Wayward5oul
Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014
Status: offline
|
quote:
'The point that should be readily apparent by those who can set aside their own agenda for a moment is that these scholar athletes
Were they scholar athletes? If so, they would have have signed papers agreeing to standards of character. According to statements made by administrators at all of these colleges, this behavior conflicts with standards explicitly set for athletes. But things like that are tied into scholarships, particularly.
quote:
texted
Not just texted. Group email threads, and some were also publicly published for years at a time, updated yearly, including info such as pics of the girls along side degrading remarks and judgments made by the boys
quote:
juvenile remarks
I have been working with juveniles for the past 20 years; overheard their talk in the hall, taken up notes, found papers with notes on them, seen their blogs on the web that they don’t realize school counselors and college admissions offices look for, etc. And I never saw things that reached the level of most of what content was available in the reports. Below are excerpts from the reports, or are quotes straight from the emails/texts in question.
“Here you’ll see me with my main bitch ***** and my side hoe *****. Also notice the bump where my penis should be. That’s my penis. The upperclassmen know not to fuck around with these two lovelies, but freshman be warned: touch either of my meat slabs and I will fucking end you. Especially *****. God knows the little one can’t protect herself.”
“asians really have horizontal vaginas”
In the email, the team member refers to one woman as “a walking STD,” and writes, “Everyone needs their meatslab,”referring to another. He describes a third woman – “Without being too mean, she is a stuck up, snobby, bitch; AKA the perfect formal date for the desperate members of our team.”
“Many debate what’s more disturbing: his fetish for the anus or his fetish for the Orient.” One of the jokes hinges on confusing two women of color personally known to the team. Another description suggests that a member of the team enjoys sexually pursuing children. A description of a current senior on the team reads “Sure, when you first meet him you may think: “Woah, is that dude in the trench coat going to rape me?”
The texts in question include wrestlers regaling each other with descriptions of their fellow students such as “fish pussy,” “ugly socially awkward cunts,” and “nigs.”
And the reports described below were the ones created each year, updated, and shared as a public Google document, there for all the world to see, to be shared. Complete with pictures of the girls and the degrading things the boys had to say about the them.
In what appears to have been a yearly team tradition, a member of Harvard’s 2012 men’s soccer team produced a document that, in sexually explicit terms, individually assessed and evaluated freshmen recruits from the 2012 women’s soccer team based on their perceived physical attractiveness and sexual appeal.
The author and his teammates referred to the nine-page document as a “scouting report,” and the author circulated the document over the group’s email list on July 31, 2012.
In lewd terms, the author of the report individually evaluated each female recruit, assigning them numerical scores and writing paragraph-long assessments of the women. The document also included photographs of each woman, most of which, the author wrote, were culled from Facebook or the Internet.
The author of the “report” often included sexually explicit descriptions of the women. He wrote of one woman that “she looks like the kind of girl who both likes to dominate, and likes to be dominated.”
Each woman was assigned a hypothetical sexual “position” in addition to her position on the soccer field.
“She seems relatively simple and probably inexperienced sexually, so I decided missionary would be her preferred position,” the author wrote about one woman. “Doggy style,” “The Triple Lindy,” and “cowgirl” were listed as possible positions for other women.
The author also assigned each woman a nickname, calling one woman “Gumbi” because “her gum to tooth ratio is about 1 to 1.”
“For that reason I am forced to rate her a 6,” the author added.
“She seems to be very strong, tall and manly so, I gave her a 3 because I felt bad. Not much needs to be said on this one folks,” the author wrote about another woman.
Concluding his assessment of one woman, the author wrote, “Yeah… She wants cock.”
The “report” appears to have been an annual practice. At the beginning of the document, the author writes that “while some of the scouting report last year was wrong, the overall consensus that” a certain player “was both the hottest and the most STD ridden was confirmed.”
These were updated and publicly available until 2014, despite administrators efforts to stop it.
quote:
and were disproportionately punished by an oppressive nanny state that prevails in American institutions.'
In the business world, people lose their jobs all the time for things just like this. These boys are not being suspended from the university or anything like that. Their sports are being restricted.
Sports are a privilege.
Their education is not being affected.
If this were a job, they probably would have been fired.
Whatever happened to people being held accountable for their actions?
|
RE: Privileged white college boys suspended for sexist ... - 
Profile
~ is part of the narrative supplied by the comforter of white male privilege that gives these boys presumed license to slander women and people of color in a fashion similar to the license you feel you have to slander as racist my presentation. You might like to suggest that there is no tolerance for a forthright discussion of American white male privilege but you would be wrong. Your silence is notable when other posters come to this forum and whine about perceived feminist bullying of white males. White privilege dulls the eyes and closes the mind to what "others" are trying to express. You are no better than wooden dummies in this arena, dulled of your senses as your are.
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread