RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump

RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Musicmystery -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 7:53:24 AM)
What are you are, 12? Play this game alone.

Nnanji -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 7:58:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery What are you are, 12? Play this game alone. Interesting, you respond to me without showing the quote to which you are responding because it was your game, your adolescent remarks and now your scorn. Apparently I was correct. In your mind those that agree with you are sage and those who don't are evil. Why would anyone ever agree to that. Examine your own little world. You put it up here to show everyone how small you are and you can expect decent.

WickedsDesire -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 8:02:51 AM)
I know Bamad – I think turn out here is typically 60-70% but I was a bit surprised to see 50ish% seems the normal in America and I was further surprised to see only 83% of the 100% were elgible to vote. 200 million from 240 million…I only mention it because a lot of the articles are going with “half the country” which is far from the truth.

CreativeDominant -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 10:19:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Look, all . . . Ya think we can at least all agree that beating people up because they disagree with you is a bad thing? [8\|] I can agree with that. Disagreement over political choices...at least in this country...isn't worth shedding your blood or someone else's over. Especially when your dispute is with another citizen.

Nnanji -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 11:13:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Look, all . . . Ya think we can at least all agree that beating people up because they disagree with you is a bad thing? [8\|] I can agree with that. Disagreement over political choices...at least in this country...isn't worth shedding your blood or someone else's over. Especially when your dispute is with another citizen. The problem is that leftists make rules based on emotion. It's not reasonable to beat someone because of a political choice. It is reasonable to beat someone that disagrees with you who owns your car and can take it out for a drive, or your wallet, or whatever. When we make silly rules it just encourages all people to scoff at the rules. It's not illigal to protest a political outcome. It is illigal to riot and destroy other people's property based on a political outcome. Some "leader", I say with a small "l" of the losing faction should stand up and say stop. Unfortunately, for too long the left has been taught to hate differences and this is the result. I will not conform. Call me a deplorable. But, come and riot on my property at your own risk.

PeonForHer -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 11:23:18 AM)
quote: The problem is that leftists make rules based on emotion. That's one of the weird little things that keeps buzzing around this forum - pushed as it is relentlessly by a few of the loudest and most insistent of right wingers: the Right is driven by reason; the Left by emotion. You must know that left-wingers commonly say the opposite. One could argue till the end of time itself that both is true, or neither is true. It's a waste of energy.

Nnanji -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 11:32:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote: The problem is that leftists make rules based on emotion. That's one of the weird little things that keeps buzzing around this forum - pushed as it is relentlessly by a few of the loudest and most insistent of right wingers: the Right is driven by reason; the Left by emotion. You must know that left-wingers commonly say the opposite. One could argue till the end of time itself that both is true, or neither is true. It's a waste of energy. There is a lot to be said about that which is true. But, it will have more meaning when you post pictures of riots and crying that occurred after elections in 2008 or 2012.

WhoreMods -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 11:33:55 AM)
The really funny thing about that argument is how clearly overwrought and emotional a few of the rightists who insist that everybody else is all emo are. Ironic or what?

Nnanji -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 11:36:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods The really funny thing about that argument is how clearly overwrought and emotional a few of the rightists who insist that everybody else is all emo are. Ironic or what? Citations please? You've listed a "few" rightists so a few citations would be reasonable. At the same time, post the pictures of them beating, burning, looting and rioting please?

PeonForHer -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 11:47:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods The really funny thing about that argument is how clearly overwrought and emotional a few of the rightists who insist that everybody else is all emo are. Ironic or what? Oh, tell me about it. It's hilarious the number of 'You lefties are so fucking emotional about fucking everything you fucking say' posts I've seen here. [:D]

Edwird -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 2:09:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji The problem is that leftists make rules based on emotion. Oh, absolutely. Many people overlooked this, but ... Being the uniter that he is, this is why Trump used hyper-dramatic, impulsive, volatile, divisive, reckless and contumacious invective in his campaign speeches and interviews- because he wanted to attract the emotional leftist vote. #didntwanttoleaveanyoneout

tamaka -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 3:21:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji The problem is that leftists make rules based on emotion. Oh, absolutely. Many people overlooked this, but ... Being the uniter that he is, this is why Trump used hyper-dramatic, impulsive, volatile, divisive, reckless and contumacious invective in his campaign speeches and interviews- because he wanted to attract the emotional leftist vote. #didntwanttoleaveanyoneout Not because he wanted to attract the emotional left... probably to exagerate the point that he wouldn't be ruled by them. Probably to differentiate himself from Hillary in that regard.

Nnanji -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 3:38:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji The problem is that leftists make rules based on emotion. Oh, absolutely. Many people overlooked this, but ... Being the uniter that he is, this is why Trump used hyper-dramatic, impulsive, volatile, divisive, reckless and contumacious invective in his campaign speeches and interviews- because he wanted to attract the emotional leftist vote. #didntwanttoleaveanyoneout Not because he wanted to attract the emotional left... probably to exagerate the point that he wouldn't be ruled by them. Probably to differentiate himself from Hillary in that regard. This. It was this with everyone I talked to anyway.

Edwird -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 4:02:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji The problem is that leftists make rules based on emotion. Oh, absolutely. Many people overlooked this, but ... Being the uniter that he is, this is why Trump used hyper-dramatic, impulsive, volatile, divisive, reckless and contumacious invective in his campaign speeches and interviews- because he wanted to attract the emotional leftist vote. #didntwanttoleaveanyoneout Not because he wanted to attract the emotional left... probably to exagerate the point that he wouldn't be ruled by them. Probably to differentiate himself from Hillary in that regard. holds in eyes before they roll out of my head ... It. Was. Sarcasm.

Greatlilbabygirl -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 4:21:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote: The problem is that leftists make rules based on emotion. That's one of the weird little things that keeps buzzing around this forum - pushed as it is relentlessly by a few of the loudest and most insistent of right wingers: the Right is driven by reason; the Left by emotion. You must know that left-wingers commonly say the opposite. One could argue till the end of time itself that both is true, or neither is true. It's a waste of energy. There is a lot to be said about that which is true. But, it will have more meaning when you post pictures of riots and crying that occurred after elections in 2008 or 2012. Stereotypically Leftists put stock in scientific reasoning (logic) while Rightists put stock in religion and faith (emotion), so not sure how you can say with a straight face liberals are more emotional than conservatives. Westboro Baptist Church is conservative and are just as emotional and destructive as the protesters you're referring to. Conservatives have beat up people, destroyed property, etc in the name of religion and conservative "values". Trump himself acted emotional after the 2012 election "DONALD TRUMP CALLED FOR A ‘REVOLUTION’ ON STREETS AFTER BARACK OBAMA WAS RE-ELECTED IN 2012, NOW HE CALLS THE PROTESTS ‘UNFAIR'" http://www.inquisitr.com/3706125/donald-trump-called-for-a-revolution-on-streets-after-barack-obama-was-re-elected-in-2012-now-he-calls-the-protests-unfair/

Greatlilbabygirl -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 4:29:06 PM)
There are protests and fear now because Trump and what he represents is damn scary. Fear suppresses hope and without hope people get emotional. The reason conservatives weren't out in droves protesting after Obama's wins was because they knew deep down that Obama was a good guy and a good president even if their blind allegiance to party affiliation kept many of them from voting for him.

bounty44 -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 4:30:08 PM)
sorry---"religion" is not predicated on a heightened sense of emotion nor does one anecdote a case make. anyway, i came to post this: "MBTI In Politics" [image]http://www.slayerment.com/files/slayerment/styles/large/public/images/table.png[/image] quote: Let's start the discussion with some general trends based off the above table. You will notice that T and J lean Republican while F and P lean Democratic. This makes sense because thinkers tend to champion things and data while feelers tend to favor people. Republicans deal more with economic issues (things) while Democrats deal more with social issues (people). somewhat simplistic, but still speaking to the points above. the rest of the site has some interesting reading and is worth looking at. also, and this might be some ann coulter influence in my life: quote: Thinking VS Feeling When it comes to thinking and feeling we need to first replace these words with something more accurate: T = things, F = people. Thinkers are into things while feelers are into people. This is probably one of the most obvious differences between men and women. And the data completely supports it. Men are much more into things like cars, engines, mechanical stuff, technological stuff and so on. Men like this kind of stuff. Women are more into people. Women would rather spend time with people than spend time working on a car. Women would rather spend time trying to organize some type of business built around helping people or even animals. Men would rather spend time trying to organize some type of business built around building something. The end result of Ts usually deals with some-thing while the end result of Fs generally deals with some-body. I believe there are more female democrats than female republicans, though I don't know that for sure. however, given the chart at the top of my post, and the information in the quote immediately above, that more women than men are "F" types, then well, it just follows that democratic men are more like women than republican men are, doesn't it? the democratic party---where the women are women and the men are too. its a joke---with some truth to it. http://www.slayerment.com/mbti-gender

Nnanji -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 4:34:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote: The problem is that leftists make rules based on emotion. That's one of the weird little things that keeps buzzing around this forum - pushed as it is relentlessly by a few of the loudest and most insistent of right wingers: the Right is driven by reason; the Left by emotion. You must know that left-wingers commonly say the opposite. One could argue till the end of time itself that both is true, or neither is true. It's a waste of energy. There is a lot to be said about that which is true. But, it will have more meaning when you post pictures of riots and crying that occurred after elections in 2008 or 2012. Stereotypically Leftists put stock in scientific reasoning (logic) while Rightists put stock in religion and faith (emotion), so not sure how you can say with a straight face liberals are more emotional than conservatives. Westboro Baptist Church is conservative and are just as emotional and destructive as the protesters you're referring to. Conservatives have beat up people, destroyed property, etc in the name of religion and conservative "values". Trump himself acted emotional after the 2012 election "DONALD TRUMP CALLED FOR A ‘REVOLUTION’ ON STREETS AFTER BARACK OBAMA WAS RE-ELECTED IN 2012, NOW HE CALLS THE PROTESTS ‘UNFAIR'" http://www.inquisitr.com/3706125/donald-trump-called-for-a-revolution-on-streets-after-barack-obama-was-re-elected-in-2012-now-he-calls-the-protests-unfair/ Ya right. Pass the kool aid.

Nnanji -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 4:35:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl There are protests and fear now because Trump and what he represents is damn scary. Fear suppresses hope and without hope people get emotional. The reason conservatives weren't out in droves protesting after Obama's wins was because they knew deep down that Obama was a good guy and a good president even if their blind allegiance to party affiliation kept many of them from voting for him. Ya right.

Greatlilbabygirl -> RE: Black Student Savagely Beats Up White Student For Supporting Trump (11/12/2016 4:38:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote: The problem is that leftists make rules based on emotion. That's one of the weird little things that keeps buzzing around this forum - pushed as it is relentlessly by a few of the loudest and most insistent of right wingers: the Right is driven by reason; the Left by emotion. You must know that left-wingers commonly say the opposite. One could argue till the end of time itself that both is true, or neither is true. It's a waste of energy. There is a lot to be said about that which is true. But, it will have more meaning when you post pictures of riots and crying that occurred after elections in 2008 or 2012. Stereotypically Leftists put stock in scientific reasoning (logic) while Rightists put stock in religion and faith (emotion), so not sure how you can say with a straight face liberals are more emotional than conservatives. Westboro Baptist Church is conservative and are just as emotional and destructive as the protesters you're referring to. Conservatives have beat up people, destroyed property, etc in the name of religion and conservative "values". Trump himself acted emotional after the 2012 election "DONALD TRUMP CALLED FOR A ‘REVOLUTION’ ON STREETS AFTER BARACK OBAMA WAS RE-ELECTED IN 2012, NOW HE CALLS THE PROTESTS ‘UNFAIR'" http://www.inquisitr.com/3706125/donald-trump-called-for-a-revolution-on-streets-after-barack-obama-was-re-elected-in-2012-now-he-calls-the-protests-unfair/ Ya right. Pass the kool aid. You really gonna fight facts with insult? That's rather emotional of you.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875