birthright merely to get their dick hard. Gifted with testosterone and the ability to be stronger, faster, more aggressive, more decisive and prone to more risk-taking than women, submissive men throw it all away because they're too weak to conquer women and want women to do all the work.
Seducing women requires risk and reward. It requires you put yourself out there and risk rejection. Submissive men buy into the nerd fantasy where women come onto them, where there's no risk required in order to get laid. And they'll readily abandon their dignity in order to do so.
I've often noted there's a difference between submissive men and submissive women. Submissive men throw their submission at any woman who glances sideways at them... whereas submissive women actually have standards. Consequently Doms have to conquer, whereas Dommes just show up and say yes.
It doesn't matter which way you slice it, but picking up a male sub is fucking easy - the fuckers are everywhere and they're desperate. Female subs, not so much.
Why chose a life of pathetic begging over one of conquering? Why abandon your advantages which biology has given you to let someone with lesser capability rule over you? Submissive men are compromising their futures by abrogating responsibility for themselves - like a child who's never truly grown up.
Now, in all that variation, you get some who simply don't have much in the way of testosterone and will trend toward androgyny. Those poor fuckers really don't have much in the way of options and a fair amount of them will predictably start advocating that gender is a social construct. The same happens with women who aren't particularly feminine either. They'll assert that androgyny is the natural order of things and start trying to pretend that men and women are exactly the same except for genitalia.
There's not much they can do, so you can understand them trying to make the best of it.... but masculine men who aren't suffering hormonal abnormalities who try and do the same? That's utter madness.
Same question as I posed to tamaka:
You're inherently superior. You challenge. You conquer. You have standards. You take responsibility for your future and that of those who depend on you.
They're weak, pathetic, grovelling, sniveling losers who give up their birthright.
How could they ever be enough of a bother to you so that you would even deem to take notice of them, let alone spare the energy to despise them?
|
|
|
|
