quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

Or Benghazi. I'm assuming it's still acceptable to whine about that?

Pointing out that her incompetency isn't whining.
And when she and Obama tried to blame it on a video that didn't help.

quote:



...The intelligence community, including leaders of the FBI and CIA, is pushing the Russian hacking narrative in unscrupulous ways.

Consider that the same media organizations that led the campaign assault on Trump were leaked details of the hacking report before Trump saw it.

The leaks came after Trump expressed doubts about Russia’s role and any election impact. Lest the rookie miss the message, Chuck Schumer, the Dems’ man in the Senate, made like a Soprano in a TV interview: “Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.”

Going public with classified information, which the leakers did, is a crime, but these days it’s acceptable if it serves the left’s political purpose.

Is Schumer suggesting CIA analysts would stay silent about a terrorist plot? Would they feed Trump misinformation to get back at him?

Going public with classified information, which the leakers did, is a crime, but these days it’s acceptable if it serves the left’s political purpose.

As for the report itself, there’s not much there there, at least in the version made public. It is full of assertions that Vladimir Putin wanted to hurt Clinton and help Trump, but zero evidence is offered. I repeat: zero evidence.

Instead, the 25-page document serves up a dog’s stew of innuendo and anecdotes. Examples include that Russian television operating in America said nice things about Occupy Wall Street.

Well, so did President Obama and half the Democratic Party. Is Obama a Russian agent?

Another silly example is that Russian TV runs lots of anti-fracking reports. Well, Gov. Cuomo also opposes fracking. The report cites the fact that Russian TV anchors are required to have social-media accounts as proof of Putin’s evil intent.

Here’s a fact that really matters and it’s not in the report: The FBI concluded that Russians hacked the Democratic National Committee without ever inspecting its computers. The gumshoes say the DNC balked, but party leaders say the FBI never asked. In the end, it let a private firm search the computers for evidence.

None of this is normal. And it’s no excuse that Trump himself often veers outside the lines. He won the election fair and square, period.

Then again, some Democrats can’t bring themselves to admit that. Nancy Pelosi, the House minority leader, was spitting fire after she was briefed on the classified report.

Asked if she believed hacking cost Clinton the election, Pelosi declared to reporters: “You were accomplices in this. Every single day you reported there was an e-mail that was embarrassing to the Clinton operation, without saying we know this because of a disruption by a foreign power of our election system. You knew that.”

Wow, so journalists are “accomplices” when they report embarrassing news. Nothing could be more Putin-like than her view of the media’s job.

To be clear, it may be true that Putin ordered that the e-mails of John Podesta and the DNC be stolen and given to WikiLeaks. But officials also admit that Russia hacked our government and industries for years and always pushes negative propaganda about America, including during the 2012 campaign.

So why the sudden DefCon outrage, especially when the intelligence report concludes there was no attempt to change vote tallies?

The furor amounts to sounding five alarms for a dumpster fire. It’s a dumb overreaction, or part of the effort to thwart a president the establishment doesn’t want. Either way, intelligence leaders are proving they are part of the swamp that must be drained.

By all means, America needs better cybersecurity and a retaliation policy to act as a deterrent. The current president has no interest in the issue, so perhaps we’ll get better policies when we get a new president. Assuming, of course, the man who won the election actually makes it to the Oval Office.

http://nypost.com/2017/01/08/democrats-wage-anti-trump-offensive-for-their-own-gain/

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I think the dems are just being sore losers at the moment.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I think the dems are just being sore losers at the moment.

If you weren't so fucking stupid, you'd know that it was REPUBLICAN Senators that are bringing it to the forefront.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I think the dems are just being sore losers at the moment.

If you weren't so fucking stupid, you'd know that it was REPUBLICAN Senators that are bringing it to the forefront.

WTF is the matter with you

It was an alt left idiot who started the thread and its you alt left idiots who have lost your fucking minds about Trump kicking the shit out of your Wall Street whore

Saying its "the Republicans" is just stupid. They are willing to look into rumors of a possible Russian connection to Wikileaks, but all that proves is that they don't march in lockstep like you goose-stepping Stalinist bitches do

Hoorah to them for that, too

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I think the dems are just being sore losers at the moment.

If you weren't so fucking stupid, you'd know that it was REPUBLICAN Senators that are bringing it to the forefront.

WTF is the matter with you

It was an alt left idiot who started the thread and its you alt left idiots who have lost your fucking minds about Trump kicking the shit out of your Wall Street whore

Saying its "the Republicans" is just stupid. They are willing to look into rumors of a possible Russian connection to Wikileaks, but all that proves is that they don't march in lockstep like you goose-stepping Stalinist bitches do

Hoorah to them for that, too

http://www.newsweek.com/mccain-graham-trump-accept-intelligence-russian-hacking-540104
Here ya go Comrade dumbass.

Too much vodka today?

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I think the dems are just being sore losers at the moment.

If you weren't so fucking stupid, you'd know that it was REPUBLICAN Senators that are bringing it to the forefront.

WTF is the matter with you

It was an alt left idiot who started the thread and its you alt left idiots who have lost your fucking minds about Trump kicking the shit out of your Wall Street whore

Saying its "the Republicans" is just stupid. They are willing to look into rumors of a possible Russian connection to Wikileaks, but all that proves is that they don't march in lockstep like you goose-stepping Stalinist bitches do

Hoorah to them for that, too

http://www.newsweek.com/mccain-graham-trump-accept-intelligence-russian-hacking-540104
Here ya go Comrade dumbass.

Too much vodka today?

Thats not what you claimed, idiot.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

A federal week in review, 7 January 2017:
1. Trump fires all Ambassadors and Special Envoys, ordering them out by inauguration day.
2. House brings back the Holman rule allowing them to reduce an individual civil service, SES positions, or political appointee's salary to $1, effectively firing them by amendment to any piece of legislation. We now know why they wanted names and positions of people in Energy and State.
3. Senate schedules 6 simultaneous hearings on cabinet nominees and triple-books those hearings with Trump's first press conference in months and an ACA budget vote, effectively preventing any concentrated coverage or protest.
4. House GOP expressly forbids the Congressional Budget Office from reporting or tracking ANY costs related to the repeal of the ACA.
5. Trump continues to throw the intelligence community under the bus to protect Putin, despite the growing mountain of evidence that the Russians deliberately interfered in our election.
6. Trump breaks a central campaign promise to make Mexico pay for the wall by asking Congress (in other words, us, the taxpayers) to pay for it.
7. Trump threatens Toyota over a new plant that was never coming to the US nor will take jobs out of the US.
8. House passes the REINS act, giving them veto power over any rules enacted by any federal agency or department--for example, FDA or EPA bans a drug or pesticide, Congress can overrule based on lobbyists not science. Don't like that endangered species designation, Congress kills it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

A federal week in review, 7 January 2017:
1. Trump fires all Ambassadors and Special Envoys, ordering them out by inauguration day.
2. House brings back the Holman rule allowing them to reduce an individual civil service, SES positions, or political appointee's salary to $1, effectively firing them by amendment to any piece of legislation. We now know why they wanted names and positions of people in Energy and State.
3. Senate schedules 6 simultaneous hearings on cabinet nominees and triple-books those hearings with Trump's first press conference in months and an ACA budget vote, effectively preventing any concentrated coverage or protest.
4. House GOP expressly forbids the Congressional Budget Office from reporting or tracking ANY costs related to the repeal of the ACA.
5. Trump continues to throw the intelligence community under the bus to protect Putin, despite the growing mountain of evidence that the Russians deliberately interfered in our election.
6. Trump breaks a central campaign promise to make Mexico pay for the wall by asking Congress (in other words, us, the taxpayers) to pay for it.
7. Trump threatens Toyota over a new plant that was never coming to the US nor will take jobs out of the US.
8. House passes the REINS act, giving them veto power over any rules enacted by any federal agency or department--for example, FDA or EPA bans a drug or pesticide, Congress can overrule based on lobbyists not science. Don't like that endangered species designation, Congress kills it.

A lot of hyperpartisan fake news there, a lot of things losers like you just have to deal with after having your extremist third-world el presidente Obama acting like a dictator for eight years toppled in a populist uprising

As for the wall, or the extremely popular proposal of enforcing our immigration laws again, President Trump never said the Mexicans would pay for it directly so that's just a lot of wild-eyed nothing. President Trump has kept jobs here that Obama policies were shipping to Mexico, that alone will pay for a lot of the wall. More reasonable people than you will wait and see what else President Trump has up his sleeves before passing judgement