Lucylastic
Posts: 40310
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Nnanji
Ah I see you got your facts from European news. Well, the NYT has already admitted they lied this whole election and have promised to re-dedicate itself to truth.
CITE PLEASE
We'll see how that goes. I'm sure all you saw was EU news picking up the admitted lies from US news. You might also consider that there are more illigal aliens here from Mexico than are here from all other nations combined. Here, illigal immigration and illigal immigration from Mexico are interchangeable comments. Of course you knew that from your 8 month stay here and you're just pretending not to get it.
Is that like your claim that mexicans make up a third of your prison population???
Is that taking into consideration that other races are coming in on visas and overstaying them, more than immigration into the country from mexico??
Everything you can read on the internet is available north of your border and across the pond.
You assume that because you only give shitty sources that everyone else is on your level of ignorance when it comes to sourcing?
Because the NYT did NOT admit to having Lied.
To Our Readers, From the Publisher and Executive Editor
NOV. 13, 2016
When the biggest political story of the year reached a dramatic and unexpected climax late Tuesday night, our newsroom turned on a dime and did what it has done for nearly two years — cover the 2016 election with agility and creativity.
After such an erratic and unpredictable election there are inevitable questions: Did Donald Trump’s sheer unconventionality lead us and other news outlets to underestimate his support among American voters? What forces and strains in America drove this divisive election and outcome? Most important, how will a president who remains a largely enigmatic figure actually govern when he takes office?
As we reflect on the momentous result, and the months of reporting and polling that preceded it, we aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor, striving always to understand and reflect all political perspectives and life experiences in the stories that we bring to you. It is also to hold power to account, impartially and unflinchingly. You can rely on The New York Times to bring the same fairness, the same level of scrutiny, the same independence to our coverage of the new president and his team.
We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism for which we are known without the loyalty of our readers. We want to take this opportunity, on behalf of all Times journalists, to thank you for that loyalty.
Sincerely,
Arthur Sulzberger Jr., publisher
Dean Baquet, executive editor
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/13/us/elections/to-our-readers-from-the-publisher-and-executive-editor.html?_r=1
BTW they also did hit pieces on Hillary all year, are you suggesting that they told the truth about her?
There are more than just US sources available out there, but Im not surprised you are ignorant of them. seemingly getting your news from alt right sites
Im not sure why you are attempting to lie so hard, because you are simply being laughed at harder with every lie.
_____________________________
(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \
\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \
(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \
Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love
|
RE: A principled man speaks out. - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread