RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


heavyblinker -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 5:57:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
I obviously mean the argument in general... but thanks for explaining to everyone that knife attacks wouldn't be prevented by more gun control.


They just were. The motherfucker was stabbing people and someone shot him.

How does it feel to be so illogical ? (not you maybe)
T^T


Wait... so the knife attacks WERE prevented by more gun control?
Oh wait, no, actually the problem is you can't read.


I can't read ? WTF.

I am almost done with these forums. People are just too stupid, I can't believe some of them can type.

T^T


1. I said 'I obviously mean the argument in general... but thanks for explaining to everyone that knife attacks wouldn't be prevented by more gun control.' KNIFE ATTACKS WOULD NOT BE PREVENTED BY MORE GUN CONTROL.

2. You said 'They just were. The motherfucker was stabbing people and someone shot him. How does it feel to be so illogical ?' BECAUSE YOU WERE REFERENCING WHAT I JUST SAID, 'THEY' IN THIS CASE REFERS TO KNIFE ATTACKS AND 'WERE' REFERS TO 'BEING PREVENTED BY GUN CONTROL'. But unlike you, I at least paid attention enough to realize you had misread my post. The knife attacked occurred, gun control didn't give the guy who shot him his weapon. What you say is either a product of not paying attention or incredible amounts of stupidity. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt so far, but it could be a mistake.

3. SO I said 'Wait... so the knife attacks WERE prevented by more gun control?' CLEARLY TRYING TO GET YOU TO UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU JUST SAID AND WHY YOU WERE MISTAKEN.

Now you say I'm so stupid you can't believe I can type.

LOOK AT THE ACTUAL POSTS YOU FRUSTRATINGLY STUPID AND ANNOYING FUCK.




Termyn8or -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 5:57:44 AM)

"I honestly don't know how badly people feel the need to own handguns and long guns or why they would need them or exactly what kind of war zone they're living in... but to be honest, none of those things would inconvenience me. If I was living in a place where I felt like owning any of those things was necessary, I would probably move... "

Then don't move here. I don't know in what type of utopia you live now but get this through your head - IT IS COMING TO YOU.

And when it does the rapists, thieves and murderers will have guns. so make sure you don't have one, we'll be well rid of your illogical ass. you better to need it and not have it shit. We'll see how that works out for you.

And you ain't taking shit from me, and I ain't defending you.

What if a wild dog was eating your kid ? Well there are people out there with the mentality of wild dogs. So give up your guns because wild dogs have to eat too. Don't discriminate against wild dogs.

And you live in this world when I am gone. I hope you gun grabbers have kids who will curse you for leaving them helpless against human formed animals who rape and take what they want, and maim and kill for entertainment. Maybe you have never been exposed to such people, I hope you are, and soon. How does that grab you ?

T^T




BamaD -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 6:01:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

"Yes, I think it's a good idea... but the NRA thinks that such measures are unfair to mentally ill people who might not have 'severe' conditions and also want to own guns. It also says that it would create incentives for these people not to seek treatment, because their desire to own guns is so great that they're willing to sacrifice their mental health for them, and we should be more mindful of their feelings.
"


You are so seriously full of shit that your whole town is brown. You have NO IDEA of the NRA's stance on anything if you made a statement like that. Why don't you go to their website and see what they say rather than repeating the lies that gungrabber websites say that they say ? Or is that against your liberal religion ?

T^T

Be fair, they most likely did not make it up, it is the kind of lie that anti-gun sites and some times the msn publish all the time. They are fed garbage so they believe it.




Termyn8or -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 6:25:25 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
I obviously mean the argument in general... but thanks for explaining to everyone that knife attacks wouldn't be prevented by more gun control.


They just were. The motherfucker was stabbing people and someone shot him.

How does it feel to be so illogical ? (not you maybe)
T^T


Wait... so the knife attacks WERE prevented by more gun control?
Oh wait, no, actually the problem is you can't read.


I can't read ? WTF.

I am almost done with these forums. People are just too stupid, I can't believe some of them can type.

T^T


1. I said 'I obviously mean the argument in general... but thanks for explaining to everyone that knife attacks wouldn't be prevented by more gun control.' KNIFE ATTACKS WOULD NOT BE PREVENTED BY MORE GUN CONTROL.

2. You said 'They just were. The motherfucker was stabbing people and someone shot him. How does it feel to be so illogical ?' BECAUSE YOU WERE REFERENCING WHAT I JUST SAID, 'THEY' IN THIS CASE REFERS TO KNIFE ATTACKS AND 'WERE' REFERS TO 'BEING PREVENTED BY GUN CONTROL'. But unlike you, I at least paid attention enough to realize you had misread my post. The knife attacked occurred, gun control didn't give the guy who shot him his weapon. What you say is either a product of not paying attention or incredible amounts of stupidity. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt so far, but it could be a mistake.

3. SO I said 'Wait... so the knife attacks WERE prevented by more gun control?' CLEARLY TRYING TO GET YOU TO UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU JUST SAID AND WHY YOU WERE MISTAKEN.

Now you say I'm so stupid you can't believe I can type.

LOOK AT THE ACTUAL POSTS YOU FRUSTRATINGLY STUPID AND ANNOYING FUCK.


Well maybe I did misread it, but it was you who made it ambiguous.

T^T




heavyblinker -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 6:25:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

"Yes, I think it's a good idea... but the NRA thinks that such measures are unfair to mentally ill people who might not have 'severe' conditions and also want to own guns. It also says that it would create incentives for these people not to seek treatment, because their desire to own guns is so great that they're willing to sacrifice their mental health for them, and we should be more mindful of their feelings.
"


You are so seriously full of shit that your whole town is brown. You have NO IDEA of the NRA's stance on anything if you made a statement like that. Why don't you go to their website and see what they say rather than repeating the lies that gungrabber websites say that they say ? Or is that against your liberal religion ?

T^T


Wow you don't even fully understand what you're so vehemently opposed to.
Not surprising for someone so lazy, but still incredibly stupid.

https://www.nraila.org/articles/20130124/mental-health-and-firearms

quote:

A person cannot be federally disqualified from owning a gun based simply on a psychiatrist’s diagnosis, a doctor’s referral, or the opinion of a law enforcement officer, let alone based on getting a drug prescription or seeking mental health treatment. Doing so would actually discourage troubled people from getting the help they need.


quote:

At least one attempt has been made to ban gun ownership by anyone with any recognized diagnosis from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—an outrageously broad standard that would affect the rights of countless Americans.


Exactly what I said, straight from the NRA's own website.




BamaD -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 6:32:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

"Yes, I think it's a good idea... but the NRA thinks that such measures are unfair to mentally ill people who might not have 'severe' conditions and also want to own guns. It also says that it would create incentives for these people not to seek treatment, because their desire to own guns is so great that they're willing to sacrifice their mental health for them, and we should be more mindful of their feelings.
"


You are so seriously full of shit that your whole town is brown. You have NO IDEA of the NRA's stance on anything if you made a statement like that. Why don't you go to their website and see what they say rather than repeating the lies that gungrabber websites say that they say ? Or is that against your liberal religion ?

T^T


Wow you don't even fully understand what you're so vehemently opposed to.
Not surprising for someone so lazy, but still incredibly stupid.

https://www.nraila.org/articles/20130124/mental-health-and-firearms

quote:

A person cannot be federally disqualified from owning a gun based simply on a psychiatrist’s diagnosis, a doctor’s referral, or the opinion of a law enforcement officer, let alone based on getting a drug prescription or seeking mental health treatment. Doing so would actually discourage troubled people from getting the help they need.


quote:

At least one attempt has been made to ban gun ownership by anyone with any recognized diagnosis from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—an outrageously broad standard that would affect the rights of countless Americans.


Exactly what I said, straight from the NRA's own website.

Which means that they don't want people barred from owning a firearm because they were treated for depression 20 years ago.




heavyblinker -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 6:38:54 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Which means that they don't want people barred from owning a firearm because they were treated for depression 20 years ago.


You do realize I was posting the NRA-propaganda interpretation, and they can't be counted on to support anything that might hurt gun sales?

I'm not in the mood to go searching for what the content of these proposed bills actually was (and no, you can't rely on pro-gun sites or partisan news to be honest about it), but I'm not sure if HAVING a recognized diagnosis is the same as HAVING HAD a recognized diagnosis, and considering you had already labelled me a brainwashed slave of the liberal media for my earlier comments which I just showed you are true, I'm not willing to trust your judgment here without seeing non-partisan proof that the Dems or whoever were trying to 'bar people from owning a firearm because they were treated for depression 20 years ago'.




Termyn8or -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 6:48:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

"Yes, I think it's a good idea... but the NRA thinks that such measures are unfair to mentally ill people who might not have 'severe' conditions and also want to own guns. It also says that it would create incentives for these people not to seek treatment, because their desire to own guns is so great that they're willing to sacrifice their mental health for them, and we should be more mindful of their feelings.
"


You are so seriously full of shit that your whole town is brown. You have NO IDEA of the NRA's stance on anything if you made a statement like that. Why don't you go to their website and see what they say rather than repeating the lies that gungrabber websites say that they say ? Or is that against your liberal religion ?

T^T


Wow you don't even fully understand what you're so vehemently opposed to.
Not surprising for someone so lazy, but still incredibly stupid.

https://www.nraila.org/articles/20130124/mental-health-and-firearms

quote:

A person cannot be federally disqualified from owning a gun based simply on a psychiatrist’s diagnosis, a doctor’s referral, or the opinion of a law enforcement officer, let alone based on getting a drug prescription or seeking mental health treatment. Doing so would actually discourage troubled people from getting the help they need.


quote:

At least one attempt has been made to ban gun ownership by anyone with any recognized diagnosis from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—an outrageously broad standard that would affect the rights of countless Americans.


Exactly what I said, straight from the NRA's own website.


And you problem with that ? the same motherfuckers who gave the Columbine shooter scrips for psychotropic drugs should decide if each of us should have guns ? they are a bunch of lazy slackerds. I am a better shrink than them.

I have talked quite a few, like a half dozen people out of suicide. I did not use drugs but in some cases I gave them a beer. I had extreme discussions with a Doctor of psychology about people and learned alot more than probably some do now, And this was a psychologist, not a psychiatrist, that means no drugs.

I know I saved a few lives, but of course not forever. One had Huntington's disease and I convinced him to wait a few times. Good dude, but his Mother had that disease and it is congenital and he knew he had it and knew it would fuck up his brain eventually.

But death now means nothing to me. By the time I was 30 or so I knew more dead people than alive. And my favorite cousin. In my eyes, if you die painless you did good, no matter what age. People who die out these long drawn out deaths like on chemo and shit, they are the losers. Iff they ever mention chemo to me I will just ask how log do I have to live without it. And I will not believe them anyway because they don't really know. Plus I am 56 and really, there is no sense in the government or insurance to spend the money to prolong my life. Give that money to some kid who has a future.

My skills are useless almost and I am in poor physical shape. If I were on death squad and someone like me applied for a kidney transplant, I would turn me down.

I am a harsh person and believe some people should die. My time will come and I will accept it. I apply this judgment to toehrs, I also apply it to myself.

T^T




heavyblinker -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 6:50:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
Well maybe I did misread it, but it was you who made it ambiguous.
T^T


I guess it was really stupid to not be able to anticipate your illiteracy.
I'll use simpler language next time.




BamaD -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 6:55:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Which means that they don't want people barred from owning a firearm because they were treated for depression 20 years ago.


You do realize I was posting the NRA-propaganda interpretation, and they can't be counted on to support anything that might hurt gun sales?

I'm not in the mood to go searching for what the content of these proposed bills actually was (and no, you can't rely on pro-gun sites or partisan news to be honest about it), but I'm not sure if HAVING a recognized diagnosis is the same as HAVING HAD a recognized diagnosis, and considering you had already labelled me a brainwashed slave of the liberal media for my earlier comments which I just showed you are true, I'm not willing to trust your judgment here without seeing non-partisan proof that the Dems or whoever were trying to 'bar people from owning a firearm because they were treated for depression 20 years ago'.

You do know that a good shrink can find a problem with anyone?
You do know that there is a difference between having a problem and being a danger?
Example I have an extreme fear of highs this would be considered a "mental problem" is there any reason to think that should bar me from firearm ownership? Of course not, but when you pass a law requiring everyone diagnosed with a mental problem would do so.




heavyblinker -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 6:59:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
And you problem with that ? the same motherfuckers who gave the Columbine shooter scrips for psychotropic drugs should decide if each of us should have guns ? they are a bunch of lazy slackerds. I am a better shrink than them.


I mostly have a problem with you saying this:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

You are so seriously full of shit that your whole town is brown. You have NO IDEA of the NRA's stance on anything if you made a statement like that. Why don't you go to their website and see what they say rather than repeating the lies that gungrabber websites say that they say ? Or is that against your liberal religion ?


without even knowing what the NRA's position is in the first place. You're so eager to insult me that you don't even check to see if I'm right, and it makes you look like an idiot. But if looking like an idiot means you're actually going to READ this shit and KNOW what you're probably voting for in the future, then that must be a good thing.

Of course it doesn't really matter if you know what their positions are, because as anyone could have predicted you started defending the NRA's policies as soon as I showed you that they were from one of your team's favorite sources.

I think I just proved that it doesn't matter what is being said, as long as it's from a source that you have been told to agree with, you will defend it will all of your meager intellectual might.




heavyblinker -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 7:07:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
You do know that a good shrink can find a problem with anyone?
You do know that there is a difference between having a problem and being a danger?
Example I have an extreme fear of highs this would be considered a "mental problem" is there any reason to think that should bar me from firearm ownership? Of course not, but when you pass a law requiring everyone diagnosed with a mental problem would do so.


This isn't a debate we can have without actually looking into whether or not the MOST SUPPORTED proposals mean that things like acrophobia would disqualify you from gun ownership. I honestly can't imagine that being the case.

The site said 'at least one attempt'... and when you consider the source, you should probably assume that they found the MOST ridiculously worded proposal of them all and mentioned it to stir up your anxieties in service of their agenda.

So what about the other attempts? I'm sure there have been more than a few, and I guarantee you're not going to hear about the more moderate proposals from the fucking NRA.




BamaD -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 7:30:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
You do know that a good shrink can find a problem with anyone?
You do know that there is a difference between having a problem and being a danger?
Example I have an extreme fear of highs this would be considered a "mental problem" is there any reason to think that should bar me from firearm ownership? Of course not, but when you pass a law requiring everyone diagnosed with a mental problem would do so.


This isn't a debate we can have without actually looking into whether or not the MOST SUPPORTED proposals mean that things like acrophobia would disqualify you from gun ownership. I honestly can't imagine that being the case.

The site said 'at least one attempt'... and when you consider the source, you should probably assume that they found the MOST ridiculously worded proposal of them all and mentioned it to stir up your anxieties in service of their agenda.

So what about the other attempts? I'm sure there have been more than a few, and I guarantee you're not going to hear about the more moderate proposals from the fucking NRA.

Believe what you want.




BamaD -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 7:34:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
You do know that a good shrink can find a problem with anyone?
You do know that there is a difference between having a problem and being a danger?
Example I have an extreme fear of highs this would be considered a "mental problem" is there any reason to think that should bar me from firearm ownership? Of course not, but when you pass a law requiring everyone diagnosed with a mental problem would do so.


This isn't a debate we can have without actually looking into whether or not the MOST SUPPORTED proposals mean that things like acrophobia would disqualify you from gun ownership. I honestly can't imagine that being the case.

The site said 'at least one attempt'... and when you consider the source, you should probably assume that they found the MOST ridiculously worded proposal of them all and mentioned it to stir up your anxieties in service of their agenda.

So what about the other attempts? I'm sure there have been more than a few, and I guarantee you're not going to hear about the more moderate proposals from the fucking NRA.

How about proposals to require a psych eval to get a gun? The person doing the eval knows that if he lets the wrong person get a gun he is ruined, you really think anyone will pass? Why are the same people pushing something like that when they say that putting the fact that a person has been committed because they want to kill everyone they know into the system is a violation of their privacy. They are the ones who want crazy people to have guns, until they can pass something to keep anyone from having one.




BamaD -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 8:52:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Which means that they don't want people barred from owning a firearm because they were treated for depression 20 years ago.


You do realize I was posting the NRA-propaganda interpretation, and they can't be counted on to support anything that might hurt gun sales?

I'm not in the mood to go searching for what the content of these proposed bills actually was (and no, you can't rely on pro-gun sites or partisan news to be honest about it), but I'm not sure if HAVING a recognized diagnosis is the same as HAVING HAD a recognized diagnosis, and considering you had already labelled me a brainwashed slave of the liberal media for my earlier comments which I just showed you are true, I'm not willing to trust your judgment here without seeing non-partisan proof that the Dems or whoever were trying to 'bar people from owning a firearm because they were treated for depression 20 years ago'.

Look at the 4473 (the form you have to fill out for the background check) there is no statute of limitations.




Lucylastic -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 11:35:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

And without gangs/drugs/mental health issues in Canada and the UK, the murder numbers would drop heavily too.


And I've read (but not absolutely verified) that if you took out a few US cities with the highest gun violence and strict gun laws, our gun violence rate is not high.

There are gang wars, or turf wars going on between rivaling gangs. If their stock in trade was legal and available at the local drugstore they would have nothing to fight about. Their brothers and cousins went to prison for decades bringing in product, they'll be damned is they aren't going to be able to sell it.

And it ain't just the Bloods and the Crips, there are thousands of gangs now, each pushing for their own hegemony in the market. There is a ton of money involved and money is why the US government kills and that is what they have learned, to be ruthless. They learned in the school playgrounds from bullies, they learned from the government using force irresponsibly, they learned from business using oney to buy the government to favor them.

What the fuck do you think they are going to do ?

There are still some neighborhoods where you have to "wear colors" just to walk down the street unaccosted. It was a big thing back in the 1970s when their Parent grew up, not so much anymore. If I go to one of those places it is to cop. Get some weed. They're not going to fuck with me, I am a customer.

And with all this gun violence, you haven't heard of any drivebys lately huh. Know why ? Bullets cost money. They want a otherfucker dead they want THAT motherfucker dead. The rest of the family and neighborhood did nothing to them.

Even what people mistakenly call the "mafia" does not threaten family usually. But if your Daddy was a terrorist Obama will send a drone for you.

There is no mafia, but if there was I would rather deal with them than the government. And yes, I am "made". Two fucking words in court did that for me. But there is no mafia, it is just known that I know when to keep y mouth shut.

The government wants to take away guns. The supposed mafia wants to give out guns. Who is your friend ? If I go to a friend who has alot of guns and ask to borrow one I can get it. I would not ask unless there was a bad problem, and I don't make bad problems. But go to the government and ask, they'll laugh at you.

There was a group, they might still exist but I haven't heard about them lately who were goping out and giving guns to low income, mostly elderly people who were still viable enough to use them and passed a background check. New York said it would not be allowed but they can go fuck themselves. If I EVER wake up in New york I WANT to be dead right then and there. Fucking cesspool. Some people like it but the reason is beyond me.

But, my car had a flat tire, so we need more gun control. That is no stupider than the asshole who spawned the OP to post this and create this thread. The lightbulb burned out on the motion sensor light on the garage, we need more gun control.

There is a rabid dog eating people in the neighborhood, we need more gun control.

People got their mantras. A republican gets elected, it is because of racists. Someone fucks up or falls down it is because of alcohol or drugs. Always the same shit when there are all kids of other reasons. We don't have jobs because of republicans. Ask fucking Germany about that, THEY don't have enough jobs. Ask England why they voted for Brexit, they must be racist. Sure, every country wants another country to open up their prisons and send them right ? You think they are sending doctors and engineers ? Fuck no, they are sending thieves, rapists and murderers.

Trump wants to cut that off, YOU take them.

T^T


what does that have to do with what I said... I said nothing about guns.

I was simply pointing out that most murders in the UK and Canada are influenced by gangs, drugs and mentally ill people or a mix. And if you took those numbers out of the UK and canadian murder counts like Bama suggested for the US, the US would still be fucking higher.

For example, nothing to do with the US, but when Brevik murdered all those people in norway, it pushed their murder rate to 2.2 per 100,000 population
There were a total of 111 murders in Norway in 2011.
If he had been an american(for example) he would be discounted(by Bama) because he was a fucking loony and there goes 77 deaths being discounted for mental health reasons.
Norways murder rate since 2011, has since dropped. to 0.6, whose actual figures are between 29-34 deaths per year.

Gang violence happens in the UK AND canada.
from wiki....
With regards to street gangs the cities identified as having the most serious gang problems, which also accounted for 65% of firearm homicides in England and Wales, were London, Birmingham, Manchester and Liverpool. Glasgow in Scotland also has a historical gang culture with the city having 6 times as many teenage gangs as London, which has ten times the population, per capita.

65 % of firearms homicides, so if we take out 65 % of the crime numbers, thats a huge dent in gun homicides, let alone homicide

In canada
In 2013, Vancouver recorded the most gang-related homicides, with 18 slayings. Stats Can ranked Montreal next with 16 victims, and there were 14 in Toronto, four in Winnipeg and three in Edmonton.
Canadian police services reported 505 homicides in 2013, 57 of them gang related.( and thats just 5 cities) so theres 57 less deaths because of gangs....it reduces overall murder stats.

Im not going to do the work on drugs or mental health murders, but I am pointing out the totally bogus bullshit claim about "what if" the US could remove gangs drugs and mental health from the murder numbers. without doing the same with Canuck and UK crime figures.

facts not bullshit.




I used to like you.

T^T


Yeah the feeling is mutual.
I notice that you ignored the information. Again.






WhoreMods -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 11:42:23 AM)

FR:
I'm very disappointed by this thread. I was hoping somebody had shot the whole of Massachusetts.




WickedsDesire -> RE: "Mass shooting" at Ohio St.leads to calls for tighter gun control. (12/3/2016 1:00:55 PM)

I have spoken on this one

the facts are apparent like my utter magnificence. I find everything else wanton, not in a dirty bitch manner that longs for my cock: which has still to spill its load this year, I know.

But heh carry on clueless simpletons.

get on your fuking knees and repeat what i said




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875