quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


The problem is that leftists make rules based on emotion.

That's one of the weird little things that keeps buzzing around this forum - pushed as it is relentlessly by a few of the loudest and most insistent of right wingers: the Right is driven by reason; the Left by emotion. You must know that left-wingers commonly say the opposite. One could argue till the end of time itself that both is true, or neither is true. It's a waste of energy.

There is a lot to be said about that which is true. But, it will have more meaning when you post pictures of riots and crying that occurred after elections in 2008 or 2012.

Stereotypically Leftists put stock in scientific reasoning (logic) while Rightists put stock in religion and faith (emotion), so not sure how you can say with a straight face liberals are more emotional than conservatives. Westboro Baptist Church is conservative and are just as emotional and destructive as the protesters you're referring to. Conservatives have beat up people, destroyed property, etc in the name of religion and conservative "values".

Trump himself acted emotional after the 2012 election
"DONALD TRUMP CALLED FOR A ‘REVOLUTION’ ON STREETS AFTER BARACK OBAMA WAS RE-ELECTED IN 2012, NOW HE CALLS THE PROTESTS ‘UNFAIR'"

http://www.inquisitr.com/3706125/donald-trump-called-for-a-revolution-on-streets-after-barack-obama-was-re-elected-in-2012-now-he-calls-the-protests-unfair/

Ya right. Pass the kool aid.

You really gonna fight facts with insult? That's rather emotional of you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

sorry---"religion" is not predicated on a heightened sense of emotion nor does one anecdote a case make.

anyway, i came to post this:

"MBTI In Politics"

[image]http://www.slayerment.com/files/slayerment/styles/large/public/images/table.png[/image]

quote:

Let's start the discussion with some general trends based off the above table. You will notice that T and J lean Republican while F and P lean Democratic. This makes sense because thinkers tend to champion things and data while feelers tend to favor people. Republicans deal more with economic issues (things) while Democrats deal more with social issues (people).

somewhat simplistic, but still speaking to the points above.

the rest of the site has some interesting reading and is worth looking at.

also, and this might be some ann coulter influence in my life:

quote:

Thinking VS Feeling

When it comes to thinking and feeling we need to first replace these words with something more accurate: T = things, F = people. Thinkers are into things while feelers are into people. This is probably one of the most obvious differences between men and women. And the data completely supports it.

Men are much more into things like cars, engines, mechanical stuff, technological stuff and so on. Men like this kind of stuff. Women are more into people. Women would rather spend time with people than spend time working on a car. Women would rather spend time trying to organize some type of business built around helping people or even animals. Men would rather spend time trying to organize some type of business built around building something. The end result of Ts usually deals with some-thing while the end result of Fs generally deals with some-body.

I believe there are more female democrats than female republicans, though I don't know that for sure. however, given the chart at the top of my post, and the information in the quote immediately above, that more women than men are "F" types, then well, it just follows that democratic men are more like women than republican men are, doesn't it?

the democratic party---where the women are women and the men are too.

its a joke---with some truth to it.

http://www.slayerment.com/mbti-gender

quote:

given the chart at the top of my post, and the information in the quote immediately above, that more women than men are "F" types, then well, it just follows that democratic men are more like women than republican men are, doesn't it?

the democratic party---where the women are women and the men are too.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


The problem is that leftists make rules based on emotion.

That's one of the weird little things that keeps buzzing around this forum - pushed as it is relentlessly by a few of the loudest and most insistent of right wingers: the Right is driven by reason; the Left by emotion. You must know that left-wingers commonly say the opposite. One could argue till the end of time itself that both is true, or neither is true. It's a waste of energy.

There is a lot to be said about that which is true. But, it will have more meaning when you post pictures of riots and crying that occurred after elections in 2008 or 2012.

Stereotypically Leftists put stock in scientific reasoning (logic) while Rightists put stock in religion and faith (emotion), so not sure how you can say with a straight face liberals are more emotional than conservatives. Westboro Baptist Church is conservative and are just as emotional and destructive as the protesters you're referring to. Conservatives have beat up people, destroyed property, etc in the name of religion and conservative "values".

Trump himself acted emotional after the 2012 election
"DONALD TRUMP CALLED FOR A ‘REVOLUTION’ ON STREETS AFTER BARACK OBAMA WAS RE-ELECTED IN 2012, NOW HE CALLS THE PROTESTS ‘UNFAIR'"

http://www.inquisitr.com/3706125/donald-trump-called-for-a-revolution-on-streets-after-barack-obama-was-re-elected-in-2012-now-he-calls-the-protests-unfair/

Ya right. Pass the kool aid.

You really gonna fight facts with insult? That's rather emotional of you.

Actually, it was a very low energy, low emotion response based on your obvious lack of knowledge but your obvious high level of indoctrination. It was about all your post deserved. This post finds you equally silly. When you actually wish to make reasonable comments, my responses may change.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

sorry---"religion" is not predicated on a heightened sense of emotion nor does one anecdote a case make.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

Is anyone arguing here that all accounts of violence from both sides isn't wrong?

quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

Is anyone arguing here that all accounts of violence from both sides isn't wrong?

Nope.

The argument is that there wasn't this kind of violence from the Right when Obama was elected.

And yet the Left insists that the Right is where the dangerous lunatics all are.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

Is anyone arguing here that all accounts of violence from both sides isn't wrong?

Nope.

The argument is that there wasn't this kind of violence from the Right when Obama was elected.

And yet the Left insists that the Right is where the dangerous lunatics all are.

Because even the right had to admit Obama was a good man. You can't say the same thing about Trump. The majority of Americans don't even want him. He's scary.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

Is anyone arguing here that all accounts of violence from both sides isn't wrong?

Nope.

The argument is that there wasn't this kind of violence from the Right when Obama was elected.

And yet the Left insists that the Right is where the dangerous lunatics all are.

Because even the right had to admit Obama was a good man. You can't say the same thing about Trump. The majority of Americans don't even want him. He's scary.

No we didn't, there were no riots when Clinton was elected either (Bill that is) and surely your not going to tell me that he too was a good man.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

Is anyone arguing here that all accounts of violence from both sides isn't wrong?

Nope.

The argument is that there wasn't this kind of violence from the Right when Obama was elected.

And yet the Left insists that the Right is where the dangerous lunatics all are.

Because even the right had to admit Obama was a good man. You can't say the same thing about Trump. The majority of Americans don't even want him. He's scary.

No we didn't, there were no riots when Clinton was elected either (Bill that is) and surely your not going to tell me that he too was a good man.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

Is anyone arguing here that all accounts of violence from both sides isn't wrong?

Nope.

The argument is that there wasn't this kind of violence from the Right when Obama was elected.

And yet the Left insists that the Right is where the dangerous lunatics all are.

Because even the right had to admit Obama was a good man. You can't say the same thing about Trump. The majority of Americans don't even want him. He's scary.

No we didn't, there were no riots when Clinton was elected either (Bill that is) and surely your not going to tell me that he too was a good man.

And there were no riots when Bush was elected. Your point?
What makes this election different? Trump. He's the volatile factor in all this.

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

The problem is that leftists make rules based on emotion.

That's one of the weird little things that keeps buzzing around this forum - pushed as it is relentlessly by a few of the loudest and most insistent of right wingers: the Right is driven by reason; the Left by emotion. You must know that left-wingers commonly say the opposite. One could argue till the end of time itself that both is true, or neither is true. It's a waste of energy.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

The problem is that leftists make rules based on emotion.

That's one of the weird little things that keeps buzzing around this forum - pushed as it is relentlessly by a few of the loudest and most insistent of right wingers: the Right is driven by reason; the Left by emotion. You must know that left-wingers commonly say the opposite. One could argue till the end of time itself that both is true, or neither is true. It's a waste of energy.

It can probably be distilled down to this: both parties are seen by the other parties as relying on emotion in areas the two parties disagree.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


I hope none of this elegant discussion gets anybody hopping up and down like Ann Coulter's Adam's apple when she says "These fucking Jews!"

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl

Is anyone arguing here that all accounts of violence from both sides isn't wrong?

Nope.

The argument is that there wasn't this kind of violence from the Right when Obama was elected.

And yet the Left insists that the Right is where the dangerous lunatics all are.

Because even the right had to admit Obama was a good man. You can't say the same thing about Trump. The majority of Americans don't even want him. He's scary.

No we didn't, there were no riots when Clinton was elected either (Bill that is) and surely your not going to tell me that he too was a good man.

Bill Clinton was a philandering adulterer. Obviously Trump supporters have no problem with that. And I can't say much about Clinton's presidency, I was too young to care.